Cervical DystoniaNCT02180139
tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
A study testing transcranial direct current stimulation in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Dystonia is a devastating disorder defined by involuntary, sustained muscle contractions or abnormal postures that can affect any part of the body. Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most pervasive form of dystonia affecting 60-90,000 individuals in the United States alone and is characterized by involuntary twisting of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dystonia
- What is being tested?
- transcranial direct current stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2017to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 21-65 years of age
- Segmental dystonia, defined as dystonia in the neck plus another region is allowed, but CD must be primary source of disability.
- Medications for dystonia are allowed, but they must be on a stable dose for the duration of the experiment. Individuals may be receiving BTX injections, but must be on a 2-cycle stable dose prior to experiment (first SC visit). Individuals who do not take BTX are also allowed to participate.
Who cannot join
- Any surgical intervention or musculoskeletal impairment that would interfere with participation (eg., neck fusion, deep brain stimulation, peripheral denervation)
- secondary dystonia (eg., Parkinson syndrome)
- any neurologic or psychiatric disability that would interfere with participation
- pregnancy
- history of seizure within the last two years
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
About this study
Official title: Optimizing tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
Dystonia is a devastating disorder defined by involuntary, sustained muscle contractions or abnormal postures that can affect any part of the body. Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most pervasive form of dystonia affecting 60-90,000 individuals in the United States alone and is characterized by involuntary twisting of the neck. The symptoms of CD are disabling, disfiguring, painful, and have a strongly negative impact on quality of life, including social withdrawal and depression. At present, there is no treatment that has been shown to have long term benefit in CD. Standard of care (SOC) is botulinum toxin, which temporarily paralyzes affected muscles, resulting in reduced muscle spasms. This treatment has many undesirable side effects, variable effectiveness, is expensive, and must be repeated every 3 months throughout the lifespan. Physical therapy based treatments aimed at retraining posture or stretching dystonic muscles are largely ineffective and not typically delivered as a part of standard of care. There is an urgent need for novel and effective therapies. Emerging technologies, specifically non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), have demonstrated compelling evidence to make a meaningful impact in the lives of people with CD. In this study, individuals with cervical dystonia will be randomly assigned to receive tDCS for 15 minutes daily for 4 days in 1 of 4 stimulation location groups.
Hypothesis 1: One location of stimulation will result in clear benefit with at least 1 standard deviation (SD) improvement in the CDQ-24, the primary outcome measure, at 1-week follow-up.
Read more
Hypothesis 2: The cortical silent period will be the most sensitive measure investigated and will demonstrate significant increase in inhibition as determined by an elongation of silent period in the affected upper trapezius muscle.
Hypothesis 3: The stimulation location determined to be most effective in Objective 1 will produce the greatest physiologic change in inhibition increase.
Hypothesis 4: The hypothesis for this aim is if certain characteristics can predict response to treatment, a strong association will be seen between baseline measure(s) and the primary outcome measure. A thorough assessment of characteristics including: age, sex, duration of symptoms, genotyping for two specific polymorphisms, botulinum toxin history, baseline measures of outcome variables, measures of brain excitability, and genetic testing will predict response.
Read the detailed description
Study Purpose
This study will investigate the use of an experimental research device called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a way to stimulate the brain with potential therapeutic benefits. It works by either increasing or decreasing brain excitability. This is done by delivering a current to the outside of the head. This weak electrical current then passes through the skull and modulates the underlying brain tissue. Genetic factors may contribute to the effectiveness of this intervention; therefore, a saliva sample will be collected to assess the status of two genes: Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E4. Our purpose is to determine the best location of stimulation for tDCS that improves the symptoms and quality of life in people with CD. The results of this study will help to identify alternative interventions for people with cervical dystonia. Brain excitability will be measured using an additional form of non-invasive brain stimulation, specifically by a device called a transcranial magnetic stimulator. By applying a magnetic field to the outside of the head, electrical currents are produced within the brain that can transiently affect brain activity and be recorded though electrodes on your skin. Using this procedure, different areas of the brain can be studied to gain a greater understanding of the brain physiology in patients with cervical dystonia.
