AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Muscular AtrophyPhase 3ENDEARNCT02193074

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nusinersen (ISIS 396443) in Infants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy

A Phase 3 study testing nusinersen in people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by Biogen at 31 sites in 13 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the study is to examine the clinical efficacy of nusinersen (ISIS 396443) administered intrathecally (IT) to participants with infantile-onset with infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 210 days
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
What is being tested?
nusinersen
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
122 participants
Where
31 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
19 Aug 2014to 21 Nov 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 210 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Be born (gestational age) between 37 and 42 weeks
  • Be medically diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)
  • Have Survival Motor Neuron2 (SMN2) Copy number = 2
  • Body weight equal to or greater than 3rd percentile for age using appropriate country-specific guidelines
  • Be able to follow all study procedures
  • Reside within approximately 9 hours ground-travel distance from a participating study center, for the duration of the study

Who cannot join

  • Hypoxemia (oxygen [O2] saturation awake less than 96% or O2 saturation asleep less than 96%, without ventilation support) during screening evaluation
  • Clinically significant abnormalities in hematology or clinical chemistry parameters or Electrocardiogram (ECG), as assessed by the Site Investigator, at the Screening visit that would render the participant unsuitable for participation in the study
  • Participant's parent or legal guardian is not willing to meet standard of care guidelines (including vaccinations and respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis if available), nor provide nutritional and respiratory support throughout the study
  • NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

31 sites in 13 countries.

31 sites in 13 countries

United States12 sites
  • Children's Hospital Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Boston Children's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • UT Southwestern Medical Center/Children's Medical Center Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Duke Children's Hospital

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Nemours Children's Hospital

    Orlando, Florida, 32827

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Neurology

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Doernbecher Children's Hospital

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Primary Children's Medical Center (University of Utah)

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

Australia2 sites
  • Royal Children's Hospital, Children's Neuroscience Centre

    Parkville, Victoria, 3052

  • Sydney Children's Hospital

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2031

Other trials in Australia

Canada2 sites
  • Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

  • British Columbia Children's Hospital/UBC

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1

Other trials in Canada

Germany2 sites
  • Universitatsklinikum Essen

    Essen, 45147

  • Universtatsklinikum Freiburg, Zentrum fur Kinder-und Jugendmedizin , Abteilung Neuropadiatrie und Muskelerkrankungen

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

Other trials in Germany

Italy2 sites
  • Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Centro Traslazionale di Miologia e Patologie Neurodegenerative

    Genova, 16148

  • Pediatric Neurology Unit, Catholic University

    Rome, 00153

Other trials in Italy

Japan2 sites
  • Hyogo College of Medicine

    Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, 663-8131

  • Tokyo Women's Medical University

    Tokyo, 162-8666

Other trials in Japan

Spain2 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz, Pediatric Neurology Department

    Madrid, 28046

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom2 sites
  • UCL Institute of Child Health/Great Ormond Street

    London, WC1N 1EH

  • MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases at Newcastle, Institute of Genetic Medicine Newcastle University

    Newcastle, NE1 3BZ

Other trials in United Kingdom

Belgium1 site
  • Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine FABIOLA (HUDERF)

    Brussels, 15 - 1020

Other trials in Belgium

France1 site
  • Institut de Myologie

    Paris, 75012

Other trials in France

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Sweden1 site
  • University of Gothenburg, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital

    Gothenburg

Other trials in Sweden

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Hacettepe Children's Hospital

    Ankara, 06230

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Procedure Controlled Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of ISIS 396443 Administered Intrathecally in Patients With Infantile-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy

The primary objective of the study is to examine the clinical efficacy of nusinersen (ISIS 396443) administered intrathecally (IT) to participants with infantile-onset with infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The secondary objective of the study is to examine the safety and tolerability of nusinersen administered intrathecally to participants with infantile-onset SMA.

Read the detailed description

This study was conducted and the protocol was registered by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

In August 2016, sponsorship of the trial was transferred to Biogen.

