AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute PharyngitisNCT02160912

Non Interventional Study (NIS) Regarding the Application of Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray in Patients With Acute Laryngitis and/or Acute Pharyngitis

An observational study of Acute Pharyngitis and Acute Laryngitis, run by Bitop AG at 8 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this observational study insights regarding the tolerability and influence on the quality of life of the topical treatment Ectoin Mund- and Rachenspray compared to Emser Pastillen in patients with acute Pharyngitis/ Laryngitis under real life conditions shall be gained. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Pharyngitis, Acute Laryngitis
How many people
95 participants
Where
8 sitesGermany
Study dates
Feb 2014to Dec 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Primary care unit In this non interventional study the therapy process of a total of 90 patients with acute pharyngitis and/or laryngitis for which the physician has planned a therapy with Ectoin Mund- \& Rachenspray 1% (60 Patients) or Emser Pastillen (30 patients) shall be observed in 8 clinical centers

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with acute Laryngitis and/or Pharyngitis which are already treated with Ectoin Mund- \& Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen

Who cannot join

  • contraindications according to instructions for use

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

Germany8 sites
  • Norbert Pasch-Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde

    Aachen, 52074

  • HNO Praxis Aachen Brand

    Aachen, 52078

  • Taufik Shahab -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde

    Cologne, 50667

  • Bey - Facharzt f. HNO Heilkunde

    Cologne, 50933

  • HNO-Praxis Peter Hinterkausen & Dr. med. Eva Bottler-Neufert

    Cologne, 50935

  • HNo Praxis Dr. Uta Thieme

    Duisburg, 47051

  • Dr. Lenzenhuber-Fachärztin für HNO Heilkunde

    Jülich, 52428

  • Wilhelm Schütz -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde

    Jülich, 52428

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Non Interventional Study Regarding the Application of Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray in Patients With Acute Laryngitis and/or Acute Pharyngitis

In this observational study insights regarding the tolerability and influence on the quality of life of the topical treatment Ectoin Mund- and Rachenspray compared to Emser Pastillen in patients with acute Pharyngitis/ Laryngitis under real life conditions shall be gained.

Patients are treated with Ectoin Mund- \& Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen according to the demands of the physician and the instructions for use.

Medical subject headings
Croup

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02160912
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspraytreatment with Ectoin Mund- \& Rachenspray 1%
Emser Pastillentreatment with Emser Pastillen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Pharyngitis symptom score evaluated by the physician

    Assessment of the symptoms of pharyngitis on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate strong):

    • swollen palatine tonsils
    • swollen lymph nodes in the throat
    • fever
    • cough

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visite 3 (after 7 days)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in patient's general condition evaluated by the physician

    Physician's assessment of the general conditions on a 4 point scale (good condition, slightly reduced condition, bad condition, very bad condition)

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

  2. Change in Evaluation of the hoarseness

    physician's assessment of the hoarseness of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

  3. Change in Dysphagia

    physician's assessment of dysphagia of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

  4. Change in efficacy evaluation by the physician

    Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 1 week)

  5. Change in efficacy evaluation by the patient

    Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0_bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

  6. Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the physician

    Assessment of the tolerability by the physician on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))

  7. Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the patient

    Assessment of the tolerability by the patient on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

    Measured: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))

  8. Change in number and type of adverse events

    incidence of adverse events and correlation with the therapy

    Measured: Visit 2 (after 3 days) Visit 3 (after 7 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2014
  3. Primary completionJul 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
95 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02160912
Sponsor's protocol ID
EctMRS/aLR/2014
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
4 Jun 2014
Last updated
9 Jan 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Pharyngitis and Acute Laryngitis, run by Bitop AG at 8 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Pharyngitis symptom score evaluated by the physician (time frame: Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visite 3 (after 7 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in