PreeclampsiaPREDICTIONNCT02189148
First-trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia
An observational study of Preeclampsia and Severe Preeclampsia, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 4 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Preeclampsia is a complication of pregnancy related to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. Several measures are used or under investigation (low-dose aspirin, low-molecular weight heparin, calcium, folic acid, among others) for the prevention of preeclampsia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Preeclampsia, Severe Preeclampsia, Fetal Growth Restriction
- How many people
- 7,554 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Nulliparous women who will deliver in one of the participating center: CHUL Hospital, Quebec city, QC Hôpital Saint-François-d'Assise, Quebec city, QC CHU Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC Southern Alberta Maternal Fetal Medicine Centre, Calgary, Alberta Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
Who may be able to join
- gestational age between 11 3/7 and 13 6/7 weeks;
- nulliparous women (no previous delivery ≥ 20 weeks).
Who cannot join
- pregnant women <18 years old at recruitment;
- multiple pregnancies;
- fetal congenital malformation;
- positive for HIV or hepatitis C or hepatitis B;
- negative fetal heart at recruitment;
- women planning a delivery outside the participating hospitals;
- women not able to provide an informed consent to the study.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Canada4 sites
South Alberta Maternal Fetal Medicine Centre, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta
CHU Ste-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5
CHU de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G2
Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
About this study
Official title: First-trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia and Other Placenta-mediated Pregnancy Complications
Preeclampsia is a complication of pregnancy related to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. Several measures are used or under investigation (low-dose aspirin, low-molecular weight heparin, calcium, folic acid, among others) for the prevention of preeclampsia. Unfortunately, most high-risk women who could benefit from those preventive measures are not identified until late in pregnancy. Recent evidences suggest that the investigators could identify women at risk of developing preeclampsia using a combination of serum and ultrasound biomarkers in the first-trimester of pregnancy. This screening test needs external validation. A first-trimester screening strategy will strengthen clinical research on preeclampsia and will contribute to the development of strategy combining the prediction and prevention of the disease and its related complications.
Read the detailed description
Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a placenta-mediated pregnancy complication related to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) and perinatal death. A growing body of evidence suggests that the preterm and severe forms of PE are associated with deep placentation disorders that occur early in gestation. Over the last decade, maternal characteristic and first-trimester biomarkers, including some that are already used for aneuploidy screening (PAPP-A) have been strongly related to the preterm and early forms of PE, suggesting that early prediction is possible. Preventive measures are actually recommended (low-dose aspirin; calcium) or under investigation (folic acid; low-molecular weight heparin; anti-oxidant) in high-risk women. However, only women with chronic disease or prior adverse pregnancy outcomes are eligible for these measures while most cases of PE occur in nulliparous women. Moreover, there are actually no clear guidelines for clinicians in Canada whose pregnant patients have one or several risk factors for preeclampsia (obesity, chronic hypertension, low PAPP-A, etc.). On the other hand, it has been suggested that prediction of PE, and particularly the most severe cases, is possible with high sensitivity and specificity by using a combination of anamnestic, biophysical, biochemical and ultrasonographic biomarkers using the web-based Fetal-Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening test. This suggests that a strategy of prediction and prevention of PE and other placenta-mediated complications is becoming possible for nulliparous women as well. However, certain major concerns must be addressed: 1) The FMF screening test has not been validated prospectively; 2) a controversy exists about the need and feasibility of Doppler ultrasound in the general population.
Objectives:
- To validate the 11-13 week FMF screening test for early-onset PE and a composite of placenta-mediated outcomes (preterm PE, IUGR <3rd percentile, stillbirth); and
- To compare the screening test with and without uterine artery (UtA) Doppler;
- To explore the efficiency of new potential biomarkers (ADAM-12; Placental protein (PP) -13; placental and subplacental volume; placental vascularization) for prediction of PE in our population.
Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study of nulliparous women recruited between 11 3/7 - 13 6/7 weeks (maternal characteristics; BMI; Mean arterial pressure (MAP); PAPP-A; placental growth factor (PIGF); UtA Doppler…) and followed until delivery. Delivery and neonatal data will be collected through chart reviews. Detection rates for early-onset PE (primary outcome) and other adverse pregnancy outcomes will be measured using the 11-13 weeks FMF screening test with and without UtA Doppler results. A case-cohort study will be performed using stored serum samples and three-dimensional ultrasound volume acquired at the 11-13 weeks visit.
Feasibility and power calculation: We estimate a minimum incidence of early-onset PE of 0.7%. A minimum of 7,600 women will be necessary to demonstrate that the FMF screening test is at least 80% sensitive and 90% specific where it is expected that it will be 95% sensitive and 92% specific. We will have the power to detect an absolute difference of 15% in the detection rate between the different screening strategies (± Doppler). Recruitment will take 3.0 years. The overall study will take 5.0 years.
