Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4PREDICTRANCT02198651
A Phase 4 Trial Assessing the ImPact of Residual Inflammation Detected Via Imaging TEchniques, Drug Levels and Patient Characteristics on the Outcome of Dose TaperIng of Adalimumab in Clinical Remission Rheumatoid ArThritis (RA) Subjects
A Phase 4 study testing Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Diseases, run by AbbVie at 70 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study was to investigate the association between residual disease activity at Baseline as detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and the occurrence of flares in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) randomized to an adalimumab dose tapering regimen controlled by adalimumab… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 149 participants
- Where
- 70 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2015to 8 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria and/or the ACR /European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria (any duration since diagnosis).
- Participant must have met the following criteria:
- Must have been treated with adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week (sc eow) for at least 12 months prior to Week 0 Visit
- Must have been treated with concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at a stable dose (oral, sc or intramuscular (im) at any dose) for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 0 Visit or if not on MTX, must have been treated with other allowed conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) at a stable dose for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 0 Visit or if not treated with csDMARDs must maintain this regimen for at least 12 weeks prior to Week 0 Visit.
- Participant must be in sustained clinical remission based on the following:
- At least one documented 4 or 3 (if Patient's Global Assessment ; PGA is not available) variables Disease Activity Score 28 Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28 ESR) or DAS28 C-reactive protein (CRP) < 2.6 (or calculated based on documented components of the DAS28) in the participant's chart 6 months or longer prior to the Screening Visit;
Show all 11Show fewer
- 4 variables DAS28 (ESR) assessed at Screening < 2.6, with all components including ESR assessed at Screening.
- If participant was receiving concomitant allowed csDMARDs (in addition or not to MTX) the dose must have been stable for at least 12 weeks prior to the Week 0 Visit (e.g., chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, gold formulations [including auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and aurothioglucose] and/or leflunomide).
- If participant was receiving concomitant oral corticosteroids, prednisone or equivalent must have been < 10 mg/day and the dose must have been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to the Week 0 Visit.
- If participant was receiving concomitant non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), tramadol or other equivalent opioids and/or non-opioid analgesics, the dose and/or therapeutic scheme must have been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to the Week 0 Visit.
- Participant must have been able and willing to provide written informed consent and comply with the requirements of this study protocol.
Who cannot join
- Any 4 or 3 (if PGA is not available) variables DAS28 (ESR) or DAS28 (CRP) (or calculated based on documented components of the DAS28) assessed within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit ≥ 2.6.
- Participant was on an additional concomitant biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (including but not limited to abatacept, anakinra, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab or tocilizumab).
- Participant had been treated with intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within the last four weeks before Screening.
- Participant had undergone joint surgery within 12 weeks of Screening (at joints to be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or ultrasound).
- Participant had a medical condition precluding an MRI (e.g. magnetic activated implanted devices - cardiac pace-maker, insulin pump, neuro stimulators, etc. and metallic devices or fragments or clips in the eye, brain or spinal canal and in the hand/wrist undergoing MRI)
- Participant had a medical condition precluding a contrast MRI with gadolinium [e.g. nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, previous anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reaction to gadolinium containing contrast agent, pregnancy or breast feeding, severe renal insufficiency with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) below 30 mL/min/1.73m^2 at Screening, hepato-renal syndrome, severe chronic liver function impairment]
- Participant had been treated with any investigational drug of chemical or biologic nature within a minimum of 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) of the drug prior to the Screening Visit.
Trial locations and contacts
70 sites in 14 countries.
