AzTrials
AzTrials

PharyngitisPhase 2NCT02183038

Efficacy and Safety of Meloxicam vs. Naproxen Sodium in Patients With Acute Non Bacterial Pharyngitis or Pharyngo-tonsillitis

A Phase 2 study testing Meloxicam low, Meloxicam high and Naproxen sodium in people with Pharyngitis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Meloxicam once daily dose of 7.5 mg and 15 mg compared with 1100 mg of naproxen sodium in the symptomatic treatment of acute non bacterial pharyngitis or pharyngo-tonsillitis, over a period of 5 days. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pharyngitis
What is being tested?
Meloxicam low, Meloxicam high and Naproxen sodium
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
390 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 1998to Feb 1999
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female aged 18 years or above
  • Ambulatory patients
  • Start of symptoms within the previous 24 hours
  • Patients suffering from acute non bacterial pharyngitis or pharyngo-tonsillitis diagnostic, under the following criteria:
  • spontaneous pharyngeal pain presence greater than 35 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)
  • Pharyngeal pain presence on swallowing greater than 35 mm on a 100 mm VAS
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Pharyngeal and/or amygdaline hyperemia
  • Absence of purulent plaques
  • Negative test for β-haemolytic Streptococcus on pharyngeal exudate
  • Therapy with NSAID (Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drug) is required or recommended
  • Patient's informed consent in accordance with local law and ICH GCP (International Conference of Harmonization Good Clinical Practice) , before inclusion into the the trial

Who cannot join

  • Suspicion of acute pharyngitis or pharyngo-tonsillitis from bacterial origin by clinical criteria; Several impairment of patients condition, indicated by one or more or the following symptoms:
  • Extremely rapid onset of clinical picture
  • Very high fever (>38.5°C)
  • Severe pharyngeal pain
  • Cervical adenopathy
  • Intense headache
Show all 25Show fewer
  • Purulent pharyngeal plaques, evidence of peritonsillar abscess or phlegmon
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to the trial drug or NSAIDs
  • Positive test for β-haemolytic Streptococcus on pharyngeal exudate
  • Therapy with antimicrobial agents prior to start of the trial
  • Chronic infections
  • Infectious mononucleosis
  • Active peptic ulcer within the past 6 months
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding precaution: attention should be drawn to reports that NSAIDs were reported to decrease the efficacy of intrauterine devices
  • Asthma, nasal polyps, angioneurotic edema or urticaria following the administration of aspirin or NSAIDs
  • Concomitant treatment with anti-coagulants (including heparin), lithium or methotrexate
  • Concomitant administration of other NSAIDs (including high-dose > 1500 mg at day aspirin) or analgesic agents
  • Administration of any NSAID during the last three days or analgesics 6 hours prior to the first administration of the trial drug
  • Present treatment or treatment within the last two months with corticosteroids
  • Historically know of impaired renal function (serum urea > 125 % of the upper limit of normal range; serum creatinine > 150 % of the upper limit of normal range)
  • Historically know of severe liver injury (alanine amino transferase ALAT > 2 x the upper normal range limit or aspartate amino transferase ASAT > 2 x the upper normal range limit)
  • Historically know of hematological disorder (platelet count < 100,000/mm3, leucocyte count < 3,000/mm3)
  • Participation in another clinical trial during this study or during the previous month
  • Previous participation in this trial
  • Patient unable to comply with the protocol

About this study

Official title: Double-blind Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg vs. Naproxen Sodium 1100 mg in the Symptomatic Treatment of Acute Non Bacterial Pharyngitis or Pharyngo-tonsillitis Over a Period of 5 Days

Study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Meloxicam once daily dose of 7.5 mg and 15 mg compared with 1100 mg of naproxen sodium in the symptomatic treatment of acute non bacterial pharyngitis or pharyngo-tonsillitis, over a period of 5 days.

Conditions
Pharyngitis
Being tested
Meloxicam low, Meloxicam high, Naproxen sodium, Meloxicam placebo low, Meloxicam placebo high
Medical subject headings
Pharyngitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Meloxicam lowDrug

  • Meloxicam highDrug

  • Naproxen sodiumDrug

  • Meloxicam placebo lowDrug

  • Meloxicam placebo highDrug

  • Naproxen sodium placeboDrug

Study groups in NCT02183038
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Meloxicam low & PlaceboExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Meloxicam low; Drug: Meloxicam placebo high; Drug: Naproxen sodium placebo
Meloxicam high & PlaceboExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Meloxicam high; Drug: Meloxicam placebo low; Drug: Naproxen sodium placebo
Naproxen sodium & PlaceboActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Naproxen sodium; Drug: Meloxicam placebo low; Drug: Meloxicam placebo high

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in intensity of spontaneous pharyngeal pain

    Measured: Baseline, day 3 and 5

  2. Change in intensity of pharyngeal pain on swallowing

    Measured: Baseline, day 3 and 5

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Final global assessment of efficacy by patient

    Measured: Day 5

  2. Final global assessment of efficacy by investigator

    Measured: Day 5

  3. Final global assessment of tolerability by patient

    Measured: Day 5

  4. Final global assessment of tolerability by investigator

    Measured: Day 5

  5. Occurrence of disease systemic manifestations (fever, and general malaise)

    Measured: up to 5 days

  6. Occurrence of pharyngeal hyperemia

    Measured: up to 5 days

  7. Assessment of patient status

    Measured: Day 5

  8. Occurrence of treatment withdrawal due to lack of efficacy

    Measured: up to 5 days

  9. Occurrence of perforation, ulceration, bleeding (PUB) of the upper gastro-intestinal tract (stomach or duodenum)

    Measured: up to day 5

  10. Intensity of adverse events

    Measured: up to 19 days

  11. Number of patients who withdraw due to adverse event

    Measured: up to 19 days

  12. Incidence of significant laboratory adverse events

    Measured: up to 19 days

  13. Occurrence and duration of hospital stay due to Gastro-Intestinal Serious Adverse Events (GI-SAE)

    Measured: up to 19 days

  14. Occurrence and duration of hospital stay due to adverse events related to trial drug administration

    Measured: up to 19 days

  15. Occurrence of an additional visit at physician due to gastro-intestinal adverse event (GI-AE)

    Measured: up to 19 days

  16. Number of patients with adverse events

    Measured: up to 19 days

  17. Number of patients with adverse events related to trial drug

    Measured: up to 19 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 1998
  3. Primary completionFeb 1999

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
390 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02183038
Sponsor's protocol ID
107.193
Status last verified
Jul 2014
First submitted
4 Jul 2014
Last updated
8 Jul 2014
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Meloxicam low, Meloxicam high and Naproxen sodium in people with Pharyngitis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in intensity of spontaneous pharyngeal pain (time frame: Baseline, day 3 and 5). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in