Procedures
Intervention: Briefly, non-invasive brain stimulation can be delivered safely and painlessly via different mechanisms with the goal of either exciting or inhibiting the underlying brain issue. In focal dystonia, as indicated above, there is thought to be a lack of inhibition, thus settings are typically used to increase inhibition. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one device that has been shown to be safe and effective at modulating excitation and inhibition in humans and has been used extensively in a variety of research applications for over 10 years. In addition to the potential physiologic benefit of altering excitability, tDCS is a particularly practical technique for use in people with CD, because it does not require one's head to remain still, thus not applying additional stress to the impaired neck.
An investigator will deliver tDCS using a constant current of 2 milliamps (mA) using a direct current stimulator (TCT Research Limited, Hong Kong) via two 35 cm2 saline soaked sponge electrodes. Treatment is 1x/day for 4 days. Electrode placement will be at one of four locations referenced in terms of dystonic head-turn resting position (i.e. if head turns to the left, the primary muscles involved are on the left, so contralateral M1 would be the right hemisphere): 1) Bilateral M1 with cathode to contralateral M1 and anode to ipsilateral M1, 15 minutes (Goal: decrease contralateral M1 excitability); 2) Cerebellum with anode to ipsilateral cerebellum with cathode to ipsilateral side of face, 15 minutes (Goal: increase ipsilateral cerebellum activation which exerts inhibitory effect on motor circuits); 3) M1+cerebellum: M1 will first be 'primed' with anode on contralateral M1, cathode on face, for 10 min, followed immediately by 15 min of cerebellar stimulation as in #2. (Goal: prime the contralateral M1 with increased excitability to engage a potentially larger effect from the following ipsilateral cerebellar stimulation that will be excited to exert inhibitory effect on the motor circuits including M1); or 4) Sham stimulation: electrode placement will be same as M1. Sham tDCS will be applied by ramping down current intensity to 0 after 30 seconds following standard practice for sham tDCS (Gandiga et al. 2006).
Pre-testing (Day1) will occur 10 weeks post standard care (SC) visit, so the participant will be near most impaired level of functioning prior to 12 week visit for botulinum (BTX) injection. tDCS will be delivered on day 1 and each subsequent day for 4 days. Posttesting will occur on Day5 and then 1 week later prior to SC visit (follow up- day 12). The primary endpoint of interest is follow up at one week.
Cortical Excitability Testing: Before and after intervention, single-pulse TMS will be delivered with a figure of eight coil (90 mm wing diameter) (MagStim Co., Whitland, Dyfed, Wales), positioned over M1. The 'hotspot' over the M1 contralateral to the direction of dystonic head turn will be used to collect motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in cervical muscles (upper trapezius) ipsilateral to head turn will be located and marked on the scalp. Various measures will be collected according to established methods to assess cortical excitability by single and paired pulse TMS.
Clinical assessment: Severity of CD will be assessed before and after the intervention. Behavioral measures will be administered by an investigator, blinded to intervention and will be assessed pre and post each intervention and at follow up. The primary endpoint of interest is the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire CDQ-24. This primary outcome was selected because it is a patient-rated, disease-specific assessment of quality of life, which we feel should be the primary issue of concern. Secondary measures are TWSTRS and visual analog scale.
CDQ-24: The CDQ-24 contains 24 items with 5 subscales: stigma, emotional well-being, pain, activities of daily living and social/family life. Internal consistency and reliability is satisfactory for all sub-scales and total score with good sensitivity and high test/retest reliability (Muller, 2004).