70 sites in 14 countries
United States13 sites
Arthritis Centers of Texas /ID# 152843
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Altoona Ctr Clinical Res /ID# 148448
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Aa Mrc Llc /Id# 151933
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439
West Tennessee Research Inst /ID# 148391
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
University of Florida /ID# 144851
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
North Georgia Rheumatology Grp /ID# 155225
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30045
The Arthritis & Diabetes Clinic, Inc. /ID# 149017
Monroe, Louisiana, 71203
Shanahan Rheuma & Immuno /ID# 148689
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617
Low Country Rheumatology, PA /ID# 154198
Summerville, South Carolina, 29486
Montefiore Medical Center /ID# 155013
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Westlake Medical Research (WMR) Clinical Trials /ID# 155386
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360-3994
North Mississippi Med Clinics /ID# 149443
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
J Michael Grelier Research /ID# 149772
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406
Spain9 sites
Hospital Parc de Salut del Mar /ID# 148670
Barcelona, 08003
Hosp Sant J. Despi-Moises Brog /ID# 135368
Barcelona, 08906
Hospital Universitario Basurto /ID# 135529
Bilbao, 48013
Hosp Clinico Virgen Arrixaca /ID# 137020
El Palmar, 30120
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon /ID# 133889
Madrid, 28007
Hospital Universitario La Paz /ID# 135369
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Univ De Mostoles /ID# 134489
Móstoles, 28935
Complejo Hosp Santiago /ID# 133890
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hosp General Univ de Valencia /ID# 134488
Valencia, 46014
Germany8 sites
Asklepios Klinik /ID# 129146
Bad Abbach, 93077
Charité Universitätsmedizin Campus Mitte /ID# 129142
Berlin, 10117
Immanuel-Krankenhaus /ID# 129143
Buch, 13125
Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein /ID# 129147
Cologne, 51149
Rheumaforschungszentrum II /ID# 148554
Hamburg, 20095
Klinikum der Univ Munich /ID# 129144
Munich, 80337
Rheumazentrum Ratingen /ID# 129148
Ratingen, 40882
Rheumatologische Praxis /ID# 151979
Rendsburg, 24768
United Kingdom7 sites
Mid Essex Hospitals NHS Trust /ID# 151636
Chelmsford, CM1 7ET
Western General Hospital /ID# 132966
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
Chapel Allerton Hospital /ID# 129208
Leeds, LS7 4SA
University Hospital Aintree /ID# 132980
Liverpool, L9 7AL
Whipps Cross Univ Hospital /ID# 133893
London, London, City of, E11 1NR
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Found /ID# 132965
London, London, City of, SE1 9RT
Queen Alexandra Hospital /ID# 132982
Portsmouth, PO6 3LY
Canada5 sites
St. Joseph's Healthcare /ID# 149233
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6
Institut de Rhum. de Montreal /ID# 129055
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 1S6
The Arthritis Program Res Grp /ID# 129056
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 3R7
Groupe de Recherche en Maladies Osseuses /ID# 129057
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 3M7
CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS /ID# 144839
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1G 2E8
Italy5 sites
A.O. Univ Consorziale Policlin /ID# 133932
Bari, 70124
Azienda Istituto Gaetano Pini /ID# 132964
Milan, 20122
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico /ID# 133886
Pavia, 27100
AP Romano Umberto I /ID# 132895
Rome, Lazio, 00161
A.O.U.I. di Verona Policlinico /ID# 132973
Verona, 37134
Australia4 sites
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital /ID# 154649
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Optimus Clinical Research Pty. /ID# 133881
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
Rheumatology Research Unit /ID# 133883
Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558
John Hunter Hospital /ID# 133884
Newcastle, New South Wales, 2305
France4 sites
CHU Amiens Picardie /ID# 144846
Amiens, Somme, 80054
Hospital Louis Pasteur /ID# 134708
Chartres, 28630
CHU de Grenoble - Albet Michal /ID# 135953
Grenoble, 38043
CHU de la miletrie /ID# 133928
Poitiers, Poitou-Charentes, 86021
Netherlands4 sites
Jan van Breemen Instituut /ID# 133887
Amsterdam, 1056 AB
Rijnstate Hospital /ID# 129206
Arnhem, 6815 AD
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden /ID# 133888
Leeuwarden, 8934 AD
UMC Utrecht /ID# 132896
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Greece3 sites
University General Hospital "Attikon" /ID# 134709
Athens, Attica, 12462
General Hospital of Athens /ID# 129202
Athens, 11527
General UH of Heraklion /ID# 134712
Heraklion, 71110
Hungary3 sites
Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz /ID# 134714
Budapest, 1023
Orszagos Reumatologiai es Fizi /ID# 134710
Budapest, 1023
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Koz /ID# 134715
Debrecen, 4032
Sweden3 sites
Akademiska Sjukhuset /ID# 148669
Uppsala, Uppsala County, 751 85
Uppsala University Hospital /ID# 133891
Uppsala, 75185
Vastmanlands Sjukhus /ID# 133892
Västerås, 72189
About this study
Official title: A Phase 4 Trial Assessing the ImPact of Residual Inflammation Detected Via Imaging TEchniques, Drug Levels and Patient Characteristics on the Outcome of Dose TaperIng of Adalimumab in Clinical Remission Rheumatoid ArThritis (RA) Subjects (PREDICTRA)
The primary objective of the study was to investigate the association between residual disease activity at Baseline as detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and the occurrence of flares in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) randomized to an adalimumab dose tapering regimen controlled by adalimumab withdrawal.
