GliomaPhase 1NCT02176720
Response Monitoring Trial in Patients With Suspected Recurrence of Glioblastoma
A Phase 1 study testing FDOPA PET in people with Glioma and Glioblastoma, run by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
It was previously shown that [18F]Fluorodopa (FDOPA) PET imaging results in intended management changes in 41% of brain tumor patients. However, its impact on patient outcome defined as survival, costs, and/or quality of life has not been demonstrated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioma, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma Multiforme
- What is being tested?
- FDOPA PET
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2014to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suspected first recurrence of a glioblastoma tumor by clinical measures and/or MRI
- Age 18 and older
Who cannot join
- Breast feeding/ Pregnancy
- Severe psychiatric illness
- Primary diagnosis of a glioblastoma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Houston Methodist Research Institute PET Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
Official title: Randomized Metabolic Response Monitoring Trial in Patients With Suspected Recurrence of Glioblastoma FDOPA PET-CT
It was previously shown that [18F]Fluorodopa (FDOPA) PET imaging results in intended management changes in 41% of brain tumor patients. However, its impact on patient outcome defined as survival, costs, and/or quality of life has not been demonstrated. Regulatory agencies require randomized trials to determine the impact of PET on patient management and outcome. In this study we hypothesize that the addition of FDOPA PET will improve patient outcome by more accurately identifying presence or absence of tumor recurrence than conventional imaging.
Read the detailed description
Malignant gliomas are aggressive primary brain tumors that almost always lead to rapid patient deterioration and death. Timely diagnosis of recurrent disease as well as accurate monitoring of therapeutic responses is critically important in glioblastoma patients.
Despite introduction of new treatment approaches patient prognosis is poor with less than half of the patients being progression-free during the first 6 months after diagnosis of disease recurrence (6-month-progression-free survival rates of 46%).
The current diagnostic standard of care for diagnosing and monitoring brain tumors is contrast-enhanced, multi-planar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the ability of MRI for early detection of disease recurrence or progression is limited. Moreover, determination of treatment responses is difficult since benign tissue changes after radiation and/or chemotherapy can have the appearance of tumor recurrence or progression on MRI. Positron emission tomography (PET) is an established imaging technique that utilizes small amounts of radioactivity attached to very minimal amounts of substances (tracers) that are injected via a hand or arm vein. These substances can track certain features of cancers that can be visualized by using the PET-CT scanner. For instance, a number of different PET-tracers have been used to study brain tumor metabolism and to detect primary or recurrent tumors. These include tracers of glucose ([18F]FDG) and amino acid metabolism (e.g., [11C] methionine and [18F]FDOPA). Metabolic imaging of brain tumors with amino acid analogues has advantages over FDG. Since FDG assess glucose metabolism and the normal brain consumes a lot of glucose it can be difficult to detect tumors against high glucose use of normal brain tissue. FDOPA has been successfully used clinically for many years. The advantage of FDOPA is that normal brain tissue consumes very little FDOPA. Thus, tumors can be seen easily against a low background activity.
FDOPA PET imaging detects brain tumors with a very high accuracy and affects the management of 40% of patients. However, its impact on patient outcome defined as survival, costs, and/or quality of life has not been demonstrated.
Randomized trials are needed to evaluate the impact of PET on patient management and outcome. We will determine this by randomizing patients with suspected recurrence of glioblastoma into those who are managed using conventional diagnostic imaging versus those who will receive conventional imaging plus FDOPA PET. Randomization is like flipping a coin. Patients will have a 50% chance to undergo standard imaging or standard imaging combined with FDOPA PET.
Approximately 25-40% of the patients with suspected tumor recurrence will have pseudo-progression on MRI (i.e., the images suggest that there is tumor recurrence when there is in fact no recurrence). These patients will have correctly negative FDOPA PET scans. In these patient initiation of treatment can be postponed. In contrast, patients with positive FDOPA PET scans will undergo some kind of treatment at the discretion of the treating physician (radiation therapy, chemotherapy or surgery). We will find out whether the management and treatment change that is based on FDOPA PET affects the survival of patients and affects the costs of caring for the patients.
- Conditions
- Glioma, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma Multiforme
- Being tested
- FDOPA PET
- Keywords
- Glioma, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma multiforme, GBM, Recurrence, PET, FDOPA
- Medical subject headings
- Glioma, Glioblastoma, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FDOPA PETDrug
Also called FDOPA PET-CT, Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine, Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET, Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET-CT
[18F]FDOPA radiopharmaceutical will be intravenousely injected for PET-CT scanning of the brain.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard diagnostics without PET | No intervention | Standard of care brain imaging modalities, predominantly MRI |
| FDOPA PET-CT | Experimental | PET-CT with administration of FDOPA as an experimental radiopharmaceutical. This arm includes standard of care imaging plus FDOPA PET-CT Receives: Drug: FDOPA PET |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic accuracy compared to standard diagnostics without PET
Imaging findings will be validated by histopathology, clinical follow-up and/or repetitive imaging. If no histopathology within 3 months is available, clinical follow-up and imaging findings will be used for validation. If within 6 months of randomization no clinical progression nor progression on other imaging modalities is found, the patient will be rated as "no disease present at time of imaging".
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Impact of FDOPA PET on patient management
Overall and progression free survival will be assessed according to the standard of clinical care with a minimum follow-up time of two years after randomization. In this study protocol there are no pre-set follow-up algorithms, however in clinical routine a follow-up every three months is standard.
