BradycardiaPREMSNCT02174484
Assessment of Intracardiac Electrograms Transmitted by Home Monitoring for the Remote Follow-up of Pacemaker (PREMS)
An observational study of Bradycardia, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 49 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of the PREMS study is to evaluate the capability of the periodic IEGM feature (intracardiac electrogram) to provide more extensive remote information about cardiac rhythm, sensing and capture, and thus to detect anomalies that may deserve a clinical action. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bradycardia
- How many people
- 571 participants
- Where
- 49 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient implanted with a single or dual chamber pacemaker and with the Biotronik Home-Monitoring® system activated
Who may be able to join
- Patient implanted with a single or dual chamber PM within the last 3 months
- Home-Monitoring activated and functional
- Periodic IEGM "ON" and programmed at 30 days intervals
- Patient willing and able to comply with the protocol and who has provided written informed consent about HM
- Patient whose medical situation is stable
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years
- Patient unable to handle the Cardio messenger correctly
- Participation in another clinical study
Trial locations and contacts
49 sites in 1 country.
49 sites in 1 country
France49 sites
Clinique Axium
Aix-en-Provence
Clinique de l'Anjou
Angers, 49044
CH d'Annecy
Annecy
CH Annonay
Annonay
CH d'Antibes
Antibes, 06606
CH d'Aurillac
Aurillac
CH de Bastia
Bastia
Clinique Saint Vincent
Besançon
CH de Blois
Blois
Cabinet de Cardiologie
Bordeaux
Polyclinique Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux
CH Pierre Oudot
Bourgoin
CH des Broussailles
Cannes
CH de Castres
Castres
Polyclinique Sevigné
Cesson-Sévigné
CH de Chambéry
Chambéry
Hôpital Privé Paul d'Egine
Champigny-sur-Marne
CH de Chartres
Chartres
Clinique Bon Secours
Châtellerault
Polyclinique du Parc
Cholet
Clinique des Dômes
Clermont-Ferrand
CH de Douarnenez
Douarnenez
Clinique du Mousseau
Évry
Clinique de la Marche
Guéret
Cabinet de cardiologie
Le Puy-en-Velay
CHG de Longjumeau
Longjumeau
CH St Luc St Joseph
Lyon
Clinique Clairval
Marseille
CH Montbrison
Montbrison
CH de Nevers
Nevers
Cabinet Descartes
Niort
CH de Niort
Niort
CH Léon Binet
Provins
Polyclinique Saint Laurent
Rennes
CH de Roanne
Roanne
CHU Hôpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen
CH Val d'Ariège
Saint Jean de Verge
Clinique de Saint Georges de Didonnes
Saint-Georges-de-Didonne
Clinique Belledonne
Saint-Martin-d'Hères
CH de Saint Malo
St-Malo
Hôpitaux du Léman
Thonon-les-Bains
HIA Saint Anne
Toulon
Hôpital Sainte Musse CHI
Toulon
HPOP
Trappes
CH de Valence
Valence
Cabinet de cardiologie
Valognes
CH André Mignot
Versailles
CH Paul Morel
Vesoul
CHG Villefranche
Villefranche-sur-Saône
About this study
Official title: Pacemaker Remote Electrogram Monitoring Study (PREMS)
The purpose of the PREMS study is to evaluate the capability of the periodic IEGM feature (intracardiac electrogram) to provide more extensive remote information about cardiac rhythm, sensing and capture, and thus to detect anomalies that may deserve a clinical action.
PREMS is a non-interventional, prospective, and multicenter study. The primary objective is to assess the added clinical value of periodic IEGMs, based on the rate of patients with a rhythm or sensing/pacing anomaly detected on the first IEGM transmitted by Home Monitoring (HM) and non detectable so obvious on the other parameter set offered for the remote follow-up.
- Conditions
- Bradycardia
- Keywords
- Pacemaker, Remote monitoring, Remote follow-up, Home monitoring, Periodic IEGM, Intracardiac electrogram
- Medical subject headings
- Bradycardia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pacemaker recipients | Patients implanted with a single or dual pacemaker and with Home-Monitoring system activated and periodic IEGM activated |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Added clinical value of periodic IEGM
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the added clinical value of periodic IEGMs for the remote follow-up of PM, compared to other HM data offered by the remote follow-up.
