AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-union of FracturesNCT02177565

Autologous Stem Cell Therapy for Fracture Non-union Healing

A study testing carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs in people with Non-union of Fractures, run by Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Do mesenchymal stem cells accelerate new bone formation in persistent non-unions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 76 years
Conditions the study is for
Non-union of Fractures
What is being tested?
carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jan 2000to Oct 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 76 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • An established non-union according to the US Food \& Drug Administration criteria14.
  • Non-union following fracture of tibia or femur suitable for synthetic bone grafting.

Who cannot join

  • Skeletal immaturity.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • Non-union following pathological fractures.
  • Positive to Hepatitis B, Hepatitis-C or HIV.
  • Infection during BMSC culture.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital

    Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7AG

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Do mesenchymal stem cells accelerate new bone formation in persistent non-unions.

Read the detailed description

Do mesenchymal stem cells accelerate new bone formation in persistent non-unions treated with carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs or carrier alone (control). Secondary aims were to analyze predictors of union in these patients and describe adverse events at final follow-up.

Being tested
carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs
Keywords
Non-union, fracture, bone marrow stem cells
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCsBiological

    The non-unions of fractures were stabilized with internal or external fixation devices. The non-union site was clearly exposed and decorticated to introduce sub-periosteal bone graft. Depending on the surgical approach, the site was partitioned in either medial/lateral or anterior/posterior sides. The contents of each universal container were mixed individually with a carrier by the surgeon, who was blinded to the contents of the container

Study groups in NCT02177565
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
carrier plus BMSCsExperimentalcarrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs
Receives: Biological: carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs
carrier alone (control).Placebo comparatorCarrier alone
Receives: Biological: carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Radiological assessment of new callus and fracture bridging

    The primary outcome measure was formation of new callus and cortical bridging, assessed from pre-operative and multiple post-operative radiographs and CT-scans up to 12 months. These images were divided into early (0-3 months) and late (9-12 months) groups. Non-unions were assessed from anonymized slides by four independent reviewers (two radiologists and two orthopedic surgeons) blinded to the side of cell insertion. Each slide had a pre-operative radiograph for comparison but no indication of time since surgery, and showed a medial/ lateral or an anterior/ posterior view depending on the surgical approach . At first, each reviewer indicated the side with largest callus and most cortical bridging pre-operatively. Then each reviewer examined subsequent radiographs to indicate the side with the largest increase in new callus and cortical bridging.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. EQ-5D

    Change in EQ-5D index at 1 year was used as secondary outcome measures.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2000
  3. Primary completionOct 2011
  4. Study completionOct 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02177565
Sponsor's protocol ID
RL1 254
Other IDs
Issuing Organisation
Status last verified
Jun 2014
First submitted
20 Jun 2014
Last updated
11 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing carrier plus in vitro expanded autologous BMSCs in people with Non-union of Fractures, run by Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Radiological assessment of new callus and fracture bridging (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in