Teeth LossNCT02159183
Controlled Pilot Study to Assess Soft Tissue Reaction at the Crestal Part of a Dental Implant With ESTA Surface
A study testing Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant and Standard Plus STL implant in people with Teeth Loss, run by Institut Straumann AG at 4 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
This study will investigate the effect on the soft tissue that is in contact with a dental implant with a modified surface of the neck (the part of the implant that is above the bone and in contact with the soft gum tissue). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Teeth Loss
- What is being tested?
- Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant and Standard Plus STL implant
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to 27 Sep 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related action
- Males and females must be at least 18 years of age and not more than 80 years old.
- Partially edentulous in posterior (position 3-7) maxilla or mandible with implants planned for single crowns in an area with a healed extraction socket.
- Adequate bone quality and quantity at the implant site to permit the insertion of a Straumann Soft Tissue Level implant of 4.1mm diameter without augmentation (at least 1mm bone buccally and lingually/palatal)
Who cannot join
- Oral surgery contraindicated according to the judgement of the investigator (should be explained in the CRF)
- Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis
- Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care. Full mouth plaque index > 25% at time of surgery
- Presence of conditions requiring chronic routine prophylactic use of antibiotics (e.g., history of rheumatic heart disease, bacterial endocarditis, cardiac valvular anomalies, prosthetic joint replacements)
- Major systemic diseases
- Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids
Show all 16Show fewer
- Current pregnancy or breastfeeding women
- Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
- Use of any investigational drug or device within the 90 day period immediately prior to implant surgery on study day 0
- Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse
- Smokers; more than 10 cigarettes per day
- Immuno-compromised patients
- Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability.
- Secondary Exclusion Criteria:
- GBR procedures at or adjacent to the planned study site
- Lack of primary stability of the dental implant at site of interest (e.g., rotational movement of the implant at a minimum of 15 Ncm torque at connection of the healing abutment, or tactile mobility)
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Switzerland4 sites
University of Bern
Bern, 3010
University of Geneva
Geneva, 1211
Private Practice
Langenthal, 4900
Ardentis Clinique Dentaire
Lausanne, 1300
About this study
Official title: A Controlled Clinical Pilot Study to Assess Soft Tissue Reaction at the Crestal Part of a Dental Implant With ESTA Surface
This study will investigate the effect on the soft tissue that is in contact with a dental implant with a modified surface of the neck (the part of the implant that is above the bone and in contact with the soft gum tissue).
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, controlled, randomised clinical pilot study with parallel groups and blinded subject.
The design has been chosen to obtain data to base a sample size calculation for future studies on by comparing the degree of mucosal inflammation of the mucosa in conjunction with the modified surface of the top of the test implant and the machined surface on the top of the control implant.
- Conditions
- Teeth Loss
- Being tested
- Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant, Standard Plus STL implant
- Medical subject headings
- Anodontia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implantDevice
The patient will receive a Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø 4.1 mm Regular Neck, SLActive® Roxolid, with a modified surface of the neck (ESTA). At 8-12 weeks after insertion, the implant will be loaded.
Standard Plus STL implantDevice
The patient will receive a Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø4.1mm Regular Neck,SLActive® Titanium grade IV, with a machined surface of the neck. At 8-12 weeks after insertion, the implant will be loaded.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant | Experimental | This arm will receive the Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø 4.1 mm Regular Neck, SLActive® Roxolid, with a modified surface of the neck (ESTA). Receives: Device: Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant |
| Standard Plus STL implant | Active comparator | This arm will receive the Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø4.1mm Regular Neck,SLActive® Titanium grade IV, with a machined surface of the neck. Receives: Device: Standard Plus STL implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sulcus Bleeding Index (According to Mombelli et al 1987)
The primary endpoint is the difference of Sulcus Bleeding Index (according to Mombelli et al 1987) between baseline (final loading) and 12 months.
