AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection Genotype 1Phase 3TOPAZ-IINCT02167945

A Study to Evaluate Long-term Outcomes Following Treatment With ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 With or Without Ribavirin (RBV) in Adults With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection

A Phase 3 study testing ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333 and Ribavirin (RBV) in people with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection Genotype 1, run by AbbVie at 48 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with ABT-450 co-formulated with ritonavir and ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333; 3-DAA regimen, with or without ribavirin (RBV) in adults with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV GT1) infection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333 and Ribavirin (RBV)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
615 participants
Where
48 sitesUnited States
Study dates
12 Jun 2014to 13 May 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Females must be post-menopausal for more than 2 years or surgically sterile or practicing specific forms of birth control
  • Chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1-infection (HCV RNA level greater than 1,000 IU/mL at screening)
  • HCV genotype 1 infection per screening laboratory result

Who cannot join

  • Use of contraindicated medications within 2 weeks of dosing
  • Abnormal laboratory tests
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antigen and anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antibody
  • History of solid organ transplant, clinical evidence of Child-Pugh B or C classification or clinical history of liver decompensation
  • Presence of hepatocellular carcinoma at screening

Trial locations and contacts

48 sites in 1 country.

48 sites in 1 country

United States48 sites
  • University of New Mexico /ID# 128859

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102-4517

  • Atlanta Gastro Assoc /ID# 126571

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Univ of Colorado Cancer Center /ID# 126568

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Franco Felizarta, Md /Id# 126569

    Bakersfield, California, 93301

  • Johns Hopkins University /ID# 127791

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Inquest Clinical Research /ID# 126574

    Baytown, Texas, 77521-2415

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center /ID# 126560

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215-5400

  • Bach and Godofsky Infec Dis /ID# 128685

    Bradenton, Florida, 34209

  • Digestive Disease Associates - Catonsville /ID# 127624

    Catonsville, Maryland, 21228

  • Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center /ID# 127632

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine /ID# 128684

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2927

  • The University of Chicago Medical Center /ID# 126576

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1443

  • University of Cincinnati Physicians Company, LLC /ID# 127790

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-2827

  • Henry Ford Health System /ID# 127783

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • AGA Clinical Research Associates, LLC /ID# 126578

    Egg Harbor, New Jersey, 08234

  • University of Florida - Archer /ID# 127787

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • Gastro One /ID# 127792

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Cure C Consortium /ID# 126570

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Liver Associates of Texas, P.A /ID# 126563

    Houston, Texas, 77030-2783

  • Duplicate_Indiana University Health /ID# 126573

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Encore Borland-Groover Clinical Research /Id# 127781

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Ruane Clinical Research Group /ID# 126577

    Los Angeles, California, 90036

  • Dean Clinic /ID# 126575

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53715

  • University of Miami /ID# 127622

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Clinical Research Ctrs America /ID# 127780

    Murray, Utah, 84123

  • North Shore University Hospital /ID# 126565

    New Hyde Park, New York, 11040

  • Tulane University /ID# 127779

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112-2699

  • The Mount Sinai Hospital /ID# 128682

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Columbia Univ Medical Center /ID# 126566

    New York, New York, 10032-3725

  • Columbia Univ Medical Center /ID# 127621

    New York, New York, 10032-3725

  • Rutgers New Jersey School of Medicine /ID# 128686

    Newark, New Jersey, 07103

  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research /ID# 126562

    Pflugerville, Texas, 78660

  • St. Josephs Hospital and Med Center /ID# 127800

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

  • Minnesota Gastroenterology PA /ID# 126579

    Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446

  • Premier Medical Group - GI Division /ID# 127793

    Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601

  • University Gastroenterology /ID# 127789

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02905

  • Univ Rochester Med Ctr /ID# 127655

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • TX Liver Inst, Americ Res Corp /ID# 127623

    San Antonio, Texas, 78215

  • California Pacific Medical Center /ID# 128681

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Southwest Care Center /ID# 127784

    Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87505

  • Virginia Mason - Seattle Orthapedics /ID# 130288

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

  • University of Washington /ID# 127785

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

  • Louisana Research Center, LLC /ID# 126561

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105-6800

  • St. Louis University /ID# 126564

    St Louis, Missouri, 63104

  • Carolinas Center For Liver Dis /ID# 127788

    Statesville, North Carolina, 28677

  • Options Health Research, LLC /ID# 127630

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104

  • Medstar Health Research Institute /ID# 128683

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

  • South Florida Ctr Gastro, P.A. /ID# 126567

    Wellington, Florida, 33414

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Long-term Outcomes With ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333 With or Without Ribavirin (RBV) in Adults With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection (TOPAZ-II)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with ABT-450 co-formulated with ritonavir and ABT-267 (ABT-450/r/ABT-267) and ABT-333; 3-DAA regimen, with or without ribavirin (RBV) in adults with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV GT1) infection.

