Unresectable Pancreatic CancerRFARCTNCT02166190
RFA RCT for Pancreatic or Bile Duct Cancer
A study testing Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe and Stenting only in people with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer and Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Malignant obstructive jaundice is a common complication of advanced stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Over 50% of common bile duct (CBD) obstructions are due to malignancy, and the majority of neoplasms are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable
- What is being tested?
- Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe and Stenting only
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to 17 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Either gender greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
- Pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma unsuitable for surgical resection. Criteria of unresectability being based on 1) metastatic disease or 2) locally advanced. Subjects that are deemed to be unresectable will be determined by a surgeon or treating oncologist.
- Biliary obstruction
- Subjects capable of giving informed consent
- Life expectancy of at least 6 months
Who cannot join
- Exclusion Criteria
- Cardiac Pacemaker
- Patient unstable for ERCP or has failed ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography )
- Inability to give informed consent
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation and Stenting vs. Stenting Alone for Biliary Obstruction Due to Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma and Pancreatic Cancer
Malignant obstructive jaundice is a common complication of advanced stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Over 50% of common bile duct (CBD) obstructions are due to malignancy, and the majority of neoplasms are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Biliary drainage with placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) for palliation is the therapy of choice in this set of patients. Conventional stent placement provides palliation for a limited duration only and these subjects come back with obstructive jaundice. Due to age, comorbidities, malignant disease status, it is better to conduct reduced number of therapeutic endoscopies to reduce the number of complications. Additionally, only biliary stenting itself may provide only palliation, and not increase the duration of survival.
Currently, there are only two therapies. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been evaluated as a palliative and potential neoadjuvant modality. Therefore if RFA confers similar benefits, then it may potentially be used as an alternative to PDT, given the lower adverse event profile. More recently, RFA has been recognized for its potential in palliative treatment of malignant biliary strictures. Based on the published data, RFA provides palliation and seems to increase survival duration in pancreatic cancer. Our own limited experience shows the same. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to definitely confirm the benefit of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing increased survival time and quality of life in patients with non-resectable cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. These benefits will improve clinical practice by making RFA the new standard of care for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and pancreatic cancer (PC). It will also enhance scientific knowledge by opening the door for new opportunities, e.g. RFA as a potential use for neoadjuvant therapy or as a downstaging agent for surgically resectable patients.
Read the detailed description
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PC) is a deadly disease. It remains the fourth most common cause of death from cancer in the USA and one of the deadliest cancers in the world. Although treatments have improved, average PC 5-year survival is around 5%. Malignant obstructive jaundice is a common complication of advanced stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Over 50% of common bile duct (CBD) obstructions are due to malignancy, and the majority of neoplasms are unresectable at the time of diagnosis.
Biliary drainage with placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for palliation is the therapy of choice in this set of patients. Metal stenting results in biliary decompression in greater than 80% of cases with a lower complication rate than surgery. When compared to plastic stents, SEMSs present a significantly reduced risk of recurrent biliary obstruction. SEMSs are also more cost effective than plastic stents in patients with a life expectancy of longer than 4 months. Despite their numerous benefits, SEMS become occluded in up to 50% of patients in the first 6-8 months. Covered SEMSs are not resistant to tumor overgrowth or sludge formation and thus stent occlusion results in increased morbidity and mortality.
This relief is temporary since stents tend to become obstructed. More recently, RFA has been recognized for its potential in palliative treatment of malignant biliary strictures.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been previously evaluated as a palliative and potential neoadjuvant modality in patients with biliary obstruction from cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore if RFA confers similar benefits, then it may potentially be used as in a similar manner to PDT, in addition given the lower adverse event profile, it may confer a greater patient tolerance. EndoHPB, the intervention arm, is an endoscopic bipolar catheter designed to ablate tissue in malignant tumors within luminal structures, such as the biliary tree or pancreatic ducts. By using radiofrequency (RF) energy to heat the tissue in the duct prior to insertion of the stent, the surrounding tissue becomes coagulated and this may delay tumor growth and the time before the stent lumen becomes blocked. Thereby, allowing increased periods between the need for intervention and further stent deployment. If EndoHPB use of luminal RF is demonstrated to be effective in luminal tumor ablation, it may have an additional role as a form of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. RFA uses a high frequency alternating current to generate heat and achieve coagulative necrosis when in contact with tissue. Within the bile duct, RFA appears to be safe and may result in decreased benign epithelial hyperplasia and tumor ingrowth. Two recent studies have shown efficacy and safety of RFA in advanced pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma. Subsequently, retrospective collection of data from a cohort of 26 patients treated with endobiliary RFA for malignant biliary obstruction in our Institution confirmed the safety of this approach and suggested a potential survival benefit at 90 and 180 days post treatment compared to matched controls.