Being tested
nusinersen, Sham procedure
Keywords
Spinal Muscular Atrophy, SMA, SMN, SMNRx, ISIS-SMNRx, ISIS-SMN Rx, ISIS 396443, IONIS-SMNRx, IONIS-SMN Rx, Spinraza, ENDEAR
Medical subject headings
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • nusinersenDrug

    Also called ISIS 396443, BIIB058, Spinraza, IONIS-SMN Rx

    Administered by intrathecal (IT) injection as specified in the treatment arm.

  • Sham procedureProcedure or surgery

    Small needle prick on the lower back at the location where the IT injection is normally made

Study groups in NCT02193074
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
nusinersenExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: nusinersen
Sham procedureSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Sham procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Motor Milestones Responders

    The definition of a motor milestones responder was based on improvement in the motor milestones categories in Section 2 of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE), with the exclusion of voluntary grasp, as follows:

    (i) subject demonstrates ≥ 2-point increase in the motor milestones category of ability to kick or achievement of maximal score on that category (touching toes), or a 1-point increase in the motor milestones category of head control, rolling, sitting, crawling, standing, or walking, and (ii) among the motor milestone categories, with the exclusion of voluntary grasp, there are more categories where there is improvement as defined in (i) than worsening. (For the category of ability to kick, worsening is defined as ≥ 2-point decrease or decrease to the lowest possible score of no kicking. For the other categories, worsening is defined as ≥ 1-point decrease.) The lowest possible score for the HINE is 0 (zero), and the highest possible score for the HINE is 28.

    Measured: assessed at the later of the Day 183, Day 302, or Day 394 study visits

  2. Time to Death or Permanent Ventilation

    Estimated proportion of participants who died or required permanent ventilation by a given study day, based on the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Time to death or permanent ventilation was defined as either tracheostomy or ≥ 16 hours ventilation/day continuously for > 21 days in the absence of an acute reversible event. This endpoint was adjudicated by a blinded, independent group of experienced clinicians, the Event Adjudication Committee (EAC), based on review of clinical study data and supporting information. Results are based on all available data.

    Measured: Day 91, Day 182, Day 273, Day 364, Day 394

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Percentage of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) Responders

    A participants was considered a CHOP-INTEND responder if the change from baseline in CHOP-INTEND total score is ≥ 4 points based on assessment at the later of the Day 183, Day 302, or Day 394 study visits. CHOP-INTEND tests includes 16 items structured to move from easiest to hardest with the grading including gravity eliminated (lower scores) to antigravity movements (higher scores). Total scores range from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating better movement functioning. Results are based on all available data.

    Measured: assessed at Baseline and the later of the Day 183, Day 302, or Day 394 study visits

  2. Summary of Time to Death

    Estimated proportion of participants who died by given duration thresholds, based on the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.

    Measured: Day 91, Day 182, Day 273, Day 364, Day 394

  3. Percentage of Participants Not Requiring Permanent Ventilation

    Measured: Up to Day 394

  4. Percentage of Compound Muscular Action Potential (CMAP) Responders

    CMAP is an electrophysiological technique that can be used to determine the approximate number of motor neurons in a muscle or group of muscles. A participant was defined as a CMAP responder if the CMAP amplitude at the peroneal nerve was increasing to or maintained at ≥ 1 mV (comparing to the baseline) based on assessment at the later of the Day 183, Day 302, or Day 394 study visits. Results are based on all available data.

    Measured: assessed at the later of the Day 183, Day 302, or Day 394 study visits

  5. Time to Death or Permanent Ventilation in the Subgroup of Participants Below the Study Median Disease Duration

    Estimated proportion of participants who died or required permanent ventilation (EAC-adjudicated events) among participants below the study median disease duration (13.1 weeks), by given duration thresholds, based on the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.

