AzTrials
AzTrials

Hernia of Abdominal WallBASE cohortNCT02168231

Abdominal Wall Repair With Strattice in Germany: a Cohort Study

An observational study of Hernia of Abdominal Wall and Biologic Mesh, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 6 sites in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication in surgery causing much morbidity and even mortality in patients. Despite studies on the optimal closing technique for laparotomies, the risk for incisional hernia after midline incision remains about 5-20%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hernia of Abdominal Wall, Biologic Mesh, Strattice
What is being tested?
Complex abdominal wall repair Strattice
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
80 participants
Where
6 sitesGermany
Study dates
1 Feb 2017to 31 Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients operated by members of the ROKI group (Arbeitsgruppe für Rekonstruktion komplexer Inzisionaler Hernien); i.e. a group of German hernia surgeons using Strattice for complex abdominal wall surgery. This group of surgeons is willing to share their patient cases with the investigators to achieve more knowledge on this delicate topic.

Who may be able to join

  • Age of 18 years or older
  • Signed informed consent
  • Abdominal wall repair
  • Strattice mesh implantation prior to inclusion in BASE cohort

Who cannot join

  • Age under 18 years
  • No signed informed consent
  • Other operation than abdominal wall repair
  • Other mesh than Strattice mesh

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

Germany6 sites
  • Trauma Hospital Berlin

    Berlin

  • Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University

    Frankfurt am Main

  • Diakoniekrankenhaus Friederikenstiftung

    Hanover

  • Agatharied Hospital

    Hausham

  • Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich

    München

  • St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden

    Wiesbaden

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Abdominal Wall Repair With Strattice in Germany: a Cohort Study (BASE Cohort)

Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication in surgery causing much morbidity and even mortality in patients. Despite studies on the optimal closing technique for laparotomies, the risk for incisional hernia after midline incision remains about 5-20%. It has been established that implementing a mesh reduces recurrence of the incisional hernia but still the results of repair are often disappointing. Incisional hernias can become increasingly complex due to complicated abdominal wall defects caused by a disturbed anatomy, fistulas, burst abdomen, wound and mesh infections. In these cases it is not save to repair the incisional hernia by means of a synthetic mesh and other augmentation tools need to be implemented.

In the recent years the use of biological meshes has been gaining popularity. Recent reports of the use of collagen-based prosthesis have suggested that they support new vessel growth, do not excite a significant foreign body reaction, form fewer adhesions, are well incorporated into host tissues with minimal wound contraction, and can be used in grossly contaminated wounds with fewer infective complications. Biologic meshes are harvested from a source tissue and processed for medical use but they vary widely in their processing methods. They include tissues of human or animal origins, both chemically cross-linked and non cross-linked processes, and submucosal, pericardial, or dermal tissue sources. Current studies investigating the effectiveness of these meshes are small and have short periods of follow-up. These shortcomings can be explained to high cost of the meshes and unclear indication when to use a biological mesh.

The aim of this study is to investigate the short and long term effects of the Strattice biological mesh. The investigators will also inquire why a biologic mesh was used and what the direct and indirect costs were.

Being tested
Complex abdominal wall repair Strattice
Keywords
Complex abdominal wall hernia, Biologic mesh, Strattice
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Abdominal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Complex abdominal wall repair StratticeProcedure or surgery

    Also called Strattice, Porcine accelular dermal matrix, Non-cross-linked biologic mesh

    Not applicable (cross-sectional data from a cohort selected after initial complex abdominal wall surgery with Strattice)

Study groups in NCT02168231
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Complex abdominal wall repair StratticeComplex abdominal wall repair Strattice
Receives: Procedure: Complex abdominal wall repair Strattice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incisional hernia recurrence

    This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient, and performing physical examination.

    Measured: At one year after initial operation

  2. Postoperative complications

    All postoperative complications and their treatment will be registered.

    Measured: Postoperatively, until one year after initial operation

  3. Survival

    Any decease postoperatively

    Measured: Postoperatively; until three years after initial operation

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. EHS incisional hernia classification

    Classification according to Ventral Hernia Working Group classification (Breuing et al. Surgery 2010; 148(3): 544-58).

    Measured: Perioperatively (noted just before or just after operation)

  2. Mesh explantations

    Strattice mesh explantation after operation

    Measured: Postoperatively; until three years after initial operation

  3. Additional "abdominal wall repair" operations

    Additional "abdominal wall (hernia) repair" operations after initial implantation of Strattice

    Measured: Postoperatively; until three years after initial operation

  4. Indication of Strattice usage

    Defined as preoperative conditions that influenced the decision (for instance: presence of stoma, fistulas, abscesses, etc.)

    Measured: Perioperatively (noted just before or just after operation)

  5. Quality of Life (questionnaire-based)

    Measured with questionnaires (SF-36, EQ-5D-5L, BIQ)

    Measured: Postoperatively; measured at one, two and three years after initial operation

  6. Health economic analysis

    Various cost-related parameters

    Measured: Postoperatively; until one year after initial operation

  7. Incisional hernia recurrence

    This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient, and performing physical examination.

    Measured: At two and three years after initial operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02168231
Sponsor's protocol ID
BASE cohort study
Acronym
BASE cohort
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
12 Jun 2014
Last updated
7 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kaufmann R, Isemer FE, Strey CW, Jeekel J, Lange JF, Woeste G. Non-cross-linked biological mesh in complex abdominal wall hernia: a cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 May;405(3):345-352. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01881-4. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

    PubMed 32323007

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hernia of Abdominal Wall and Biologic Mesh, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 6 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incisional hernia recurrence (time frame: At one year after initial operation). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02168231, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in