AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseCONTRASTNCT02184117

CONTRAST (Can cONTrast Injection Better Approximate FFR compAred to Pure reSTing Physiology?)

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 11 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic performances of iodine contrast medium and resting conditions to predict fractional flow reserve (FFR). Reference FFR will be measured using standard adenosine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Adenosine, Contrast Media and Resting conditions
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
763 participants
Where
11 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
Jul 2014to May 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications.
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
  • Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding intracoronary physiologic measurements. Operators may exclude subtotal or similar high-grade lesions, which in their judgment may be threatened by pressure wire placement.
  • Known severe left ventricular hypertrophy (septal wall thickness at echocardiography of >13 mm).
  • Inability to receive adenosine (for example, severe reactive airway disease, marked hypotension, or advanced atrioventricular block without pacemaker).
  • Recent (within 3 weeks prior to cardiac catheterization) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in any arterial distribution (not specifically target lesion).
  • Culprit lesions (based on clinical judgment of the operator) for either STEMI or non-STEMI cannot be included.
  • Severe cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction <30%).
  • Renal insufficiency such that an additional 12 to 20 mL of contrast would, in the opinion of the operator, pose unwarranted risk to the patient.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 9 countries.

11 sites in 9 countries

United States2 sites
  • Integris Health

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Stanford University, Palo Alto VA

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

Other trials in United States

South Korea2 sites
  • Seoul National University College of Medicine

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

Belgium1 site
  • Cardiovascular Center (OLV-Ziekenhuis)

    Aalst

Other trials in Belgium

France1 site
  • Hôpital Louis Pradel

    Lyon

Other trials in France

Italy1 site
  • University of Naples Federico II

    Naples, 80131

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands1 site
  • Catharina Hospital

    Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623EJ

Other trials in Netherlands

Portugal1 site
  • Hospital Fernando Fonseca

    Lisbon

Other trials in Portugal

Sweden1 site
  • Södersjukhuset

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

United Kingdom1 site
  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital

    Clydebank, G81 4HX

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic performances of iodine contrast medium and resting conditions to predict fractional flow reserve (FFR). Reference FFR will be measured using standard adenosine. We hypothesize that contrast FFR will offer superior diagnostic agreement compared to resting conditions.

Read the detailed description

We are conducting a diagnostic accuracy study. The reference standard is adenosine-derived FFR. The diagnostic tests undergoing evaluation are resting conditions and hyperemia induced by intracoronary injection of contrast medium. While all these tests give a continuous result, we will apply binary cutoffs for comparison to FFR≤0.8 as the reference standard. Subjects will be selected prospectively from consecutive patients undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications. The paired comparative design means that each patient will undergo resting (baseline), post-contrast, and adenosine-derived measurements. To enhance test integrity, all pressure recordings will be analyzed in a central physiology core laboratory blinded to clinical data and recruiting site.

Being tested
Adenosine, Contrast Media, Resting conditions
Keywords
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Adenosine, Contrast Media
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AdenosineDrug

    Intracoronary or intravenous adenosine to induce hyperemia for reference FFR

  • Contrast MediaDrug

    Intracoronary injection of contrast medium to induce hyperemia for "contrast FFR"

  • Resting conditionsDrug

    Baseline measurement of aortic and coronary pressures

Study groups in NCT02184117
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
All patientsEntire cohort undergoes paired testing
Receives: Drug: Adenosine; Drug: Contrast Media; Drug: Resting conditions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Agreement with binary FFR≤0.80

    To quantify any improvement in binary agreement from resting conditions to contrast medium injection, using adenosine-derived FFR≤0.8 as the reference standard.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Binary diagnostic performance

    To describe the diagnostic performance of resting conditions and contrast medium injection using sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, compared to adenosine-derived FFR≤0.8 as the reference standard.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Continuous relationship with FFR

    To determine the relationship between adenosine-derived FFR and either resting conditions or contrast medium injection using scatter plots (correlation coefficient) and Bland-Altman analysis (bias and limits of agreement).

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completionMay 2015
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
763 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02184117
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC-MS-14-0399
Acronym
CONTRAST
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
2 Jul 2014
Last updated
16 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003 Apr 15;107(14):1877-83. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000061950.24940.88. Epub 2003 Mar 31.