Read the detailed description
This was a Phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The study included a Screening period of up to 28 days (unless extended with justification approved by study-designated physician), a 4-week Lead-In Period with open label (OL) 40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every other week (eow), and a randomized 36-week double-blind period with 40 mg adalimumab sc every 3 weeks (q3wks; tapering arm) or placebo sc q3wks (withdrawal arm). Participants were randomized in a 5:1 ratio (tapering arm: withdrawal arm) after confirmation of meeting the disease activity score (DAS) criteria. Participants who experienced a protocol-defined flare at any time were to enter a rescue arm with OL 40 mg adalimumab administered sc eow for 16 weeks.
- Being tested
- Adalimumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Adalimumab, Taper, Flare, Arthritis, Anti-rheumatic drugs, Remission, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, Biomarker, Drug Level, Reduced dose
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Connective Tissue Diseases, Arthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabBiological
Also called ABT-D2E7, Humira
Pre-filled syringe, administered by subcutaneous injection
PlaceboOther
Pre-filled syringe, administered by subcutaneous injection in the Double-blind period
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab 40 mg eow | Experimental | 40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously every other week (eow) from Week 0 to Week 4 (Lead-in Period) Receives: Biological: Adalimumab |
| Adalimumab Tapering | Active comparator | 40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously every three weeks from Week 4 to Week 40 (Double-blind Period) Receives: Biological: Adalimumab |
| Adalimumab Withdrawal Arm | Placebo comparator | Placebo administered subcutaneously every three weeks from Week 4 to Week 40 (Double-blind Period) Receives: Other: Placebo |
| Adalimumab 40 mg eow Rescue Arm | Experimental | 40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously every other week from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16 (Open-label Rescue Period) Receives: Biological: Adalimumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Association Between Baseline Hand and Wrist Synovitis Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score and Flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering Arm
Synovitis was assessed in three wrist regions (the distal radioulnar joint; the radiocarpal joint; the intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints) and in each Metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) joint. The first carpometacarpal joint and the first MCP joint are not scored. The scale is 0-3. Score 0 is normal, and 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Flare is defined as an increase from Double-blind Baseline in DAS (Disease Activity Score) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of > 0.6 AND DAS28 [ESR] > 2.6, OR an increase in DAS28 (ESR) of ≥ 1.2 irrespective of the resulting DAS28 [ESR]. The association between baseline hand and wrist synovitis RAMRIS score and occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering arm was examined using logistic regression, and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio was calculated.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40
Association Between Baseline Bone Marrow Edema RAMRIS Score and Flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering Arm
Bone marrow edema in each bone was scored separately. The scale is 0-3 based on the proportion of bone with edema, as follows-0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Flare is defined as an increase from Double-blind Baseline in DAS (Disease Activity Score) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of > 0.6 AND DAS28 [ESR] > 2.6, OR an increase in DAS28 (ESR) of ≥ 1.2 irrespective of the resulting DAS28 [ESR]. The association between baseline bone marrow edema rheumatoid arthritis MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) score and occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering arm was examined using logistic regression, and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio was calculated.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40
Association Between a Composite of Baseline Hand and Wrist Synovitis and Bone Marrow Edema RAMRIS Scores and Flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering Arm
The composite score is the sum of the baseline hand and wrist synovitis and bone marrow edema RAMRIS scores. Flare is defined as an increase from Double-blind Baseline in DAS (Disease Activity Score) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of > 0.6 AND DAS28 [ESR] > 2.6, OR an increase in DAS28 (ESR) of ≥ 1.2 irrespective of the resulting DAS28 [ESR]. The association between the composite baseline hand and wrist synovitis score and baseline bone marrow edema rheumatoid arthritis MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) score and occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering arm was examined using logistic regression, and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio was calculated.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40
Secondary outcomes (37)
Median Time to Flare
Time to flare was defined as the number of weeks from the date of the first dose of study drug in the Double-blind period to the date of flare.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40
Physicians' Assessment of Flare Severity
Physicians rated the severity of flare at the Flare Week 0 visit from 0 (not severe) to 10 (very severe). The number of participants within each level of flare severity is presented.
