Huntington's DiseasePhase 2NCT02197130
Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease
A Phase 2 study testing PF-02545920 in people with Huntington's Disease, run by Pfizer at 57 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a 26 week, randomized, parallel group, double blind comparison of PF-02545920 5 mg, PF-02545920 20 mg, and placebo dosed BID in the treatment of motor impairment of subjects with Huntington's Disease. A total of approximately 260 subjects are planned to be randomized in the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Huntington's Disease
- What is being tested?
- PF-02545920
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 272 participants
- Where
- 57 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CAG repeat equal or greater than 36;
- Total motor score equal or greater than 10;
- Total functional capacity equal or greater than 7.
Who cannot join
- Clinically significant neurologic disorder other than Huntington's disease;
- Other severe acute psychiatric conditions, mania and/or psychosis;
- History of neutropenia, and myeloproliferative disorders;
Trial locations and contacts
57 sites in 5 countries.
57 sites in 5 countries
United States22 sites
Albany Medical College
Albany, New York, 12208
The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Massachusetts General Hospital
Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129
Cleveland Clinic Foundation Hospital Pharmacy
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Davis Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
The Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43221
Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43221
Rocky Mountain Movement Disorders Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Health Neuroscience Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697
Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center Drug Information Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Neurology Clinic
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Radiology
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center - Dept. of Neurology
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
United Kingdom15 sites
NHS Grampian, Clinical Genetics Centre
Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, AB25 2ZA
Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2FG
John Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair
Cambridge, CB2 0PY
University of Wales Hospital
Cardiff, CF14 4XW
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Glasgow, G51 4TF
Clinical Research Facility
London, SE1 9RT
University College London Hospitals Huntington's Disease Research Centre
London, WC1B 5EH
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, WC1N 3BG
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M13 9WL
The National Institute for Health Research/Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility
Manchester, M13 9WL
St Nicholas Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3 3XT
Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
Germany12 sites
Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Prof. Dr. Carsten Saft
Bochum, 44791
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
Erlangen, 91054
Prof. Dr. med. Stephan Klebe
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Universitat zu Lubeck
Lübeck, 23562
Philipps Universitat Marburg
Marburg, 35043
Technische Universität München
München, Bavaria, 81675
George Huntington Institut
Münster, 48149
Kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum gGmbH
Taufkirchen, 84416
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Universitatsklinikum Wuerzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Canada4 sites
CHUM-Notre-Dame Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
CHUM Notre Dame, Pharmacie
Montreal, Quebec, H4L 4M1
Centre for Movement Disorders
Toronto, Ontario, M3B 2S7
The Centre for Huntington Disease
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5
Poland4 sites
Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy sp. z o.o.
Gdansk, 80462
Krakowska Akademia Neurologii Sp. z o.o.
Krakow, 31505
Solumed Centrum Medyczne
Poznan, 60529
Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Warsaw, 02957
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Proof-of-concept Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Pf-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease
This study is a 26 week, randomized, parallel group, double blind comparison of PF-02545920 5 mg, PF-02545920 20 mg, and placebo dosed BID in the treatment of motor impairment of subjects with Huntington's Disease. A total of approximately 260 subjects are planned to be randomized in the study. Primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) after 26 weeks of treatment. secondary endpoints will include change from baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) score of the UHDRS after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment.
- Conditions
- Huntington's Disease
- Being tested
- PF-02545920, Placebo
- Keywords
- Huntington; chorea; total motor score; CAG repeat: total functional capacity; motor cognitive and behavioral symptoms
- Medical subject headings
- Huntington Disease, Chorea, Behavioral Symptoms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PF-02545920Drug
20 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 20 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets of 5 mg. The 20mg dose will be titrated as follow: 5mg BID for 7 days, 10mg BID for 7 days, 15 mg BID for 7 days and 20 mg BID to week 26. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards.
PF-02545920Drug
5 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 5 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets: one tablet of 5 mg and 3 tablets of matching placebo. The 5mg dose will not be titrated. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards.
