AzTrials
AzTrials

Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT02185040

A Pilot Study of CC-220 to Treat Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

A Phase 2 study testing CC-220 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Celgene at 35 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether CC-220 is effective for the treatment of skin, joint and serological manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
What is being tested?
CC-220
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
42 participants
Where
35 sitesUnited States
Study dates
16 Sep 2014to 25 Sep 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Part 1
  • The subject has an established diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as defined by the 1997 Update of the 1982 ACR Revised Criteria for Classification of SLE at screening. The diagnosis is fulfilled provided that at least 4 criteria are met.
  • Disease history of SLE ≥ 6 months at baseline
  • Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must:
  • Have two negative pregnancy tests as verified by the study doctor prior to starting study therapy. She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study therapy. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence from heterosexual contact.
  • Either commit to true abstinence from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting IP, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 28 days after discontinuation of study therapy.
Show all 30Show fewer
  • Male subjects must:
  • Must practice true abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 28 days following IP discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.
  • If the subject is using oral corticosteroids, the daily dose must be less than or equal to 10 mg of prednisone or equivalent during the study; the dose must be stable over the 4 weeks preceding screening and throughout the study.
  • All subjects taking hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine and/or quinacrine during the study must have documentation of a normal ophthalmologic examination performed within 1 year of the Baseline Visit.
  • For subjects not taking corticosteroids, or antimalarials, the last dose (in case of previous use) must be at least 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • ATEP
  • Male or female 18 years of age or older
  • Understand and voluntarily sign an ICD prior to the initiation of any study related assessments/procedures
  • Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements. Pregnancy
  • Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must:
  • Have two negative pregnancy tests as verified by the study doctor prior to starting study therapy. She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study therapy. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence* from heterosexual contact.
  • Either commit to true abstinence* from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting IP, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 28 days after discontinuation of study therapy.
  • Male subjects must:
  • Practice true abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 28 days following IP discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy. True abstinence is acceptable when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. (Periodic abstinence [eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods] and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.)
  • Male subjects must agree not to donate semen or sperm during therapy and for at least 90 days following the discontinuation of IP.
  • All subjects must:
  • Understand that the IP could have potential teratogenic risk
  • Agree to abstain from donating blood while taking IP and for 28 days following discontinuation of the IP
  • Agree not to share IP with another person
  • Other than the subject, FCBP and males able to father a child should not handle the IP or touch the capsules unless gloves are worn
  • Be counseled about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure as described in the Pregnancy Prevention Plan. Concomitant Medications
  • If the subject is using oral corticosteroids, the daily dose must be less than or equal to 10 mg of prednisone or equivalent during the study; the dose must be stable over the 4 weeks preceding randomization and throughout the study.
  • All subjects taking hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine or quinacrine during the study must have documentation of a normal ophthalmologic examination performed within 1 year of the Baseline Visit.
  • For subjects not taking corticosteroids the last dose (in case of previous use) must be at least 4 weeks prior to screening.

Who cannot join

  • The subject has been treated with intra-articular, intramuscular or IV pulse corticosteroids within 4 weeks of screening.
  • The subject has received high dose oral prednisone (> 100 mg/day) within 4 weeks of screening.
  • The subject has received cyclophosphamide, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil within 12 weeks of screening.
  • The subject has participated in a clinical trial and has received an investigational product within 30 days, 5 pharmacokinetic half-lives or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product (whichever is longer) prior to screening; OR participation in two or more investigational drug trials within 12 months of screening.
  • Unstable lupus nephritis defined as: proteinuria > 1.0 g/24 hour /1.73 m2 OR eGFR of less than 60 mL/1.73 m2 CNS disease, including active severe CNS lupus (including seizures, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), cerebritis or CNS vasculitis) requiring therapeutic intervention within 6 months of screening.
  • The subject has New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAG). Subjects may have a positive anti-hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) if the anti-hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) is positive as well.
  • Antibodies to hepatitis C at Screening.
  • The subject has a known positive history of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or HIV disease or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDs).
  • Has a history of an organ transplant (e.g., heart, lung, kidney, liver) or hematopoietic stem cell/marrow transplant.
  • Malignancy or history of malignancy, except for:
  • treated (ie, cured) basal cell or squamous cell in situ skin carcinomas;
  • treated (ie, cured) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or carcinoma in situ of the cervix with no evidence of recurrence within 5 years of Screening
  • Systemic bacterial infections requiring treatment with oral or injectable antibiotics, or significant viral or fungal infections, within 4 weeks of Screening. Any treatment for such infections must have been completed and the infection cured, at least 2 weeks prior to Screening and no new or recurrent infections prior to the Baseline visit.
  • History of venous thrombosis or any thromboembolic events within 2 years of screening.
  • Clinical evidence of significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic disease not due to SLE (ie, cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, malignancy, psychiatric or infectious disease) which in the opinion of the investigator could put the subject at undue risk or confound study results.
  • Presence of active uveitis or any other clinically significant ophthalmological finding.
  • History or current diagnosis of peripheral or radicular neuropathy. Any clinically significant abnormalities on ECG, which, in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with safe participation in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

35 sites in 1 country.

