Traumatic Brain InjuryPhase 2TRAHTNCT02203292
Transfusion Requirements After Head Trauma
A Phase 2 study testing Liberal transfusion strategy and Restrictive transfusion strategy in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
TRAHT is a pilot randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate safety and feasibility of two red blood cells transfusion thresholds in moderate or severe traumatic brain injured patients Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Liberal transfusion strategy and Restrictive transfusion strategy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age equal to or greater than 18 years
- Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, defined as Glasgow coma scale less than or equal to 12 at hospital admission
- Hemoglobin lower than 9.0 g/dL within 7 days from hospital admission
Who cannot join
- Glasgow coma scale equal to 3 with dilated pupils bilaterally
- Previous neurological sequelae
- Pregnant women
- Jehovah's Witnesses
- Hemorrhagic shock at randomization
- Moribund patients
- Unable to provide consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo
About this study
TRAHT is a pilot randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate safety and feasibility of two red blood cells transfusion thresholds in moderate or severe traumatic brain injured patients
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- Liberal transfusion strategy, Restrictive transfusion strategy
- Keywords
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Blood Transfusion
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liberal transfusion strategyBehavioural
Patients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 9.0 g/dL
Restrictive transfusion strategyBehavioural
Patients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 7.0 g/dL
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Active comparator | Liberal transfusion strategy. Patients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 9.0 g/dL Receives: Behavioral: Liberal transfusion strategy |
| Restrictive | Experimental | Restrictive transfusion strategy. Patients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 7.0 g/dL Receives: Behavioral: Restrictive transfusion strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hemoglobin difference
Hemoglobin difference between restrictive and liberal groups
Measured: 14 days
Secondary outcomes (18)
Number of transfused patients
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Number of red blood cell packages transfused
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
ICU mortality
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Hospital mortality
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
180 days mortality
Measured: Participants will be followed for 180 after hospital discharge
Blood stream infection
Positive blood culture with a pathogenic microorganism
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Re-bleeding
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Intensity of measures to reduce intracranial pressure
Measures to reduce intracranial pressure such as sedation, hypertonic solutions, hypothermia, liquorice drainage, decompressive craniectomy or hyperventilation
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Hospital length of stay
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
ICU length of stay
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Mechanical ventilation free days
Days breathing without assistance from hospital admission to day 28.
Measured: 28 days
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at hospital discharge
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale after 6 months
Measured: 180 days
Myocardial Infarction
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Septic Shock
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Cerebral autoregulation
Cerebral autoregulation as measure by the transcranial doppler
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Pulsatility index
Pulsatility index as measure by the transcranial doppler
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, André Luiz Nunes Gobatto, University of Sao Paulo
- Investigators
- André LN Gobatto, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02203292
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 32520914.3.0000.0068
- Acronym
- TRAHT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 27 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Fergusson DA, Pagano MB, Roubinian NH, Turgeon AF, Valentine S, Trivella M, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 20;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub6.
PubMed 41114449Gobatto ALN, Solla D, Brasil S, Taccone FS, Carlotti CG Jr, Malbouisson LMS, Paiva WS. Progressive hemorrhagic injury and ischemia after severe traumatic brain injury according to hemoglobin transfusion thresholds: a post-hoc analysis of the transfusion requirements after head trauma trial. Crit Care. 2024 Jul 3;28(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04981-5. No abstract available.
PubMed 38961443Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
PubMed 34932836Gobatto ALN, Link MA, Solla DJ, Bassi E, Tierno PF, Paiva W, Taccone FS, Malbouisson LM. Transfusion requirements after head trauma: a randomized feasibility controlled trial. Crit Care. 2019 Mar 12;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2273-9.
PubMed 30871608
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transfusion Requirements After Head Trauma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02203292
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRAHT / 32520914.3.0000.0068
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Keywords
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Blood Transfusion
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
TRAHT is a pilot randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate safety and feasibility of two red blood cells transfusion thresholds in moderate or severe traumatic brain injured patients
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Active comparator | Behavioral: Liberal transfusion strategyLiberal transfusion strategy. Patients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 9.0 g/dL |
| Restrictive | Experimental | Behavioral: Restrictive transfusion strategyRestrictive transfusion strategy. Patients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 7.0 g/dL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age equal to or greater than 18 years
- Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, defined as Glasgow coma scale less than or equal to 12 at hospital admission
- Hemoglobin lower than 9.0 g/dL within 7 days from hospital admission
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Glasgow coma scale equal to 3 with dilated pupils bilaterally
- Previous neurological sequelae
- Pregnant women
- Jehovah's Witnesses
- Hemorrhagic shock at randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal transfusion strategyPatients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 9.0 g/dL | Behavioural | Liberal |
| Restrictive transfusion strategyPatients will have red blood cells transfused only if Hb < 7.0 g/dL | Behavioural | Restrictive |
Primary outcome
Hemoglobin difference
Time frame: 14 days
Hemoglobin difference between restrictive and liberal groups
18 secondary outcomes
Number of transfused patients
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Number of red blood cell packages transfused
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
ICU mortality
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Hospital mortality
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
180 days mortality
Time frame: Participants will be followed for 180 after hospital discharge
Blood stream infection
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Re-bleeding
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Intensity of measures to reduce intracranial pressure
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
ICU length of stay
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Mechanical ventilation free days
Time frame: 28 days
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at hospital discharge
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale after 6 months
Time frame: 180 days
Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Septic Shock
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Cerebral autoregulation
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Pulsatility index
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41114449Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Fergusson DA, Pagano MB, Roubinian NH, Turgeon AF, Valentine S, Trivella M, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 20;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38961443Gobatto ALN, Solla D, Brasil S, Taccone FS, Carlotti CG Jr, Malbouisson LMS, Paiva WS. Progressive hemorrhagic injury and ischemia after severe traumatic brain injury according to hemoglobin transfusion thresholds: a post-hoc analysis of the transfusion requirements after head trauma trial. Crit Care. 2024 Jul 3;28(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04981-5. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34932836Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30871608Gobatto ALN, Link MA, Solla DJ, Bassi E, Tierno PF, Paiva W, Taccone FS, Malbouisson LM. Transfusion requirements after head trauma: a randomized feasibility controlled trial. Crit Care. 2019 Mar 12;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2273-9.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Cortical Spreading Depolarization After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Predict Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
Enrolling by invitation
Risk Assessment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Military Training
Trauma, Brain
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Post-Traumatic Seizures Prevention Trial (E-PTS Trial)
Seizures, Traumatic Brain Injuries
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Description of Clinicians' Predictive Abilities Before and After a Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Prognosis, Brain Injury, Traumatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
André LN Gobatto, M.D. principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Liberal transfusion strategy and Restrictive transfusion strategy in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hemoglobin difference (time frame: 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02203292, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.