Parkinson DiseaseNCT02205216
Can tDCS Enhance Efficacy of Rehabilitative Intervention for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease?
A study testing Active tDCS and Rehabilitation Therapy in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major cause of disability and falls and responds often incompletely to conventional therapy. The pathogenesis remains largely unknown and therapeutic alternatives are needed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Active tDCS and Rehabilitation Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- men and women aged 30 to 80 years with DOPA-responsive PD Hoehn and Yahr (HY) grade of 2 to 4 while "off"
- must be on a regimen including levodopa
- total dose of levodopa and dopamine agonists (using dopamine equivalents) has to be equal to or more than 300 milligrams per day
- Gait difficulties with Freezing of Gait as defined by MDS-UPDRS I score ≥ 2 in FOG
- Optimal conventional PD medication for > 1 month prior to screening
- scheduled for rehabilitative intervention for the treatment of freezing of gait
Who cannot join
- significant concurrent medical or psychiatric disease
- history of seizures and epilepsy
- Dementia or other neurodegenerative disease (besides PD)
- pallidotomy, implanted electrodes and generator for deep brain stimulation
- pregnancy
- surgically or traumatically implanted foreign bodies such as an implanted medical pump, implanted hearing aids, metal plate in the skull, or metal implant in the skull or eyes (other than dental appliances or fillings) that may pose a physical hazard during tDCS.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Study would cause undue risk or stress for reasons such as tendency to fall, excessive fatigue, general frailty, or excessive apprehensiveness.
- significant postural instability with daily falls, inability to walk the parcours or inability to walk 10 meters.
- presence of significant cognitive dysfunction as determined by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) <20 or mentally impaired patients having no capacity to provide their own consent (the physician establishing the diagnosis and applying UPDRS will evaluate patient's mental capacity using conventional clinical interview).
- presence of other co-morbid conditions that can contribute to gait dysfunction (orthopedic, rheumatologic, cardiac, other)
- presence of clinically significant hallucinations
- participation in any rehabilitation therapy for FOG within the last six months prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
David Benninger, MD, +41 21 314 95 83, david.benninger@chuv.ch
David Benninger, MD
About this study
Official title: Can Transcranial Direct Stimulation Enhance the Efficacy of a Rehabilitative Intervention for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease? A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study
Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major cause of disability and falls and responds often incompletely to conventional therapy. The pathogenesis remains largely unknown and therapeutic alternatives are needed. Rehabilitative interventions that consist of learning cognitive strategies with sensory cueing to prevent and to overcome FOG represent the most efficacious intervention, but difficulties in learning and execution of these cognitive strategies are the main cause of failure. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances motor task learning and execution in patients with PD and might enhance the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions.
This study intends to address the following question whether tDCS can enhance the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions in the treatment of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease?
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Active tDCS, Sham tDCS, Rehabilitation Therapy
- Keywords
- tDCS, FOG, Freezing of Gait, Parkinson, Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active tDCSDevice
anode over the motor and premotor cortex with cathodes placed over both mastoids. TDCS will be applied for 20 minutes at 2 mA.
Sham tDCSDevice
anode and cathode placed 1 cm apart over the forehead and DC (1mA) applied for 1-2 min, short-circuited through the skin creating the same temporary "tingling" sensation without effects on the brain.
Rehabilitation TherapyBehavioural
All patients will undergo a rehabilitation therapy intervention (2x a week for 4 weeks = 8 intervention sessions) with simultaneous sham or active tDCS. The trained physiotherapist will follow a standardized program with checklist. Each of the 8 training session will last approximately 45min. The rehabilitative interventions include:
- cognitive training: attentional strategies (mental counting, mental obstacle)
- transfer training: everyday activities
- motor training (walking) with sensory cueing (visual, acoustic, cane, ball) The rehabilitation therapy is divided into two sessions both including a 5 minutes warm-up and the learning of cueing and movement strategies based on different modalities (cognitive, visual, tactile and auditory).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Active comparator | Active tDCS combined with a rehabilitative intervention consisting of cognitive training and sensory cueing. Receives: Device: Active tDCS; Behavioral: Rehabilitation Therapy |
| Sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Sham tDCS combined with a rehabilitative intervention consisting of cognitive training and sensory cueing. Receives: Device: Sham tDCS; Behavioral: Rehabilitation Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Walking parcours
This standardized parcours, performed under guidance of a physiotherapist, includes real-life conditions which are known to precipitate freezing. Time needed to perform the parcours and number of FOG episodes will be assessed.
