AzTrials
AzTrials

Huntington's DiseasePhase 2NCT02197130

Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease

A Phase 2 study testing PF-02545920 in people with Huntington's Disease, run by Pfizer at 57 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a 26 week, randomized, parallel group, double blind comparison of PF-02545920 5 mg, PF-02545920 20 mg, and placebo dosed BID in the treatment of motor impairment of subjects with Huntington's Disease. A total of approximately 260 subjects are planned to be randomized in the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Huntington's Disease
What is being tested?
PF-02545920
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
272 participants
Where
57 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Sep 2014to Oct 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • CAG repeat equal or greater than 36;
  • Total motor score equal or greater than 10;
  • Total functional capacity equal or greater than 7.

Who cannot join

  • Clinically significant neurologic disorder other than Huntington's disease;
  • Other severe acute psychiatric conditions, mania and/or psychosis;
  • History of neutropenia, and myeloproliferative disorders;

Trial locations and contacts

57 sites in 5 countries.

57 sites in 5 countries

United States22 sites
  • Albany Medical College

    Albany, New York, 12208

  • The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • The University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129

  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation Hospital Pharmacy

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Davis Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • The Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

  • Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

  • Rocky Mountain Movement Disorders Center

    Englewood, Colorado, 80113

  • University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration

    Gainesville, Florida, 32607

  • Baylor College of Medicine

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University Health Neuroscience Center

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • University of California, Irvine

    Irvine, California, 92697

  • Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center Drug Information Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • UCLA Neurology Clinic

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • UCLA Radiology

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Mayo Clinic Arizona

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054

  • Mayo Clinic Arizona

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center - Dept. of Neurology

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom15 sites
  • NHS Grampian, Clinical Genetics Centre

    Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, AB25 2ZA

  • Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

    Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2FG

  • John Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair

    Cambridge, CB2 0PY

  • University of Wales Hospital

    Cardiff, CF14 4XW

  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

    Glasgow, G51 4TF

  • Clinical Research Facility

    London, SE1 9RT

  • University College London Hospitals Huntington's Disease Research Centre

    London, WC1B 5EH

  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    London, WC1N 3BG

  • Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Manchester, M13 9WL

  • The National Institute for Health Research/Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility

    Manchester, M13 9WL

  • St Nicholas Hospital

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3 3XT

  • Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL

  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

    Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU

  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF

  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

    Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany12 sites
  • Uniklinik RWTH Aachen

    Aachen, 52074

  • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Prof. Dr. Carsten Saft

    Bochum, 44791

  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Prof. Dr. med. Stephan Klebe

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

  • Universitat zu Lubeck

    Lübeck, 23562

  • Philipps Universitat Marburg

    Marburg, 35043

  • Technische Universität München

    München, Bavaria, 81675

  • George Huntington Institut

    Münster, 48149

  • Kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum gGmbH

    Taufkirchen, 84416

  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm

    Ulm, 89081

  • Universitatsklinikum Wuerzburg

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Canada4 sites
  • CHUM-Notre-Dame Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1

  • CHUM Notre Dame, Pharmacie

    Montreal, Quebec, H4L 4M1

  • Centre for Movement Disorders

    Toronto, Ontario, M3B 2S7

  • The Centre for Huntington Disease

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5

Other trials in Canada

Poland4 sites
  • Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy sp. z o.o.

    Gdansk, 80462

  • Krakowska Akademia Neurologii Sp. z o.o.

    Krakow, 31505

  • Solumed Centrum Medyczne

    Poznan, 60529

  • Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii

    Warsaw, 02957

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Proof-of-concept Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Pf-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease

This study is a 26 week, randomized, parallel group, double blind comparison of PF-02545920 5 mg, PF-02545920 20 mg, and placebo dosed BID in the treatment of motor impairment of subjects with Huntington's Disease. A total of approximately 260 subjects are planned to be randomized in the study. Primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) after 26 weeks of treatment. secondary endpoints will include change from baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) score of the UHDRS after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment.

Being tested
PF-02545920, Placebo
Keywords
Huntington; chorea; total motor score; CAG repeat: total functional capacity; motor cognitive and behavioral symptoms
Medical subject headings
Huntington Disease, Chorea, Behavioral Symptoms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PF-02545920Drug

    20 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 20 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets of 5 mg. The 20mg dose will be titrated as follow: 5mg BID for 7 days, 10mg BID for 7 days, 15 mg BID for 7 days and 20 mg BID to week 26. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards.

  • PF-02545920Drug

    5 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 5 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets: one tablet of 5 mg and 3 tablets of matching placebo. The 5mg dose will not be titrated. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards.