TWSTRS. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale is an outcome measure used to rate severity, disability and pain in CD (Consky et al., 1990). TWSTRS utilizes three sub-scores of physician-based severity (0-35), patient-based disability (0-30) and pain (0-20) with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. Inter-observer reliability is excellent (rs=99) and good for disability and pain measurements (r˃0.88). The global severity scale was moderate (rs=0.63)(Salvia et al., 2006). TWSTRS exam will be videotaped for posthoc assessment by investigator blinded to group and testing period.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS). At the end of each intervention session participants will be asked to rate the ease of movement and perceived pain during cervical rotation in the contralateral direction to their head turn using VAS for self-assessment.
Adverse reactions. Adverse reactions will be recorded using established reporting forms.
Genetic Testing: At the last session, a saliva sample will be collected for genetic screening for BDNF and apolipoprotein E4 polymorphisms. We will collect approximately 2 ml (less than one-half teaspoon) of saliva by asking the subject to spit into a tube. It may take up to 30 minutes to provide a saliva sample, however, most people typically require less time (approximately 5 minutes). Collection of saliva using Oragene Discover is non-invasive and there are no anticipated personal risks of injury.
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Being tested
- transcranial direct current stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Torticollis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transcranial direct current stimulationDevice
Also called Transcranial Technologies, TCT Research Limited, Kowloon, Hong Kong
tDCS using a constant current of 2 mA via two 35 cm2 saline soaked sponge electrodes. Treatment is 1x/day for 4 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation | Experimental | Treatment by transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the motor cortex for all treatment sessions with Bilateral M1 with cathode to contralateral M1 and anode to ipsilateral M1, 15 minutes (Goal: decrease contralateral M1 excitability) Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation |
| Cerebellum stimulation | Experimental | Treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the cerebellum at every session with anode to ipsilateral cerebellum with cathode to ipsilateral side of face, 15 minutes (Goal: increase ipsilateral cerebellum activation which exerts inhibitory effect on motor circuits) Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation |
| Combined M1 and Cerebellum stimulation | Experimental | Treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be placed with M1 anode contralateral + cerebellum anode. M1 will first be 'primed' with anode on contralateral M1, cathode on face, for 10 min, followed immediately by 15 min of cerebellar stimulation as in #2. (Goal: prime the contralateral M1 with increased excitability to engage a potentially larger effect from the following ipsilateral cerebellar stimulation that will be excited to exert inhibitory effect on the motor circuits including M1) Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation |
| Sham stimulation | Placebo comparator | transcranial direct current stimulation will be given in placebo form. Sham stimulation: electrode placement will be same as M1. Sham tDCS will be applied by ramping down current intensity to 0 after 30 seconds following standard practice for sham tDCS. Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24)
This primary outcome was selected because it is a patient-rated, disease-specific assessment of quality of life, which we feel should be the primary issue of concern.
Measured: up to Day 6
Secondary outcomes (3)
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale is an outcome measure used to rate severity, disability and pain in CD. TWSTRS utilizes three sub-scores of physician-based severity (0-35), patient-based disability (0-30) and pain (0-20) with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. Inter-observer reliability is excellent (rs=99) and good for disability and pain measurements (r˃0.88). The global severity scale was moderate (rs=0.63). TWSTRS exam will be videotaped for posthoc assessment by investigator blinded to group and testing period.
Measured: Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
At the end of each intervention session participants will be asked to rate the ease of movement and perceived pain during cervical rotation in the contralateral direction to their head turn using VAS for self-assessment.
Measured: Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Cortical Excitability as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Single and paired pulse testing to assess GABAergic and glutaminergic network function
Measured: Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Study was withdrawn due to lack of funding and staff availability.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical DystoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Teresa J Kimberley, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Minnesota
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02180139
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TDCS-2014
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
PubMed 16427357Muller J, Wissel J, Kemmler G, Voller B, Bodner T, Schneider A, Wenning GK, Poewe W. Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24): development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 May;75(5):749-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.013441.
PubMed 15090572Consky, E. S., Basinski, A., Belle, L., Ranawaya, R., & Lang, A. E. (1990). The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS): assessment of validity and inter-rater reliability. Neurology, 40(suppl 1), 445.