35 sites in 1 country

United States35 sites

  • Emory University School of Medicine

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30303

  • Advanced Medical Research

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Austin Regional Clinic

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Vipul Joshi, MD, PA, dba Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis

    Brandon, Florida, 33511

  • Low Country Rheumatology PA

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • DJL Clinical Research

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Northwestern Medical Group; Department of Dermatology

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • MetroHealth Medical Systems

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44109

  • Ohio State University Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43230

  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • UCSD Center for Innovative Therapy

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Northwell Health / Division of Rheumatology

    Lake Success, New York, 11042

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • Feinstein Institute For Medical Research

    Manhasset, New York, 11030

  • Tulane University Health Sciences Center

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • NYU Langone Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032-370

  • Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research, PLLC

    Paradise Valley, Arizona, 85253

  • University of Pennsylvania Health Systems

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • UMPC Lupus Center of Excellence

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261

  • Univ of Rochester Medical Center

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group Inc.

    San Leandro, California, 94578

  • Clinical Science Institute

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Seattle Arthritis Clinic

    Seattle, Washington, 98133

  • Northshore University Health System

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

    Springfield, Illinois, 62794

  • Arthritis Research and Treatment Center

    Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281

  • University of Toledo Medical Center

    Toledo, Ohio, 43614

  • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor - UCLA

    Torrance, California, 90502

  • University of Arizona Clinical and Translational Science Research Center

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

  • Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials

    Upland, California, 91786

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot, Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Study To Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenetics of CC-220 In Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The purpose of this study is to determine whether CC-220 is effective for the treatment of skin, joint and serological manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Read the detailed description

The study consists of 2 parts. Part 1 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, ascending dose study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CC-220 in SLE subjects.

Subject participation in Part 1 consists of 3 phases:

  • Pre-treatment Screening Phase: up to 28 days prior to the first dose of the investigational product (IP)
  • Treatment Phase: up to 84 days
  • Observation Phase: 84 day post-treatment A total of approximately 40 subjects will be randomized into 4 dose groups with a 4:1 ratio of CC-220 (0.3 mg every other day [QOD], 0.3 mg everyday [QD], 0.6 mg and 0.3 mg on alternating days, and 0.6 mg QD) or matching placebo. In each dosing arm, 8 subjects will receive active drug and 2 subjects will receive placebo. The Treatment Phase will be up to 84 days in duration for all dose groups. Subjects who discontinue IP early and all subjects who complete the 84 day treatment phase will enter into the Observational Follow-up Phase for an 84 day period. A subject will be permitted to reduce their dose one time during Part 1 of the study.

Part 2 is the Active Treatment Extension Phase (ATEP) which is an extension to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety/tolerability of CC-220 in SLE subjects who completed Part 1 of the study. Subjects who complete the Treatment Phase of Part 1 of the study will be eligible to receive CC-220 in the ATEP for up to 2 years. All subjects who participate in the ATEP will receive either 0.3 mg QD or 0.6 mg and 0.3 mg QD on alternating days. Subjects who terminate the Treatment Phase of Part 1 early will not be eligible for entry into the ATEP.

Subject participation consists of two phases:

  • Active Treatment Extension Phase: Up to 2 years
  • Observational Follow-up Phase: One month
Being tested
CC-220, Placebo
Keywords
Lupus, Systemic Lupus, SLE
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CC-220Drug

    0.3 mg oral capsules once every other day with or without food

  • CC-220Drug

    Subjects will receive 0.3 mg oral capsules every day with or without food

  • CC-220Drug

    CC-220 oral capsules 0.6 mg and 0.3 mg on alternating days with or without food

  • CC-220Drug

    CC-220 oral capsule 0.6 mg QD with or without food

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matching oral placebo daily

Study groups in NCT02185040
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CC-220 0.3mg Every Other Day (QOD)ExperimentalPart 1: CC-220 0.3mg capsules by mouth every other day (QOD)
Receives: Drug: CC-220
CC-220 0.3mg Every Day (QD)Experimental* Part 1: CC-220 0.3mg capsules by mouth every day (QD) * ATEP: CC-220 0.3 mg capsules by mouth every day (QD)
Receives: Drug: CC-220
CC-220 0.6mg/0.3mg alternating dose QDExperimental* Part 1: CC-220 0.6 mg and 0.3mg capsules PO on alternating days * ATEP:CC-220 0.6 mg and 0.3 mg capsules PO on alternating days
Receives: Drug: CC-220
CC-220 0.6mg QDExperimentalPart 1: CC-220 0.6mg capsules by mouth QD
Receives: Drug: CC-220
Placebo QDPlacebo comparatorPart 1: Identically matching placebo capsules PO QD
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Part 1 Treatment Phase

