AzTrials
AzTrials

Rhegmatogenous Retinal DetachmentNCT02185469

Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss After Pneumatic Retinopexy for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

A study testing Pneumatic retinopexy, vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) in people with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There are multiple ways to treat retinal detachment, the aim of this study is to compare the amount of corneal endothelial cell loss after pneumatic retinopexy in comparison to vitrectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
What is being tested?
Pneumatic retinopexy, vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jul 2014to Jul 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age more than 18 years old.
  • Patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment undergoing pneumatic retinopexy and pars plana vitrectomy.
  • Patients on which specular microscopy and IOLMaster® can be performed without delaying their treatment (availability of a qualified operator).
  • Decision makers able to give informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to attend follow-up visits.
  • History of previous intraocular surgery in surgical eye, except cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.
  • Aphakia in surgical eye.
  • Presence of an anterior chamber intraocular lens in surgical eye.
  • Need for cryotherapy to treat the retinal break.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Charlene Muller, RN, PHN,CCRP contact

416-480-5091

charlene.muller@sunnybrook.ca

Canada1 site
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

    Charlene Muller, RN, PHN,CCRP, 416-480-5091, charlene.muller@sunnybrook.ca

    Peter Kertes, MD, CM, FRCSC

Other trials in Canada

About this study

There are multiple ways to treat retinal detachment, the aim of this study is to compare the amount of corneal endothelial cell loss after pneumatic retinopexy in comparison to vitrectomy.

Read the detailed description

Retinal detachment is a separation of the neurosensory retina from the retinal pigment epithelium. The most common form is rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, which occurs as the result of a full-thickness retinal break. There are three major techniques available to repair the detachment: scleral buckling, primary vitrectomy, and pneumatic retinopexy. At our institution, pneumatic retinopexy is the technique most commonly employed for primary repair. Pneumatic retinopexy is a minimally invasive surgery that involves injection of an intravitreal gas bubble to tamponade the causative retinal tear(s) and cryotherapy or laser photocoagulation to create a permanent chorioretinal adhesion.

Endothelial cells pumping function is essential to keep the cornea in a relatively dehydrated state that allows optical clarity. Corneal endothelial damage has been associated with almost all types of intraocular surgery. Cell loss due to vitrectomy in phakic eyes varies between 0.4 and 2.8%. , , , , During pars plana vitrectomy, all manipulation take place in the vitreous cavity; a certain distance from the corneal endothelium. Cataract extraction by phacoemulsification results in greater endothelial cell loss (4-18%), because of the greater proximity to the corneal endothelium during manipulation and direct damage from the use of ultrasound. To our knowledge, corneal endothelial cell loss after pneumatic retinopexy has never been studied. Corneal endothelium can be damaged during pneumatic retinopexy because an anterior paracentesis is performed before the gas injection. A 5/8-in 25-gauge needle is used to withdraw 0.3 to 0.35 ml of aqueous fluid form the anterior chamber. The procedure is invariably accompanied by a certain degree of shallowing of the anterior chamber. We postulate that endothelial cell damage can result from the direct contact of the needle tip with the corneal endothelium during wound creation and by inadvertent contact during shallowing of the anterior chamber.

A standard method of endothelial cell analysis used worldwide is specular microscopy. Specular microscopy is a non-invasive technique to access the structure and function of the corneal endothelium by permitting visualization of the corneal endothelial mosaic. From the areas of the cornea measured with specular microscopy, an estimate of endothelial cell density can be made.

Being tested
Pneumatic retinopexy, vitrectomy, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), 5/8-in 25-gauge needle, laser
Keywords
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss, pneumatic retinopexy, vitrectomy
Medical subject headings
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pneumatic retinopexyProcedure or surgery

    First, a 5/8-in 25-gauge needle will be used to perform an anterior chamber paracentesis, aiming to withdraw a minimum of 0.3 ml of aqueous fluid form the anterior chamber. Then, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) will be injected in the vitreous cavity. The total volume of gas injected will exceed by 0.3 ml the amount of fluid withdrawn by the anterior chamber paracentesis (ex: 0.6 ml of SF6 would be injected after having withdrawn 0.3 ml). The laser retinopexy will be performed 48 hours later with laser.

  • vitrectomyProcedure or surgery

    Under certain circumstances, pneumatic retinopexy can't be considered as a primary treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In these cases, the patient will be booked for urgent 25 G vitrectomy with intraoperative laser retinopexy and gas injection to treat retinal detachment

  • sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)Drug

  • 5/8-in 25-gauge needleDevice

  • laserDevice

    intraoperative laser retinopexy

Study groups in NCT02185469
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
pneumatic retinopexy groupActive comparatorFirst, a 5/8-in 25-gauge needle will be used to perform an anterior chamber paracentesis, aiming to withdraw a minimum of 0.3 ml of aqueous fluid form the anterior chamber. Then, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) will be injected in the vitreous cavity. The total volume of gas injected will exceed by 0.3 ml the amount of fluid withdrawn by the anterior chamber paracentesis (ex: 0.6 ml of SF6 would be injected after having withdrawn 0.3 ml). The laser retinopexy will be performed 48 hours later with laser.
Receives: Procedure: Pneumatic retinopexy; Drug: sulfur hexafluoride (SF6); Device: 5/8-in 25-gauge needle; Device: laser
vitrectomy groupActive comparatorUnder certain circumstances, pneumatic retinopexy can't be considered as a primary treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In these cases, the patient will be booked for urgent 25 G vitrectomy with intraoperative laser retinopexy and gas injection to treat retinal detachment
Receives: Procedure: vitrectomy; Device: laser

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Endothelial cells count as measured by specular microscopy

    Measured: at 3 and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02185469
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRECC001
Status last verified
Jul 2014
First submitted
9 Jun 2014
Last updated
9 Jul 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pneumatic retinopexy, vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) in people with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Charlene Muller, RN, PHN,CCRP (416-480-5091, charlene.muller@sunnybrook.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Endothelial cells count as measured by specular microscopy (time frame: at 3 and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in