Measured: At the Flare Week 0 Visit
Participants' Assessment of Flare Severity
Participants rated the severity of flare at the Flare Week 0 visit from 0 (not severe) to 10 (very severe). The number of participants within each level of flare severity is presented.
Measured: At the Flare Week 0 Visit
Percentage of Participants With a Flare
Flare was defined as an increase from Double-blind Baseline in DAS (Disease Activity Score) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of > 0.6 AND DAS28 [ESR] > 2.6, OR an increase in DAS28 (ESR) of ≥ 1.2 irrespective of the resulting DAS28 [ESR].
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40
Number of Participants Who Regained Clinical Remission in the Open-Label Rescue Arm Over Time
The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; mm/hour), and the participant's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 (ESR) score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as DAS28 (ESR) < 2.6.
Measured: From Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Median Time to Clinical Remission From the Occurrence of Flare
The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; mm/hour), and the participant's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 (ESR) score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as DAS28 (ESR) < 2.6. Time to clinical remission was defined as the number of weeks from the occurrence of flare to the first date of clinical remission.
Measured: From Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
The Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; mm/hour), and the participant's assessment of global disease activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS] from 0 to 10 cm) are included in the DAS28 (ESR) score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more disease activity. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
The CDAI is a validated measure of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, global health assessed by the participant on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 (cm), and global health assessed by an investigator on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 (cm) were included in the CDAI score. Scores on the CDAI range from 0 to 76; higher scores indicate more disease activity. Negative values indicate improvement from the Double-blind baseline score.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score
The SDAI is a validated measure of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, global health assessed by the participant on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 (cm), global health assessed by an investigator on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 (cm), and serum levels of C-reactive protein levels (mg/dL) were included in the SDAI score. Scores on the SDAI range from 0 to 86; higher scores indicate more disease activity. Negative values indicate improvement from the Double-blind baseline score.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Number of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission Defined By DAS28 (ESR) < 2.6, SDAI ≤ 3.3, and CDAI ≤ 2.8 at Each Visit By Treatment Arm
The maintenance of clinical remission after regaining remission during the Open-label rescue period was defined as either Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28 ESR) < 2.6, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score ≤ 3.3, or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score ≤ 2.8).
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 40 or Final Visit in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Synovitis Score
Synovitis was assessed in three wrist regions (the distal radioulnar joint; the radiocarpal joint; the intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints) and in each Metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) joint. The first carpometacarpal joint and the first MCP joint are not scored. The scale is 0-3. Score 0 is normal, and 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 or Final visit
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 40 or Final Visit in Bone Marrow Edema (BME) Score
Bone edema in each bone was scored separately. The scale is 0-3 based on the proportion of bone with edema, as follows-0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 or Final visit
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 40 or Final Visit in Bone Erosions Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score
Bone erosions in each bone (wrists: carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna, metacarpal bases; MCP joints: metacarpal heads, phalangeal bases) were scored separately. The scale is 0-10, based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the ''assessed bone volume'', judged on all available images-0: no erosion; 1: 1-10% of bone eroded; 2; 11-20%, etc.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 or Final Visit
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Over Time
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a participant-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defined for the HAQ-DI is ≥ 0.22.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score ≤ 0.5 at Double-blind Baseline and at Week 40
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a participant-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. The number of participants with HAQ-DI score ≤ 0.5 (considered to be normal) was recorded.
