Condition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group)NCT02203617
Using Baby Books to Promote Maternal and Child Health
A study testing Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidance and Book provision in people with Condition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group) and Condition 2 - Non-educational Condition (Non-educational Book Group), run by Vanderbilt University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The Baby Books Project tests whether embedding educational information into baby books can improve the health and wellbeing of first-time mothers and their young children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Condition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group), Condition 2 - Non-educational Condition (Non-educational Book Group), Condition 3 - Control Condition (No-book Group)
- What is being tested?
- Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidance and Book provision
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 198 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2005to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women who are pregnant with first child and able to read in English at a first grade reading level
Who cannot join
- Women with other children, men, those not able to read in English at a first grade level
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
About this study
The Baby Books Project tests whether embedding educational information into baby books can improve the health and wellbeing of first-time mothers and their young children.
Read the detailed description
This study tests the efficacy of embedding educational information (i.e., pediatric anticipatory guidance) into baby books that first-time mothers read to their infants. This 3-group longitudinal study recruited first-time mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy, randomly assigned them to conditions, and followed them until the child was 18 months of age. One group received educational baby books, another group was given the same illustrated books with non-educational text, and the third group was not given any books. Thus, the effects of educational reading could be parsed from the effects of reading alone. The study aimed to test whether embedding pediatric anticipatory guidance in picture books is an effective method for increasing maternal knowledge of child development, parenting strategies, and safety practices, improving parenting beliefs and attitudes (e.g., parenting efficacy, importance of reading, use of corporal punishment), supporting optimal parenting practices (e.g., breastfeeding and nutrition, responsiveness, safety practices), improving maternal health (stress, depression), and supporting children's healthier development (injuries, illness, immunizations, and linguistic, social, and cognitive development).
Survey and observational data collection occurred in participants' homes during their third trimester of pregnancy and when their child was 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months of age. Twelve phone call interviews were conducted between these home visits. When children were 18 months, a retrospective medical chart audit was conducted.
- Conditions
- Condition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group), Condition 2 - Non-educational Condition (Non-educational Book Group), Condition 3 - Control Condition (No-book Group)
- Being tested
- Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidance, Book provision
- Keywords
- anticipatory guidance, baby books, safety
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory GuidanceBehavioural
educational information from Bright Futures Guidelines for Health Supervision for birth to 18 months
Book provisionBehavioural
Given free books prenatally and at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postpartum
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| educational baby books | Experimental | books embedded with educational information (pediatric anticipatory guidance) Receives: Behavioral: Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidance; Behavioral: Book provision |
| non-educational baby books | Active comparator | baby books given with same illustrations but no educational information Receives: Behavioral: Book provision |
| no books | No intervention | not given any baby books |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in knowledge of child development and parenting
Measured with Opinions about Babies questionnaire
Measured: Change from Baseline (pregnancy) to 18 months postpartum
Change in Reading Practices
Self-reported joint reading practices
Measured: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Parenting Stress
Measured with the Parenting Stress Index
Measured: Change from 2 to 18 months post-partum
Costs
Maternal costs due to their own and their child's illness/injury, use of substances, and purchase of food was measured with the Incurred Cost Questionnaire.
Measured: Cumulative costs over study duration
Secondary outcomes (17)
Safety Practices
Measured with the Home Safety Assessment, an observational and self-report measure of safety practices in the home, car, and outside
Measured: 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postpartum
Attitudes about Corporal punishment
Adolescent-Adult Parenting Inventory
Measured: 2, 6, 12 and 18 months postpartum
Maternal Depressive Symptoms
Depressive symptoms were measured with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.
Measured: Change from baseline (pregnancy) to 18 months postpartum
Beliefs about the Importance of Reading to Children
Maternal beliefs about the importance of reading was measured with the Modified Parent Reading Belief Inventory
Measured: Change from baseline (prenatal) to 18 months postpartum
Injuries and illnesses
Child illnesses injuries were measured with the Incurred Cost Questionnaire and through a retrospective medical chart audit.
