Myofascial Pain SyndromeNCT02179320
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Neurological Effects of Dry Needling in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
A study testing Dry needling and acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm in people with Myofascial Pain Syndrome, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
AIM OF INVESTIGATION: To evaluate in a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study the pattern of analgesic efficacy of trigger point dry needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Dry needling and acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Assymetric shoulder pain (VAS on painful side : VAS on non painful side > 2:1)
- Pain due to unilateral Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the trapezius muscle.
- Chronic pain, with duration of at least 3 months and VAS > 40/100
- Patients with pain at least 4 days in a week
- Patients without neurological pain, as in DN4 score less than 4
- Age over 18 years
- Patients with stable drug treatment over at least 15 days, without any acute pharmacological changes during the study
- Patients who read, understood and signed the Free and Clarified Consent Term
Who cannot join
- Patients with major depression, according to DSM-IV criteria
- History of bipolar mood disorder, panic syndrome or psychosis
- Intermittent pain history
- Refusal to sing the Consent Term
- Patients not able to attend all the follow-ups
- Patients with another pain syndrome in shoulders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-010
About this study
AIM OF INVESTIGATION: To evaluate in a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study the pattern of analgesic efficacy of trigger point dry needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) patients.
Read the detailed description
This study will be performed in patients with shoulder pain due to excess of nociception associated with chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome in asymmetrical unilateral trapezius muscle trigger points.
Patients will be randomly assigned to two treatment arms: Active (A) (n=20) and Sham (S) (n=21). Group A will receive actual treatment with trigger point dry needling. Group S will receive a sham treatment, with the needle inserted superficially in the skin, without reaching the muscle underneath it.
The duration and pain elicited during active and sham dry needling will be controlled for. Patients will be evaluated one week before needling (D-7), on the day of dry needling (D0) and seven days after the procedure (D+7).
Patients will fill out the Brazilian version of the Douleur Neuropathique 4, Beck Depression Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), McGill Pain Questionnaire-SF (SFMPQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Global Impression of Change, and also a 14-day Carnet to more accurately evaluate their daily pain before and after the treatment.
For the evaluation of neurologic changes, we will evaluate local hyperalgesia, tactile, mechanical, static and thermal sensitivity with thermal quantitative sensorial testing (TQS), and also mapping of the painful area, before and after treatment in both D0 and D+7.
- Conditions
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Being tested
- Dry needling, acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm
- Keywords
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome, Dry needling, Clinical Trial
- Medical subject headings
- Myofascial Pain Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dry needlingProcedure or surgery
Dry needling of the painful muscles, with an acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm
acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mmDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needling | Active comparator | Dry needling for myofascial pain syndrome, in the trapezius muscle. Receives: Procedure: Dry needling; Device: acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm |
| Sham needling | Sham comparator | Superficial dry needling in the trapezius muscle Receives: Procedure: Dry needling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Analgesic effects of dry needling
Maximum, average and lowest pain will be evaluated daily 7 days before the treatment, on the day of the treatment, and also 7 days after the treatment is done.
Measured: Within the first 7 days after treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Neurologic effects of dry needling
Tactile, mechanical, static and thermal sensitivity will be evaluated with thermal quantitative sensorial testing, as well as hyperalgesia. The painful area will also be mapped to compara before and after treatment results.
Measured: Within the first 7 days after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myofascial Pain SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao Paulo General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daniel C Andrade, M.D., P.h.D., Study chair, University of Sao PauloJuliana T Toma, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Sao PauloIrina Raicher, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Sao PauloManoel J Teixeira, M.D., P.h.D., Study director, University of Sao PauloHelena H Kaziyama, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02179320
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HC-GDOR-MIOFASCIAL
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 3 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Yap EC. Myofascial pain--an overview. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007 Jan;36(1):43-8.
PubMed 17285185Gerwin RD. Classification, epidemiology, and natural history of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001 Oct;5(5):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11916-001-0052-8.