Read the detailed description

This study (TOPAZ-II; M14-222), was a Phase 3b, open-label, multicenter study conducted in the United States which, together with its companion study TOPAZ-I (M14-423; NCT02219490) conducted outside of the United States, was designed with the primary objective of assessing the effect of treatment response on long-term clinical outcomes in adults with chronic HCV GT1 infection with or without compensated cirrhosis, who were either treatment-naïve or interferon/ribavirin (IFN/RBV) treatment- experienced. In both studies, participants were treated with the 3-DAA regimen with or without RBV. This study consisted of a screening period of up to 42 days, a treatment period of either 12 weeks for HCV GT1a-infected subjects without cirrhosis and for HCV GT1b-infected subjects without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis or 24 weeks for GT1a-infected participants with compensated cirrhosis, and a 260-week post-treatment period.

Being tested
ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333, Ribavirin (RBV)
Keywords
Hepatitis C Genotype 1, Compensated Cirrhosis, Cirrhosis, Naïve, Hepatitis C, Hepatitis C Virus, Treatment-Experienced, Relapser, Null responder, Non responder
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis C, Chronic, Hepatitis C, Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ABT-450/r/ABT-267Drug

    Also called ABT-450 also known as paritaprevir, ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir, Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir also known as Viekirax

    Tablet for oral use

  • ABT-333Drug

    Also called ABT-333 also known as dasabuvir, ABT-333 also known as Exviera

    Tablet for oral use

  • Ribavirin (RBV)Drug

    Ribavirin was provided as 200 mg tablets, and dosed based on weight, 1000 to 1200 mg divided twice daily per local label. For example, for participants weighing < 75 kg, RBV may have been taken orally as 2 tablets in the morning and 3 tablets in the evening which corresponds to a 1000 mg total daily dose. For participants weighing ≥ 75 kg, RBV may have been taken orally as 3 tablets in the morning and 3 tablets in the evening which corresponds to a 1200 mg total daily dose.

Study groups in NCT02167945
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ABT-450/r/ABT-267 plus ABT-333 with or without ribavirin (RBV)ExperimentalParticipants with HCV GT1b without cirrhosis received the 3-DAA (ABT-450/ritonavir/ABT-267 and ABT-333) regimen: two 75 mg ABT-450/50 mg ritonavir/12.5 mg ABT-267 tablets taken orally every morning (QD) and one ABT-333 250 mg tablet taken orally twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks. Participants with HCV GT1a without cirrhosis and those with HCV GT1b with cirrhosis received the 3-DAA regimen and weight-based ribavirin (RBV; 1000 to 1200 mg divided twice daily per local label) for 12 weeks. Participants with HCV GT1a with cirrhosis received the 3-DAA regimen and weight-based RBV per local label for 24 weeks.
Receives: Drug: ABT-450/r/ABT-267; Drug: ABT-333; Drug: Ribavirin (RBV)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All-Cause Death: Time to Event

    Time to all-cause death was defined as the number of days from the first day of study drug dosing for the participant to the date of death. All deaths were to be included, regardless of whether the death occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or had previously discontinued study drug. If the participant did not die, their data was to be censored at the date of their last available assessment of clinical outcomes. For participants with no post-baseline assessment, the participant's data was to be censored on the first day of study drug dosing. The event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and incidence estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals. The pre-specified analysis of all-cause death included pooled data from TOPAZ-II (this study) and the companion study TOPAZ-I (M14-423; NCT02219490).

    Measured: At Post-Treatment Weeks 52, 104, 156, 208, and 260

  2. Liver-Related Death: Time to Event

    Time to liver-related death was defined as number of days from the 1st day of study drug dosing for the participant to date of liver-related death. All liver-related deaths were to be included, regardless of whether the death occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or had previously discontinued study drug. If the participant didn't experience the event of interest nor had died (all-cause death), their data was to be censored at the date of their last available assessment of clinical outcomes. For participants with no post-baseline assessment, their data was to be censored on the 1st day of study drug dosing. All-cause death was a censoring event for liver-related death. The event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and incidence estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals. The pre-specified analysis of liver-related death included pooled data from TOPAZ-II (this study) and the companion study TOPAZ-I (M14-423; NCT02219490).

    Measured: At Post-Treatment Weeks 52, 104, 156, 208, and 260

  3. Liver Decompensation: Time to Event

    Time to liver decompensation was defined as number of days from the 1st day of study drug dosing for the participant to the date of liver decompensation. All liver decompensation was to be included, regardless of whether it occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or had previously discontinued study drug. If the participant didn't experience the event of interest nor had died (all-cause death), their data was to be censored at the date of their last available assessment of clinical outcomes. For participants with no post-baseline assessment, their data was to be censored on the 1st day of study drug dosing. All-cause death was a censoring event for liver decompensation. The event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and incidence estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals. The pre-specified analysis of liver decompensation included pooled data from TOPAZ-II (this study) and the companion study TOPAZ-I (M14-423; NCT02219490).