Measured: Week 4 and Week 40
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) Questionnaire Scores Assessed During In-office Visits
The RAPID3 is an activity index derived from the Multi-dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MD-HAQ). It includes an assessment of physical function, a pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and a participant global assessment of disease activity VAS. The total RAPID3 score ranges from 0 to 30 where higher scores represent severe disease. Negative values indicate improvement from the Double-blind baseline score.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Flare Week 0 in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) Questionnaire Scores Assessed at Home
The RAPID3 is an activity index derived from the Multi-dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MD-HAQ). It includes an assessment of physical function, a pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and a participant global assessment of disease activity VAS. The total RAPID3 score ranges from 0 to 30 where higher scores represent severe disease. Negative values indicate improvement from the Double-blind baseline score.
Measured: Flare Week 0 and Flare Weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Swollen Joint Count 28
Twenty-eight joints, excluding hip joints, were assessed for swelling by physical examination. Swelling of each joint was classified as present (1) or absent (0), for a total possible score of 0 (0 joints with swelling) to 28 (worst possible score/28 joints with swelling). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Swollen Joint Count 66
Sixty-six joints were assessed for swelling by physical examination. Swelling of each joint was classified as present (1) or absent (0), for a total possible score of 0 (0 joints with swelling) to 66 (worst possible score/66 joints with swelling). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Tender Joint Count 28
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness by physical examination. Pain or tenderness of each joint was classified as present (1) or absent (0), for a total possible score of 0 (0 joints with tenderness) to 28 (worst possible score/28 joints with tenderness). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68
Sixty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness by physical examination. Pain or tenderness of each joint was classified as present (1) or absent (0), for a total possible score of 0 (0 joints with tenderness) to 68 (worst possible score/68 joints with tenderness). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Participants rated the severity of their rheumatoid arthritis symptoms and how well they were doing during the last 24 hours by placing a vertical mark on a line with a range of 0 (very well) to 100 mm (very poorly). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain
Participants rated the severity of their rheumatoid arthritis pain in the past week by placing a vertical mark on a line with a range of 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (severe pain). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Physicians assessed participants' current rheumatoid arthritis disease activity at the time of the visit (independent of the participant's self-assessment) by placing a vertical mark on a line with a range of 0 (very low) to 100 mm (very high). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Morning Stiffness Duration
The duration of morning stiffness was reported by participants as the average daily length during the past week in minutes (from time of awaking to time of maximal improvement). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Morning Stiffness Severity
Morning stiffness severity was assessed by a numeric rating-scale (NRS). Participants rated the severity of morning stiffness during the past week from 0 to 10 with 0 representing "not severe" and 10 "very severe". Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Sleep Disturbance
Participants rated the severity of their sleep disturbance in the past week by placing a vertical mark on a line with a range of 0 (sleep is no problem) to 100 mm (sleep is a major problem). Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Effectiveness Score
Participants completed the 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM; Version 1.4) to assess satisfaction with their current rheumatoid arthritis treatment over the previous 2-3 weeks or since the last time that they took the medication. The TSQM consists of fourteen items over four domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). The 14 questions are answered either with yes/no or by means of a five or seven stage scale (ranging from very unsatisfied to satisfied). TSQM Scale scores for each domain range from 0 to 100 and higher scores represent higher satisfaction. Negative values indicate worsening from baseline.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Side Effects Score
Participants completed the 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM; Version 1.4) to assess satisfaction with their current rheumatoid arthritis treatment over the previous 2-3 weeks or since the last time that they took the medication. The TSQM consists of fourteen items over four domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). The 14 questions are answered either with yes/no or by means of a five or seven stage scale (ranging from very unsatisfied to satisfied). TSQM Scale scores for each domain range from 0 to 100 and higher scores represent higher satisfaction. Negative values indicate worsening from baseline.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Convenience Score
Participants completed the 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM; Version 1.4) to assess satisfaction with their current rheumatoid arthritis treatment over the previous 2-3 weeks or since the last time that they took the medication. The TSQM consists of fourteen items over four domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). The 14 questions are answered either with yes/no or by means of a five or seven stage scale (ranging from very unsatisfied to satisfied). TSQM Scale scores for each domain range from 0 to 100 and higher scores represent higher satisfaction. Negative values indicate worsening from baseline.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Global Satisfaction Score