Measured: from baseline to one month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (6)
New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (N-FOGQ)
NFOG-Q is a widely used and validated questionnaire for quantifying FOG severity and frequency in the daily living
Measured: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)
Measured: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Measured: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Measured: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
10MWT measures the time taken and the number of steps needed to walk a 10-meter distance from a standing position. Gait testing includes three averaged trials.
Measured: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Timed Up & GO (TUG)
TUG requires patients to get up of a standard armed-chair, to walk 3 meters away, to turn around a cone, to walk back and to sit down.
Measured: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionAug 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David Benninger, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
- Investigators
- David Benninger, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02205216
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VD226/14
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Can Transcranial Direct Stimulation Enhance the Efficacy of a Rehabilitative Intervention for the Treatment of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease? A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02205216
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VD226/14
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- tDCS, FOG, Freezing of Gait, Parkinson, Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major cause of disability and falls and responds often incompletely to conventional therapy. The pathogenesis remains largely unknown and therapeutic alternatives are needed. Rehabilitative interventions that consist of learning cognitive strategies with sensory cueing to prevent and to overcome FOG represent the most efficacious intervention, but difficulties in learning and execution of these cognitive strategies are the main cause of failure. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances motor task learning and execution in patients with PD and might enhance the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions.
This study intends to address the following question whether tDCS can enhance the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions in the treatment of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease?
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Active comparator | Device: Active tDCS, Behavioral: Rehabilitation TherapyActive tDCS combined with a rehabilitative intervention consisting of cognitive training and sensory cueing. |
| Sham tDCS | Sham comparator | Device: Sham tDCS, Behavioral: Rehabilitation TherapySham tDCS combined with a rehabilitative intervention consisting of cognitive training and sensory cueing. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- men and women aged 30 to 80 years with DOPA-responsive PD Hoehn and Yahr (HY) grade of 2 to 4 while "off"
- must be on a regimen including levodopa
- total dose of levodopa and dopamine agonists (using dopamine equivalents) has to be equal to or more than 300 milligrams per day
- Gait difficulties with Freezing of Gait as defined by MDS-UPDRS I score ≥ 2 in FOG
- Optimal conventional PD medication for > 1 month prior to screening
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- significant concurrent medical or psychiatric disease
- history of seizures and epilepsy
- Dementia or other neurodegenerative disease (besides PD)
- pallidotomy, implanted electrodes and generator for deep brain stimulation
- pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active tDCSanode over the motor and premotor cortex with cathodes placed over both mastoids. TDCS will be applied for 20 minutes at 2 mA. | Device | Active tDCS |
| Sham tDCSanode and cathode placed 1 cm apart over the forehead and DC (1mA) applied for 1-2 min, short-circuited through the skin creating the same temporary "tingling" sensation without effects on the brain. | Device | Sham tDCS |
| Rehabilitation TherapyAll patients will undergo a rehabilitation therapy intervention (2x a week for 4 weeks = 8 intervention sessions) with simultaneous sham or active tDCS. The trained physiotherapist will follow a standardized program with checklist. Each of the 8 training session will last approximately 45min. The rehabilitative interventions include: 1. cognitive training: attentional strategies (mental counting, mental obstacle) 2. transfer training: everyday activities 3. motor training (walking) with sensory cueing (visual, acoustic, cane, ball) The rehabilitation therapy is divided into two sessions both including a 5 minutes warm-up and the learning of cueing and movement strategies based on different modalities (cognitive, visual, tactile and auditory). | Behavioural | Active tDCS, Sham tDCS |
Primary outcome
Walking parcours
Time frame: from baseline to one month follow-up
This standardized parcours, performed under guidance of a physiotherapist, includes real-life conditions which are known to precipitate freezing. Time needed to perform the parcours and number of FOG episodes will be assessed.
6 secondary outcomes
New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (N-FOGQ)
Time frame: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)
Time frame: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time frame: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time frame: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time frame: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Timed Up & GO (TUG)
Time frame: from baseline to follow-up periods (immediately, 1 and 3 months after the last intervention)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2015.
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, Switzerland
David Benninger, MD principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active tDCS and Rehabilitation Therapy in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Walking parcours (time frame: from baseline to one month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2015.