    Measured: Day 91, Day 182, Day 273, Day 364, Day 394

  6. Time to Death or Permanent Ventilation in the Subgroup of Participants Above the Study Median Disease Duration

    Estimated proportion of participants who died or required permanent ventilation (EAC-adjudicated events) among participants above the study median disease duration (13.1 weeks), by given duration thresholds, based on the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.

    Measured: Day 91, Day 182, Day 273, Day 364, Day 394

  7. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to AEs

    AE: any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the study or use of investigational drug product, whether or not the AE is considered related to the investigational drug product. SAE: any AE that in the view of either the Investigator or Sponsor, meets any of the following criteria: results in death; is life threatening: that is, poses an immediate risk of death at the time of the event; requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; results in congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of the participant (whether male or female); is an important medical event in the opinion of the Investigator or Sponsor.

    Measured: Screening through Day 394 (± 7 days) or early termination

  8. Number of Participants With AEs Corresponding to Changes in Hematology Values

    Measured: up to Day 394 (± 7 days) or early termination

  9. Number of Participants With AEs Corresponding to Changes in Blood Chemistry Values

    Measured: up to Day 394 (± 7 days) or early termination

  10. Number of Participants Meeting Selected Vital Sign Criteria Post-Baseline

    Measured: up to Day 394 (± 7 days) or early termination

  11. Summary of Shifts in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results

    Shift to 'abnormal, not clinically significant' includes 'unknown' or 'normal' to 'abnormal, not clinically significant'. Shift to 'abnormal, clinically significant' includes 'unknown' or 'normal' to 'abnormal, clinically significant'.

    Measured: up to Day 394 (± 7 days) or early termination

  12. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Urinalysis Values

    Measured: up to Day 394 (± 7 days) or early termination

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start19 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completion21 Nov 2016
  4. Study completion21 Nov 2016

Why it stopped: After a positive interim analysis, the decision was made to terminate the study early to allow for participants to enroll into an open label study

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
122 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02193074
Sponsor's protocol ID
ISIS 396443-CS3B
Other IDs
2013-004422-29
Acronym
ENDEAR
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
14 Jul 2014
Last updated
17 Feb 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Kokaliaris C, Evans R, Hawkins N, Mahajan A, Scott DA, Sutherland CS, Nam J, Sajeev G. Long-Term Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Risdiplam and Nusinersen in Children with Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2414-2434. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02845-6. Epub 2024 May 5.

    PubMed 38705943
  • Darras BT, Farrar MA, Mercuri E, Finkel RS, Foster R, Hughes SG, Bhan I, Farwell W, Gheuens S. An Integrated Safety Analysis of Infants and Children with Symptomatic Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Treated with Nusinersen in Seven Clinical Trials. CNS Drugs. 2019 Sep;33(9):919-932. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00656-w.

    PubMed 31420846
  • Dabbous O, Maru B, Jansen JP, Lorenzi M, Cloutier M, Guerin A, Pivneva I, Wu EQ, Arjunji R, Feltner D, Sproule DM. Survival, Motor Function, and Motor Milestones: Comparison of AVXS-101 Relative to Nusinersen for the Treatment of Infants with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1. Adv Ther. 2019 May;36(5):1164-1176. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00923-8. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

    PubMed 30879249
  • Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J, Chiriboga CA, Saito K, Servais L, Tizzano E, Topaloglu H, Tulinius M, Montes J, Glanzman AM, Bishop K, Zhong ZJ, Gheuens S, Bennett CF, Schneider E, Farwell W, De Vivo DC; ENDEAR Study Group. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1723-1732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702752.

    PubMed 29091570
  • Finkel RS, Chiriboga CA, Vajsar J, Day JW, Montes J, De Vivo DC, Yamashita M, Rigo F, Hung G, Schneider E, Norris DA, Xia S, Bennett CF, Bishop KM. Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):3017-3026. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31408-8. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

    PubMed 27939059

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing nusinersen in people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by Biogen at 31 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 31 sites in United States, Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Motor Milestones Responders (time frame: assessed at the later of the Day 183, Day 302, or Day 394 study visits). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02193074, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in