SchizophreniaNCT02187692
The Effectiveness of the Meta-cognitive Training Among Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia
A study testing MCT in people with Schizophrenia, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the meta-cognitive training (MCT) for schizophrenia against treatment as usual (TAU) among patients who attends community support groups. 4 weeks of MCT will be administered for patients two times per week. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- MCT
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- schizophrenia diagnosis accotding to the ICD-10 criteria
- attending local community support groups for psychitatric patients
Who cannot join
- neurological diseases
- substance abuse
- severe psychotic symptoms
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
II Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, 02-243
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness of The Meta-cognitive Training Among Chronic Schizophrenia Patients Treated Within Community Support Groups in Poland.
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the meta-cognitive training (MCT) for schizophrenia against treatment as usual (TAU) among patients who attends community support groups. 4 weeks of MCT will be administered for patients two times per week. MCT consists of well structured cognitive behavioral therapy interventions. MCT will be administered according authors recommendations. All participants will be assessed at baseline (T0) and up to one week after the MCT intervention (T1, 4-5 week of the study).
Read the detailed description
50 patients with established schizophrenia diagnosis will be included and randomized into two conditions: MCT (n= 25) and TAU (n=25). Exclusion criteria are: neurological diseases, substance dependence (alcohol and drugs).
A broad outcome measures will be provided including symptoms severity, cognitive biases, neurocognition, insight and social functioning. Changes in variable after the intervention will be compared between two condition.
Only patients with established schizophrenia with no neurological diseases will be included.
All patients will be assessed at two time points: T0 - at baseline, up to one week before the intervention starts and T1 up to one week after the intervention is finished. T1 assessment will be at 4-5 weeks after the study begun.
Measures
- General functioning General Assessment of Functioning was used as a measure of the severity of patients' functional disabilities.
- Insigh A questionnaire of insight into schizophrenia consists of six items targeting insight. The scale has a good reliability with Cronbach's alpha 0.8.
- The subjective sense of influence on the course of schizophrenia The Brief Measure to Assess Perception of the Self-influence on the Disease Course - Version for Schizophrenia consists of five items targeting different aspects of subjective sense of influence on the course of schizophrenia. The scale has satisfactory psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha= 0.78).
4, Psychotic symptoms The severity of delusions and hallucinations were assessed at the baseline and after the intervention with the semi-structured Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (The PSYRATS). The PSYRATS comprises hallucination and delusions subscale, each design to assess psychological aspects of the symptoms on a five point scale from 0 to 4. The items for the hallucination scale are: frequency (PH1); duration (PH2); location (PH3); loudness (PH4); beliefs regarding the origin of voices (PH5); amount of negative content of voices (PH6); degree of negative content (PH7); amount of distress (PH8); intensity of distress (PH9); disruption to life caused by voices (PH10); controlability of voices (PH11). The delusion subscale consists of six items: amount of preoccupation with delusions (PD1); duration of preoccupation with delusions (PD2); conviction (PD3); amount of distress (PD4); intensity of distress (PD5); disruption to life caused by beliefs (PD6). The PSYRATS has good psychometric properties and have been reported being sensitive to symptoms change over time. In addition the Paranoia Checklist which comprises 18 items, each rated on 5 point scale for frequency, distress and degree of conviction, was used in order to assess delusional ideations. The participants were asked to state if they experience different delusional ideation during the last week before filling out the questionnaire.
- Cognitive Biases. Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis consists of 30 vignettes of everyday life scenarios. Participants are asked to imagine themselves as being in the situation and then choose one out of four cognitive responses indicating specific cognitive biases. CBQp comprises of seven subscales: anomalous perceptions (AP); threatening events (TE); intentionalising (I); catastrophising (C); dichotomous thinking (DT); jumping to conclusion (JTC); emotion based reasoning (ER).
In addition two behavioral tasks were used in order to assess the most prominent cognitive biases in schizophrenia, that is to say jumping to conclusion and theory of mind deficits. In the Fish Task the participants are presented with two lakes with different proportion of grey and orange fishes. In the first lake (lake A) there is 80% grey and 20% of orange fishes. The proportion of fishes in the lake B is reversed. Participants are presented with the fisherman who stands between lakes to catch fishes, but he is allowed to do that only from one lake during the entire experiment. Participants on the computer screen were presented with fishes. Two responses were gathered: 1) the participant should make the confidence judgment by indicating from 0-100% how confident they are regarding the fish is from lake A or lake B; 2) whether the participant has enough evidences for the final decision on the fish is from lake A or B. Two alternative versions of the Fish Task were used for pre- and post-test. We analyzed a number of fishes that were considered by participants for the final decision. The less fishes were considered the more the participant has jumping to conclusions tendencies.
