AsthmaPhase 3NCT02182505
Safety and Efficacy of Berodual® Inhaled Via Respimat® Compared to MDI (Metered Dose Inhaler) in Pediatric Patients With Asthma
A Phase 3 study testing Berodual® Respimat®, low dose, Berodual® Respimat®, high dose and Berodual® MDI in people with Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.
Trial summary
Study to demonstrate that at least one of the two doses of Berodual® (50 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 20 µg ipratropium bromide and 25 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 10 µg ipratropium bromide, 1 puff t.i.d.) administered via Respimat® device gives a bronchodilator response which is not inferior to that obtained from one… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Berodual® Respimat®, low dose, Berodual® Respimat®, high dose and Berodual® MDI
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 535 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 1998to Jul 1999
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of bronchial asthma according to the ATS (American Thoracic Society) criteria
- Male or female children between 6 and 15 years old
- Screening FEV1: 60-90 % of predicted normal. Predicted normal values will be based on the reference values by Cotes
- Airway obstruction reversibility: FEV1 should increase ≥ 12% over baseline 30 to 60 minutes after administration of 2 puffs from the Berodual® MDI used with the Aerochamber®
- Ability to be trained in proper use of MDI with Aerochamber® and Respimat®
- Ability to perform technically satisfactory pulmonary function tests
- No hospital admission for an exacerbation and stable dosage of all pulmonary medication in the last four weeks
- Parent(s)/legal guardian is able and willing to give written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation. The child is willing to give oral consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with significant disease other than asthma, e.g. history of clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, neurological, hepatic or endocrine dysfunction (e.g. hyperthyreosis). A clinically significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or which may influence the results of the study or the ability of the patient to participate in and complete the study
- Tuberculosis with indication for treatment
- History of cancer within the last five years
- Patients who have undergone thoracotomy
- Current psychiatric disorders
- History of life threatening pulmonary obstruction, active bronchiectasis, lung fibrosis, AIDS (acquired immunity deficiency syndrome) and cystic fibrosis
Show all 16Show fewer
- Severe bronchial asthma with frequent nocturnal asthma attacks or acute exacerbations induced by recurrent bronchial infections several times per year
- An upper or lower respiratory tract infection in the four weeks prior to the screening visit (= Visit 1) or during the 2-week run-in period
- Patients with known narrow-angle glaucoma or raised intra-ocular pressure
- Patients with known intolerance or hypersensitivity to any of the trial medication including excipients
- Patients using oral corticosteroid medication within the last 4 weeks
- Patients using leukotriene receptor antagonists and 5-LO (lipoxygenase) inhibitors within the last 4 weeks
- Beta-blocker medication
- Patients who have taken an investigational drug one month or six half-lives (whichever is greater) prior to the screening visit
- Previous participation in the run-in phase of this study
- Presence of psycho-social factors in the patient and/or relatives which, at the discretion of the investigator, do not assure compliance with medication, procedures and/or protocol
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Berodual® Inhaled Via the Respimat® Device in Two Dosages (50 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 20 µg Ipratropium Bromide and 25 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 10 µg Ipratropium Bromide, 1 Puff t.i.d.) With That of Berodual® Inhaled Via the MDI With Aerochamber® (50 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 21 µg Ipratropium Bromide, 2 Puffs t.i.d.) in Pediatric Patients With Asthma Over a 4 Week Period
Study to demonstrate that at least one of the two doses of Berodual® (50 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 20 µg ipratropium bromide and 25 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 10 µg ipratropium bromide, 1 puff t.i.d.) administered via Respimat® device gives a bronchodilator response which is not inferior to that obtained from one dose of Berodual® (50 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 21 µg ipratropium bromide, 2 puffs t.i.d.) administered via the MDI (chlorofluorocarbon-metered dose inhaler) with Aerochamber® and that the safety profile is at least as good when paediatric asthma patients are treated for four weeks.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Berodual® Respimat®, low dose, Berodual® Respimat®, high dose, Berodual® MDI
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Berodual® Respimat®, low doseDrug
Berodual® Respimat®, high doseDrug
Berodual® MDIDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Berodual® Respimat®, low dose | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Berodual® Respimat®, low dose |
| Berodual® Respimat®, high dose | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Berodual® Respimat®, high dose |
| Berodual® MDI Aerochamber® | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Berodual® MDI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in average FEV1 AUC0-1 (FEV1( (Forced expiratory volume in one second) AUC0-1(Area under the curve between 0 and 1 hour ))
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on day 29
Secondary outcomes (13)
Average FEV1 between 0 and 1 hour (FEV1 AUC0-1)
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1 and 15
Total average FEV1 between 0 and 1 hour (FEV1 AUC0-1)
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on day 29
FVC (Forced vital capacity)
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15 and 29
FEV25-75% (mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15 and 29
FEV1max
