Spinal Cord InjuryPhase 1NCT02165904
Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in SCI
A Phase 1 study testing Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Puerta de Hierro University Hospital at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- May 2014to May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Incomplete SCI
- Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
- Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
- The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- Thread Men and women will compromise to use anticonceptive issues from first cell´s extraction to 6 months after last cell´s administration.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Ability to attend clinical follow-up and perform physical therapy through the treatment period.
- Written and signed informed consent, according to the local regulation.
- Hematologic and creatinin parameters, SGOT and SGPT, within the normal range, according to laboratory standards considering that small variations could be accepted based on clinical study team criteria.
Who cannot join
- A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
- Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
- Age below 18 years or above 70.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
- Patients with systemic disease that represents and additional risk to treatment.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Patients with uncertain commitment to follow the physical therapy and clinical visits as well as patient with a negative input in the previous phycological assessment.
- Inability to assess the SCI features through MRI either noise due to spinal stabilization systems or any other cause.
- Patients currently under hematopoietic growth factors treatment or who required or maintained anticoagulation.
- Neurodegenerative disease additional.
- History of substance abuse, psychiatric disease or allergy to the protein products used in the process of cell expansion.
- Positive serology for HIV and syphilis.
- Active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C.
- With other reason that would consider the patient ineligible for cell therapy according to the investigators judgment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients Suffering Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose.
When the clinical trial finishes, it will be done a completed check of all obtained parameters.
Read the detailed description
It is a clinical trial phase I, single center, non-randomized, uncontrolled, open prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) .10 patients will be included with this injury.
Primary objective: Analyze the possible clinical efficacy of administration of main adult mesenchymal autologous cells expanded "in vitro" in patients with incomplete and chronically established SCI.
Secondary objectives: Confirm the safety of treatment, and study possible changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels (Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), Nerve Growth Factor 3 and 4(NT3 and NT4) after subarachnoid administration of BMMC.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
- Keywords
- Analyze clinical efficacy of subarachnoid administration of, autologous BMSC expanded "in vitro"
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow CellBiological
Diagnosed patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and chronically established SCI will be treated with Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cells.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell | Experimental | All patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell Receives: Biological: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score
Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scale
- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.
Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Change in Barthel Score
- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.
Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS Scale
-Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale
Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.
Measured: Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.
- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Changes in ASHWORTH Score
- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Changes in EVA Score
- Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy- Changes in Geffner Score
changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder
Measured: Changes in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Efficacy- Changes in NBD Score
changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)
Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.
Measured: Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor Pressure
Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)
Measured: Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliance
Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling
. It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching.
It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.
Measured: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric Capacity
Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity
Measured: Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images
Measured: before (baseline visit) and at 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Adverse Events .
- The safety will be valued with number of adverse events related with administration of subarachnoid autologous Bone Marrow Expanded Mesenchymal Cells in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
Measured: Up to 12 months
Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) Samples
Changes in expression of neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) samples obtained previously to first administration of cell therapy, and previously to the last administration, at month 10, in order to study the variability in the expression of neurotrophins along time. The mean+SD (standard deviation) at each time point was obtained. The tested neurotrophins were: BDNF.
Measured: Basal and 10 months after the administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jesús Vaquero Crespo, M.D., Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jesús JV Vaquero Crespo, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02165904
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CME-LEM2
- Other IDs
- 2011-005684-24
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 6 May 2014
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical development plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication
Publications
Vaquero J, Zurita M. Functional recovery after severe CNS trauma: current perspectives for cell therapy with bone marrow stromal cells. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
PubMed 21163325Otero L, Zurita M, Bonilla C, Aguayo C, Vela A, Rico MA, Vaquero J. Late transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow stromal cells improves neurologic deficits subsequent to intracerebral hemorrhage. Cytotherapy. 2011 May;13(5):562-71. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.544720. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
PubMed 21208021
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients Suffering Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02165904
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CME-LEM2
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Keywords
- Analyze clinical efficacy of subarachnoid administration of, autologous BMSC expanded "in vitro"
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Puerta de Hierro University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose.
When the clinical trial finishes, it will be done a completed check of all obtained parameters.
Detailed description
It is a clinical trial phase I, single center, non-randomized, uncontrolled, open prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) .10 patients will be included with this injury.
Primary objective: Analyze the possible clinical efficacy of administration of main adult mesenchymal autologous cells expanded "in vitro" in patients with incomplete and chronically established SCI.
Secondary objectives: Confirm the safety of treatment, and study possible changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels (Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), Nerve Growth Factor 3 and 4(NT3 and NT4) after subarachnoid administration of BMMC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell | Experimental | Biological: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow CellAll patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Incomplete SCI
- Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
- Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
- The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
- Age between 18 and 70 years
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
- Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
- Age below 18 years or above 70.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow CellDiagnosed patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and chronically established SCI will be treated with Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cells. | Biological | Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell |
Primary outcome
Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery
Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.
Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scale
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment. Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.
Efficacy-Change in Barthel Score
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment. Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.
Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS Scale
Time frame: Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
-Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.
Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.
Changes in ASHWORTH Score
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension
Efficacy-Changes in EVA Score
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
• Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.
Efficacy- Changes in Geffner Score
Time frame: Changes in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder
Efficacy- Changes in NBD Score
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period) Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.
Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)
Time frame: Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery
Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.
Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor Pressure
Time frame: Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliance
Time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery
Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling . It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching. It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric Capacity
Time frame: Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity
Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time frame: before (baseline visit) and at 12 months
Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Adverse Events .
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) Samples
Time frame: Basal and 10 months after the administration
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21163325Vaquero J, Zurita M. Functional recovery after severe CNS trauma: current perspectives for cell therapy with bone marrow stromal cells. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
- Background: PubMed 21208021Otero L, Zurita M, Bonilla C, Aguayo C, Vela A, Rico MA, Vaquero J. Late transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow stromal cells improves neurologic deficits subsequent to intracerebral hemorrhage. Cytotherapy. 2011 May;13(5):562-71. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.544720. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical development plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jesús JV Vaquero Crespo, M.D. principal investigator
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Puerta de Hierro University Hospital at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score (time frame: measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02165904, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2019.