Measured: 16 months (from 2 to 18 months postpartum)
Quality of Parent-Child Interaction
Video recording and in-vivo coding of mother-child dyads during play and reading.
Measured: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Home environment and parenting
measured with the Home Observation for Measurement of Environment (HOME).
Measured: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Receptive and Expressive language
Measured with the Preschool Language Scale - Fourth Edition (PLS4).
Measured: Change from 6 to 18 months postpartum
Cognitive and neurological development screening
Measured with the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS)
Measured: 4, 6, 9 months postpartum
Infant nutrition
Infant Nutrition Interview measured the introduction of news foods, types of foods, and serving portions at each time point.
Measured: 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postpartum
Breastfeeding intentions and practices
measured with the Breastfeeding Intentions and Practices Scale
Measured: prenatal and postnatal every visit until no longer breastfeeding
Pregnancy uplifts and Hassles
measured with the Pregnancy Experience Scale
Measured: Baselines (pregnancy)
Parenting Satisfaction
measured with the Parenting Satisfaction Scale
Measured: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Parenting Self-Efficacy
Measured with the Maternal Self-Efficacy Scale
Measured: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Reading self-efficacy
measured with the Reading Self-Efficacy Scale
Measured: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Cognitive Development
measured with Exploratory Play Task
Measured: 12 and 18 months postpartum
Immunizations, medical visits, and growth status
measured through a retrospective medical chart audit.
Measured: 18 months postpartum
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2005
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Condition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 198 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Irvine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Leonard Bickman, Vanderbilt University
- Investigators
- Stephanie M Reich, PhD, Study director, University of California, IrvineLeonard Bickman, PhD, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02203617
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01HD447749
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Khalessi A, Reich SM. A Month of Breastfeeding Associated with Greater Adherence to Pediatric Nutrition Guidelines. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013 Jul 1;31(3):299-308. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2013.784898.
PubMed 24062596Reich SM, Penner EK, Duncan GJ, Auger A. Using baby books to change new mothers' attitudes about corporal punishment. Child Abuse Negl. 2012 Feb;36(2):108-17. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.09.017. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
PubMed 22391417Reich SM, Penner EK, Duncan GJ. Using baby books to increase new mothers' safety practices. Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.006.
PubMed 21272822Reich SM, Bickman L, Saville BR, Alvarez J. The effectiveness of baby books for providing pediatric anticipatory guidance to new mothers. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):997-1002. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2728. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
PubMed 20385630
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Baby Books to Promote Maternal and Child Health
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02203617
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01HD447749
- Conditions
- Condition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group), Condition 2 - Non-educational Condition (Non-educational Book Group), Condition 3 - Control Condition (No-book Group)
- Keywords
- anticipatory guidance, baby books, safety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 198 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Irvine
- Study start
- Apr 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Baby Books Project tests whether embedding educational information into baby books can improve the health and wellbeing of first-time mothers and their young children.
Detailed description
This study tests the efficacy of embedding educational information (i.e., pediatric anticipatory guidance) into baby books that first-time mothers read to their infants. This 3-group longitudinal study recruited first-time mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy, randomly assigned them to conditions, and followed them until the child was 18 months of age. One group received educational baby books, another group was given the same illustrated books with non-educational text, and the third group was not given any books. Thus, the effects of educational reading could be parsed from the effects of reading alone. The study aimed to test whether embedding pediatric anticipatory guidance in picture books is an effective method for increasing maternal knowledge of child development, parenting strategies, and safety practices, improving parenting beliefs and attitudes (e.g., parenting efficacy, importance of reading, use of corporal punishment), supporting optimal parenting practices (e.g., breastfeeding and nutrition, responsiveness, safety practices), improving maternal health (stress, depression), and supporting children's healthier development (injuries, illness, immunizations, and linguistic, social, and cognitive development).