Participants completed the 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM; Version 1.4) to assess satisfaction with their current rheumatoid arthritis treatment over the previous 2-3 weeks or since the last time that they took the medication. The TSQM consists of fourteen items over four domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). The 14 questions are answered either with yes/no or by means of a five or seven stage scale (ranging from very unsatisfied to satisfied). TSQM Scale scores for each domain range from 0 to 100 and higher scores represent higher satisfaction. Negative values indicate worsening from baseline.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Overall Work Impairment and Activity Impairment Scores
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire for general health is a validated tool in rheumatoid arthritis consisting of 6 questions, based on participant recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 28, and 40 and Flare Weeks 0, 10, and 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Short-Form 36 Version 2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
The SF-36v2 is a non-disease specific Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) instrument. The SF-36v2 comprises 36 total items (questions) targeting a subject's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health) with a recall period of four weeks. Domain scores are aggregated into a Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. SF-36v2 scores for each domain and PCS/MCS range from 0-100: higher scores indicate a better state of health and a decrease from baseline represents worsening.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Short-Form 36 Version 2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score
The SF-36v2 is a non-disease specific Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) instrument. The SF-36v2 comprises 36 total items (questions) targeting a subject's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health) with a recall period of four weeks. Domain scores are aggregated into a Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. SF-36v2 scores for each domain and PCS/MCS range from 0-100: higher scores indicate a better state of health and a decrease from baseline represents worsening.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale
The FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire is a participant questionnaire that consists of 13 questions designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by participants in the previous 7 days. Participants respond to the questions on a scale from 'not at all' (0) to 'very much' (4). The scale score is computed by summing the item scores, after reversing those items that are worded in the negative direction. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.
Measured: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Serum Levels of C-reactive Protein (CRP)
C-Reactive Protein (CRP; mg/L) was measured from blood samples as a marker for inflammation. Higher levels are indicative of more inflammation. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Serum Levels of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; mm/hour) indirectly measures how much inflammation is in the body. A higher ESR is indicative of increased inflammation. Negative values indicate improvement from baseline.
Measured: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study start5 Jan 2015
- Primary completion3 May 2018
- Study completion8 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 149 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02198651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M14-500
- Other IDs
- 2014-001114-26, 2014
- Acronym
- PREDICTRA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Publications
Emery P, Burmester GR, Naredo E, Sinigaglia L, Lagunes I, Koenigsbauer F, Conaghan PG. Adalimumab dose tapering in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are in long-standing clinical remission: results of the phase IV PREDICTRA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Aug;79(8):1023-1030. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217246. Epub 2020 May 13.
PubMed 32404343Emery P, Burmester GR, Naredo E, Zhou Y, Hojnik M, Conaghan PG. Design of a phase IV randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the ImPact of Residual Inflammation Detected via Imaging TEchniques, Drug Levels and Patient Characteristics on the Outcome of Dose TaperIng of Adalimumab in Clinical Remission Rheumatoid ArThritis (RA) patients (PREDICTRA). BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 28;8(2):e019007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019007.
PubMed 29490959
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 4 Trial Assessing the ImPact of Residual Inflammation Detected Via Imaging TEchniques, Drug Levels and Patient Characteristics on the Outcome of Dose TaperIng of Adalimumab in Clinical Remission Rheumatoid ArThritis (RA) Subjects (PREDICTRA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02198651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREDICTRA / M14-500
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Adalimumab, Taper, Flare, Arthritis, Anti-rheumatic drugs, Remission, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 149 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jun 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study was to investigate the association between residual disease activity at Baseline as detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and the occurrence of flares in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) randomized to an adalimumab dose tapering regimen controlled by adalimumab withdrawal.