Reading the Mind from Eyes Test (RMET,) was used in order to assess the deficits in the theory of mind. The test consists of 36 different faces pictures restricted to eyes area only. Based on the face expression participant is asked to infer the emotional state of the person presented on the picture. We split the original 36 pictures test into two separate tests for the pre- and post-test. In addition to original test we included the conviction question in which participants responded how confident they are in their decisions (100% sure). The RMET test has good psychometric properties and has been used often in schizophrenia.
- Global neurocognitive functioning Trial making test (TMT) A and B was used to assess global cognitive flexibility. TMT A test is design to test psychomotor speed and attention. TMT B test targets the data on the cognitive flexibility.
All tests will be administered at T0 (baseline assessment up to one week before intervention) and T1 (up to one week after the intervention ).
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- MCT
- Keywords
- schizophrenia;, meta-cognition;, general functioning;, positive symptoms;, insight;
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MCTBehavioural
The meta-cognitive training (the MCT) consists of eight structurized psychological therapy modules that provides basic knowledge about cognitive biases that are associated with schizophrenia and it provides the sklills how to overcome negative consequences of the biases. The MCT includes: Module 1 manages self-serving bias (i.e. external-personal attribution for failure, internal attribution for positive events); Module 2 and 7 target the jumping to conclusion; Module 3 and 7 concern beliefs flexibility and bias against disconfirmatory evidence; Module 4 and 6 target deficits in theory of mind; Module 5 is devote to ameliorate the cognitive over-confidence in false memories; Module 8 deals with depressive thinking style.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TAU | No intervention | Treatment as Usual (TAU) vs meta-cogntive training (MCT) condition will be contrasted. In the TAU patients attend regular day programm that includes psychoeducation, social training, vocational rehabilitation, psychotherapy. The MCT condition is an active condition that includes structuralized therapy modules twice a week for four weeks (eight modules in total). There will be no additional differences in the interventions between two groups. Participants will be randomized from patients from the same population into two conditions. |
| MCT | Experimental | Treatment as Usual (TAU) vs meta-cogntive training (MCT) condition will be contrasted. In the TAU patients attend regular day programm that includes psychoeducation, social training, vocational rehabilitation, psychotherapy. The MCT condition is an active condition that includes structuralized therapy modules twice a week for four weeks (eight modules in total). There will be no additional differences in the interventions between two groups. Participants will be randomized from patients from the same population into two conditions. Receives: Behavioral: MCT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (The PSYRATS)
The severity of delusions and hallucinations were assessed at the baseline and after the intervention with the semi-structured Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale. The PSYRATS comprises hallucination and delusions subscale, each design to assess psychological aspects of the symptoms on a five point scale from 0 to 4.
Measured: week 0
[change] Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (The PSYRATS)
The severity of delusions and hallucinations were assessed at the baseline and after the intervention with the semi-structured Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale. The PSYRATS comprises hallucination and delusions subscale, each design to assess psychological aspects of the symptoms on a five point scale from 0 to 4.
Measured: week 4-5
Secondary outcomes (2)
Cognitive Biases Questionnairre for Psychosis (CBQp)
Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQp) consists of 30 vignettes of everyday life scenarios. Participants are asked to imagine themselves as being in the situation and then choose one out of four cognitive responses indicating specific cognitive biases. CBQp comprises of seven subscales: anomalous perceptions (AP); threatening events (TE); intentionalising (I); catastrophising (C); dichotomous thinking (DT); jumping to conclusion (JTC); emotion based reasoning (ER).
Measured: week 0
[Change] Cognitive Biases Questionnairre for Psychosis (CBQp)
Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQp) consists of 30 vignettes of everyday life scenarios. Participants are asked to imagine themselves as being in the situation and then choose one out of four cognitive responses indicating specific cognitive biases. CBQp comprises of seven subscales: anomalous perceptions (AP); threatening events (TE); intentionalising (I); catastrophising (C); dichotomous thinking (DT); jumping to conclusion (JTC); emotion based reasoning (ER).
