AzTrials
AzTrials

Membranous NephropathySOURISNCT02199145

Role of Anti-mouse PLA2R1 ELISA in Membranous Nephropathy

A study testing Blood and urine analysis in people with Membranous Nephropathy, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 3 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is an auto-immune kidney disease and a common cause of nephrotic syndrome. About 30% of MN patients progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) while 30% undergo spontaneous remission. The phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) is the major auto-antigen in idiopathic MN. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Membranous Nephropathy
What is being tested?
Blood and urine analysis
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
3 sitesFrance
Study dates
17 Jul 2015to 4 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients
  • Patients with MN stade I-II confirmed by kidney biopsy
  • Patients with MDRD>30 ml/mn/1.73m2
  • Patients with anti-PLA2R1 antibodies
  • Effective Contraception for women of childbearing age

Who cannot join

  • Patients minors
  • Patients refusing to participate in the study
  • Patients with secondary MN (systemic Lupus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus or cancer)
  • Pregnant women: a urine pregnancy test will be performed for women of childbearing age. The results will be communicated to the patient by a doctor of his choice.
  • Persons deprived of liberty (administrative or judicial)
  • Persons under guardianship
  • People may not understand the research
  • Persons under guardianship, under judicial protection

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

France3 sites
  • CHU de Besançon

    Besançon

  • AP-HM

    Marseille, 13354

  • Nephrology Department, Nice University Hospital

    Nice, 06003

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Indication and Response to Immunosuppressive Treatment in Membranous Nephropathy : Role of Anti-mouse PLA2R1 ELISA

Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is an auto-immune kidney disease and a common cause of nephrotic syndrome. About 30% of MN patients progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) while 30% undergo spontaneous remission. The phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) is the major auto-antigen in idiopathic MN. Anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies are found during the active phase of MN. Predictors of disease progression include high titers of anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies and serum creatinine levels at presentation, as well as decline in renal function during the first six months of follow-up. Investigators identified new prognostic factors in a cohort of 41 idiopathic MN patients with nephrotic syndrome and anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies at the time of presentation. During a follow-up of at least 36 months, 21 patients had a persistent nephrotic syndrome (group A) and 20 showed partial or total remission (group R). We first measured the cross-reactivity of their sera at the time of presentation to human, rabbit and mouse recombinant PLA2R1 by western blot. All patients exhibited reactivity against human and rabbit PLA2R1, but only some of them did against mouse PLA2R1. These results suggest the presence of distinct epitopes that are differentially conserved among PLA2R1 orthologs.Investigators then set-up three parallel ELISAs using human, rabbit and mouse recombinant PLA2R1. All 41 MN patients showed activity in human and rabbit ELISAs at presentation but only 32 of them (78%) in mouse ELISA.They finally analyzed the association between anti-PLA2R1 titers at presentation in the different ELISAs and the subsequent clinical outcome. The mean anti-PLA2R1 activity was significantly different between group A and R in mouse ELISA but not in human and rabbit ELISA. Patients with anti-mouse PLA2R1 activity over 605 RU (relative unit)/ml showed a significantly lower survival without doubling of serum creatinine or ESKD , but patients in the highest tertile of anti-PLA2R1 activity in rabbit and human ELISA did not show a significant increased risk of renal failure progression. The results suggest that the specific detection of particular anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies using the novel anti-mouse PLA2R1 ELISA can identify MN patients at risk for ESKD. The aim is to confirm these result on a prospective cohort.

Read the detailed description

Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is an auto-immune kidney disease and a common cause of nephrotic syndrome. About 30% of MN patients progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) while 30% undergo spontaneous remission. The phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) is the major auto-antigen in idiopathic MN. Anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies are found during the active phase of MN [2,3]. Predictors of disease progression include high titers of anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies and serum creatinine levels at presentation, as well as decline in renal function during the first six months of follow-up. Investigators identified new prognostic factors in a cohort of 41 idiopathic MN patients with nephrotic syndrome and anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies at the time of presentation. During a follow-up of at least 36 months, 21 patients had a persistent nephrotic syndrome (group A) and 20 showed partial or total remission (group R). We first measured the cross-reactivity of their sera at the time of presentation to human, rabbit and mouse recombinant PLA2R1 by western blot. All patients exhibited reactivity against human and rabbit PLA2R1, but only some of them did against mouse PLA2R1. These results suggest the presence of distinct epitopes that are differentially conserved among PLA2R1 orthologs. We then set-up three parallel ELISAs using human, rabbit and mouse recombinant PLA2R1. All 41 MN patients showed activity in human and rabbit ELISAs at presentation but only 32 of them (78%) in mouse ELISA.