The inflammatory status of the mucosa will be evaluated by means of a UNC 15 periodontal probe.
0: No bleeding when a periodontal probe is passed along the peri-implant sulcus
- Isolated bleeding spots are recognizable
- Confluent bleeding line along the marginal mucosa
- Profound bleeding.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Sulcus Bleeding Index (According to Mombelli et al 1987)
The inflammatory status of the mucosa will be evaluated by means of a UNC 15 periodontal probe.
0: No bleeding when a periodontal probe is passed along the peri-implant sulcus
- Isolated bleeding spots are recognizable
- Confluent bleeding line along the marginal mucosa
- Profound bleeding.
Measured: 3 years
Soft Tissue Healing Evaluation
Assessment of the wound healing by classifying the implantation site (normal or compromised healing).
Measured: 10 days and 12 weeks
Oral Hygiene
Full mouth plaque index (FMPI) and full mouth bleeding on probing index (FMBoP) will be recorded as an indicator for the Oral Hygiene. The indexes are given in percent [%] calculated as the total numbers of surfaces with plaque or bleeding divided by the total number of teeth surfaces x100.
Measured: Screening, 6, 12, 36 months
Recession of Gingival Margin Buccally and Lingually/Palatal
The recession of the gingival margin will be measured (distance from the gingival margin to the crown/implant margin) by using an UNC 15 periodontal probe. Changes in (averaged) recession at the follow-up visits 12+36 months compared to baseline visit ( final loading ) are displayed
Measured: 1 and 3 years
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
The PPD will be measured from the mucosal margin to the bottom of the periimplant pocket by means of an UNC 15 probe.
Probing pocket depth (mm) - average over buccal, palatal, distal and mesial measurements.
Measured: 6 months, 1 and 3 years
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
The CAL will be measured from the crown margin to the bottom of the periimplant pocket by means of an UNC 15 probe.
Clinical attachment level (mm) - average over buccal, palatal, distal and mesial measurements
Measured: 6 months, 1 and 3 years
Bone Crest Levels. Bone Levels (mm) - Average Over Mesial+Distal Measurements
Periapical radiographs are used to measure changes in mesial and distal bone crest levels (of the implant) from baseline (final loading) to one (1) year and three (3) years, respectively.
The parameter derives from the subtraction of mesial and distal bone level linear x-ray measurements. The distance between the alveolar bone at the level of the first radiographic bone contact with the implant surface, and the shoulder of the implant will be measured to the closest 0.1mm at the mesial and distal surfaces of all implants on digitized standardized periapical x-rays using an image analysis computer programme. Bone levels are averaged over mesial+distal measurements. Since bone levels were measured from the implant shoulder, an increase in bone level over time corresponds to bone loss.
Measured: 1 and 3 years
Dental Implant Success and Implant Loss
The implant success will be defined according to Buser et al 1990. Overall evaluation of implant success.
Measured: 3 years
Adverse Events
All subjects are monitored continuously for adverse event.
Measured: up to 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completion27 Sep 2016
Why it stopped: 5-Y FUP will not result in new perception, no diff. between groups at 1+3y FUP
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Teeth LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Straumann AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anton Sculean, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Universität Bern, Klinik für Parodontologie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02159183
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR 01/11
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Controlled Clinical Pilot Study to Assess Soft Tissue Reaction at the Crestal Part of a Dental Implant With ESTA Surface
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02159183
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR 01/11
- Conditions
- Teeth Loss
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: 5-Y FUP will not result in new perception, no diff. between groups at 1+3y FUP
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Straumann AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Mar 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will investigate the effect on the soft tissue that is in contact with a dental implant with a modified surface of the neck (the part of the implant that is above the bone and in contact with the soft gum tissue).
Detailed description
This is a prospective, controlled, randomised clinical pilot study with parallel groups and blinded subject.