    A TEAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) that began or worsened on or after the start of IP up to 28 days after the last dose of IP or IP discontinuation date, whichever was later. Each participant was counted once for each applicable category. An IP-related TEAE was defined as a TEAE that the investigator considered to be of suspected relationship to IP. The severity of each adverse event and serious AE (SAE) was assessed by the investigator and graded based on a scale from mild - mild symptoms to severe AEs (non-serious or serious). A serious adverse event (SAE) was any AE which: • Resulted in death • Was life-threatening • Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect • Constituted an important medical event.

    Measured: From the start of the first dose of IP until 28 days after the last dose or study discontinuation in Part 1; median treatment duration = 12.0 weeks for the placebo, 0.3 mg QOD and 0.3 mg iberdomide QD arms, 11.9 weeks for the 0.6/0.3 ALT and 0.6 cohorts.

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Active Treatment Extension Phase

    A TEAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) that began or worsened on or after the start of IP through 28 days after the last dose of IP or IP discontinuation date, whichever was later. Each participant was counted once for each applicable category. An IP-related TEAE was defined as a TEAE that the investigator considered to be of suspected relationship to IP. The severity of each adverse event and serious AE (SAE) was assessed by the investigator and graded based on a scale from mild - mild symptoms to severe AEs (non-serious or serious). A serious adverse event (SAE) was any AE which: • Resulted in death • Was life-threatening • Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect • Constituted an important medical event.

    Measured: From the date of the first dose of IP in the ATEP until 28 days after the last dose in the ATEP or study discontinuation; median duration of IP was 95.86 weeks for the 0.3 mg iberdomide QD cohort and 60.64 weeks for the 0.6 mg/0.3 mg ALT QD cohorts.

Secondary outcomes (15)

  1. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of Iberdomide

    The area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUCt) was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed.

    Measured: Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.

  2. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Of Iberdomide

    Maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed.

    Measured: Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 at pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.

  3. Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Iberdomide

    Time to Cmax, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed.

    Measured: Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 at pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.

  4. Terminal Phase Half-Life (T1/2) Of Iberdomide

    Terminal phase half-life in plasma, calculated as [(In 2)/λz]. T1/2 half was only calculated when a reliable estimate for λz could be obtained. Single and multiple-dose PK were collected in Part 1 of the study for all dose groups. Iberdomide reaches steady state within 7 days. PK collection on Day 29 was sufficient to understand PK once steady state was reached. As no dose adjustments were made in ATEP, further PK collection was not needed.

    Measured: Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected on Day 1 and Day 29 at pre-dose (Time = 0 hours) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, between 6 and 8 hours and 24 hours after administration of IP.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ≥4 Points Reduction From Baseline in Hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment SLE Disease Activity Index Score (SELENA SLEDAI) During the ATEP by Time Point

    The SELENA SLEDAI score measures SLE disease activity through assessment of 24 lupus descriptors/manifestations. Each descriptor (clinical or lab values) receives a positive score if it is present over the previous assessment period; a score of '0' indicates inactive disease while a positive score (from 1 to 8 based on the relative importance of each descriptor in the total scoring) indicates disease activity. The SELENA SLEDAI score is the sum of all 24 descriptors' scores for the assessment period. The SELENA SLEDAI score can range from '0' (no SLE disease activity) to a maximum theoretical score of 105 (maximum SLE disease activity). The higher the SELENA SLEDAI score the greater of SLE disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  6. Change From Baseline in the Hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA SLEDAI) During the ATEP by Time Point

    The SELENA SLEDAI score measures SLE disease activity through assessment of 24 lupus descriptors/manifestations. Each descriptor (clinical or lab values) receives a positive score if it is present over the previous assessment period; a score of '0' indicates inactive disease while a positive score (from 1 to 8 based on the relative importance of each descriptor in the total scoring) indicates disease activity. The SELENA SLEDAI score is the sum of all 24 descriptors' scores for the assessment period. The SELENA SLEDAI score can range from '0' (no SLE disease activity) to a maximum theoretical score of 105 (maximum SLE disease activity). The higher the SELENA SLEDAI score the greater of SLE disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  7. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count During the ATEP by Time Point

    Joint swelling was noted as present or absent. Forty-four joints were assessed for swelling, including the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were included in this joint count.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  8. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count During the ATEP by Time Point

    Joint tenderness was noted as present or absent. Forty-four joints were assessed for swelling, including the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were included in this joint count.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score During the ATEP by Time Point