Expectations: First, our research will potentially provide a validated, highly sensitive and specific, and cheap tool to help clinicians' decision in the care of nulliparous women with risk factors for PE. In case of negative results, the clinician will have good evidence to reassure the patients facing abnormal maternal serum screening values. The validation of a first-trimester screening strategy will strengthen clinical research on PE providing new information on the natural evolution of the disease. Finally, this study will contribute to develop the optimal design for randomized trials aiming at the prevention of early-onset PE and other placenta-mediated complications of pregnancy.
- Keywords
- Prediction, Preeclampsia, Preterm birth, Pregnancy, Placenta, Intra-uterine growth restriction, fetal growth restriction, Ultrasound, Doppler, Biomarkers, PAPP-A, Placental growth factor (PlGF)
- Medical subject headings
- Pre-Eclampsia, Fetal Growth Retardation, Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | Each participant will : * give consent * provide a blood sample (10 ml) * be measured (weight and height for BMI calculation) * undergo a blood pressure measurement * have an ultrasound exam (uterine arteries Doppler, placental volume, thickness of the placenta) * answer to a short questionnaire (5 pages) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
early onset preeclampsia
Preeclampsia will be defined according to the Canadian Guidelines for Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy guidelines, as de novo hypertension with diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg on two occasions at least four hours apart, after 20 weeks of pregnancy, associated with proteinuria ≥300 mg/24 h or at least '2 +' protein on urine dipstick or an adverse conditions
Measured: diagnosed between 20 and 34 weeks of gestation
Secondary outcomes (2)
Severe preeclampsia
Severe Preeclampsia will be defined by the presence of at least one of the following adverse condition: 1) systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg after 4 h of bed rest, 2) proteinuria ≥ 5 g/24 h or at least '3 +' protein on urine dipstick, or 3) oliguria < 400 ml/24 h; 4) cerebral or visual disturbances; epigastric pain; pulmonary edema or cyanosis; thrombocytopenia <100,000mm
Measured: between 20 and 42 weeks of gestation
Fetal growth restriction
Fetal growth restriction will be defined as a birth weight below the 10th centile (or below the 3rd centile for severe FGR) of Canadian reference growth charts.
Measured: between 20 and 42 weeks of gestation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PreeclampsiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 7,554 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Laval University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emmanuel Bujold, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Investigators
- Emmanuel Bujold, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, CHU de QuébecFrançois Audibert, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, St. Justine's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02189148
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIHR-MOP-133672
- Other IDs
- B14-05-2024
- Acronym
- PREDICTION
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Guerby P, Audibert F, Johnson JA, Okun N, Giguere Y, Forest JC, Chaillet N, Masse B, Wright D, Ghesquiere L, Bujold E. Prospective Validation of First-Trimester Screening for Preterm Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women (PREDICTION Study). Hypertension. 2024 Jul;81(7):1574-1582. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22584. Epub 2024 May 6.
PubMed 38708601
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- First-trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia and Other Placenta-mediated Pregnancy Complications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02189148
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREDICTION / CIHR-MOP-133672
- Keywords
- Prediction, Preeclampsia, Preterm birth, Pregnancy, Placenta, Intra-uterine growth restriction, fetal growth restriction, Ultrasound
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7,554 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite LavalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Laval University
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Preeclampsia is a complication of pregnancy related to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. Several measures are used or under investigation (low-dose aspirin, low-molecular weight heparin, calcium, folic acid, among others) for the prevention of preeclampsia. Unfortunately, most high-risk women who could benefit from those preventive measures are not identified until late in pregnancy. Recent evidences suggest that the investigators could identify women at risk of developing preeclampsia using a combination of serum and ultrasound biomarkers in the first-trimester of pregnancy. This screening test needs external validation. A first-trimester screening strategy will strengthen clinical research on preeclampsia and will contribute to the development of strategy combining the prediction and prevention of the disease and its related complications.
Detailed description
Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a placenta-mediated pregnancy complication related to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) and perinatal death. A growing body of evidence suggests that the preterm and severe forms of PE are associated with deep placentation disorders that occur early in gestation. Over the last decade, maternal characteristic and first-trimester biomarkers, including some that are already used for aneuploidy screening (PAPP-A) have been strongly related to the preterm and early forms of PE, suggesting that early prediction is possible. Preventive measures are actually recommended (low-dose aspirin; calcium) or under investigation (folic acid; low-molecular weight heparin; anti-oxidant) in high-risk women. However, only women with chronic disease or prior adverse pregnancy outcomes are eligible for these measures while most cases of PE occur in nulliparous women. Moreover, there are actually no clear guidelines for clinicians in Canada whose pregnant patients have one or several risk factors for preeclampsia (obesity, chronic hypertension, low PAPP-A, etc.). On the other hand, it has been suggested that prediction of PE, and particularly the most severe cases, is possible with high sensitivity and specificity by using a combination of anamnestic, biophysical, biochemical and ultrasonographic biomarkers using the web-based Fetal-Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening test. This suggests that a strategy of prediction and prevention of PE and other placenta-mediated complications is becoming possible for nulliparous women as well. However, certain major concerns must be addressed: 1) The FMF screening test has not been validated prospectively; 2) a controversy exists about the need and feasibility of Doppler ultrasound in the general population.