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1 and 29
Onset of therapeutic response
Measured: Days 1 and 29
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Measured: pre-dose until day 29
Extent of use of rescue bronchodilator medication
Measured: up to day 29
Overall incidence of adverse events
Measured: up to day 29
Occurrence of application induced bronchoconstriction
Measured: up to day 29
Number of patients with clinically significant changes in heart rate
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15, 29
Number of patients with clinically significant changes in blood pressure
Measured: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15, 29
Number of patients with abnormal findings in physical examination
Measured: Baseline, day 29
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 1998
- Primary completionJul 1999
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 535 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02182505
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 215.1105
- Status last verified
- Jul 2014
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Berodual® Inhaled Via the Respimat® Device in Two Dosages (50 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 20 µg Ipratropium Bromide and 25 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 10 µg Ipratropium Bromide, 1 Puff t.i.d.) With That of Berodual® Inhaled Via the MDI With Aerochamber® (50 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 21 µg Ipratropium Bromide, 2 Puffs t.i.d.) in Pediatric Patients With Asthma Over a 4 Week Period
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02182505
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 215.1105
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 535 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 1998
- Primary completion
- Jul 1999 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study to demonstrate that at least one of the two doses of Berodual® (50 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 20 µg ipratropium bromide and 25 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 10 µg ipratropium bromide, 1 puff t.i.d.) administered via Respimat® device gives a bronchodilator response which is not inferior to that obtained from one dose of Berodual® (50 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 21 µg ipratropium bromide, 2 puffs t.i.d.) administered via the MDI (chlorofluorocarbon-metered dose inhaler) with Aerochamber® and that the safety profile is at least as good when paediatric asthma patients are treated for four weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Berodual® Respimat®, low dose | Experimental | Drug: Berodual® Respimat®, low dose |
| Berodual® Respimat®, high dose | Experimental | Drug: Berodual® Respimat®, high dose |
| Berodual® MDI Aerochamber® | Active comparator | Drug: Berodual® MDI |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Diagnosis of bronchial asthma according to the ATS (American Thoracic Society) criteria
- Male or female children between 6 and 15 years old
- Screening FEV1: 60-90 % of predicted normal. Predicted normal values will be based on the reference values by Cotes
- Airway obstruction reversibility: FEV1 should increase ≥ 12% over baseline 30 to 60 minutes after administration of 2 puffs from the Berodual® MDI used with the Aerochamber®
- Ability to be trained in proper use of MDI with Aerochamber® and Respimat®
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patients with significant disease other than asthma, e.g. history of clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, neurological, hepatic or endocrine dysfunction (e.g. hyperthyreosis). A clinically significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or which may influence the results of the study or the ability of the patient to participate in and complete the study
- Tuberculosis with indication for treatment
- History of cancer within the last five years
- Patients who have undergone thoracotomy
- Current psychiatric disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Berodual® Respimat®, low dose | Drug | Berodual® Respimat®, low dose |
| Berodual® Respimat®, high dose | Drug | Berodual® Respimat®, high dose |
| Berodual® MDI | Drug | Berodual® MDI Aerochamber® |
Primary outcome
Change in average FEV1 AUC0-1 (FEV1( (Forced expiratory volume in one second) AUC0-1(Area under the curve between 0 and 1 hour ))
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on day 29
13 secondary outcomes
Average FEV1 between 0 and 1 hour (FEV1 AUC0-1)
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1 and 15
Total average FEV1 between 0 and 1 hour (FEV1 AUC0-1)
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on day 29
FVC (Forced vital capacity)
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15 and 29
FEV25-75% (mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15 and 29
FEV1max
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1 and 29
Onset of therapeutic response
Time frame: Days 1 and 29
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Time frame: pre-dose until day 29
Extent of use of rescue bronchodilator medication
Time frame: up to day 29
Overall incidence of adverse events
Time frame: up to day 29
Occurrence of application induced bronchoconstriction
Time frame: up to day 29
Number of patients with clinically significant changes in heart rate
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15, 29
Number of patients with clinically significant changes in blood pressure
Time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15, 29
Number of patients with abnormal findings in physical examination
Time frame: Baseline, day 29
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2014.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Berodual® Respimat®, low dose, Berodual® Respimat®, high dose and Berodual® MDI in people with Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in average FEV1 AUC0-1 (FEV1( (Forced expiratory volume in one second) AUC0-1(Area under the curve between 0 and 1 hour )) (time frame: pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on day 29). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2014.