PubMed 11560806Ga H, Choi JH, Park CH, Yoon HJ. Dry needling of trigger points with and without paraspinal needling in myofascial pain syndromes in elderly patients. J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(6):617-24. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.6371.
PubMed 17718644Cummings TM, White AR. Needling therapies in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul;82(7):986-92. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24023.
PubMed 11441390McCain GA, Bell DA, Mai FM, Halliday PD. A controlled study of the effects of a supervised cardiovascular fitness training program on the manifestations of primary fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Sep;31(9):1135-41. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310908.
PubMed 3048273Giamberardino MA. Referred muscle pain/hyperalgesia and central sensitisation. J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;(41 Suppl):85-8. doi: 10.1080/16501960310010205.
PubMed 12817663Ge HY, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Arendt-Nielsen L. Sympathetic facilitation of hyperalgesia evoked from myofascial tender and trigger points in patients with unilateral shoulder pain. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jul;117(7):1545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.026. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
PubMed 16737848Hong CZ, Simons DG. Pathophysiologic and electrophysiologic mechanisms of myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jul;79(7):863-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90371-9.
PubMed 9685106Hong CZ. Treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006 Oct;10(5):345-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-006-0058-3.
PubMed 16945250Giamberardino MA, Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Costantini R. Myofascial pain syndromes and their evaluation. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Apr;25(2):185-98. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.002.
PubMed 22094195Skootsky SA, Jaeger B, Oye RK. Prevalence of myofascial pain in general internal medicine practice. West J Med. 1989 Aug;151(2):157-60.
PubMed 2788962SOLA AE, RODENBERGER ML, GETTYS BB. Incidence of hypersensitive areas in posterior shoulder muscles; a survey of two hundred young adults. Am J Phys Med. 1955 Dec;34(6):585-90. No abstract available.
PubMed 13268620Hong CZ. Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jul-Aug;73(4):256-63. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006.
PubMed 8043247Ge HY, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L. Topographical mapping and mechanical pain sensitivity of myofascial trigger points in the infraspinatus muscle. Eur J Pain. 2008 Oct;12(7):859-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
PubMed 18203637
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Efficacy and Neurological Effects of Dry Needling in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02179320
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HC-GDOR-MIOFASCIAL
- Conditions
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Keywords
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome, Dry needling, Clinical Trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Study start
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
AIM OF INVESTIGATION: To evaluate in a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study the pattern of analgesic efficacy of trigger point dry needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) patients.
Detailed description
This study will be performed in patients with shoulder pain due to excess of nociception associated with chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome in asymmetrical unilateral trapezius muscle trigger points.
Patients will be randomly assigned to two treatment arms: Active (A) (n=20) and Sham (S) (n=21). Group A will receive actual treatment with trigger point dry needling. Group S will receive a sham treatment, with the needle inserted superficially in the skin, without reaching the muscle underneath it.
The duration and pain elicited during active and sham dry needling will be controlled for. Patients will be evaluated one week before needling (D-7), on the day of dry needling (D0) and seven days after the procedure (D+7).
Patients will fill out the Brazilian version of the Douleur Neuropathique 4, Beck Depression Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), McGill Pain Questionnaire-SF (SFMPQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Global Impression of Change, and also a 14-day Carnet to more accurately evaluate their daily pain before and after the treatment.
For the evaluation of neurologic changes, we will evaluate local hyperalgesia, tactile, mechanical, static and thermal sensitivity with thermal quantitative sensorial testing (TQS), and also mapping of the painful area, before and after treatment in both D0 and D+7.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needling | Active comparator | Procedure: Dry needling, Device: acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mmDry needling for myofascial pain syndrome, in the trapezius muscle. |
| Sham needling | Sham comparator | Procedure: Dry needlingSuperficial dry needling in the trapezius muscle |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Assymetric shoulder pain (VAS on painful side : VAS on non painful side > 2:1)
- Pain due to unilateral Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the trapezius muscle.