A pilot study was initiated and IRB approved at the Weill Cornell Medical College in 2011 with primary investigator Dr. Michel Kahaleh. The study was closed in Nov 2013 as the results showed that RFA significantly increased the bile duct diameter. Analysis also showed that survival duration was slightly increased in the Pancreatic Cancer group.
- Hypothesis: Luminal application of RF energy using EndoHPB in the bile duct of patients with cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer provides ablation of tumor causing biliary obstruction(s). Effectiveness will assessed by looking at the change in diameter(s), on cholangiography and assess time till stent occlusion.
- Study Design: Randomized, Controlled, 2- arm, Non-Blinded, Randomised controlled trial Treatment group: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with RFA and biliary stenting.
Control group: ERCP with biliary stenting only
- Primary outcome measure: is survival time, measured from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the patient was known to be alive.
- Secondary outcome measure: Number of Participants with Adverse Events. To assess safety of an endoscopic bipolar radiofrequency catheter (EndoHPB) in the management of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
- Condition : - Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma or Pancreatic Cancer
- Intervention: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation using the ENDOHPB probe.
- Being tested
- Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe, Stenting only
- Keywords
- Pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, radiofrequency ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms, Cholangiocarcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB ProbeProcedure or surgery
Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
Stenting onlyProcedure or surgery
Stenting only
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation (EndoHbp probe) | Experimental | Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe |
| Stenting only | Active comparator | Stenting only Receives: Procedure: Stenting only |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Success- composite
Clinical Success Composite of Stent patency, serum bilirubin and general quality of life measured at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months as well as survival duration.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Mutational Profile of DNA post interventional procedure
Mutational profile of DNA using FISH (Fluorescence in situ hybridization) analysis on brushings of bile duct after RFA procedure to further understand the implications at the cellular and genetic level at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completion17 May 2017
- Study completion17 May 2017
Why it stopped: Enrollment was feasibly not going to be reached.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Unresectable Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Reem Z Sharaiha, MD, Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02166190
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1403014843
- Acronym
- RFARCT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No IPD sharing
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation and Stenting vs. Stenting Alone for Biliary Obstruction Due to Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma and Pancreatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02166190
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RFARCT / 1403014843
- Keywords
- Pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, radiofrequency ablation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Enrollment was feasibly not going to be reached.
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- 17 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Malignant obstructive jaundice is a common complication of advanced stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Over 50% of common bile duct (CBD) obstructions are due to malignancy, and the majority of neoplasms are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Biliary drainage with placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) for palliation is the therapy of choice in this set of patients. Conventional stent placement provides palliation for a limited duration only and these subjects come back with obstructive jaundice. Due to age, comorbidities, malignant disease status, it is better to conduct reduced number of therapeutic endoscopies to reduce the number of complications. Additionally, only biliary stenting itself may provide only palliation, and not increase the duration of survival.
Currently, there are only two therapies. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been evaluated as a palliative and potential neoadjuvant modality. Therefore if RFA confers similar benefits, then it may potentially be used as an alternative to PDT, given the lower adverse event profile. More recently, RFA has been recognized for its potential in palliative treatment of malignant biliary strictures. Based on the published data, RFA provides palliation and seems to increase survival duration in pancreatic cancer. Our own limited experience shows the same. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to definitely confirm the benefit of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing increased survival time and quality of life in patients with non-resectable cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. These benefits will improve clinical practice by making RFA the new standard of care for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and pancreatic cancer (PC). It will also enhance scientific knowledge by opening the door for new opportunities, e.g. RFA as a potential use for neoadjuvant therapy or as a downstaging agent for surgically resectable patients.
Detailed description
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PC) is a deadly disease. It remains the fourth most common cause of death from cancer in the USA and one of the deadliest cancers in the world. Although treatments have improved, average PC 5-year survival is around 5%. Malignant obstructive jaundice is a common complication of advanced stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Over 50% of common bile duct (CBD) obstructions are due to malignancy, and the majority of neoplasms are unresectable at the time of diagnosis.
Biliary drainage with placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for palliation is the therapy of choice in this set of patients. Metal stenting results in biliary decompression in greater than 80% of cases with a lower complication rate than surgery. When compared to plastic stents, SEMSs present a significantly reduced risk of recurrent biliary obstruction. SEMSs are also more cost effective than plastic stents in patients with a life expectancy of longer than 4 months. Despite their numerous benefits, SEMS become occluded in up to 50% of patients in the first 6-8 months. Covered SEMSs are not resistant to tumor overgrowth or sludge formation and thus stent occlusion results in increased morbidity and mortality.
