Cerebral PalsyPhase 2NCT02196298
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Lokomat® With a Gait-related Physiotherapy Program in Children With Cerebral Palsy
A Phase 2 study testing Lokomat and Physiotherapy in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The Lokomat is a robotic treadmill gait trainer that is used to help people who have neurologic conditions walk better. Early research with children with cerebral palsy (CP) shows that it may help to improve walking skills. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- Lokomat and Physiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to 30 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- age 5 to12 years inclusive
- assessed as GMFCS Levels II or III
- able to follow testing instructions, and participate in a minimum of 30 minutes of active PT
- able to reliably signal pain, fear and discomfort
- have passive range of motion (ROM) of hips and knees within minimum range requirement for Lokomat (hip and knee flexion contracture < 10 degrees, and knee valgus < 40 degrees)
- client of Child Development Program at Holland Bloorview
- able to commit to attendance of twice weekly for eight weeks (to support the primary efficacy analysis).
Who cannot join
- a fixed knee contracture > 10 degrees, knee valgus >40 degrees such that robotic leg orthosis will not be adaptable to lower limbs
- hip instability/subluxation > 45%
- orthopaedic surgery within the last 9 months (muscle) or 12 months (bone)
- Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) injections to lower limb in the last 4 months
- inability to discontinue BTX-A for period of 6 months (during trial) due to concerns about ROM or pain
- severe spasticity may be a contraindication
Show all 12Show fewer
- any weightbearing restrictions
- seizure disorder that is not controlled by medication (if on medication, must not have had a seizure in the last 12 months)
- open skin lesions or vascular disorder of lower extremities
- not able to co-operate or be positioned adequately within the Lokomat as shown during the two Lokomat fitting/acclimatisation sessions
- not prepared or unable to discontinue a regular therapy intervention during the course of the trial
- involved in another intervention study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M4G 1R8
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Cross-over Clinical Trial Comparing the Impact of the Lokomat® Gait Training System With a Gait-related Physiotherapy Program in Children With Cerebral Palsy
The Lokomat is a robotic treadmill gait trainer that is used to help people who have neurologic conditions walk better. Early research with children with cerebral palsy (CP) shows that it may help to improve walking skills. The purpose of this two-group randomized study is to compare Lokomat training to regular physiotherapy (PT) as far as impact on walking abilities and related function. The primary (alternate) hypothesis is that children will improve more with Lokomat training in terms of gross motor skills and walking endurance.
The investigators are enrolling 40 ambulatory children who are ages 5 to 12 years, have CP and are in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level II (n=20) or III (n=20). In this crossover randomized clinical trial (RCT), whether PT or Lokomat intervention is done first is decided by an independent randomization process that occurs after the first baseline assessment. In the Lokomat phase, children receive 8 to 10 weeks of twice weekly therapy for a maximum of 16 sessions. Each session is 35 minutes plus the time needed for set-up. The 35 minute PT program is also given twice weekly for 8 to 10 weeks for a maximum of 16 sessions, and focuses on a menu-based strength, co-ordination, fitness, walking and balance activities. There is a 6 week break between the Lokomat and PT interventions.
Read more
Each child has four study assessments during their ~6 months in the study. The first assessment is done before starting the Lokomat or physiotherapy phase. The second happens after the first intervention has finished. The child then has a 6-week break period. The third assessment is done at the end of this break, and the fourth occurs after the second intervention. The PT assessor who does these assessments will not be the same as the PT who gives the intervention. The assessor is blinded to the child's intervention phase and previous assessment results. The primary outcome measures are the Gross Motor Function Measure and 6 minute walk test. Secondary measures evaluate gait, functional abilities, participation, health related quality of life and individualized goals.
The randomized aspect of the study lets us look at outcome differences between children for Lokomat and PT within their first intervention phase (n=20/group). The cross-over phase evaluates within-child outcomes across the two phases. A qualitative component is concurrently underway to examine child/parent experiences and their views of Lokomat outcomes.
Read the detailed description
No further information
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- Lokomat, Physiotherapy
- Keywords
- physical therapy, gait, pediatric rehabilitation, gross motor function, participation
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LokomatDevice
Also called Lokomat®Pro Pediatric Orthoses
16 sessions in total, 30 minutes each plus set-up time followed by 5 minutes of overground walking. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.
