AzTrials
AzTrials

Orthostatic HypotensionCHHONCT02179216

Evaluation of the Effect of Hydration About Orthostatic Hypotension in the Elderly. Difference With Venous Compression

A study testing Hydration and Venous contention in people with Orthostatic Hypotension, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 2 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary objective: To compare the decrease in systolic blood pressure between hydration and venous contention when switching to a standing position. Hypothesis in that hydration is better than venous contention. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 75 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Orthostatic Hypotension
What is being tested?
Hydration and Venous contention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jul 2014to Jun 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 75 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient aged 75 and older with orthostatic hypotension proved to 1 and / or 3 minutes.
  • Written consent of the subject
  • Hospitalization or stay expected minimum 3 days
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme

Who cannot join

  • bedridden patient or without possibility of verticalization
  • Patient who can't stand up (pulmonary embolism with high risk)
  • Patient who refuse to participate in the study
  • Patient with legal protection
  • State or condition that may affect the stability of blood pressure during the study (hyperthermia, modification antihypertensive treatments less than 48 hours before inclusion...)
  • Pathology preventing hydration: Heart failure with less than 1 Liter water restriction, swallowing disorders preventing hydration orally, inability to nutrition and hydration orally
  • Intravenous or subcutaneous hydration (intravenous or subcutaneous treatments not included)
  • Patient who can't have venous contention: Blue phlebitis, septic thrombosis, arteritis with score less than 0.6, varicose ulcers during treatment

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Athanase Benetos, Pr contact

0383153322

a.benetos@chu-nancy.fr

Marion Serot Gresser contact

0664524831

mariongresser@hotmail.fr

France2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy

    Nancy, 54000

    Athanase Benetos, Pr, 0383153322, a.benetos@chu-nancy.fr

    Marion Serot Gresser, 0664524831, mariongresser@hotmail.fr

    Recruiting
  • Maison Hospitalière Saint Charles

    Nancy, 54000

    NOEL-RUEF Marie-Hélène, 03.83.17.58.07, mh.noel@saint-charles.fr

    GRESSER Marion, 06.64.52.48.31, mariongresser@hotmail.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Effect of Hydration About Orthostatic Hypotension in the Elderly. Difference With Venous Compression. A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

Primary objective: To compare the decrease in systolic blood pressure between hydration and venous contention when switching to a standing position. Hypothesis in that hydration is better than venous contention.

Secondary objective: To evaluate the effect of hydration on lowering systolic blood pressure during the passage standing in elderly patients with orthostatic hypotension.

Inclusion criteria: Patient aged over 75 years old with orthostatic hypotension proved to 1 and / or 3 min

Read the detailed description

Day 0: confirmation of the orthostatic hypotension, without prevented measures

Two groups randomized :

  • Group 1: First day (day 1), Orthostatic Hypotension test after hydration by three large glasses of clear liquid (33cl). Second day (day 2), Orthostatic Hypotension test with venous contention in the morning.
  • Group 2: First day (day 1), Orthostatic Hypotension test after implementation of venous contention in the morning. Second day (day 2), Orthostatic Hypotension after hydration by three large glasses of clear liquid (33cl).
Being tested
Hydration, Venous contention
Keywords
Orthostatic hypotension in the elderly, Efficacity of Hydration, Difference between hydratation and venous contention
Medical subject headings
Hypotension, Orthostatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HydrationOther

    Hydratation the first day in the arm 1 Hydration the second day in the arm 2

  • Venous contentionOther

    Venous contention the second day in the arm 1 Venous contention the first day in the arm 2

Study groups in NCT02179216
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HydrationActive comparator•Group 1: First day, Orthostatic Hypotension test after hydration by three large glasses of clear liquid (33cl). Second day, Orthostatic Hypotension test with venous contention in the morning.
Receives: Other: Hydration; Other: Venous contention
Venous contentionActive comparator•Group 2: First day, Orthostatic Hypotension test after implementation of venous contention in the morning. Second day, Orthostatic Hypotension test after hydration by three large glasses of clear liquid (33cl).
Receives: Other: Hydration; Other: Venous contention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. difference in systolic blood pressure between sitting and standing at 1 and 3 minutes between hypotension test with hydration and hypotension test with venous contention

    Measured: during 3 days: day 0, day 1, day 2

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. difference in systolic blood pressure between sitting and standing at 1 and 3 minutes between hypotension test with hydration and hypotension test without prevention

    Measured: during 3 days: at day 0, day 1, day 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completionMay 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
110 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02179216
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014-A00695-42
Acronym
CHHO
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
24 Jun 2014
Last updated
2 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Gorelik O, Almoznino-Sarafian D, Litvinov V, Alon I, Shteinshnaider M, Dotan E, Modai D, Cohen N. Seating-induced postural hypotension is common in older patients with decompensated heart failure and may be prevented by lower limb compression bandaging. Gerontology. 2009;55(2):138-44. doi: 10.1159/000141920. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

    PubMed 18583904
  • Tyberghein M, Philips JC, Krzesinski JM, Scheen AJ. [Orthostatic hypotension: definition, symptoms, assessment and pathophysiology]. Rev Med Liege. 2013 Feb;68(2):65-73. French.

    PubMed 23469486
  • Schols JM, De Groot CP, van der Cammen TJ, Olde Rikkert MG. Preventing and treating dehydration in the elderly during periods of illness and warm weather. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Feb;13(2):150-7. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0023-z.

    PubMed 19214345
  • Rutan GH, Hermanson B, Bild DE, Kittner SJ, LaBaw F, Tell GS. Orthostatic hypotension in older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. Hypertension. 1992 Jun;19(6 Pt 1):508-19. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.19.6.508.

    PubMed 1592445

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hydration and Venous contention in people with Orthostatic Hypotension, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Athanase Benetos, Pr (0383153322, a.benetos@chu-nancy.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

difference in systolic blood pressure between sitting and standing at 1 and 3 minutes between hypotension test with hydration and hypotension test with venous contention (time frame: during 3 days: day 0, day 1, day 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02179216, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in