AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisTeRANCT02155894

Tight Control of Disease Activity Among Patients With RA Based on a Systematic Telemedicine Treatment Strategy

A study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by University of Aarhus at 2 sites in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aims to investigate the effect a systematic telemedicine intervention, based on the tigth control principals, as a platform for disease monitoring among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
2 sitesDenmark
Study dates
May 2014to Jul 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis according to the criteria's defined by the American College of Rheumatology, 1987, with a disease duration >= 2 years.

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to answer a questionnaire.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Denmark2 sites
  • Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus, 8000

  • Department of Rheumatology, Silkeborg Regional Hospital

    Silkeborg, 8600

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Tight Control of Disease Activity Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Based on a Systematic Telemedicine Treatment Strategy

The study aims to investigate the effect a systematic telemedicine intervention, based on the tigth control principals, as a platform for disease monitoring among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

It is hypothesized that:

  • A systematic telemedicine intervention targeted to tight control of disease activity among patients with RA will be equally effective as usual care (outpatient consultation by a rheumatologist).
  • There will be no difference in the effect whether this telemedicine consultation is carried out by a rheumatologist or a rheumatology nurse.
  • Patient satisfaction and the patient's general perception of involvement in their treatment will be increased for patients who receive the telemedicine intervention.
  • All the effects will apply both in the short term (< 6 months) and in the long term (> 1 year).
Read the detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease affecting 0.5-1.0 % of the Danish population. Due to an expected growing population and a higher proportion of elderly the prevalence is likely to increase in the years to come.

Untreated RA will lead to joint destruction disabling the patients, but in recent years both treatment and treatment strategies have been markedly improved. According to international guidelines early start of medical treatment, quick escalation of doses, and adjustment of the dose throughout the whole disease course when there are signs of disease activity, are considered important elements in the RA treatment strategy. Consequently, the success of this strategy implies the possibility of regular routine testing of all RA patients, which could become a challenge to the health care system causing substandard treatment to RA patients in the future. This calls for reorganization of the routine care of RA, i.e. in form of a telemedicine intervention.

Telemedicine is considered to be the use of communication and information technologies to deliver clinical care where the individuals involved are not at the same location. No studies have yet investigated the effect of monitoring disease activity through a standardized telemedicine treatment strategy in patients with RA, and most of the evidence is derived from studies within chronic heart disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, asthma, diabetes and hypertension. This evidence indicates, however, that telemedicine interventions seem to be effective, time saving and associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

RA disease activity is measured using a composite score that includes both objective and subjective outcome parameters to measure present as well as past disease activity. These scores include: tender and swollen joint count together with the patient's global assessment, report of physical functioning, the measurement of an acute-phase reactant and serial radiographic assessment. The most commonly used instruments for measuring RA disease activity in daily clinical practice is the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28).

However, in a telemedicine intervention there is no direct physical contact between the patient and the health professionals, making traditional disease activity measures unfit for use, as they imply an assessment of tender and swollen joints carried out by a health professional. It has been suggested to let the patients examine their joints. Still, it has been shown that patients tend to overestimate the presence of swollen joints which impairs the identification of synovitis - and thereby disease activity and flare. Hence, telemedicine disease activity monitoring in RA may be best supported by validated measures based on other kinds of patient self-assessment, i.e. the newly developed "Flare" instrument.

According to international recommendations from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) patients should have access to nurse-led telephone services to enhance continuity of care and to provide ongoing support, but it still remains unclarified which of the occupational groups, doctors or nurses, is to carry out the routine telemedicine disease monitoring.

The trend in RA treatment is towards patients taking a more active role in the treatment, and telemedicine could be a very workable solution. However, before decision is made of transforming tight control of disease activity among patients with RA into a telemedicine intervention the effectiveness of such intervention, both when executed by doctors and nurses, need to be investigated.

The objectives of this study are:

  1. To test the effectiveness of a customized telemedicine intervention targeted to tight control of disease activity among patients with RA, compared with usual outpatient care in a pragmatic randomized controlled trail.
  2. To test if the effect differs depending on whether the telemedicine consultation is carried out by a rheumatologist or by a rheumatology nurse.
  3. To examine the patients perspective towards telemedicine tight control of disease activity in RA, and assess patient satisfaction and acceptability towards the intervention.

Power calculation

A decrease in DAS28 on 1.2 is regarded as a significant clinically improvement. A change in DAS28 on 0.6 is regarded as non-response . Thus, a change in the DAS28 score >0.6 will be used as the cut-point for a change in the condition. The standard deviation in DAS28 is presumed to be 1.5. Hence, in order to detect a 1-sided statistically significant change between the three groups, with a statistical power on 80% (beta=0.20), a sample size of at least 98 patients in each group is required.

Intervention

A systematic review of the literature has been conducted in order to make sure that the telemedicine management is informed by evidence. Further, focus group interviews have been conducted both among patient groups and among health professionals, to ensure that the intervention is based on expert consensus.

The software used in the telemedicine intervention will be based on the established generic Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) system, WestChronic, which was developed in 2004 for collection of PRO data for research purposes in clinical epidemiological studies. WestChronic supports dynamic dual mode data collection with web or paper forms as well as communication to the patient with personalized postal letters, e-mails, and text messages. All information regarding implementations, items and questionnaires, communication, users, and patients resides in tables in a Structured Query Language (SQL) database, and all administration of implementations, questionnaires, users, and patients is supported by the server software and carried out in browser-windows. The software interphase serves a dual purpose: a) to be a customized communication tool between the patients and the health professionals, and b) to serve as decision support for the health professionals through the incorporation of a validated disease self-assessment tool.