The design has been chosen to obtain data to base a sample size calculation for future studies on by comparing the degree of mucosal inflammation of the mucosa in conjunction with the modified surface of the top of the test implant and the machined surface on the top of the control implant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant | Experimental | Device: Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implantThis arm will receive the Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø 4.1 mm Regular Neck, SLActive® Roxolid, with a modified surface of the neck (ESTA). |
| Standard Plus STL implant | Active comparator | Device: Standard Plus STL implantThis arm will receive the Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø4.1mm Regular Neck,SLActive® Titanium grade IV, with a machined surface of the neck. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related action
- Males and females must be at least 18 years of age and not more than 80 years old.
- Partially edentulous in posterior (position 3-7) maxilla or mandible with implants planned for single crowns in an area with a healed extraction socket.
- Adequate bone quality and quantity at the implant site to permit the insertion of a Straumann Soft Tissue Level implant of 4.1mm diameter without augmentation (at least 1mm bone buccally and lingually/palatal)
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Oral surgery contraindicated according to the judgement of the investigator (should be explained in the CRF)
- Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis
- Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care. Full mouth plaque index > 25% at time of surgery
- Presence of conditions requiring chronic routine prophylactic use of antibiotics (e.g., history of rheumatic heart disease, bacterial endocarditis, cardiac valvular anomalies, prosthetic joint replacements)
- Major systemic diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implantThe patient will receive a Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø 4.1 mm Regular Neck, SLActive® Roxolid, with a modified surface of the neck (ESTA). At 8-12 weeks after insertion, the implant will be loaded. | Device | Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant |
| Standard Plus STL implantThe patient will receive a Straumann Soft Tissue Level Standard Plus Implant Ø4.1mm Regular Neck,SLActive® Titanium grade IV, with a machined surface of the neck. At 8-12 weeks after insertion, the implant will be loaded. | Device | Standard Plus STL implant |
Primary outcome
Sulcus Bleeding Index (According to Mombelli et al 1987)
Time frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint is the difference of Sulcus Bleeding Index (according to Mombelli et al 1987) between baseline (final loading) and 12 months. The inflammatory status of the mucosa will be evaluated by means of a UNC 15 periodontal probe. 0: No bleeding when a periodontal probe is passed along the peri-implant sulcus 1. Isolated bleeding spots are recognizable 2. Confluent bleeding line along the marginal mucosa 3. Profound bleeding.
9 secondary outcomes
Sulcus Bleeding Index (According to Mombelli et al 1987)
Time frame: 3 years
Soft Tissue Healing Evaluation
Time frame: 10 days and 12 weeks
Oral Hygiene
Time frame: Screening, 6, 12, 36 months
Recession of Gingival Margin Buccally and Lingually/Palatal
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Time frame: 6 months, 1 and 3 years
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
Time frame: 6 months, 1 and 3 years
Bone Crest Levels. Bone Levels (mm) - Average Over Mesial+Distal Measurements
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Dental Implant Success and Implant Loss
Time frame: 3 years
Adverse Events
Time frame: up to 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Teeth Loss
Enrolling by invitation
Investigation of the Effect of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin Placed in Tooth Extraction Sockets on Bone Formation
Tooth Loss, Dental Implant Failed
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) During Full Arch Implant Treatment
Edentulous Mouth, Quality of Life
Recruiting
Effect of Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation
Dehiscence, Tooth Extraction
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Bitewing Radiography on Outcomes and Costs of Treating Caries in Permanent Teeth
Dental Caries, Teeth Loss
Not yet recruiting
Immediate vs Conventional Loading With Different Crown Materials on Immediately Placed Single Implants
Partial Edentulism, Dental Implant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anton Sculean, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Universität Bern, Klinik für Parodontologie
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standard Plus ESTA STL Roxolid implant and Standard Plus STL implant in people with Teeth Loss, run by Institut Straumann AG at 4 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Mar 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sulcus Bleeding Index (According to Mombelli et al 1987) (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2019.