Survey and observational data collection occurred in participants' homes during their third trimester of pregnancy and when their child was 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months of age. Twelve phone call interviews were conducted between these home visits. When children were 18 months, a retrospective medical chart audit was conducted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| educational baby books | Experimental | Behavioral: Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidance, Behavioral: Book provisionbooks embedded with educational information (pediatric anticipatory guidance) |
| non-educational baby books | Active comparator | Behavioral: Book provisionbaby books given with same illustrations but no educational information |
| no books | No intervention | –not given any baby books |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women who are pregnant with first child and able to read in English at a first grade reading level
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women with other children, men, those not able to read in English at a first grade level
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidanceeducational information from Bright Futures Guidelines for Health Supervision for birth to 18 months | Behavioural | educational baby books |
| Book provisionGiven free books prenatally and at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postpartum | Behavioural | educational baby books, non-educational baby books |
Primary outcome
Change in knowledge of child development and parenting
Time frame: Change from Baseline (pregnancy) to 18 months postpartum
Measured with Opinions about Babies questionnaire
Change in Reading Practices
Time frame: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Self-reported joint reading practices
Parenting Stress
Time frame: Change from 2 to 18 months post-partum
Measured with the Parenting Stress Index
Costs
Time frame: Cumulative costs over study duration
Maternal costs due to their own and their child's illness/injury, use of substances, and purchase of food was measured with the Incurred Cost Questionnaire.
17 secondary outcomes
Safety Practices
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postpartum
Attitudes about Corporal punishment
Time frame: 2, 6, 12 and 18 months postpartum
Maternal Depressive Symptoms
Time frame: Change from baseline (pregnancy) to 18 months postpartum
Beliefs about the Importance of Reading to Children
Time frame: Change from baseline (prenatal) to 18 months postpartum
Injuries and illnesses
Time frame: 16 months (from 2 to 18 months postpartum)
Quality of Parent-Child Interaction
Time frame: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Home environment and parenting
Time frame: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Receptive and Expressive language
Time frame: Change from 6 to 18 months postpartum
Cognitive and neurological development screening
Time frame: 4, 6, 9 months postpartum
Infant nutrition
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postpartum
Breastfeeding intentions and practices
Time frame: prenatal and postnatal every visit until no longer breastfeeding
Pregnancy uplifts and Hassles
Time frame: Baselines (pregnancy)
Parenting Satisfaction
Time frame: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Parenting Self-Efficacy
Time frame: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Reading self-efficacy
Time frame: Change from 2 to 18 months postpartum
Cognitive Development
Time frame: 12 and 18 months postpartum
Immunizations, medical visits, and growth status
Time frame: 18 months postpartum
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24062596Khalessi A, Reich SM. A Month of Breastfeeding Associated with Greater Adherence to Pediatric Nutrition Guidelines. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013 Jul 1;31(3):299-308. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2013.784898.
- Results publication: PubMed 22391417Reich SM, Penner EK, Duncan GJ, Auger A. Using baby books to change new mothers' attitudes about corporal punishment. Child Abuse Negl. 2012 Feb;36(2):108-17. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.09.017. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 21272822Reich SM, Penner EK, Duncan GJ. Using baby books to increase new mothers' safety practices. Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.006.
- Results publication: PubMed 20385630Reich SM, Bickman L, Saville BR, Alvarez J. The effectiveness of baby books for providing pediatric anticipatory guidance to new mothers. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):997-1002. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2728. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephanie M Reich, PhD study director
University of California, Irvine
Leonard Bickman, PhD principal investigator
Vanderbilt University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educational Content/Pediatric Anticipatory Guidance and Book provision in people with Condition 1 - Educational Condition (Educational Book Group) and Condition 2 - Non-educational Condition (Non-educational Book Group), run by Vanderbilt University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in knowledge of child development and parenting (time frame: Change from Baseline (pregnancy) to 18 months postpartum). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02203617, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2017.