End Stage Renal DiseaseNCT02165761
Evaluation of Anti-platelet Factor 4/Heparin Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients
A study testing GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft and Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft in people with End Stage Renal Disease, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
To characterize the GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft as compared to non-heparin bonded synthetic vascular grafts in terms of the prevalence and persistence of anti-platelet factor 4 / heparin antibodies (anti-PF4 / H antibodies). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End Stage Renal Disease
- What is being tested?
- GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft and Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to 20 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is not a candidate for a native fistula.
- The patient requires the creation of an upper arm vascular access graft for hemodialysis secondary to a diagnosis of End-Stage Renal Disease.
- The patient has been on hemodialysis for ≥1 month.
Who cannot join
- The patient is scheduled for a different surgical procedure within 30 days post Index Procedure.
- The patient has a known hypercoagulable disorder or bleeding disorder.
- The patient has had a previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II (HIT type II) or has known sensitivity to heparin.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Study site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Study site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Anti-platelet Factor 4/Heparin Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Implanted With the GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft Versus Non-heparin Bonded Synthetic Vascular Grafts.
To characterize the GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft as compared to non-heparin bonded synthetic vascular grafts in terms of the prevalence and persistence of anti-platelet factor 4 / heparin antibodies (anti-PF4 / H antibodies).
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease
- Being tested
- GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft, Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft
- Keywords
- Hemodialysis, End Stage Renal Disease, Vascular Graft
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GORE® Hybrid Vascular GraftDevice
Non-heparin bonded synthetic graftDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft | Active comparator | GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft Receives: Device: GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft |
| Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft | Other | Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft Receives: Device: Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With a Prevalence of a Positive Poly-specific Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) at Day 7 and/or Day 14 Time Points
Antibody screening was performed using a commercial poly-specific EIA that detects antibodies of any of the IgG, IgA, and / or IgM classes against PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate complexes, the EIA-GAM.
Measured: 14 days after index procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completion20 Jan 2017
- Study completion20 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for End Stage Renal DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by W.L.Gore & AssociatesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & Associates
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02165761
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HVG 13-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Anti-platelet Factor 4/Heparin Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Implanted With the GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft Versus Non-heparin Bonded Synthetic Vascular Grafts.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02165761
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HVG 13-01
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease
- Keywords
- Hemodialysis, End Stage Renal Disease, Vascular Graft
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & AssociatesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2014
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To characterize the GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft as compared to non-heparin bonded synthetic vascular grafts in terms of the prevalence and persistence of anti-platelet factor 4 / heparin antibodies (anti-PF4 / H antibodies).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft | Active comparator | Device: GORE® Hybrid Vascular GraftGORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft |
| Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft | Other | Device: Non-heparin bonded synthetic graftNon-heparin bonded synthetic graft |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The patient is not a candidate for a native fistula.
- The patient requires the creation of an upper arm vascular access graft for hemodialysis secondary to a diagnosis of End-Stage Renal Disease.
- The patient has been on hemodialysis for ≥1 month.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The patient is scheduled for a different surgical procedure within 30 days post Index Procedure.
- The patient has a known hypercoagulable disorder or bleeding disorder.
- The patient has had a previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II (HIT type II) or has known sensitivity to heparin.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft | Device | GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft |
| Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft | Device | Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With a Prevalence of a Positive Poly-specific Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) at Day 7 and/or Day 14 Time Points
Time frame: 14 days after index procedure
Antibody screening was performed using a commercial poly-specific EIA that detects antibodies of any of the IgG, IgA, and / or IgM classes against PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate complexes, the EIA-GAM.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for End Stage Renal Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Recruiting
Guiding Optimal Blood Pressure Management in Peritoneal Dialysis Pilot Trial
End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), Hypertension (HTN)
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Impairments in Children With Chronic Renal Failure
Chronic Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Test the Safety of the Study Drug Fosmanogepix and How the Body Handles It in Adults With Severe Kidney Failure on Dialysis
End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Adult
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GORE® Hybrid Vascular Graft and Non-heparin bonded synthetic graft in people with End Stage Renal Disease, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With a Prevalence of a Positive Poly-specific Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) at Day 7 and/or Day 14 Time Points (time frame: 14 days after index procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2018.