PhysiotherapyOther
16 sessions, 35 minutes. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lokomat | Experimental | 16 sessions in total, 30 minutes each plus set-up time followed by 5 minutes of overground walking. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks. Receives: Device: Lokomat |
| Physiotherapy | Active comparator | 16 sessions, 35 minutes. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks. Receives: Other: Physiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in motor function on Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) at week 8
Stand and Walk items of the GMFM-66. Gold standard measure of foundational gross motor skills in children with CP.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change from baseline in walk speed on the Six-minute walk test at week 8
Used as the co-primary outcome measure. Standardized 6 minute walk test (with shoes, orthoses, walking devices as required) to determine distance covered (capability measure). Well-validated in pediatric CP.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in advanced motor skills on the Challenge Module at week 8
Just for children in GMFCS Level II. This is a new published measure of advanced motor skills.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in activity and participation on the Activities Scale for Kids at week 8
Well-validated measure of physical functional ability in children. Child (if 8+ years) or parent-report questionnaire
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in quality of life on the KidScreen Questionnaire at week 8
Measure of health-related quality of life. Questionnaire completed by children 8+ years or parents of younger children.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in participation on the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) at week 8
Using the physical activity and sport sections of this parent-report questionnaire to gain picture of areas/extent of participation in these areas.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in gait kinematics as measured on the GaitRite evaluation system at week 8
Time distance parameters of gait via GaitRite system
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in Gait quality as measured on an observational gait scale at week 8
Gait pattern as evaluated via observational gait scale, rating from video of child's walking
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in targeted goal abilities as measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at week 8
Three to five individualized walking-based activity/participation goals set with child/parent/treating PT at baseline 1 and reset at baseline 2. Evaluated by treating PT with child/parent input at post-intervention 1 and 2
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in targeted goal abilities and satisfaction with performance as measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at week 8
Three to five individualized walking-based activity/participation set at baseline 1 and 2 with assessor and child/parent, and re-evaluated by child/parent at post-intervention assessment 1 and 2. Used by treating PT to formulate GAS goals
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in movement quality as measured by the Quality Function Measure (QFM) at week 8
Companion measure to the GMFM-66 to assess alignment, co-ordination, dissociated movement, stability and weight shift. Rated by PT assessor from GMFM video. Recently validated.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completion30 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CIBC Children's Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Virginia Wright, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
- Investigators
- Virginia Wright, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation HospitalDarcy Fehlings, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02196298
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-293
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 9 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hilderley AJ, Fehlings D, Lee GW, Wright FV. Comparison of a robotic-assisted gait training program with a program of functional gait training for children with cerebral palsy: design and methods of a two group randomized controlled cross-over trial. Springerplus. 2016 Oct 28;5(1):1886. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3535-0. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27843743Phelan SK, Gibson BE, Wright FV. What is it like to walk with the help of a robot? Children's perspectives on robotic gait training technology. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(24):2272-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019648. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
PubMed 25856202Beveridge B, Feltracco D, Struyf J, Strauss E, Dang S, Phelan S, Wright FV, Gibson BE. "You gotta try it all": Parents' Experiences with Robotic Gait Training for their Children with Cerebral Palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;35(4):327-41. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.990547. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
PubMed 25529412
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Cross-over Clinical Trial Comparing the Impact of the Lokomat® Gait Training System With a Gait-related Physiotherapy Program in Children With Cerebral Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02196298
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12-293
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- physical therapy, gait, pediatric rehabilitation, gross motor function, participation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CIBC Children's Foundation
- Study start
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Lokomat is a robotic treadmill gait trainer that is used to help people who have neurologic conditions walk better. Early research with children with cerebral palsy (CP) shows that it may help to improve walking skills. The purpose of this two-group randomized study is to compare Lokomat training to regular physiotherapy (PT) as far as impact on walking abilities and related function. The primary (alternate) hypothesis is that children will improve more with Lokomat training in terms of gross motor skills and walking endurance.
The investigators are enrolling 40 ambulatory children who are ages 5 to 12 years, have CP and are in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level II (n=20) or III (n=20). In this crossover randomized clinical trial (RCT), whether PT or Lokomat intervention is done first is decided by an independent randomization process that occurs after the first baseline assessment. In the Lokomat phase, children receive 8 to 10 weeks of twice weekly therapy for a maximum of 16 sessions. Each session is 35 minutes plus the time needed for set-up. The 35 minute PT program is also given twice weekly for 8 to 10 weeks for a maximum of 16 sessions, and focuses on a menu-based strength, co-ordination, fitness, walking and balance activities. There is a 6 week break between the Lokomat and PT interventions.