    Measured: At Post-Treatment Weeks 52, 104, 156, 208, and 260

  4. Liver Transplantation: Time to Event

    Time to liver transplantation was defined as number of days from the 1st day of study drug dosing for the participant to date of liver transplantation. All liver transplantation was to be included, regardless of whether it occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or had previously discontinued study drug. If the participant didn't experience the event of interest nor had died (all-cause death), their data was to be censored at the date of their last available assessment of clinical outcomes. For participants with no post-baseline assessment, their data was to be censored on the 1st day of study drug dosing. All-cause death was a censoring event for liver transplantation. The event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and incidence estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals. The pre-specified analysis of liver transplantation included pooled data from TOPAZ-II (this study) and the companion study TOPAZ-I (M14-423; NCT02219490).

    Measured: At Post-Treatment Weeks 52, 104, 156, 208, and 260

  5. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Time to Event

    Time to hepatocellular carcinoma was defined as number of days from the 1st day of study drug dosing for the participant to date of hepatocellular carcinoma. All hepatocellular carcinoma was to be included, whether it occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or had previously discontinued study drug. If the participant didn't experience the event of interest nor had died (all-cause death), their data was to be censored at the date of their last available assessment of clinical outcomes. For those with no post-baseline assessment, their data was to be censored on the 1st day of study drug dosing. All-cause death was a censoring event for hepatocellular carcinoma. The event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and incidence estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals. The pre-specified analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma included pooled data from TOPAZ-II (this study) and the companion study TOPAZ-I (M14-423; NCT02219490).

    Measured: At Post-Treatment Weeks 52, 104, 156, 208, and 260

  6. All-Cause Death, Liver-Related Death, Liver Decompensation, Liver Transplantation, Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Time to Event

    Time to the composite of clinical outcomes is the time to the first occurrence of all-cause death, liver-related death, liver decompensation, liver transplantation, or hepatocellular carcinoma. All first occurrences were to be included, regardless of whether it occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or had previously discontinued study drug. If the participant did not experience any of these events, their data was to be censored at the date of their last available assessment of clinical outcomes. For participants with no post-baseline assessment, the participant's data was to be censored on the first day of study drug dosing. The event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and incidence estimates are presented with 95% confidence intervals. Pre-specified analysis included pooled data from this study and from TOPAZ-I; NCT02219490.

    Measured: At Post-Treatment Weeks 52, 104, 156, 208, and 260

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12)

    SVR12 is defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug.

    Measured: 12 weeks after the last actual dose of study drug

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Post-Treatment Week 12 and Post-Treatment Week 24

    The SF-36v2 is a non-disease specific Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises 36 total items (questions) targeting a subject's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health) with a recall period of 4 weeks. Domain scores are aggregated into a Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. SF-36v2 scores for each domain and PCS/MCS range from 0-100: higher scores indicate a better state of health. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

    Measured: From Baseline to Post-Treatment Week 12 and Post-Treatment Week 24

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36 V2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Post-Treatment Week 12 and Post-Treatment Week 24

    The SF-36v2 is a non-disease specific Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises 36 total items (questions) targeting a subject's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health) with a recall period of 4 weeks. Domain scores are aggregated into a Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. SF-36v2 scores for each domain and PCS/MCS range from 0-100: higher scores indicate a better state of health. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

    Measured: From Baseline to Post-Treatment Week 12 and Post-Treatment Week 24

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Total Score at Post-Treatment Week 12 and Post-Treatment Week 24

    The FACIT-F is a symptom specific instrument with a focus on measuring fatigue in a variety of chronic diseases or health conditions. It was originally developed from interviews with oncology patients and clinical experts to assess anemia-associated fatigue. Its 13-item-version assesses peripheral, central, or mixed fatigue with a recall period of 7 days and yields a summed total score ranging between 0 and 52. Higher FACIT-F scores indicate a lesser degree of fatigue. Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline.

    Measured: From Baseline to Post-Treatment Week 12 and Post-Treatment Week 24

  5. Treatment Compliance: Percentage of Tablets Taken Relative to the Total Tablets

    Treatment compliance was calculated as the percentage of tablets taken (presumed as [tablets dispensed-tablets returned]) relative to the total tablets, respectively, expected to be taken. Study drug interruptions due to an adverse event or other planned interruptions recorded on the electronic case report form (eCRF) were to be subtracted from the duration. For compliance to ribavirin (RBV), RBV dose modifications due to adverse events, toxicity management, or weight changes as recorded on the RBV Dose Modifications eCRF were to be used to modify the total number of tablets that should have been taken. A participant is considered to be compliant if the percentage is between 80% and 120%.

    Measured: Up to Treatment Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start12 Jun 2014
  3. Primary completion13 May 2021
  4. Study completion13 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
615 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02167945
Sponsor's protocol ID
M14-222
Acronym
TOPAZ-II
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
18 Jun 2014
Last updated
19 Jul 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333 and Ribavirin (RBV) in people with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection Genotype 1, run by AbbVie at 48 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 48 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All-Cause Death: Time to Event (time frame: At Post-Treatment Weeks 52, 104, 156, 208, and 260). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in