Detailed description
This was a Phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The study included a Screening period of up to 28 days (unless extended with justification approved by study-designated physician), a 4-week Lead-In Period with open label (OL) 40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously (sc) every other week (eow), and a randomized 36-week double-blind period with 40 mg adalimumab sc every 3 weeks (q3wks; tapering arm) or placebo sc q3wks (withdrawal arm). Participants were randomized in a 5:1 ratio (tapering arm: withdrawal arm) after confirmation of meeting the disease activity score (DAS) criteria. Participants who experienced a protocol-defined flare at any time were to enter a rescue arm with OL 40 mg adalimumab administered sc eow for 16 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab 40 mg eow | Experimental | Biological: Adalimumab40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously every other week (eow) from Week 0 to Week 4 (Lead-in Period) |
| Adalimumab Tapering | Active comparator | Biological: Adalimumab40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously every three weeks from Week 4 to Week 40 (Double-blind Period) |
| Adalimumab Withdrawal Arm | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPlacebo administered subcutaneously every three weeks from Week 4 to Week 40 (Double-blind Period) |
| Adalimumab 40 mg eow Rescue Arm | Experimental | Biological: Adalimumab40 mg adalimumab administered subcutaneously every other week from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16 (Open-label Rescue Period) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Participant had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as defined by the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria and/or the ACR /European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria (any duration since diagnosis).
- Participant must have met the following criteria:
- Participant must be in sustained clinical remission based on the following:
- If participant was receiving concomitant allowed csDMARDs (in addition or not to MTX) the dose must have been stable for at least 12 weeks prior to the Week 0 Visit (e.g., chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, gold formulations [including auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and aurothioglucose] and/or leflunomide).
- If participant was receiving concomitant oral corticosteroids, prednisone or equivalent must have been < 10 mg/day and the dose must have been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to the Week 0 Visit.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Any 4 or 3 (if PGA is not available) variables DAS28 (ESR) or DAS28 (CRP) (or calculated based on documented components of the DAS28) assessed within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit ≥ 2.6.
- Participant was on an additional concomitant biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) (including but not limited to abatacept, anakinra, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab or tocilizumab).
- Participant had been treated with intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within the last four weeks before Screening.
- Participant had undergone joint surgery within 12 weeks of Screening (at joints to be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or ultrasound).
- Participant had a medical condition precluding an MRI (e.g. magnetic activated implanted devices - cardiac pace-maker, insulin pump, neuro stimulators, etc. and metallic devices or fragments or clips in the eye, brain or spinal canal and in the hand/wrist undergoing MRI)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: ABT-D2E7, HumiraPre-filled syringe, administered by subcutaneous injection | Biological | Adalimumab 40 mg eow, Adalimumab 40 mg eow Rescue Arm, Adalimumab Tapering |
| PlaceboPre-filled syringe, administered by subcutaneous injection in the Double-blind period | Other | Adalimumab Withdrawal Arm |
Primary outcome
Association Between Baseline Hand and Wrist Synovitis Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score and Flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering Arm
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40
Synovitis was assessed in three wrist regions (the distal radioulnar joint; the radiocarpal joint; the intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints) and in each Metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) joint. The first carpometacarpal joint and the first MCP joint are not scored. The scale is 0-3. Score 0 is normal, and 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Flare is defined as an increase from Double-blind Baseline in DAS (Disease Activity Score) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of > 0.6 AND DAS28 [ESR] > 2.6, OR an increase in DAS28 (ESR) of ≥ 1.2 irrespective of the resulting DAS28 [ESR]. The association between baseline hand and wrist synovitis RAMRIS score and occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering arm was examined using logistic regression, and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio was calculated.