Measured: week 4-5
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of WarsawThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Warsaw
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Łukasz Gawęda, Medical University of Warsaw
- Investigators
- Łukasz Gawęda, PhD, Principal investigator, II Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Warsaw
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02187692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MCTPOLAND
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Gaweda L, Krezolek M, Olbrys J, Turska A, Kokoszka A. Decreasing self-reported cognitive biases and increasing clinical insight through meta-cognitive training in patients with chronic schizophrenia. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;48:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PubMed 25775947
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of The Meta-cognitive Training Among Chronic Schizophrenia Patients Treated Within Community Support Groups in Poland.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02187692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MCTPOLAND
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Keywords
- schizophrenia;, meta-cognition;, general functioning;, positive symptoms;, insight;
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of WarsawUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of the meta-cognitive training (MCT) for schizophrenia against treatment as usual (TAU) among patients who attends community support groups. 4 weeks of MCT will be administered for patients two times per week. MCT consists of well structured cognitive behavioral therapy interventions. MCT will be administered according authors recommendations. All participants will be assessed at baseline (T0) and up to one week after the MCT intervention (T1, 4-5 week of the study).
Detailed description
50 patients with established schizophrenia diagnosis will be included and randomized into two conditions: MCT (n= 25) and TAU (n=25). Exclusion criteria are: neurological diseases, substance dependence (alcohol and drugs).
A broad outcome measures will be provided including symptoms severity, cognitive biases, neurocognition, insight and social functioning. Changes in variable after the intervention will be compared between two condition.
Only patients with established schizophrenia with no neurological diseases will be included.
All patients will be assessed at two time points: T0 - at baseline, up to one week before the intervention starts and T1 up to one week after the intervention is finished. T1 assessment will be at 4-5 weeks after the study begun.
Measures
- General functioning General Assessment of Functioning was used as a measure of the severity of patients' functional disabilities.
- Insigh A questionnaire of insight into schizophrenia consists of six items targeting insight. The scale has a good reliability with Cronbach's alpha 0.8.
- The subjective sense of influence on the course of schizophrenia The Brief Measure to Assess Perception of the Self-influence on the Disease Course - Version for Schizophrenia consists of five items targeting different aspects of subjective sense of influence on the course of schizophrenia. The scale has satisfactory psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha= 0.78).
4, Psychotic symptoms The severity of delusions and hallucinations were assessed at the baseline and after the intervention with the semi-structured Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (The PSYRATS). The PSYRATS comprises hallucination and delusions subscale, each design to assess psychological aspects of the symptoms on a five point scale from 0 to 4. The items for the hallucination scale are: frequency (PH1); duration (PH2); location (PH3); loudness (PH4); beliefs regarding the origin of voices (PH5); amount of negative content of voices (PH6); degree of negative content (PH7); amount of distress (PH8); intensity of distress (PH9); disruption to life caused by voices (PH10); controlability of voices (PH11). The delusion subscale consists of six items: amount of preoccupation with delusions (PD1); duration of preoccupation with delusions (PD2); conviction (PD3); amount of distress (PD4); intensity of distress (PD5); disruption to life caused by beliefs (PD6). The PSYRATS has good psychometric properties and have been reported being sensitive to symptoms change over time. In addition the Paranoia Checklist which comprises 18 items, each rated on 5 point scale for frequency, distress and degree of conviction, was used in order to assess delusional ideations. The participants were asked to state if they experience different delusional ideation during the last week before filling out the questionnaire.
- Cognitive Biases. Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis consists of 30 vignettes of everyday life scenarios. Participants are asked to imagine themselves as being in the situation and then choose one out of four cognitive responses indicating specific cognitive biases. CBQp comprises of seven subscales: anomalous perceptions (AP); threatening events (TE); intentionalising (I); catastrophising (C); dichotomous thinking (DT); jumping to conclusion (JTC); emotion based reasoning (ER).