PlaceboOther
Matching Placebo twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each placebo dose will be taken as 4 tablets of matching Placebo. The placebo dose will not be titrated. Matching placebo will be provided in weekly blister cards.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 20 mg PF-02545920 BID | Experimental | 20 mg PF-02545920 BID Receives: Drug: PF-02545920 |
| 5 mg PF-02545920 BID | Experimental | 5 mg PF-02545920 BID Receives: Drug: PF-02545920 |
| Placebo BID | Placebo comparator | Matching placebo Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) Assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) After 26 Weeks of Treatment.
The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of Huntington's Disease (HD). The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The total motor score (TMS) assessed motor features of HD with standardized ratings of oculomotor function, dysarthria, chorea, dystonia, gait, and postural stability. Some items (such as chorea and dystonia) required grading each extremity (face, bucco-oral-lingual, and trunk) separately. Eye movements require both horizontal and vertical grades. The total motor impairment scores was the sum of all the individual 31 motor sub-items (each rated from 0 to 4), with higher scores indicating more severe motor impairment than lower scores. The range of TMS is 0-124.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26
Secondary outcomes (14)
Number of Participants That Met White Blood Count (WBC) and Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Stopping Criteria
The criteria for temporary study suspension was as follow: Criterion A: WBC count <=3000 cells/mm3 but >= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1500 cells/mm3 but >= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion B: WBC <= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion C: participants who are discontinued or permanently suspended due to WBC or ANC findings; Criterion D: ANC <= 500 cells/mm3
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly.
Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormalities)
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (With Normal Baseline)
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)
Absolute values were analyzed for supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), standing SBP, supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP), standing DBP, supine pulse rate, and standing pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: supine SBP less than (<) 90 millimeter of mercury(mmHg); Criterion B: standing SBP < 90 mmHg; Criterion C: supine DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion D: standing DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion E: supine pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion F: supine pulse rate greater than (>)120 BPM; Criterion G: standing pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion H: standing pulse rate >120 BPM;
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)
The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum increase from baseline in supine SBP greater than or equal to (>=) 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum increase from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum increase from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum increase from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Decrease From Baseline)
The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum decrease from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum decrease from baseline in supine SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum decrease from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum decrease from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum decrease from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Absolute Values)
The number of participants with ECG absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization) >=300 msec; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex(time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization) >=140 msec; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) 450-<480 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval 480-<500 msec; Criterion E: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) >=500 msec
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Increase From Baseline)
Number of participants with ECG meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval increase from baseline percentage change (PctChg)>= 25/50%; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex increase from baseline PctChg >=50%; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline 30<=change<60 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline change >=60 msec.
Measured: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Severity of Adverse Events Related to Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS) Including Dystonia and Akathisia
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to severity; mild (not causing any significant problem, dose adjustment not required), moderate (caused problem that does not interfere significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, dose adjustment needed due to adverse event) and severe (caused problem that interferes significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, study drug stopped due to adverse event). EPS were reported AEs of dystonia and akathisia.
Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Change From Baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) Score of the UHDRS After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of HD. The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) was a subset of the TMS assessment. It was composed of the scoring of 7 chorea assessments (face, orobuccolingual, trunk, right and left upper extremities, right and left lower extremities). Each assessment was rated from 0 to 4 (absent to prolonged). TMC is obtained by adding up each of the separate scores, leading to max score of 28. The minimum score is 0. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms. n is the number of evaluable subjects in each visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) From Baseline to Follow-up Visit
The C-SSRS captured the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide; suicide attempt; preparatory acts towards imminent suicidal behavior; suicidal ideation; self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent. The results presented are the number of participants with completed suicide or non-fatal suicide events or behaviors. Worsening of suicidal ideation was an increase in severity of suicidal ideation from baseline.
Measured: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Clinician responded to a question: "Compared to your subject's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your subject changed?". Improvement was compared to baseline and was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. n is the number of evaluable participants in each visit.