Decision support, the Flare instrument

The Flare instrument (FI) serves as decision support for assessing disease activity in RA during the telemedicine intervention.

FI is a 12-item questionnaire where patients are asked to express their degree of agreement about different statements concerning disease activity on a 10-point likert scale. Six items concerns joint symptoms (tenderness, stiffness and pain) and six items is concerning general symptoms. When scoring FI it is possible to compute a FI total score (all 12 items) or a subscale for joint or general symptoms, respectively.

The instrument is translated into Danish according to the International Quality of Life Asessment (IQULA) method. It is validated in a cross sectional study among 100 consecutive patients from the outpatient clinic at Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, using DAS28 as the gold standard (unpublished data).

Execution

After randomization patients will be allocated to one of the three treatment arms: Telemedicine, doctor (TD), Telemedicine, Nurse (TN) or control in week 0, 13, 26, 39 and 52. The telemedicine consultation will be based on a telephone consultation. The consultation will follow a predefined consultation checklist.

Patients allocated to TD or TN, who has expressed a desire to complete questionnaires in webform, will receive a letter a week before the consultation to remind them that they must assess their disease activity through the software interphase, within the next couple of days. Patients, who have expressed a wish to fill in questionnaires in paper form, will receive the questionnaire a week before the consultation and asked to return it to WestChronic immediately after completion. A chasing procedure will be carried out in case of non-respondence. Two reminders will be send to the patients over a period of four weeks and continuous non-respondence will hereafter lead to exclusion from the study.

During telephone consultation, updated clinical test results will be available through the electronic medical system. Acute consultations will be performed and registered in all three groups as needed.

Statistics

Comparisons between groups will be made with the Fisher exact test for dichotomous responses and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-dichotomous responses. Changes over time will be analyzed with McNemar's test for dichotomous responses and Wilcoxon signed rank sum test for non-dichotomous responses. Data will be reported as a mean (SD) for variables in which normal distribution is found; otherwise data will be reported as the median ((interquartile range (IQR)).

Data will be analyzed using both "intention to treat" and per protocol. In case of missing data multiple imputations will be used.

Being tested
Disease control, Telemedicine, doctor, Disease control, Telemedicine, nurse
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, treat to target, telemedicine
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Disease control, Telemedicine, doctorBehavioural

    Control of disease activity by a telemedicine consultation carried out by a doctor.

    The telemedicine consultation will be based on a telephone consultation, following a predefined consultation checklist.

    Patients who have expressed a desire to complete questionnaires in webform, will receive a letter a week before the consultation to remind them that they must assess their disease activity through the software interphase, within the next couple of days. Patients, who have expressed a wish to fill in questionnaires in paperform, will receive the questionnaire a week before the consultation.

    During telephone consultation, updated clinical test results will be available through the electronic medical system.

  • Disease control, Telemedicine, nurseBehavioural

    Control of disease activity by a telemedicine consultation carried out by a nurse.

    The telemedicine consultation will be based on a telephone consultation, following a predefined consultation checklist.

    Patients who have expressed a desire to complete questionnaires in webform, will receive a letter a week before the consultation to remind them that they must assess their disease activity through the software interphase, within the next couple of days. Patients, who have expressed a wish to fill in questionnaires in paperform, will receive the questionnaire a week before the consultation.

    During telephone consultation, updated clinical test results will be available through the electronic medical system.

Study groups in NCT02155894
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Disease control, Telemedicine, doctorExperimentalUsing an online platform for self assessment and with the Flare instrument as decision support, the patients are contacted over the telephone by a doctor at week 13, 26, 39.
Receives: Behavioral: Disease control, Telemedicine, doctor
Disease control, Telemedicine, nurseExperimentalUsing an online platform for self assessment and with the Flare instrument as decision support, the patients are contacted over the telephone by a nurse at week 13, 26, 39.
Receives: Behavioral: Disease control, Telemedicine, nurse
Usual careNo interventionUsual care: control of disease activity with consultations in the outpatient clinic.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28, CRP)

    RA disease activity is measured using DAS28, CRP. This score includes: tender and swollen joint count together with the patient's global assessment, report of physical functioning, the measurement of an acute-phase reactant. The DAS28 score run from 0-9.4 and RA disease activity is defined as followed: DAS28< 3.2: mild disease activity, DAS28 >3.2-< 5.1: moderate disease activity, DAS28 >5.1: high disease activity.

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Self-efficacy

    Measured by the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), a 10-item scale with a score for each question ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate stronger patient's belief in self-efficacy.

    The GSE is designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs used to cope with a variety of demands in life. The scale was designed to assess self efficacy, i.e., the belief that one's actions are responsible for successful outcomes.

    Measured: One year

  2. X Ray, hand and feet

    Erosive changes

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionMay 2014
  4. Study completionJul 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02155894
Sponsor's protocol ID
TeRA_15-05-14
Acronym
TeRA
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
2 Jun 2014
Last updated
9 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • de Thurah A, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Axelsen M, Fredberg U, Schougaard LMV, Hjollund NHI, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Laurberg TB, Tarp U, Lomborg K, Maribo T. Tele-Health Followup Strategy for Tight Control of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):353-360. doi: 10.1002/acr.23280. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

    PubMed 28511288

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by University of Aarhus at 2 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28, CRP) (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02155894, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in