Objectives:
- To validate the 11-13 week FMF screening test for early-onset PE and a composite of placenta-mediated outcomes (preterm PE, IUGR <3rd percentile, stillbirth); and
- To compare the screening test with and without uterine artery (UtA) Doppler;
- To explore the efficiency of new potential biomarkers (ADAM-12; Placental protein (PP) -13; placental and subplacental volume; placental vascularization) for prediction of PE in our population.
Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study of nulliparous women recruited between 11 3/7 - 13 6/7 weeks (maternal characteristics; BMI; Mean arterial pressure (MAP); PAPP-A; placental growth factor (PIGF); UtA Doppler…) and followed until delivery. Delivery and neonatal data will be collected through chart reviews. Detection rates for early-onset PE (primary outcome) and other adverse pregnancy outcomes will be measured using the 11-13 weeks FMF screening test with and without UtA Doppler results. A case-cohort study will be performed using stored serum samples and three-dimensional ultrasound volume acquired at the 11-13 weeks visit.
Feasibility and power calculation: We estimate a minimum incidence of early-onset PE of 0.7%. A minimum of 7,600 women will be necessary to demonstrate that the FMF screening test is at least 80% sensitive and 90% specific where it is expected that it will be 95% sensitive and 92% specific. We will have the power to detect an absolute difference of 15% in the detection rate between the different screening strategies (± Doppler). Recruitment will take 3.0 years. The overall study will take 5.0 years.
Expectations: First, our research will potentially provide a validated, highly sensitive and specific, and cheap tool to help clinicians' decision in the care of nulliparous women with risk factors for PE. In case of negative results, the clinician will have good evidence to reassure the patients facing abnormal maternal serum screening values. The validation of a first-trimester screening strategy will strengthen clinical research on PE providing new information on the natural evolution of the disease. Finally, this study will contribute to develop the optimal design for randomized trials aiming at the prevention of early-onset PE and other placenta-mediated complications of pregnancy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | – | –Each participant will : * give consent * provide a blood sample (10 ml) * be measured (weight and height for BMI calculation) * undergo a blood pressure measurement * have an ultrasound exam (uterine arteries Doppler, placental volume, thickness of the placenta) * answer to a short questionnaire (5 pages) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Nulliparous women who will deliver in one of the participating center: CHUL Hospital, Quebec city, QC Hôpital Saint-François-d'Assise, Quebec city, QC CHU Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC Southern Alberta Maternal Fetal Medicine Centre, Calgary, Alberta Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- gestational age between 11 3/7 and 13 6/7 weeks;
- nulliparous women (no previous delivery ≥ 20 weeks).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- pregnant women <18 years old at recruitment;
- multiple pregnancies;
- fetal congenital malformation;
- positive for HIV or hepatitis C or hepatitis B;
- negative fetal heart at recruitment;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
early onset preeclampsia
Time frame: diagnosed between 20 and 34 weeks of gestation
Preeclampsia will be defined according to the Canadian Guidelines for Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy guidelines, as de novo hypertension with diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg on two occasions at least four hours apart, after 20 weeks of pregnancy, associated with proteinuria ≥300 mg/24 h or at least '2 +' protein on urine dipstick or an adverse conditions
2 secondary outcomes
Severe preeclampsia
Time frame: between 20 and 42 weeks of gestation
Fetal growth restriction
Time frame: between 20 and 42 weeks of gestation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38708601Guerby P, Audibert F, Johnson JA, Okun N, Giguere Y, Forest JC, Chaillet N, Masse B, Wright D, Ghesquiere L, Bujold E. Prospective Validation of First-Trimester Screening for Preterm Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women (PREDICTION Study). Hypertension. 2024 Jul;81(7):1574-1582. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22584. Epub 2024 May 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Preeclampsia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The CoPenHagen PREeClampsia and cardIOvascUlar diSease Study
Pre-Eclampsia, Atherosclerosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Furosemide vs Placebo in Severe Preeclampsia Postpartum
Severe Preeclampsia
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Validation of the MaiRa Preeclampsia Test for Screening Early/Late Preeclampsia in First and Second Trimesters
Preeclampsia (PE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Preeclampsia Intervention Netherlands
Pre-Eclampsia Onset Less Than 37 Weeks, Pre-Eclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emmanuel Bujold, MD, MSc principal investigator
CHU de Québec
François Audibert, MD, MSc principal investigator
St. Justine's Hospital
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Preeclampsia and Severe Preeclampsia, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 4 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
early onset preeclampsia (time frame: diagnosed between 20 and 34 weeks of gestation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02189148, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019.