  • PlaceboOther

    Matching Placebo twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each placebo dose will be taken as 4 tablets of matching Placebo. The placebo dose will not be titrated. Matching placebo will be provided in weekly blister cards.

Study groups in NCT02197130
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
20 mg PF-02545920 BIDExperimental20 mg PF-02545920 BID
Receives: Drug: PF-02545920
5 mg PF-02545920 BIDExperimental5 mg PF-02545920 BID
Receives: Drug: PF-02545920
Placebo BIDPlacebo comparatorMatching placebo
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) Assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) After 26 Weeks of Treatment.

    The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of Huntington's Disease (HD). The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The total motor score (TMS) assessed motor features of HD with standardized ratings of oculomotor function, dysarthria, chorea, dystonia, gait, and postural stability. Some items (such as chorea and dystonia) required grading each extremity (face, bucco-oral-lingual, and trunk) separately. Eye movements require both horizontal and vertical grades. The total motor impairment scores was the sum of all the individual 31 motor sub-items (each rated from 0 to 4), with higher scores indicating more severe motor impairment than lower scores. The range of TMS is 0-124.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Number of Participants That Met White Blood Count (WBC) and Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Stopping Criteria

    The criteria for temporary study suspension was as follow: Criterion A: WBC count <=3000 cells/mm3 but >= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1500 cells/mm3 but >= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion B: WBC <= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion C: participants who are discontinued or permanently suspended due to WBC or ANC findings; Criterion D: ANC <= 500 cells/mm3

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)

  2. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

    Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)

  3. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

    Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly.

    Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)

  4. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormalities)

    Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)

  5. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (With Normal Baseline)

    Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)

  6. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)

    Absolute values were analyzed for supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), standing SBP, supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP), standing DBP, supine pulse rate, and standing pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: supine SBP less than (<) 90 millimeter of mercury(mmHg); Criterion B: standing SBP < 90 mmHg; Criterion C: supine DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion D: standing DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion E: supine pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion F: supine pulse rate greater than (>)120 BPM; Criterion G: standing pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion H: standing pulse rate >120 BPM;

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182

  7. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)

    The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum increase from baseline in supine SBP greater than or equal to (>=) 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum increase from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum increase from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum increase from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182

  8. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Decrease From Baseline)

    The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum decrease from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum decrease from baseline in supine SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum decrease from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum decrease from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum decrease from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182

  9. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Absolute Values)

    The number of participants with ECG absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization) >=300 msec; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex(time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization) >=140 msec; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) 450-<480 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval 480-<500 msec; Criterion E: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) >=500 msec

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182

  10. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Increase From Baseline)

    Number of participants with ECG meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval increase from baseline percentage change (PctChg)>= 25/50%; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex increase from baseline PctChg >=50%; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline 30<=change<60 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline change >=60 msec.

    Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182

  11. Severity of Adverse Events Related to Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS) Including Dystonia and Akathisia

    Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to severity; mild (not causing any significant problem, dose adjustment not required), moderate (caused problem that does not interfere significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, dose adjustment needed due to adverse event) and severe (caused problem that interferes significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, study drug stopped due to adverse event). EPS were reported AEs of dystonia and akathisia.

    Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)

  12. Change From Baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) Score of the UHDRS After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.

    The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of HD. The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) was a subset of the TMS assessment. It was composed of the scoring of 7 chorea assessments (face, orobuccolingual, trunk, right and left upper extremities, right and left lower extremities). Each assessment was rated from 0 to 4 (absent to prolonged). TMC is obtained by adding up each of the separate scores, leading to max score of 28. The minimum score is 0. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms. n is the number of evaluable subjects in each visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26

  13. Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) From Baseline to Follow-up Visit

    The C-SSRS captured the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide; suicide attempt; preparatory acts towards imminent suicidal behavior; suicidal ideation; self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent. The results presented are the number of participants with completed suicide or non-fatal suicide events or behaviors. Worsening of suicidal ideation was an increase in severity of suicidal ideation from baseline.

    Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)

  14. Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.

    CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Clinician responded to a question: "Compared to your subject's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your subject changed?". Improvement was compared to baseline and was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. n is the number of evaluable participants in each visit.

    Measured: Week 13 & Week 26

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionOct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
272 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02197130
Sponsor's protocol ID
A8241021
Other IDs
2014-001291-56, 2014
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
16 Jul 2014
Last updated
17 Nov 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PF-02545920 in people with Huntington's Disease, run by Pfizer at 57 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 57 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) Assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) After 26 Weeks of Treatment. (time frame: Baseline, Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in