Primary endpoint:
Rate of patients with at least one rhythm or sensing/pacing anomaly detected on the periodic IEGM, and non detectable on the other HM data. The anomalies are defined as an arrhythmia (extrasystole, atrial fibrillation or flutter), loss of sensing, oversensing or loss of capture.
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (4)
Planned corrective action
Rate of detected anomalies triggering a planned corrective action
Measured: 1 month
Added clinical value of the remote follow-up
Rate of anomalies that can be identified based on remote data other than the periodic IEGM and comparison with the previous event notifications
Measured: 1 month
Type of detected anomalies
The types of anomalies detected on the periodic IEGM or/and on the other HM data will be evaluated separately (arrhythmia, loss of capture, loss of sensing, oversensing)
Measured: 1 month
Capability of periodic IEGM to fulfil the guidelines requirements
The periodic IEGMs transmitted by HM are designed in accordance with ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines. Indeed, guidelines for a PM follow-up require to determine the current intrinsic rhythm, but also to check the appropriate sensing and capture. The periodic IEGM could remotely provide the same information than an in-office follow-up. So, the capability of periodic IEGM to fulfil the requirements for PM follow-up by ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines will be evaluated.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for BradycardiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 571 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Arnaud Lazarus, MD, Principal investigator, Clinique Ambroise Paré, Neuilly sur Seine, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02174484
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HS057
- Acronym
- PREMS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pacemaker Remote Electrogram Monitoring Study (PREMS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02174484
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREMS / HS057
- Conditions
- Bradycardia
- Keywords
- Pacemaker, Remote monitoring, Remote follow-up, Home monitoring, Periodic IEGM, Intracardiac electrogram
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 571 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the PREMS study is to evaluate the capability of the periodic IEGM feature (intracardiac electrogram) to provide more extensive remote information about cardiac rhythm, sensing and capture, and thus to detect anomalies that may deserve a clinical action.
PREMS is a non-interventional, prospective, and multicenter study. The primary objective is to assess the added clinical value of periodic IEGMs, based on the rate of patients with a rhythm or sensing/pacing anomaly detected on the first IEGM transmitted by Home Monitoring (HM) and non detectable so obvious on the other parameter set offered for the remote follow-up.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pacemaker recipients | – | –Patients implanted with a single or dual pacemaker and with Home-Monitoring system activated and periodic IEGM activated |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient implanted with a single or dual chamber pacemaker and with the Biotronik Home-Monitoring® system activated
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient implanted with a single or dual chamber PM within the last 3 months
- Home-Monitoring activated and functional
- Periodic IEGM "ON" and programmed at 30 days intervals
- Patient willing and able to comply with the protocol and who has provided written informed consent about HM
- Patient whose medical situation is stable
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age < 18 years
- Patient unable to handle the Cardio messenger correctly
- Participation in another clinical study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Added clinical value of periodic IEGM
Time frame: 1 month
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the added clinical value of periodic IEGMs for the remote follow-up of PM, compared to other HM data offered by the remote follow-up. Primary endpoint: Rate of patients with at least one rhythm or sensing/pacing anomaly detected on the periodic IEGM, and non detectable on the other HM data. The anomalies are defined as an arrhythmia (extrasystole, atrial fibrillation or flutter), loss of sensing, oversensing or loss of capture.
4 secondary outcomes
Planned corrective action
Time frame: 1 month
Added clinical value of the remote follow-up
Time frame: 1 month
Type of detected anomalies
Time frame: 1 month
Capability of periodic IEGM to fulfil the guidelines requirements
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2016.
Related trials for Bradycardia
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
RecruitingObservational study
Leadless Pacemaker Registry: Outcomes and Follow-up From the University Hospital of St. Pölten
Pacemaker, Leadless Pacemaker
RecruitingObservational study
Product Performance Report: Evaluate Long-term Reliability & Performance of Medtronic Marketed Cardiac Therapy Products
Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Safety, Performance, and Clinical Benefit of Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Area - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block
RecruitingObservational study
BIO|STREAM.CSP Study
Cardiac Pacing, Cardiac Pacemaker
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arnaud Lazarus, MD principal investigator
Clinique Ambroise Paré, Neuilly sur Seine, France
49 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bradycardia, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 49 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 49 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Added clinical value of periodic IEGM (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.