Each child has four study assessments during their ~6 months in the study. The first assessment is done before starting the Lokomat or physiotherapy phase. The second happens after the first intervention has finished. The child then has a 6-week break period. The third assessment is done at the end of this break, and the fourth occurs after the second intervention. The PT assessor who does these assessments will not be the same as the PT who gives the intervention. The assessor is blinded to the child's intervention phase and previous assessment results. The primary outcome measures are the Gross Motor Function Measure and 6 minute walk test. Secondary measures evaluate gait, functional abilities, participation, health related quality of life and individualized goals.
The randomized aspect of the study lets us look at outcome differences between children for Lokomat and PT within their first intervention phase (n=20/group). The cross-over phase evaluates within-child outcomes across the two phases. A qualitative component is concurrently underway to examine child/parent experiences and their views of Lokomat outcomes.
Detailed description
No further information
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lokomat | Experimental | Device: Lokomat16 sessions in total, 30 minutes each plus set-up time followed by 5 minutes of overground walking. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks. |
| Physiotherapy | Active comparator | Other: Physiotherapy16 sessions, 35 minutes. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- age 5 to12 years inclusive
- assessed as GMFCS Levels II or III
- able to follow testing instructions, and participate in a minimum of 30 minutes of active PT
- able to reliably signal pain, fear and discomfort
- have passive range of motion (ROM) of hips and knees within minimum range requirement for Lokomat (hip and knee flexion contracture < 10 degrees, and knee valgus < 40 degrees)
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- a fixed knee contracture > 10 degrees, knee valgus >40 degrees such that robotic leg orthosis will not be adaptable to lower limbs
- hip instability/subluxation > 45%
- orthopaedic surgery within the last 9 months (muscle) or 12 months (bone)
- Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) injections to lower limb in the last 4 months
- inability to discontinue BTX-A for period of 6 months (during trial) due to concerns about ROM or pain
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LokomatAlso: Lokomat®Pro Pediatric Orthoses16 sessions in total, 30 minutes each plus set-up time followed by 5 minutes of overground walking. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks. | Device | Lokomat |
| Physiotherapy16 sessions, 35 minutes. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks to maximum of 10 weeks. | Other | Physiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in motor function on Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Stand and Walk items of the GMFM-66. Gold standard measure of foundational gross motor skills in children with CP.
10 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in walk speed on the Six-minute walk test at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in advanced motor skills on the Challenge Module at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in activity and participation on the Activities Scale for Kids at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in quality of life on the KidScreen Questionnaire at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in participation on the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in gait kinematics as measured on the GaitRite evaluation system at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in Gait quality as measured on an observational gait scale at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in targeted goal abilities as measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in targeted goal abilities and satisfaction with performance as measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Change from baseline in movement quality as measured by the Quality Function Measure (QFM) at week 8
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2017.
- Background: PubMed 27843743Hilderley AJ, Fehlings D, Lee GW, Wright FV. Comparison of a robotic-assisted gait training program with a program of functional gait training for children with cerebral palsy: design and methods of a two group randomized controlled cross-over trial. Springerplus. 2016 Oct 28;5(1):1886. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3535-0. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25856202Phelan SK, Gibson BE, Wright FV. What is it like to walk with the help of a robot? Children's perspectives on robotic gait training technology. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(24):2272-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019648. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 25529412Beveridge B, Feltracco D, Struyf J, Strauss E, Dang S, Phelan S, Wright FV, Gibson BE. "You gotta try it all": Parents' Experiences with Robotic Gait Training for their Children with Cerebral Palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;35(4):327-41. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.990547. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
- Website of facility where trial is occurring. Investigators' lab sites are also on that websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders Related to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
Frontotemporal Dementia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Recruiting
Intrathecal Baclofen and Pediatric Dystonia
Dystonic Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
The Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Clinical Trial Platform - Regimen B: LM11A-31
PSP - Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Tributyrin for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP): Virtual Trial
Parkinson Disease, Multiple System Atrophy
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Robotic Gloves Training on Upper Limb Coordination, Selective Motor Control and Activities of Daily Living in Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy
Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Virginia Wright, PT, PhD principal investigator
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation Hospital
Darcy Fehlings, MD, MSc principal investigator
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabiltation Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lokomat and Physiotherapy in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in motor function on Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) at week 8 (time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (repeated in same manner after crossover)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02196298, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2017.