Association Between Baseline Bone Marrow Edema RAMRIS Score and Flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering Arm
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40
Bone marrow edema in each bone was scored separately. The scale is 0-3 based on the proportion of bone with edema, as follows-0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Flare is defined as an increase from Double-blind Baseline in DAS (Disease Activity Score) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of > 0.6 AND DAS28 [ESR] > 2.6, OR an increase in DAS28 (ESR) of ≥ 1.2 irrespective of the resulting DAS28 [ESR]. The association between baseline bone marrow edema rheumatoid arthritis MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) score and occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering arm was examined using logistic regression, and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio was calculated.
Association Between a Composite of Baseline Hand and Wrist Synovitis and Bone Marrow Edema RAMRIS Scores and Flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering Arm
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40
The composite score is the sum of the baseline hand and wrist synovitis and bone marrow edema RAMRIS scores. Flare is defined as an increase from Double-blind Baseline in DAS (Disease Activity Score) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of > 0.6 AND DAS28 [ESR] > 2.6, OR an increase in DAS28 (ESR) of ≥ 1.2 irrespective of the resulting DAS28 [ESR]. The association between the composite baseline hand and wrist synovitis score and baseline bone marrow edema rheumatoid arthritis MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) score and occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering arm was examined using logistic regression, and the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio was calculated.
37 secondary outcomes
Median Time to Flare
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40
Physicians' Assessment of Flare Severity
Time frame: At the Flare Week 0 Visit
Participants' Assessment of Flare Severity
Time frame: At the Flare Week 0 Visit
Percentage of Participants With a Flare
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40
Number of Participants Who Regained Clinical Remission in the Open-Label Rescue Arm Over Time
Time frame: From Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Median Time to Clinical Remission From the Occurrence of Flare
Time frame: From Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Number of Participants Maintaining Clinical Remission Defined By DAS28 (ESR) < 2.6, SDAI ≤ 3.3, and CDAI ≤ 2.8 at Each Visit By Treatment Arm
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 40 or Final Visit in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Synovitis Score
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 or Final visit
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 40 or Final Visit in Bone Marrow Edema (BME) Score
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 or Final visit
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline to Week 40 or Final Visit in Bone Erosions Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 or Final Visit
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Over Time
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score ≤ 0.5 at Double-blind Baseline and at Week 40
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 40
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) Questionnaire Scores Assessed During In-office Visits
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Flare Week 0 in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) Questionnaire Scores Assessed at Home
Time frame: Flare Week 0 and Flare Weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Swollen Joint Count 28
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Swollen Joint Count 66
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Tender Joint Count 28
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Morning Stiffness Duration
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Morning Stiffness Severity
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Sleep Disturbance
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Effectiveness Score
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Side Effects Score
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Convenience Score
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Global Satisfaction Score
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Overall Work Impairment and Activity Impairment Scores
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 28, and 40 and Flare Weeks 0, 10, and 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Short-Form 36 Version 2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Short-Form 36 Version 2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 16, 28, and 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Serum Levels of C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Mean Change From Double-blind Baseline in Serum Levels of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40 and from Flare Week 0 to Flare Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32404343Emery P, Burmester GR, Naredo E, Sinigaglia L, Lagunes I, Koenigsbauer F, Conaghan PG. Adalimumab dose tapering in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are in long-standing clinical remission: results of the phase IV PREDICTRA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Aug;79(8):1023-1030. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217246. Epub 2020 May 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29490959Emery P, Burmester GR, Naredo E, Zhou Y, Hojnik M, Conaghan PG. Design of a phase IV randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the ImPact of Residual Inflammation Detected via Imaging TEchniques, Drug Levels and Patient Characteristics on the Outcome of Dose TaperIng of Adalimumab in Clinical Remission Rheumatoid ArThritis (RA) patients (PREDICTRA). BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 28;8(2):e019007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019007.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
70 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Diseases, run by AbbVie at 70 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 70 sites in United States, Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Association Between Baseline Hand and Wrist Synovitis Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score and Flare up to Week 40 in the Tapering Arm (time frame: From Week 4 to Week 40). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02198651, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2019.