Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCIPhase 3REMEDYNCT02205775
Rosuvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage and Systemic Inflammation During Coronary Angioplasty
A Phase 3 study testing Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in people with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCI, run by G. d'Annunzio University at 6 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Myocardial necrosis is relatively frequent after percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with higher mortality during the follow-up. Since anti-inflammatory properties of statins have been demonstrated and the benefit of statins in acute coronary syndromes have been proven, this study aims at testing the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCI
- What is being tested?
- Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- May 2010to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- suspected CAD for which an indication to PCI is given: both patients with stable CAD, and stable post-acute coronary syndromes (ACS), both with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) patients, provided that markers of myocardial necrosis (CK-MB, troponins) are stabilized (i.e., with variations <20% in two consecutive measurements obtained at ≥6 h time distance before PCI, according to the universal definition of peri-procedural myocardial infarction).
Who cannot join
- any previously known increase in liver enzymes (AST, ALT) ascribed to liver dysfunction at baseline;
- history of liver toxicity or myopathy on previous treatment with statins;
- left ventricular ejection fraction <30%;
- renal insufficiency, with creatinine >2 mg/dL at baseline;
- ongoing treatment with high-dose statins (atorvastatin 80 mg/d or rosuvastatin 40 mg/d);
- pregnant or lactating women.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Italy6 sites
A.O. S. Anna e S. Sebastiano - II Università di Napoli
Caserta, 81100
SS. Annunziata Hospital
Chieti, CH, 66100
Azienda ASL 6 - P. Ospedaliero Livorno
Livorno, 57100
Ospedale Civile G. Fornaroli
Magenta, 20013
Azienda Ospedaliera - Ospedale San Paolo
Milan, 20142
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo
Pavia, PV, 27100
About this study
Official title: Rosuvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage and Systemic Inflammation During Coronary Angioplasty - The REMEDY Study
Myocardial necrosis is relatively frequent after percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with higher mortality during the follow-up.
Since anti-inflammatory properties of statins have been demonstrated and the benefit of statins in acute coronary syndromes have been proven, this study aims at testing the hypothesis that the pre-procedural intensive statin treatment reduce the extent of peri-procedural necrosis.
Read the detailed description
Myocardial necrosis, assessed by creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) elevation, is relatively frequent after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), occurring in up to 40% of cases. Although most patients remain asymptomatic and with no changes in cardiac function, even a mild release of CK-MB is associated with higher mortality during the follow-up. A number of treatment strategies have been proposed to limit myocardial damage during PCI, but procedural ischemic myocardial injury remains the most frequent complication after coronary angioplasty.
Several randomized studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of therapy with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with already established coronary artery disease or in normal subjects with hypercholesterolemia in primary prevention, and retrospective observational studies have suggested that pre-treatment with statins might reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction after coronary intervention. This benefit was confirmed in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) undergoing PCI, who received 80 mg atorvastatin 12 h before PCI, with a further 40-mg pre-procedure, as compared with placebo.
The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of statins in ischemic conditions are not completely clear. Previous studies have suggested that the anti-inflammatory effect of statins may play a role, showing that the benefit was higher in patients with high C-reactive protein. Since an inflammatory status before angioplasty, as detected by high levels of C-reactive protein, is associated with a higher risk of peri-procedural myocardial necrosis and adverse cardiac events during the follow-up, the anti-inflammatory effects of statins might contribute to reduce myocardial necrosis, by reducing to the microembolization occurring during coronary intervention. Statin administration also rapidly improves endothelial function. Thus, even short-term treatment with statins (unable to provide LDL reduction persistent enough to decrease the atherosclerotic burden) may have important effects on endothelial function and inflammation. In patients undergoing PCI, reduction of peri-procedural myocardial injury after pre-treatment with statins is paralleled by a concomitant attenuation of post-procedural increase of intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and E-selectin plasma levels, thus reinforcing the concept that a reduction of endothelial inflammatory response may explain peri-procedural protective effect of statins.
Statins induce heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression in vitro and are reported to have pleiotropic benefits that reduce oxidative stress in the vasculature and in various extravascular tissues Two anti-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-beta, play a critical role in the modulation of immunoinflammatory cell infiltration in the atherosclerotic intima and the mechanism underlying the protective effects of IL-10 against inflammatory cell infiltration involves heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). Moreover, statins can efficiently increase levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), contributing to vascular repair, in patients with coronary heart disease and in patients with chronic heart failure, and augment EPC proliferative capacity, in a way similar to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
Therefore, this study is directed at:
- documenting whether the immediate pre-procedural administration of a statin at a high dosage may reduce the extent of peri-procedural MI compared with placebo on the background of the best current medical therapy;
- proving that treatment with rosuvastatin, a hydrophilic statin, at the proposed dosage, is at least comparable (and possibly superior) to atorvastatin at the proposed dosage on top of standard treatment in inducing a significant reduction of peri-procedural damage previously documented with atorvastatin in the presence of a 1-week pre-treatment at 40 mg/day (12);
- characterizing the relevance of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition (vs largely HMGCoA reductase-independent cholesterol lowering) in this phenomenon;
- providing a mechanistic explanation for such effects, investigating the role of 1) HO-1 and 2) EPCs in the context of peri-PCI myocardial damage.