    The CLASI Activity Score ranges from 0 to 70. To generate the activity score erythema is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (dark red; purple/violaceous/crusted/hemorrhagic) and scale/hypertrophy are scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 2 (verrucous/hypertrophic). Both the erythema and scale/hypertrophy scores are assessed in 13 different anatomical locations. In addition, the presence of mucous membrane lesions is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 1 (lesion or ulceration), the occurrence of recent hair loss is captured (1=yes; 0=no) and nonscarring alopecia is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (focal or patchy in more than one quadrant). To calculate the CLASI activity score, all scores for erythema, scale/hypertrophy, mucous membrane lesions and alopecia are added together. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. The higher the score, the greater the cutaneous disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  10. Change From Baseline in the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score During the ATEP by Time Point

    The physician's global assessment was administered by the treating physician and was used to gauge the participants overall state of health. The instrument uses a visual analogue scale with scores between 0 and 3 to indicate worsening of disease. The scoring is as follows:

    • 0 = none
    • 1 = mild disease
    • 2 = moderate disease
    • 3 = severe disease

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  11. Change From Baseline in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Global Score During the ATEP by Time Point

    The BILAG-2004 index measures clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 9 domains (constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, renal, and hematologic). BILAG A represents the most active disease or severe disease; BILAG B represents intermediate activity or moderate disease; BILAG C represents stable mild disease; BILAG D represents organ system previously affected but now inactive; and BILAG E represents organ system never involved. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 9 domains. The theoretical range spans from 0 (no activity) to 13 active or severe disease activity BILAG. A higher score means more severe disease activity while a lower score means lower disease activity (or no disease activity for score of zero).

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  12. Change From Baseline in the Pericardial/Pleuritic Pain Scale During ATEP by Time Poimt

    The pericardial/pleuritic pain scale was scored using numerical values of 1 through 10 with 1 representing 'no pain' and 10 representing 'worst possible pain'. These were self-administered by the participants and gauged the severity of their SLE pain related to pericardial and pleuritic discomfort. Any indication from participants or study assessments, aside from pain, which indicated clinically significant pericardial or pleuritic manifestations of SLE was thoroughly investigated; if clinically significant SLE related complications were found, the participants was to be discontinued from the study and entered into the Observational Follow-up Period and treated appropriately.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  13. Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS) During the ATEP by Time Point

    The Fatigue VAS evaluates SLE-related fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale. The Fatigue VAS allowed the participant to indicate the degree of SLE-related fatigue by placing an "X" representing how they feel, along a visual analog line that extends between two extremes (e.g., from not at all tired to extremely tired) over the previous week. A decrease in the fatigue VAS indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  14. Change From Baseline in the Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Damage Score During the ATEP by Time Point

    The CLASI Activity Score ranges from 0 to 70. To generate the activity score erythema is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (dark red; purple/violaceous/crusted/hemorrhagic) and scale/hypertrophy are scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 2 (verrucous/hypertrophic). Both the erythema and scale/hypertrophy scores are assessed in 13 different anatomical locations. In addition, the presence of mucous membrane lesions is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 1 (lesion or ulceration), the occurrence of recent hair loss is captured (1=yes; 0=no) and nonscarring alopecia is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (focal or patchy in more than one quadrant). To calculate the CLASI activity score, all scores for erythema, scale/hypertrophy, mucous membrane lesions and alopecia are added together. Composite scores are calculated by summing the individual component scores. The higher the score, the greater the cutaneous disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

  15. Change From Baseline in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLICC/ACR SLE) Damage Index Score During the ATEP by Time Point

    SLICC/ACR score or damage index is a measure of cumulative damage due to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Damage is defined as nonreversible change (not related to active inflammation) occurring since onset of lupus, ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. Damage is defined for 12 separate organ systems: ocular (range 0-2), neuropsychiatric (0-6), renal (0-3), pulmonary (0-5), cardiovascular (0-6), peripheral vascular (0-5), gastrointestinal (0-6), musculoskeletal (0-7), skin (0-3), endocrine (diabetes) (0-1), gonadal (0-1) and malignancies (0-2). A score of 0=no damage, early damage is defined as ≥1. The total maximum score is 47, and increasing score indicates increasing disease damage severity.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and follow-up at Week 100 during the ATEP.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Sep 2014
  3. Primary completion25 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion25 Sep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02185040
Sponsor's protocol ID
CC-220-SLE-001
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
7 Jul 2014
Last updated
19 Mar 2020
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.

    PubMed 33687069

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing CC-220 in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Celgene at 35 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 30 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 35 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Part 1 Treatment Phase (time frame: From the start of the first dose of IP until 28 days after the last dose or study discontinuation in Part 1; median treatment duration = 12.0 weeks for the placebo, 0.3 mg QOD and 0.3 mg iberdomide QD arms, 11.9 weeks for the 0.6/0.3 ALT and 0.6 cohorts.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02185040, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2020.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in