Motor Condition as Measured by Quantified ScalePhase 3NCT02163330
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Treatment by Acetazolamide
A Phase 3 study testing Acetazolamide and sugar pill in people with Motor Condition as Measured by Quantified Scale and Cognitive Investigation, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is an uncommon cause of dementia possibly reversible with treatment. First described in 1965 it consists of a triad of gait disturbance, cognitive deterioration, and urinary incontinence together with enlarged cerebral ventricles and normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Motor Condition as Measured by Quantified Scale, Cognitive Investigation
- What is being tested?
- Acetazolamide and sugar pill
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Included will be subjects with a probable diagnosis of iNPH. The diagnosis will be based primarily on presence of gait impairment plus at least one other impairment in urinary symptoms, cognition impairment or both.
- Are 60 years old or older
- Patients who understand the study protocol
- Patients who meet the criteria for NPH
- A typical personal history
- A typical brain imaging on head CT or MRI
Show all 9Show fewer
- Normal LP findings excluding other conditions
- Exclusion of other conditions causing the symptomatology
- Patients who underwent Continuous lumbar drainage or spinal tap which improved symptomatology.
Who cannot join
- Patients below the age of 60 years.
- Patients who underwent shunt surgery
- Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of a neurodegenerative or neurovascular disease that causes a significant impairment of gait and cognitive functions
- Patients with symptom duration of more than 6 month
- Patients with contraindications for acetazolamide treatment:
- Cirrhosis or marked liver disease or dysfunction
Show all 13Show fewer
- hyperchloremic acidosis
- hypersensitivity to acetazolamide or any component of the product
- hypersensitivity to sulfonamides or other sulfonamide derivatives, as cross-sensitivity may occur
- hypokalemia
- hyponatremia
- renal dysfunction or disease
- suprarenal gland failure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is an uncommon cause of dementia possibly reversible with treatment. First described in 1965 it consists of a triad of gait disturbance, cognitive deterioration, and urinary incontinence together with enlarged cerebral ventricles and normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. Foregoing trauma and hemorrhage, infection, mass lesions, or aqueductal stenosis can contribute to hydrocephalus. These symptomatic or secondary forms of NPH are not considered here and the focus lies on the idiopathic type (iNPH). Prevalence of iNPH increases significantly with age. General estimates range from 21.9 per 100,000 in total population surveys but increase up to 181.7 per 100,000 for people 70 to 79 years of age. The clinical presentation varies significantly in severity and progression of symptoms. For diagnosis the entire triad does not have to be present. In typical cases gait and balance disturbances appear either before or concurrently with urinary incontinence or the onset of dementia. Current treatment recommendations are based on surgical diversion of CSF , with shunts placed either into the ventricular system or the lumbar subarachnoid space to a distal site, such as the peritoneal or the pleural cavity or the venous system, where the CSF can be reabsorbed . Even though immediate response rate to shunt treatment might be favorable and rates of 80% responders have been reported , the perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality of CSF shunting procedures are significant. A meta-analysis of 44 articles found that the pooled, mean rate of shunt complication was 38% . Even though acute surgical complication rates are low, shunt dysfunctions and long-term complications are relatively common. Shunt malfunction (20%), subdural hematoma (2-17%), seizure (3-11%), shunt infection (3-6%) and intracerebral hematoma (3%) are the most common complications . In those with good long-term survival, sustained improvement is possible, with a rate of 39% documented after 5 years .In view of the complication rates, the lack of alternative treatment options and clinical studies is surprising. Even though iNPH per definition lacks raised intracranial pressure on spinal tap, monitoring of ICP prior to surgery reveals an increased amount of brief (usually 30 seconds to 1 minute) increases in the static ICP, called Lundberg B waves, in patients which improve by shunt placements . When patients are scheduled for shunt treatment there is a waiting period of several weeks between diagnosis and operation due to congested waiting list.
Acetazolamide (Diamox) has been shown to reduce the production of CSF in clinical cases of raised intracranial pressure . It is considered the drug of choice for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial pressure (pseudotumor cerebri). Intuitively a connection between Acetazolamide as a treatment option in iNPH seems logical. Encouraging case studies have been published previously showing a fascinating improvement and success of treating iNPH with Acetazolamide. A systematic placebo controlled study concerning the use of Acetazolamide in iNPH is missing and would possibly pave the way to an alternative treatment option avoiding surgery and its complications.
- Being tested
- Acetazolamide, sugar pill
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcetazolamideDrug
sugar pillDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acetazolamide | Active comparator | active comparator group will receives 500 mg azetazolamide daily Receives: Drug: Acetazolamide |
| sugar pill | Placebo comparator | placebo comparator group will receives placebo daily. Receives: Drug: sugar pill |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1. Changes from baseline in motor on the Boon scale at week 4
The effect of acetazolamide on motor and cognitive function in iNPH patients will be examined.
Motor system investigations - Gait assessment using a quantified scale (Boon et al., 1997). Scores from this metric represent 3 summed subscores: 10-m step count, 10-m time, and the following 10 features: hesitation, wide and small steps, low clearance, impaired turning, sway, fall tendency, impaired tandem walking, and inability to walk with and without assistance. The summed score has a range from 2-40, with 2 representing unimpaired gait.