- Being tested
- Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin, Ezetimibe, placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AtorvastatinDrug
80 + 40 mg pre PCI
RosuvastatinDrug
40 + 40 mg before PCI
RosuvastatinDrug
5 mg twice before PCI (+ 10 mg ezetimibe)
EzetimibeDrug
10 mg twice before PCI (+ 5 mg rosuvastatin)
placeboDrug
twice before PCI
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| twice placebo before PCI | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo |
| atorvastatin 80 + 40 mg pre PCI | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Atorvastatin |
| rosuvastatin 40 + 40 mg before PCI | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Rosuvastatin |
| rosuvastatin 5 + ezetimibe 10 mg twice before PCI | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Rosuvastatin; Drug: Ezetimibe |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
myocardial injury
The proportion of patients with a post-procedural increase of any measured marker of myocardial injury (CK-MB, troponin I or troponin T) above upper normal limits, measured at any of the post-PCI determinations at up to 48 hours
Measured: up to 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (4)
Major adverse cardiac events
The combined occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke or the need for unplanned revascularization from the time of the procedure until the end of a 1-month follow-up.
Measured: 1 month
Serum creatinine
Any post-procedural increase in serum creatinine or decrease in creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula)
Measured: 6, 24 and 48 h
HO-1
Changes in HO-1 levels/biologic activity among treated groups(only for sites participating in the specific substudies)
Measured: 6, 24 and 48 h
endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)
Changes in EPC levels/biologic activity among treated groups (only for sites participating in the specific substudies)
Measured: 6, 24 and 48 h
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionMar 2012
- Study completionJun 2012
Why it stopped: difficult recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCIStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- G. d'Annunzio University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Working Group Aterosclerosi, Trombosi e Biologia Vascolare
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Raffaele De Caterina, G. d'Annunzio University
- Investigators
- Raffaele De Caterina, Prof, Principal investigator, Università G. d'Annunzio
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02205775
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009-013622-17
- Other IDs
- 2009
- Acronym
- REMEDY
- Status last verified
- Feb 2011
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rosuvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage and Systemic Inflammation During Coronary Angioplasty - The REMEDY Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02205775
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REMEDY / 2009-013622-17
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: difficult recruitment
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- G. d'Annunzio UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Working Group Aterosclerosi, Trombosi e Biologia Vascolare
- Study start
- May 2010
- Primary completion
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Myocardial necrosis is relatively frequent after percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with higher mortality during the follow-up.
Since anti-inflammatory properties of statins have been demonstrated and the benefit of statins in acute coronary syndromes have been proven, this study aims at testing the hypothesis that the pre-procedural intensive statin treatment reduce the extent of peri-procedural necrosis.
Detailed description
Myocardial necrosis, assessed by creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) elevation, is relatively frequent after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), occurring in up to 40% of cases. Although most patients remain asymptomatic and with no changes in cardiac function, even a mild release of CK-MB is associated with higher mortality during the follow-up. A number of treatment strategies have been proposed to limit myocardial damage during PCI, but procedural ischemic myocardial injury remains the most frequent complication after coronary angioplasty.
Several randomized studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of therapy with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with already established coronary artery disease or in normal subjects with hypercholesterolemia in primary prevention, and retrospective observational studies have suggested that pre-treatment with statins might reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction after coronary intervention. This benefit was confirmed in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) undergoing PCI, who received 80 mg atorvastatin 12 h before PCI, with a further 40-mg pre-procedure, as compared with placebo.
The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of statins in ischemic conditions are not completely clear. Previous studies have suggested that the anti-inflammatory effect of statins may play a role, showing that the benefit was higher in patients with high C-reactive protein. Since an inflammatory status before angioplasty, as detected by high levels of C-reactive protein, is associated with a higher risk of peri-procedural myocardial necrosis and adverse cardiac events during the follow-up, the anti-inflammatory effects of statins might contribute to reduce myocardial necrosis, by reducing to the microembolization occurring during coronary intervention. Statin administration also rapidly improves endothelial function. Thus, even short-term treatment with statins (unable to provide LDL reduction persistent enough to decrease the atherosclerotic burden) may have important effects on endothelial function and inflammation. In patients undergoing PCI, reduction of peri-procedural myocardial injury after pre-treatment with statins is paralleled by a concomitant attenuation of post-procedural increase of intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and E-selectin plasma levels, thus reinforcing the concept that a reduction of endothelial inflammatory response may explain peri-procedural protective effect of statins.