Salvia P, Champagne O, Feipel V, Rooze M, de Beyl DZ. Clinical and goniometric evaluation of patients with spasmodic torticollis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 May;21(4):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.11.011. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
PubMed 16427167
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02180139
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TDCS-2014
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study was withdrawn due to lack of funding and staff availability.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinnesotaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dystonia is a devastating disorder defined by involuntary, sustained muscle contractions or abnormal postures that can affect any part of the body. Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most pervasive form of dystonia affecting 60-90,000 individuals in the United States alone and is characterized by involuntary twisting of the neck. The symptoms of CD are disabling, disfiguring, painful, and have a strongly negative impact on quality of life, including social withdrawal and depression. At present, there is no treatment that has been shown to have long term benefit in CD. Standard of care (SOC) is botulinum toxin, which temporarily paralyzes affected muscles, resulting in reduced muscle spasms. This treatment has many undesirable side effects, variable effectiveness, is expensive, and must be repeated every 3 months throughout the lifespan. Physical therapy based treatments aimed at retraining posture or stretching dystonic muscles are largely ineffective and not typically delivered as a part of standard of care. There is an urgent need for novel and effective therapies. Emerging technologies, specifically non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), have demonstrated compelling evidence to make a meaningful impact in the lives of people with CD. In this study, individuals with cervical dystonia will be randomly assigned to receive tDCS for 15 minutes daily for 4 days in 1 of 4 stimulation location groups.
Hypothesis 1: One location of stimulation will result in clear benefit with at least 1 standard deviation (SD) improvement in the CDQ-24, the primary outcome measure, at 1-week follow-up.
Hypothesis 2: The cortical silent period will be the most sensitive measure investigated and will demonstrate significant increase in inhibition as determined by an elongation of silent period in the affected upper trapezius muscle.
Hypothesis 3: The stimulation location determined to be most effective in Objective 1 will produce the greatest physiologic change in inhibition increase.
Hypothesis 4: The hypothesis for this aim is if certain characteristics can predict response to treatment, a strong association will be seen between baseline measure(s) and the primary outcome measure. A thorough assessment of characteristics including: age, sex, duration of symptoms, genotyping for two specific polymorphisms, botulinum toxin history, baseline measures of outcome variables, measures of brain excitability, and genetic testing will predict response.
Detailed description
Study Purpose
This study will investigate the use of an experimental research device called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a way to stimulate the brain with potential therapeutic benefits. It works by either increasing or decreasing brain excitability. This is done by delivering a current to the outside of the head. This weak electrical current then passes through the skull and modulates the underlying brain tissue. Genetic factors may contribute to the effectiveness of this intervention; therefore, a saliva sample will be collected to assess the status of two genes: Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E4. Our purpose is to determine the best location of stimulation for tDCS that improves the symptoms and quality of life in people with CD. The results of this study will help to identify alternative interventions for people with cervical dystonia. Brain excitability will be measured using an additional form of non-invasive brain stimulation, specifically by a device called a transcranial magnetic stimulator. By applying a magnetic field to the outside of the head, electrical currents are produced within the brain that can transiently affect brain activity and be recorded though electrodes on your skin. Using this procedure, different areas of the brain can be studied to gain a greater understanding of the brain physiology in patients with cervical dystonia.
Procedures
Intervention: Briefly, non-invasive brain stimulation can be delivered safely and painlessly via different mechanisms with the goal of either exciting or inhibiting the underlying brain issue. In focal dystonia, as indicated above, there is thought to be a lack of inhibition, thus settings are typically used to increase inhibition. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one device that has been shown to be safe and effective at modulating excitation and inhibition in humans and has been used extensively in a variety of research applications for over 10 years. In addition to the potential physiologic benefit of altering excitability, tDCS is a particularly practical technique for use in people with CD, because it does not require one's head to remain still, thus not applying additional stress to the impaired neck.
