AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerAPPRONCT02163785

Abdominoperineal Extra-Elevators Rectal Resection for Cancer: Prone Position vs. Supine Position

A study testing Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer in people with Rectal Cancer and Abdominoperineal Resection, run by Hospital Universitario La Fe at 19 sites in Spain.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the prone vs. the supine position of the perineal time of the Miles operation in patients with advanced rectal cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rectal Cancer, Abdominoperineal Resection
What is being tested?
Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
280 participants
Where
19 sitesSpain
Study dates
Jun 2014to Jan 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with primary low lying rectal cancer involving or threatening anal sphincter complex as seen in MRI

Who cannot join

  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification of Physical Health (ASA) IV patients
  • Locally palliative purpose of the operation
  • Age < 18 years
  • Preoperative indication for pelvic exenteration
  • Pregnancy
  • Lack of patients consent

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

Spain19 sites
  • Hospital Bellvitge

    Barcelona, Catalonia

  • Hospital del Mar

    Barcelona, Catalonia

  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, Andalusia

  • Hospital Universitario Donostia

    Donostia / San Sebastian, Basque Country

  • Hospital General Universitario

    Elche, Valencia

  • Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta

    Girona, Catalonia

  • Hospital del SAS

    Jerez de la Frontera, Andalusia

  • Hospital General

    Medina del Campo, Castille and León

  • Hospital Universitario "Virgen de la Arrixaca"

    Murcia

  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario

    Ourense, Galicia

  • Complejo Hospitalario

    Pamplona, Navarre

  • Hospital General

    Requena, Valencia

  • Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli

    Sabadell, Catalonia

  • Hospital de Sagunto

    Sagunto, Valencia

  • Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

  • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

    Valencia

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario

    Valencia

  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario

    Vigo, Galicia

  • Hospital Luis Alcanyis

    Xàtiva, Valencia

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Estudio A.P.PRO: Estrategia quirúrgica en la amputación Abdominoperineal cilíndrica Del Recto Por cáncer: posición de litotomía vs. Prono-navaja

Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the prone vs. the supine position of the perineal time of the Miles operation in patients with advanced rectal cancer.

Primary objective:

  • Pathological circumferential resection margin

Secondary objectives:

  • 5 year oncological outcomes
  • Morbimortality rates
  • Surgical specimen quality
  • Perineal hernia incidence
Being tested
Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer
Keywords
Inferior rectal cancer, Abdominoperineal resection, Miles operation, Supine Miles operation, Prone Miles operation, Total mesorectal excision, Circumferential radial margin
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancerProcedure or surgery

    Also called Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum, Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum, Abdominoperineal resection

    Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer involving anal sphincter complex

Study groups in NCT02163785
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Supine positionActive comparatorAbdominoperineal resection - perineal time- in supine position
Receives: Procedure: Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer
Prone positionExperimentalAbdominoperineal resection - perineal time- in prone position
Receives: Procedure: Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of the circumferential resection margin

    Histopathological report of the circumferential resection margin of the surgical specimen obtained in patients that underwent perineal time of Miles procedure in prone vs supine position.

    Measured: 15-30 days after surgery date

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Histopathological quality of surgical specimen

    Comparison of the quality of the surgical specimen in terms of integrity of the circumferential resection margin, accidental iatrogenic rupture etc.

    Measured: 15-30 days after

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completionJan 2021
  4. Study completionJan 2021

Why it stopped: insufficient recruitment rate

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
280 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02163785
Sponsor's protocol ID
APPRO
Acronym
APPRO
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
12 Jun 2014
Last updated
1 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Garcia-Granero E, Faiz O, Munoz E, Flor B, Navarro S, Faus C, Garcia-Botello SA, Lledo S, Cervantes A. Macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a useful tool for improving quality control in a multidisciplinary team. Cancer. 2009 Aug 1;115(15):3400-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24387.

    PubMed 19479978
  • Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;133(8):894-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894.

    PubMed 9711965
  • Flor-Lorente B, Frasson M, Montilla E. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position. Cir Esp. 2014 Mar;92 Suppl 1:30-9. doi: 10.1016/S0009-739X(14)70006-5. English, Spanish.

    PubMed 24842689
  • Frasson M, Garcia-Granero E. Reply to Kelly et al. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;18(3):312-3. doi: 10.1111/codi.13272. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26757199

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer in people with Rectal Cancer and Abdominoperineal Resection, run by Hospital Universitario La Fe at 19 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: insufficient recruitment rate). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of the circumferential resection margin (time frame: 15-30 days after surgery date). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02163785, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in