Statins induce heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) expression in vitro and are reported to have pleiotropic benefits that reduce oxidative stress in the vasculature and in various extravascular tissues Two anti-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-beta, play a critical role in the modulation of immunoinflammatory cell infiltration in the atherosclerotic intima and the mechanism underlying the protective effects of IL-10 against inflammatory cell infiltration involves heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). Moreover, statins can efficiently increase levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), contributing to vascular repair, in patients with coronary heart disease and in patients with chronic heart failure, and augment EPC proliferative capacity, in a way similar to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
Therefore, this study is directed at:
- documenting whether the immediate pre-procedural administration of a statin at a high dosage may reduce the extent of peri-procedural MI compared with placebo on the background of the best current medical therapy;
- proving that treatment with rosuvastatin, a hydrophilic statin, at the proposed dosage, is at least comparable (and possibly superior) to atorvastatin at the proposed dosage on top of standard treatment in inducing a significant reduction of peri-procedural damage previously documented with atorvastatin in the presence of a 1-week pre-treatment at 40 mg/day (12);
- characterizing the relevance of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition (vs largely HMGCoA reductase-independent cholesterol lowering) in this phenomenon;
- providing a mechanistic explanation for such effects, investigating the role of 1) HO-1 and 2) EPCs in the context of peri-PCI myocardial damage.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| twice placebo before PCI | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo |
| atorvastatin 80 + 40 mg pre PCI | Experimental | Drug: Atorvastatin |
| rosuvastatin 40 + 40 mg before PCI | Experimental | Drug: Rosuvastatin |
| rosuvastatin 5 + ezetimibe 10 mg twice before PCI | Experimental | Drug: Rosuvastatin, Drug: Ezetimibe |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- suspected CAD for which an indication to PCI is given: both patients with stable CAD, and stable post-acute coronary syndromes (ACS), both with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) patients, provided that markers of myocardial necrosis (CK-MB, troponins) are stabilized (i.e., with variations <20% in two consecutive measurements obtained at ≥6 h time distance before PCI, according to the universal definition of peri-procedural myocardial infarction).
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- any previously known increase in liver enzymes (AST, ALT) ascribed to liver dysfunction at baseline;
- history of liver toxicity or myopathy on previous treatment with statins;
- left ventricular ejection fraction <30%;
- renal insufficiency, with creatinine >2 mg/dL at baseline;
- ongoing treatment with high-dose statins (atorvastatin 80 mg/d or rosuvastatin 40 mg/d);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Atorvastatin80 + 40 mg pre PCI | Drug | atorvastatin 80 + 40 mg pre PCI |
| Rosuvastatin40 + 40 mg before PCI | Drug | rosuvastatin 40 + 40 mg before PCI |
| Rosuvastatin5 mg twice before PCI (+ 10 mg ezetimibe) | Drug | rosuvastatin 5 + ezetimibe 10 mg twice before PCI |
| Ezetimibe10 mg twice before PCI (+ 5 mg rosuvastatin) | Drug | rosuvastatin 5 + ezetimibe 10 mg twice before PCI |
| placebotwice before PCI | Drug | twice placebo before PCI |
Primary outcome
myocardial injury
Time frame: up to 48 hours
The proportion of patients with a post-procedural increase of any measured marker of myocardial injury (CK-MB, troponin I or troponin T) above upper normal limits, measured at any of the post-PCI determinations at up to 48 hours
4 secondary outcomes
Major adverse cardiac events
Time frame: 1 month
Serum creatinine
Time frame: 6, 24 and 48 h
HO-1
Time frame: 6, 24 and 48 h
endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)
Time frame: 6, 24 and 48 h
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: difficult recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2014.
Related trials for Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCI
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Non-Invasive Follow-Up of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Treated With Drug-Coated Balloon PCI Using CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Advanced Invasive Diagnosis Strategy for Post-PCI Patients With Stable Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Angiography
Angina (Stable), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
RecruitingPhase 4
Effects of Low-dose Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Stable Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
A Precision Medicine Approach to Identify Patients Undergoing Elective PCI at Risk of Peri-PCI Myocardial Infarction
Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
LEADERS FREE IV (RCT): BioFreedom™ Ultra vs BioFreedom™ in HBR Patients
Coronary Artery Disease, Chronic Stable Angina
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raffaele De Caterina, Prof principal investigator
Università G. d'Annunzio
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in people with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing PCI, run by G. d'Annunzio University at 6 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: difficult recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
myocardial injury (time frame: up to 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2014.