Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 3ARTC-HCCNCT02169765
HR Versus RFA for Early Stage HCC
A Phase 3 study testing Hepatic resection and Radiofrequency ablation in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Cancer, run by Guangxi Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading death cancer in the world. It is important to explore a safe and effective therapy for early-stage HCC. Previous studies reported that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has higher efficacy and is associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than hepatic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Hepatic resection and Radiofrequency ablation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2020to 30 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-75 years
- Clinical diagnosis of HCC was confirmed by histopathological examination of surgical samples in all patients
- Tumor stage fitted into Milan Criteria
- Patients have Child-Pugh A liver function
- No previous neoadjuvant treatment
- No evidence of metastasis to the lymph nodes and/or distant metastases on the basis of preoperative imaging results and perioperative findings
- No malignancy other than HCC for 5 years prior to the initial HCC treatment
- No history of encephalopathy, ascites refractory to diuretics or variceal bleeding
Who cannot join
- History of cardiac disease:
- Congestive heart failure > New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2; active coronary artery disease (myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is permitted);
- Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy other than beta blockers, calcium channel blocker or digoxin; or
- Uncontrolled hypertension (failure of diastolic blood pressure to fall below 90 mmHg, despite the use of 3 antihypertensive drugs).
- Active clinically serious infections ( > grade 2 National Cancer Institute [NCI]-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0)
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Show all 15Show fewer
- Known Central Nervous System tumors including metastatic brain disease
- Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry
- History of organ allograft
- Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results
- Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial
- Any condition that is unstable or which could jeopardize the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within seven days prior to the start of study drug. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial.
- Excluded therapies and medications, previous and concomitant:
- Autologous bone marrow transplant or stem cell rescue within four months of start of study drug
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor of Guangxi University
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021
Jian-Hong Zhong, MD, 86-771-5330855, zhongjianhong66@163.com
About this study
Official title: Hepatic Resection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading death cancer in the world. It is important to explore a safe and effective therapy for early-stage HCC. Previous studies reported that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has higher efficacy and is associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than hepatic resection (HR) for early-stage HCC. However, meta-analysis and systematic review found that RFA is associated with higher recurrence rate and lower long-term overall survival.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer
- Being tested
- Hepatic resection, Radiofrequency ablation
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Liver Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hepatic resectionOther
Adequate remnant liver volume was 30% for HCC patients without cirrhosis, and >50% for HCC patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or severe fatty liver.
Radiofrequency ablationOther
Radiofrequency ablation is performed in less than one week after clinical diagnosis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatic resection | Active comparator | Indications for HR were the presence of appropriate residual liver volume determined by volumetric computed tomography and lack of hepatic encephalopathy. Receives: Other: Hepatic resection |
| Radiofrequency ablation | Experimental | Radiofrequency ablation is performed in less than one week after clinical diagnosis. Receives: Other: Radiofrequency ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survivals
Measured: 5-years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Recurrence rates
Measured: 5-years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study start1 Aug 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion20 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Guangxi Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jian-Hong Zhong, Guangxi Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02169765
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HRRFA-HCC
- Other IDs
- HRRFA-HCC
- Acronym
- ARTC-HCC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Cho YK, Rhim H, Noh S. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection as primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Sep;26(9):1354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06812.x.
PubMed 21679247Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, Cescon M, Colecchia A, Ercolani G, Bolondi L, Pinna AD. Cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2013 Aug;59(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
PubMed 23603669Duan C, Liu M, Zhang Z, Ma K, Bie P. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma meeting Milan criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug 13;11(1):190. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-190.
PubMed 23941614Wang Y, Luo Q, Li Y, Deng S, Wei S, Li X. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 3;9(1):e84484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084484. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24404166Cho YK, Kim JK, Kim WT, Chung JW. Hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model analysis. Hepatology. 2010 Apr;51(4):1284-90. doi: 10.1002/hep.23466.
PubMed 20099299
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hepatic Resection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02169765
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARTC-HCC / HRRFA-HCC
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Guangxi Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading death cancer in the world. It is important to explore a safe and effective therapy for early-stage HCC. Previous studies reported that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has higher efficacy and is associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than hepatic resection (HR) for early-stage HCC. However, meta-analysis and systematic review found that RFA is associated with higher recurrence rate and lower long-term overall survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatic resection | Active comparator | Other: Hepatic resectionIndications for HR were the presence of appropriate residual liver volume determined by volumetric computed tomography and lack of hepatic encephalopathy. |
| Radiofrequency ablation | Experimental | Other: Radiofrequency ablationRadiofrequency ablation is performed in less than one week after clinical diagnosis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 18-75 years
- Clinical diagnosis of HCC was confirmed by histopathological examination of surgical samples in all patients
- Tumor stage fitted into Milan Criteria
- Patients have Child-Pugh A liver function
- No previous neoadjuvant treatment
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- History of cardiac disease:
- Active clinically serious infections ( > grade 2 National Cancer Institute [NCI]-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0)
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Known Central Nervous System tumors including metastatic brain disease
- Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatic resectionAdequate remnant liver volume was 30% for HCC patients without cirrhosis, and >50% for HCC patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or severe fatty liver. | Other | Hepatic resection |
| Radiofrequency ablationRadiofrequency ablation is performed in less than one week after clinical diagnosis. | Other | Radiofrequency ablation |
Primary outcome
Overall survivals
Time frame: 5-years
1 secondary outcome
Recurrence rates
Time frame: 5-years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21679247Cho YK, Rhim H, Noh S. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection as primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Sep;26(9):1354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06812.x.
- Background: PubMed 23603669Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, Cescon M, Colecchia A, Ercolani G, Bolondi L, Pinna AD. Cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2013 Aug;59(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
- Background: PubMed 23941614Duan C, Liu M, Zhang Z, Ma K, Bie P. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma meeting Milan criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug 13;11(1):190. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-190.
- Background: PubMed 24404166Wang Y, Luo Q, Li Y, Deng S, Wei S, Li X. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 3;9(1):e84484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084484. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 20099299Cho YK, Kim JK, Kim WT, Chung JW. Hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model analysis. Hepatology. 2010 Apr;51(4):1284-90. doi: 10.1002/hep.23466.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1 and 2 Study of VMD-102 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Other Solid Tumors
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of BGB-B2033 in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Cancer, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Nivolumab, Fluorouracil, and Interferon Alpha 2B for the Treatment of Unresectable Fibrolamellar Cancer
Stage III Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage IIIA Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Integration of Imaging, Molecular, Pathological, and Clinical Outcome Data in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Radiation Therapy With Protons or Photons in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer
Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Stage III Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v7
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Hepatic resection and Radiofrequency ablation in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Cancer, run by Guangxi Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jian-Hong Zhong, MD (86-771-5330855, zhongjianhong66@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survivals (time frame: 5-years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02169765, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2020.