    PubMed 12668522
  • Johnson NP, Jeremias A, Zimmermann FM, Adjedj J, Witt N, Hennigan B, Koo BK, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Barbato E, Esposito G, Trimarco B, Rioufol G, Park SJ, Yang HM, Baptista SB, Chrysant GS, Leone AM, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Oldroyd KG, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF. Continuum of Vasodilator Stress From Rest to Contrast Medium to Adenosine Hyperemia for Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 25;9(8):757-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.273.

    PubMed 27101902
  • Carson RG. A cogent technique to circumvent the use of (some) ratio measures in physiology. J Physiol. 2024 Oct;602(19):4713-4728. doi: 10.1113/JP285214. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

    PubMed 39234878
  • Achim A, Johnson NP, Liblik K, Burckhardt A, Krivoshei L, Leibundgut G. Coronary steal: how many thieves are out there? Eur Heart J. 2023 Aug 7;44(30):2805-2814. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad327.

    PubMed 37264699
  • Johnson NP, Matsuo H, Nakayama M, Eftekhari A, Kakuta T, Tanaka N, Christiansen EH, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Combined Pressure and Flow Measurements to Guide Treatment of Coronary Stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1904-1913. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.041.

    PubMed 34503741
  • Johnson NP, Collet C. Can FFR After Stenting Help Reduce Target Vessel Failure? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1901-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.001. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34503740
  • Gould KL, Johnson NP, Roby AE, Nguyen T, Kirkeeide R, Haynie M, Lai D, Zhu H, Patel MB, Smalling R, Arain S, Balan P, Nguyen T, Estrera A, Sdringola S, Madjid M, Nascimbene A, Loyalka P, Kar B, Gregoric I, Safi H, McPherson D. Regional, Artery-Specific Thresholds of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion by PET Associated with Reduced Myocardial Infarction and Death After Revascularization in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J Nucl Med. 2019 Mar;60(3):410-417. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.211953. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

    PubMed 30115688
  • Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Same Lesion, Different Artery, Different FFR!? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;12(4):718-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.029. Epub 2018 Jan 17. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29361484
  • Kobayashi Y, Johnson NP, Zimmermann FM, Witt N, Berry C, Jeremias A, Koo BK, Esposito G, Rioufol G, Park SJ, Nishi T, Choi DH, Oldroyd KG, Barbato E, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Fearon WF; CONTRAST Study Investigators. Agreement of the Resting Distal to Aortic Coronary Pressure With the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 24;70(17):2105-2113. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.049.

    PubMed 29050557
  • Nishi T, Johnson NP, De Bruyne B, Berry C, Gould KL, Jeremias A, Oldroyd KG, Kobayashi Y, Choi DH, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF; CONTRAST Study Investigators. Influence of Contrast Media Dose and Osmolality on the Diagnostic Performance of Contrast Fractional Flow Reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct;10(10):e004985. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004985.

    PubMed 29042397
  • Matsumura M, Johnson NP, Fearon WF, Mintz GS, Stone GW, Oldroyd KG, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Maehara A, Jeremias A. Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice: Observations From a Core Laboratory Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 24;10(14):1392-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.031.

    PubMed 28728652
  • Gargiulo G, Stabile E, Ferrone M, Barbato E, Zimmermann FM, Adjedj J, Hennigan B, Matsumura M, Johnson NP, Fearon WF, Jeremias A, Trimarco B, Esposito G; CONTRST Study Investigators. Diabetes does not impact the diagnostic performance of contrast-based fractional flow reserve: insights from the CONTRAST study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Jan 13;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0494-2.

    PubMed 28086778
  • Johnson NP, Gould KL, Di Carli MF, Taqueti VR. Invasive FFR and Noninvasive CFR in the Evaluation of Ischemia: What Is the Future? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 14;67(23):2772-2788. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.584.

    PubMed 27282899
  • Gould KL, Johnson NP. Coronary Blood Flow After Acute MI: Alternative Truths. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 28;9(6):614-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.009. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27013162
  • Gould KL, Johnson NP. Myocardial Bridges: Lessons in Clinical Coronary Pathophysiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;8(6):705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.013. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26068287

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 11 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States, South Korea, Belgium, France, Italy and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Agreement with binary FFR≤0.80 (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02184117, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in