- Chronic pain, with duration of at least 3 months and VAS > 40/100
- Patients with pain at least 4 days in a week
- Patients without neurological pain, as in DN4 score less than 4
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with major depression, according to DSM-IV criteria
- History of bipolar mood disorder, panic syndrome or psychosis
- Intermittent pain history
- Refusal to sing the Consent Term
- Patients not able to attend all the follow-ups
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dry needlingDry needling of the painful muscles, with an acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm | Procedure or surgery | Dry needling, Sham needling |
| acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm | Device | Dry needling |
Primary outcome
Analgesic effects of dry needling
Time frame: Within the first 7 days after treatment
Maximum, average and lowest pain will be evaluated daily 7 days before the treatment, on the day of the treatment, and also 7 days after the treatment is done.
1 secondary outcome
Neurologic effects of dry needling
Time frame: Within the first 7 days after treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 17285185Yap EC. Myofascial pain--an overview. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007 Jan;36(1):43-8.
- Background: PubMed 11560806Gerwin RD. Classification, epidemiology, and natural history of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001 Oct;5(5):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11916-001-0052-8.
- Background: PubMed 17718644Ga H, Choi JH, Park CH, Yoon HJ. Dry needling of trigger points with and without paraspinal needling in myofascial pain syndromes in elderly patients. J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(6):617-24. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.6371.
- Background: PubMed 11441390Cummings TM, White AR. Needling therapies in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul;82(7):986-92. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24023.
- Background: PubMed 3048273McCain GA, Bell DA, Mai FM, Halliday PD. A controlled study of the effects of a supervised cardiovascular fitness training program on the manifestations of primary fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Sep;31(9):1135-41. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310908.
- Background: PubMed 12817663Giamberardino MA. Referred muscle pain/hyperalgesia and central sensitisation. J Rehabil Med. 2003 May;(41 Suppl):85-8. doi: 10.1080/16501960310010205.
- Background: PubMed 16737848Ge HY, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Arendt-Nielsen L. Sympathetic facilitation of hyperalgesia evoked from myofascial tender and trigger points in patients with unilateral shoulder pain. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jul;117(7):1545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.026. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 9685106Hong CZ, Simons DG. Pathophysiologic and electrophysiologic mechanisms of myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jul;79(7):863-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90371-9.
- Background: PubMed 16945250Hong CZ. Treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006 Oct;10(5):345-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-006-0058-3.
- Background: PubMed 22094195Giamberardino MA, Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Costantini R. Myofascial pain syndromes and their evaluation. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Apr;25(2):185-98. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.002.
- Background: PubMed 2788962Skootsky SA, Jaeger B, Oye RK. Prevalence of myofascial pain in general internal medicine practice. West J Med. 1989 Aug;151(2):157-60.
- Background: PubMed 13268620SOLA AE, RODENBERGER ML, GETTYS BB. Incidence of hypersensitive areas in posterior shoulder muscles; a survey of two hundred young adults. Am J Phys Med. 1955 Dec;34(6):585-90. No abstract available.
Related trials for Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Objective Measurement of Pain Regulation in Individuals Who Have Received Internet-delivered Exposure-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruiting
Effects of IASTM, Deep Friction Massage, and Sham Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Electromyographical Activation, Pain and Function in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Open-Label Safety Study of AXS-14 in Subjects With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia
Recruiting
Exercise Interventions and Dietary Advice in Fibromyalgia and IBS
Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Recruiting
Whole-body Cryotherapy in Those With Chronic Fatigue: A Feasibility Study
ME/CFS, Fibromyalgia (FM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel C Andrade, M.D., P.h.D. study chair
University of Sao Paulo
Juliana T Toma, M.D. principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
Irina Raicher, M.D. principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dry needling and acupuncture needle 0,25 x 40mm in people with Myofascial Pain Syndrome, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Analgesic effects of dry needling (time frame: Within the first 7 days after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02179320, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2018.