Measured: Week 13 & Week 26
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Huntington's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 272 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02197130
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A8241021
- Other IDs
- 2014-001291-56, 2014
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 16 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Proof-of-concept Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Pf-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02197130
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A8241021
- Conditions
- Huntington's Disease
- Keywords
- Huntington; chorea; total motor score; CAG repeat: total functional capacity; motor cognitive and behavioral symptoms
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 272 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Nov 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a 26 week, randomized, parallel group, double blind comparison of PF-02545920 5 mg, PF-02545920 20 mg, and placebo dosed BID in the treatment of motor impairment of subjects with Huntington's Disease. A total of approximately 260 subjects are planned to be randomized in the study. Primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) after 26 weeks of treatment. secondary endpoints will include change from baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) score of the UHDRS after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 20 mg PF-02545920 BID | Experimental | Drug: PF-0254592020 mg PF-02545920 BID |
| 5 mg PF-02545920 BID | Experimental | Drug: PF-025459205 mg PF-02545920 BID |
| Placebo BID | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboMatching placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- CAG repeat equal or greater than 36;
- Total motor score equal or greater than 10;
- Total functional capacity equal or greater than 7.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Clinically significant neurologic disorder other than Huntington's disease;
- Other severe acute psychiatric conditions, mania and/or psychosis;
- History of neutropenia, and myeloproliferative disorders;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PF-0254592020 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 20 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets of 5 mg. The 20mg dose will be titrated as follow: 5mg BID for 7 days, 10mg BID for 7 days, 15 mg BID for 7 days and 20 mg BID to week 26. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards. | Drug | 20 mg PF-02545920 BID |
| PF-025459205 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 5 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets: one tablet of 5 mg and 3 tablets of matching placebo. The 5mg dose will not be titrated. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards. | Drug | 5 mg PF-02545920 BID |
| PlaceboMatching Placebo twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each placebo dose will be taken as 4 tablets of matching Placebo. The placebo dose will not be titrated. Matching placebo will be provided in weekly blister cards. | Other | Placebo BID |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) Assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) After 26 Weeks of Treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of Huntington's Disease (HD). The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The total motor score (TMS) assessed motor features of HD with standardized ratings of oculomotor function, dysarthria, chorea, dystonia, gait, and postural stability. Some items (such as chorea and dystonia) required grading each extremity (face, bucco-oral-lingual, and trunk) separately. Eye movements require both horizontal and vertical grades. The total motor impairment scores was the sum of all the individual 31 motor sub-items (each rated from 0 to 4), with higher scores indicating more severe motor impairment than lower scores. The range of TMS is 0-124.
14 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants That Met White Blood Count (WBC) and Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Stopping Criteria
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormalities)
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (With Normal Baseline)
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Decrease From Baseline)
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Absolute Values)
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Increase From Baseline)
Time frame: Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Severity of Adverse Events Related to Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS) Including Dystonia and Akathisia
Time frame: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Change From Baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) Score of the UHDRS After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) From Baseline to Follow-up Visit
Time frame: Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
Time frame: Week 13 & Week 26
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Huntington's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Efficacy of SKY-0515 in Participants With Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Pridopidine Phase 3 Study in Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease
Not yet recruiting
Creatine and Beta-Hydroxy-Beta-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation Plus Home-Based Exercise for Sarcopenia in Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease, Sarcopenia
Recruiting
Feasibility and Acceptability of an LLM-based Chatbot for Family Caregivers: Evaluation Study
Caregivers
RecruitingObservational study
Development of Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis for Single Gene Disorders
Invasive PreNatal Diagnosis in a Context of Family History of Single-gene Disorders, Including, Sickle Cell Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
57 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PF-02545920 in people with Huntington's Disease, run by Pfizer at 57 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 57 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) Assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) After 26 Weeks of Treatment. (time frame: Baseline, Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017.