An investigator will deliver tDCS using a constant current of 2 milliamps (mA) using a direct current stimulator (TCT Research Limited, Hong Kong) via two 35 cm2 saline soaked sponge electrodes. Treatment is 1x/day for 4 days. Electrode placement will be at one of four locations referenced in terms of dystonic head-turn resting position (i.e. if head turns to the left, the primary muscles involved are on the left, so contralateral M1 would be the right hemisphere): 1) Bilateral M1 with cathode to contralateral M1 and anode to ipsilateral M1, 15 minutes (Goal: decrease contralateral M1 excitability); 2) Cerebellum with anode to ipsilateral cerebellum with cathode to ipsilateral side of face, 15 minutes (Goal: increase ipsilateral cerebellum activation which exerts inhibitory effect on motor circuits); 3) M1+cerebellum: M1 will first be 'primed' with anode on contralateral M1, cathode on face, for 10 min, followed immediately by 15 min of cerebellar stimulation as in #2. (Goal: prime the contralateral M1 with increased excitability to engage a potentially larger effect from the following ipsilateral cerebellar stimulation that will be excited to exert inhibitory effect on the motor circuits including M1); or 4) Sham stimulation: electrode placement will be same as M1. Sham tDCS will be applied by ramping down current intensity to 0 after 30 seconds following standard practice for sham tDCS (Gandiga et al. 2006).
Pre-testing (Day1) will occur 10 weeks post standard care (SC) visit, so the participant will be near most impaired level of functioning prior to 12 week visit for botulinum (BTX) injection. tDCS will be delivered on day 1 and each subsequent day for 4 days. Posttesting will occur on Day5 and then 1 week later prior to SC visit (follow up- day 12). The primary endpoint of interest is follow up at one week.
Cortical Excitability Testing: Before and after intervention, single-pulse TMS will be delivered with a figure of eight coil (90 mm wing diameter) (MagStim Co., Whitland, Dyfed, Wales), positioned over M1. The 'hotspot' over the M1 contralateral to the direction of dystonic head turn will be used to collect motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in cervical muscles (upper trapezius) ipsilateral to head turn will be located and marked on the scalp. Various measures will be collected according to established methods to assess cortical excitability by single and paired pulse TMS.
Clinical assessment: Severity of CD will be assessed before and after the intervention. Behavioral measures will be administered by an investigator, blinded to intervention and will be assessed pre and post each intervention and at follow up. The primary endpoint of interest is the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire CDQ-24. This primary outcome was selected because it is a patient-rated, disease-specific assessment of quality of life, which we feel should be the primary issue of concern. Secondary measures are TWSTRS and visual analog scale.
CDQ-24: The CDQ-24 contains 24 items with 5 subscales: stigma, emotional well-being, pain, activities of daily living and social/family life. Internal consistency and reliability is satisfactory for all sub-scales and total score with good sensitivity and high test/retest reliability (Muller, 2004).
TWSTRS. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale is an outcome measure used to rate severity, disability and pain in CD (Consky et al., 1990). TWSTRS utilizes three sub-scores of physician-based severity (0-35), patient-based disability (0-30) and pain (0-20) with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. Inter-observer reliability is excellent (rs=99) and good for disability and pain measurements (r˃0.88). The global severity scale was moderate (rs=0.63)(Salvia et al., 2006). TWSTRS exam will be videotaped for posthoc assessment by investigator blinded to group and testing period.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS). At the end of each intervention session participants will be asked to rate the ease of movement and perceived pain during cervical rotation in the contralateral direction to their head turn using VAS for self-assessment.
Adverse reactions. Adverse reactions will be recorded using established reporting forms.