Measured: Baseline, Week4
Secondary outcomes (1)
Changes from baseline in cognitive function on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Cognitive tests -Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be performed by our neuropsychology staff.
Measured: Baseline, week4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionJan 2017
- Study completionJan 2017
Why it stopped: difficulty in recruiting participants to the study
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Motor Condition as Measured by Quantified ScaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rabin Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, israel Steiner, Rabin Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02163330
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IS 05 - 12
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Treatment by Acetazolamide
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02163330
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IS 05 - 12
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: difficulty in recruiting participants to the study
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rabin Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is an uncommon cause of dementia possibly reversible with treatment. First described in 1965 it consists of a triad of gait disturbance, cognitive deterioration, and urinary incontinence together with enlarged cerebral ventricles and normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. Foregoing trauma and hemorrhage, infection, mass lesions, or aqueductal stenosis can contribute to hydrocephalus. These symptomatic or secondary forms of NPH are not considered here and the focus lies on the idiopathic type (iNPH). Prevalence of iNPH increases significantly with age. General estimates range from 21.9 per 100,000 in total population surveys but increase up to 181.7 per 100,000 for people 70 to 79 years of age. The clinical presentation varies significantly in severity and progression of symptoms. For diagnosis the entire triad does not have to be present. In typical cases gait and balance disturbances appear either before or concurrently with urinary incontinence or the onset of dementia. Current treatment recommendations are based on surgical diversion of CSF , with shunts placed either into the ventricular system or the lumbar subarachnoid space to a distal site, such as the peritoneal or the pleural cavity or the venous system, where the CSF can be reabsorbed . Even though immediate response rate to shunt treatment might be favorable and rates of 80% responders have been reported , the perioperative and long-term morbidity and mortality of CSF shunting procedures are significant. A meta-analysis of 44 articles found that the pooled, mean rate of shunt complication was 38% . Even though acute surgical complication rates are low, shunt dysfunctions and long-term complications are relatively common. Shunt malfunction (20%), subdural hematoma (2-17%), seizure (3-11%), shunt infection (3-6%) and intracerebral hematoma (3%) are the most common complications . In those with good long-term survival, sustained improvement is possible, with a rate of 39% documented after 5 years .In view of the complication rates, the lack of alternative treatment options and clinical studies is surprising. Even though iNPH per definition lacks raised intracranial pressure on spinal tap, monitoring of ICP prior to surgery reveals an increased amount of brief (usually 30 seconds to 1 minute) increases in the static ICP, called Lundberg B waves, in patients which improve by shunt placements . When patients are scheduled for shunt treatment there is a waiting period of several weeks between diagnosis and operation due to congested waiting list.
Acetazolamide (Diamox) has been shown to reduce the production of CSF in clinical cases of raised intracranial pressure . It is considered the drug of choice for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial pressure (pseudotumor cerebri). Intuitively a connection between Acetazolamide as a treatment option in iNPH seems logical. Encouraging case studies have been published previously showing a fascinating improvement and success of treating iNPH with Acetazolamide. A systematic placebo controlled study concerning the use of Acetazolamide in iNPH is missing and would possibly pave the way to an alternative treatment option avoiding surgery and its complications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acetazolamide | Active comparator | Drug: Acetazolamideactive comparator group will receives 500 mg azetazolamide daily |
| sugar pill | Placebo comparator | Drug: sugar pillplacebo comparator group will receives placebo daily. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Included will be subjects with a probable diagnosis of iNPH. The diagnosis will be based primarily on presence of gait impairment plus at least one other impairment in urinary symptoms, cognition impairment or both.
- Are 60 years old or older
- Patients who understand the study protocol
- Patients who meet the criteria for NPH
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients below the age of 60 years.
- Patients who underwent shunt surgery
- Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of a neurodegenerative or neurovascular disease that causes a significant impairment of gait and cognitive functions
- Patients with symptom duration of more than 6 month
- Patients with contraindications for acetazolamide treatment:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acetazolamide | Drug | Acetazolamide |
| sugar pill | Drug | sugar pill |
Primary outcome
1. Changes from baseline in motor on the Boon scale at week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week4
The effect of acetazolamide on motor and cognitive function in iNPH patients will be examined. Motor system investigations - Gait assessment using a quantified scale (Boon et al., 1997). Scores from this metric represent 3 summed subscores: 10-m step count, 10-m time, and the following 10 features: hesitation, wide and small steps, low clearance, impaired turning, sway, fall tendency, impaired tandem walking, and inability to walk with and without assistance. The summed score has a range from 2-40, with 2 representing unimpaired gait.
1 secondary outcome
Changes from baseline in cognitive function on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time frame: Baseline, week4
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: difficulty in recruiting participants to the study). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2017.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Acetazolamide and sugar pill in people with Motor Condition as Measured by Quantified Scale and Cognitive Investigation, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: difficulty in recruiting participants to the study). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1. Changes from baseline in motor on the Boon scale at week 4 (time frame: Baseline, Week4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.