In addition two behavioral tasks were used in order to assess the most prominent cognitive biases in schizophrenia, that is to say jumping to conclusion and theory of mind deficits. In the Fish Task the participants are presented with two lakes with different proportion of grey and orange fishes. In the first lake (lake A) there is 80% grey and 20% of orange fishes. The proportion of fishes in the lake B is reversed. Participants are presented with the fisherman who stands between lakes to catch fishes, but he is allowed to do that only from one lake during the entire experiment. Participants on the computer screen were presented with fishes. Two responses were gathered: 1) the participant should make the confidence judgment by indicating from 0-100% how confident they are regarding the fish is from lake A or lake B; 2) whether the participant has enough evidences for the final decision on the fish is from lake A or B. Two alternative versions of the Fish Task were used for pre- and post-test. We analyzed a number of fishes that were considered by participants for the final decision. The less fishes were considered the more the participant has jumping to conclusions tendencies.
Reading the Mind from Eyes Test (RMET,) was used in order to assess the deficits in the theory of mind. The test consists of 36 different faces pictures restricted to eyes area only. Based on the face expression participant is asked to infer the emotional state of the person presented on the picture. We split the original 36 pictures test into two separate tests for the pre- and post-test. In addition to original test we included the conviction question in which participants responded how confident they are in their decisions (100% sure). The RMET test has good psychometric properties and has been used often in schizophrenia.
- Global neurocognitive functioning Trial making test (TMT) A and B was used to assess global cognitive flexibility. TMT A test is design to test psychomotor speed and attention. TMT B test targets the data on the cognitive flexibility.
All tests will be administered at T0 (baseline assessment up to one week before intervention) and T1 (up to one week after the intervention ).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TAU | No intervention | –Treatment as Usual (TAU) vs meta-cogntive training (MCT) condition will be contrasted. In the TAU patients attend regular day programm that includes psychoeducation, social training, vocational rehabilitation, psychotherapy. The MCT condition is an active condition that includes structuralized therapy modules twice a week for four weeks (eight modules in total). There will be no additional differences in the interventions between two groups. Participants will be randomized from patients from the same population into two conditions. |
| MCT | Experimental | Behavioral: MCTTreatment as Usual (TAU) vs meta-cogntive training (MCT) condition will be contrasted. In the TAU patients attend regular day programm that includes psychoeducation, social training, vocational rehabilitation, psychotherapy. The MCT condition is an active condition that includes structuralized therapy modules twice a week for four weeks (eight modules in total). There will be no additional differences in the interventions between two groups. Participants will be randomized from patients from the same population into two conditions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- schizophrenia diagnosis accotding to the ICD-10 criteria
- attending local community support groups for psychitatric patients
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- neurological diseases
- substance abuse
- severe psychotic symptoms
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MCTThe meta-cognitive training (the MCT) consists of eight structurized psychological therapy modules that provides basic knowledge about cognitive biases that are associated with schizophrenia and it provides the sklills how to overcome negative consequences of the biases. The MCT includes: Module 1 manages self-serving bias (i.e. external-personal attribution for failure, internal attribution for positive events); Module 2 and 7 target the jumping to conclusion; Module 3 and 7 concern beliefs flexibility and bias against disconfirmatory evidence; Module 4 and 6 target deficits in theory of mind; Module 5 is devote to ameliorate the cognitive over-confidence in false memories; Module 8 deals with depressive thinking style. | Behavioural | MCT |
Primary outcome
Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (The PSYRATS)
Time frame: week 0
The severity of delusions and hallucinations were assessed at the baseline and after the intervention with the semi-structured Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale. The PSYRATS comprises hallucination and delusions subscale, each design to assess psychological aspects of the symptoms on a five point scale from 0 to 4.
[change] Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (The PSYRATS)
Time frame: week 4-5
The severity of delusions and hallucinations were assessed at the baseline and after the intervention with the semi-structured Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale. The PSYRATS comprises hallucination and delusions subscale, each design to assess psychological aspects of the symptoms on a five point scale from 0 to 4.
2 secondary outcomes
Cognitive Biases Questionnairre for Psychosis (CBQp)
Time frame: week 0
[Change] Cognitive Biases Questionnairre for Psychosis (CBQp)
Time frame: week 4-5
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25775947Gaweda L, Krezolek M, Olbrys J, Turska A, Kokoszka A. Decreasing self-reported cognitive biases and increasing clinical insight through meta-cognitive training in patients with chronic schizophrenia. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;48:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Łukasz Gawęda, PhD principal investigator
II Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Warsaw
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MCT in people with Schizophrenia, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (The PSYRATS) (time frame: week 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02187692, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2014.