Genetic Testing: At the last session, a saliva sample will be collected for genetic screening for BDNF and apolipoprotein E4 polymorphisms. We will collect approximately 2 ml (less than one-half teaspoon) of saliva by asking the subject to spit into a tube. It may take up to 30 minutes to provide a saliva sample, however, most people typically require less time (approximately 5 minutes). Collection of saliva using Oragene Discover is non-invasive and there are no anticipated personal risks of injury.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation | Experimental | Device: transcranial direct current stimulationTreatment by transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the motor cortex for all treatment sessions with Bilateral M1 with cathode to contralateral M1 and anode to ipsilateral M1, 15 minutes (Goal: decrease contralateral M1 excitability) |
| Cerebellum stimulation | Experimental | Device: transcranial direct current stimulationTreatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the cerebellum at every session with anode to ipsilateral cerebellum with cathode to ipsilateral side of face, 15 minutes (Goal: increase ipsilateral cerebellum activation which exerts inhibitory effect on motor circuits) |
| Combined M1 and Cerebellum stimulation | Experimental | Device: transcranial direct current stimulationTreatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be placed with M1 anode contralateral + cerebellum anode. M1 will first be 'primed' with anode on contralateral M1, cathode on face, for 10 min, followed immediately by 15 min of cerebellar stimulation as in #2. (Goal: prime the contralateral M1 with increased excitability to engage a potentially larger effect from the following ipsilateral cerebellar stimulation that will be excited to exert inhibitory effect on the motor circuits including M1) |
| Sham stimulation | Placebo comparator | Device: transcranial direct current stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulation will be given in placebo form. Sham stimulation: electrode placement will be same as M1. Sham tDCS will be applied by ramping down current intensity to 0 after 30 seconds following standard practice for sham tDCS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 21-65 years of age
- Segmental dystonia, defined as dystonia in the neck plus another region is allowed, but CD must be primary source of disability.
- Medications for dystonia are allowed, but they must be on a stable dose for the duration of the experiment. Individuals may be receiving BTX injections, but must be on a 2-cycle stable dose prior to experiment (first SC visit). Individuals who do not take BTX are also allowed to participate.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Any surgical intervention or musculoskeletal impairment that would interfere with participation (eg., neck fusion, deep brain stimulation, peripheral denervation)
- secondary dystonia (eg., Parkinson syndrome)
- any neurologic or psychiatric disability that would interfere with participation
- pregnancy
- history of seizure within the last two years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transcranial direct current stimulationAlso: Transcranial Technologies, TCT Research Limited, Kowloon, Hong KongtDCS using a constant current of 2 mA via two 35 cm2 saline soaked sponge electrodes. Treatment is 1x/day for 4 days. | Device | Cerebellum stimulation, Combined M1 and Cerebellum stimulation, Primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation, Sham stimulation |
Primary outcome
Cervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24)
Time frame: up to Day 6
This primary outcome was selected because it is a patient-rated, disease-specific assessment of quality of life, which we feel should be the primary issue of concern.
3 secondary outcomes
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)
Time frame: Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Cortical Excitability as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Time frame: Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2017.
- Background: PubMed 16427357Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
- Background: PubMed 15090572Muller J, Wissel J, Kemmler G, Voller B, Bodner T, Schneider A, Wenning GK, Poewe W. Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24): development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 May;75(5):749-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.013441.
- BackgroundConsky, E. S., Basinski, A., Belle, L., Ranawaya, R., & Lang, A. E. (1990). The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS): assessment of validity and inter-rater reliability. Neurology, 40(suppl 1), 445.
- Background: PubMed 16427167Salvia P, Champagne O, Feipel V, Rooze M, de Beyl DZ. Clinical and goniometric evaluation of patients with spasmodic torticollis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 May;21(4):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.11.011. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cervical Dystonia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Dystonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion Restrictions in Infants With Arthrogenic Torticollis - A Feasibility Study
Torticollis (Arthrogenic)
Recruiting
Effect of Vibro-tactile Stimulation Intensity on Head Posture in Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study of Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Isolated/Primary Dystonia That Affects More Than One Region of the Body
Recruiting
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Teresa J Kimberley, PT, PhD principal investigator
University of Minnesota
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transcranial direct current stimulation in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) (time frame: up to Day 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02180139, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2017.