Investigators finally analyzed the association between anti-PLA2R1 titers at presentation in the different ELISAs and the subsequent clinical outcome. The mean anti-PLA2R1 activity was significantly different between group A and R in mouse ELISA in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p =0.006 and p =0.02, respectively) but not in human and rabbit ELISAs. An analysis of the mouse ELISA titers defines a threshold of 605 RU/ml above which 100% of patients had a poor prognosis, but no such threshold could be defined in rabbit and human ELISA. Patients with anti-mouse PLA2R1 activity over 605 RU/ml showed a significantly lower survival without doubling of serum creatinine or ESKD (p=0.002 using the log-rank test), but patients in the highest tertile of anti-PLA2R1 activity in rabbit and human ELISAs did not show a significant increased risk of renal failure progression. The results suggest that the specific detection of particular anti-PLA2R1 autoantibodies using the novel anti-mouse PLA2R1 ELISA can identify MN patients at risk for ESKD. The aim is to confirm these result on a prospective cohort.We propose to measure on a prospective cohort at the time of MN diagnosis if high titer of anti-mPLA2R1 Ab (anti-mouse phospholipase A2 receptor1 antibodies) is associated with nephrotic proteinuria (over 3.5 g/g) or increased of creatininemia over 30% at month 6, 12 and 18. An ancillary study will try to characterised the nephrogenic epitope conserved between human, rabbit and mouse.

Each patient with nephrotic syndrome should benefit of a kidney biopsy. For each patient we will conserved 2 dry tubes frozen at the time of biopsy. If we confirm the diagnosis of MN with anti-PLA2R1 Ab, we propose to the patient to be included in this study. He will have a visit every months for the first three months and every three months after, with collection of the following: blood pressure, weight, creatinine, albumin, blood electrolytes, proteinuria / creatinine in sample 1 assay Ac anti-PLA2R1 on 3 ELISA (human, rabbit and mouse) In case of persistent refractory nephrotic syndrome after 6 months, or the appearance of a 30% increase in serum creatinine, treatment with rituximab (2 × 1 g IV 15 days) will be proposed. Clinical and biological monitoring will be continued every 3 months for 18 months.

Being tested
Blood and urine analysis
Medical subject headings
Glomerulonephritis, Membranous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood and urine analysisProcedure or surgery

    creatinine, albumin, blood electrolytes, proteinuria / creatinine in sample 1 assay Ac anti-PLA2R1 on 3 ELISA (human, rabbit and mouse)

Study groups in NCT02199145
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blood and urine analysisOthercreatinine, albumin, blood electrolytes, proteinuria /creatinine in sample 1 assay Ac anti-PLA2R1 on 3 ELISA (human, rabbit and mouse)
Receives: Procedure: Blood and urine analysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline Creatininemia level

    30% increase in creatininemia after 6 months of symptomatic treatment with RAAS blocker

    Measured: at 6, 12 and 18 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Remission rate in MN

    Remission rate in MN one year after Rituximab with absence of nephrotic syndrome and renal insufficiency (estimated by MDRD> 60 ml/min/1, 73m2).

    (MDRD=Modification of the Diet in Renal Disease)

    Measured: at 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 Jul 2015
  3. Primary completion4 Jun 2020
  4. Study completion4 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02199145
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-AOI-05
Acronym
SOURIS
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
22 Jul 2014
Last updated
24 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Seitz-Polski B, Dahan K, Debiec H, Rousseau A, Andreani M, Zaghrini C, Ticchioni M, Rosenthal A, Benzaken S, Bernard G, Lambeau G, Ronco P, Esnault VLM. High-Dose Rituximab and Early Remission in PLA2R1-Related Membranous Nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Aug 7;14(8):1173-1182. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11791018. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

    PubMed 31340979
  • Teisseyre M, Cremoni M, Boyer-Suavet S, Crepin T, Benzaken S, Zorzi K, Esnault V, Brglez V, Seitz-Polski B. Rituximab Immunomonitoring Predicts Remission in Membranous Nephropathy. Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 13;12:738788. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.738788. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34721403

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood and urine analysis in people with Membranous Nephropathy, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 3 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline Creatininemia level (time frame: at 6, 12 and 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02199145, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in