Measured: [ Time Frame: 7 years ]
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Why it stopped: PI left HMRI
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GliomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daniel Lee, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02176720
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00009857
- Other IDs
- 121638, 1013-0158
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan to share data.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Metabolic Response Monitoring Trial in Patients With Suspected Recurrence of Glioblastoma FDOPA PET-CT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02176720
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00009857
- Conditions
- Glioma, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma Multiforme
- Keywords
- Glioma, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma multiforme, GBM, Recurrence, PET, FDOPA
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: PI left HMRI
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It was previously shown that [18F]Fluorodopa (FDOPA) PET imaging results in intended management changes in 41% of brain tumor patients. However, its impact on patient outcome defined as survival, costs, and/or quality of life has not been demonstrated. Regulatory agencies require randomized trials to determine the impact of PET on patient management and outcome. In this study we hypothesize that the addition of FDOPA PET will improve patient outcome by more accurately identifying presence or absence of tumor recurrence than conventional imaging.
Detailed description
Malignant gliomas are aggressive primary brain tumors that almost always lead to rapid patient deterioration and death. Timely diagnosis of recurrent disease as well as accurate monitoring of therapeutic responses is critically important in glioblastoma patients.
Despite introduction of new treatment approaches patient prognosis is poor with less than half of the patients being progression-free during the first 6 months after diagnosis of disease recurrence (6-month-progression-free survival rates of 46%).
The current diagnostic standard of care for diagnosing and monitoring brain tumors is contrast-enhanced, multi-planar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the ability of MRI for early detection of disease recurrence or progression is limited. Moreover, determination of treatment responses is difficult since benign tissue changes after radiation and/or chemotherapy can have the appearance of tumor recurrence or progression on MRI. Positron emission tomography (PET) is an established imaging technique that utilizes small amounts of radioactivity attached to very minimal amounts of substances (tracers) that are injected via a hand or arm vein. These substances can track certain features of cancers that can be visualized by using the PET-CT scanner. For instance, a number of different PET-tracers have been used to study brain tumor metabolism and to detect primary or recurrent tumors. These include tracers of glucose ([18F]FDG) and amino acid metabolism (e.g., [11C] methionine and [18F]FDOPA). Metabolic imaging of brain tumors with amino acid analogues has advantages over FDG. Since FDG assess glucose metabolism and the normal brain consumes a lot of glucose it can be difficult to detect tumors against high glucose use of normal brain tissue. FDOPA has been successfully used clinically for many years. The advantage of FDOPA is that normal brain tissue consumes very little FDOPA. Thus, tumors can be seen easily against a low background activity.
FDOPA PET imaging detects brain tumors with a very high accuracy and affects the management of 40% of patients. However, its impact on patient outcome defined as survival, costs, and/or quality of life has not been demonstrated.
Randomized trials are needed to evaluate the impact of PET on patient management and outcome. We will determine this by randomizing patients with suspected recurrence of glioblastoma into those who are managed using conventional diagnostic imaging versus those who will receive conventional imaging plus FDOPA PET. Randomization is like flipping a coin. Patients will have a 50% chance to undergo standard imaging or standard imaging combined with FDOPA PET.
Approximately 25-40% of the patients with suspected tumor recurrence will have pseudo-progression on MRI (i.e., the images suggest that there is tumor recurrence when there is in fact no recurrence). These patients will have correctly negative FDOPA PET scans. In these patient initiation of treatment can be postponed. In contrast, patients with positive FDOPA PET scans will undergo some kind of treatment at the discretion of the treating physician (radiation therapy, chemotherapy or surgery). We will find out whether the management and treatment change that is based on FDOPA PET affects the survival of patients and affects the costs of caring for the patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard diagnostics without PET | No intervention | –Standard of care brain imaging modalities, predominantly MRI |
| FDOPA PET-CT | Experimental | Drug: FDOPA PETPET-CT with administration of FDOPA as an experimental radiopharmaceutical. This arm includes standard of care imaging plus FDOPA PET-CT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Suspected first recurrence of a glioblastoma tumor by clinical measures and/or MRI
- Age 18 and older
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Breast feeding/ Pregnancy
- Severe psychiatric illness
- Primary diagnosis of a glioblastoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FDOPA PETAlso: FDOPA PET-CT, Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine, Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET, Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine PET-CT[18F]FDOPA radiopharmaceutical will be intravenousely injected for PET-CT scanning of the brain. | Drug | FDOPA PET-CT |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic accuracy compared to standard diagnostics without PET
Time frame: 5 years
Imaging findings will be validated by histopathology, clinical follow-up and/or repetitive imaging. If no histopathology within 3 months is available, clinical follow-up and imaging findings will be used for validation. If within 6 months of randomization no clinical progression nor progression on other imaging modalities is found, the patient will be rated as "no disease present at time of imaging".
1 secondary outcome
Impact of FDOPA PET on patient management
Time frame: [ Time Frame: 7 years ]
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI left HMRI). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2018.
- CollaboratorLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan to share data.
Related trials for Glioma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
EF-41/KEYNOTE D58: Phase 3 Study of Optune Concomitant With Temozolomide Plus Pembrolizumab in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of the Drugs Selumetinib vs. Carboplatin and Vincristine in Patients With Low-Grade Glioma
Low Grade Astrocytoma, Low Grade Glioma
RecruitingPhase 3
Beginning Radiation Immediately With GammaTile at GBM Excision Versus Standard of Care
Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Selinexor, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Temozolomide) for Brain Tumors That Have Returned After Previous Treatment
Recurrent Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype, Recurrent MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Lee, MD, PhD principal investigator
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing FDOPA PET in people with Glioma and Glioblastoma, run by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI left HMRI). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic accuracy compared to standard diagnostics without PET (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2018.