This relief is temporary since stents tend to become obstructed. More recently, RFA has been recognized for its potential in palliative treatment of malignant biliary strictures.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been previously evaluated as a palliative and potential neoadjuvant modality in patients with biliary obstruction from cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore if RFA confers similar benefits, then it may potentially be used as in a similar manner to PDT, in addition given the lower adverse event profile, it may confer a greater patient tolerance. EndoHPB, the intervention arm, is an endoscopic bipolar catheter designed to ablate tissue in malignant tumors within luminal structures, such as the biliary tree or pancreatic ducts. By using radiofrequency (RF) energy to heat the tissue in the duct prior to insertion of the stent, the surrounding tissue becomes coagulated and this may delay tumor growth and the time before the stent lumen becomes blocked. Thereby, allowing increased periods between the need for intervention and further stent deployment. If EndoHPB use of luminal RF is demonstrated to be effective in luminal tumor ablation, it may have an additional role as a form of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. RFA uses a high frequency alternating current to generate heat and achieve coagulative necrosis when in contact with tissue. Within the bile duct, RFA appears to be safe and may result in decreased benign epithelial hyperplasia and tumor ingrowth. Two recent studies have shown efficacy and safety of RFA in advanced pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma. Subsequently, retrospective collection of data from a cohort of 26 patients treated with endobiliary RFA for malignant biliary obstruction in our Institution confirmed the safety of this approach and suggested a potential survival benefit at 90 and 180 days post treatment compared to matched controls.
A pilot study was initiated and IRB approved at the Weill Cornell Medical College in 2011 with primary investigator Dr. Michel Kahaleh. The study was closed in Nov 2013 as the results showed that RFA significantly increased the bile duct diameter. Analysis also showed that survival duration was slightly increased in the Pancreatic Cancer group.
- Hypothesis: Luminal application of RF energy using EndoHPB in the bile duct of patients with cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer provides ablation of tumor causing biliary obstruction(s). Effectiveness will assessed by looking at the change in diameter(s), on cholangiography and assess time till stent occlusion.
- Study Design: Randomized, Controlled, 2- arm, Non-Blinded, Randomised controlled trial Treatment group: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with RFA and biliary stenting.
Control group: ERCP with biliary stenting only
- Primary outcome measure: is survival time, measured from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the patient was known to be alive.
- Secondary outcome measure: Number of Participants with Adverse Events. To assess safety of an endoscopic bipolar radiofrequency catheter (EndoHPB) in the management of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
- Condition : - Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma or Pancreatic Cancer
- Intervention: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation using the ENDOHPB probe.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation (EndoHbp probe) | Experimental | Procedure: Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB ProbeRadiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe |
| Stenting only | Active comparator | Procedure: Stenting onlyStenting only |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Either gender greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
- Pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma unsuitable for surgical resection. Criteria of unresectability being based on 1) metastatic disease or 2) locally advanced. Subjects that are deemed to be unresectable will be determined by a surgeon or treating oncologist.
- Biliary obstruction
- Subjects capable of giving informed consent
- Life expectancy of at least 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Exclusion Criteria
- Cardiac Pacemaker
- Patient unstable for ERCP or has failed ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography )
- Inability to give informed consent
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB ProbeRadiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe | Procedure or surgery | Radiofrequency Ablation (EndoHbp probe) |
| Stenting onlyStenting only | Procedure or surgery | Stenting only |
Primary outcome
Clinical Success- composite
Time frame: 1 year
Clinical Success Composite of Stent patency, serum bilirubin and general quality of life measured at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months as well as survival duration.
1 secondary outcome
Mutational Profile of DNA post interventional procedure
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Enrollment was feasibly not going to be reached.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No IPD sharing
Related trials for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
Recruiting
CREO - Microwave Ablation Feasibility Study
Pancreatic Cancer, Liver Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)
RecruitingPhase 1
Lm-LLO-TT and Gemcitabine in Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Pancreas Cancer, Duct Cell Adenocarcinoma, Pancreatic Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn More About How Well Treatment With Sevabertinib (BAY 2927088) Tablets Works and How Safe it is in Participants Who Have a Solid Tumor With Mutations of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)
Advanced Solid Tumors, HER2 Mutation
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Zanzalintinib Versus Everolimus in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (pNET), Extra-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (epNET)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Reem Z Sharaiha, MD principal investigator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe and Stenting only in people with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer and Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Enrollment was feasibly not going to be reached.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Success- composite (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2019.