DyslipidemiaPhase 3EBBINGHAUSNCT02207634
Evaluating PCSK9 Binding antiBody Influence oN coGnitive HeAlth in High cardiovascUlar Risk Subjects
A Phase 3 study testing Evolocumab and Background Statin Therapy in people with Dyslipidemia, run by Amgen at 416 sites in 30 countries.
Trial summary
This study evaluated change over time in neurocognitive testing in patients receiving statin therapy in combination with evolocumab (AMG 145), compared with patients receiving statin therapy in combination with placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dyslipidemia
- What is being tested?
- Evolocumab and Background Statin Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,974 participants
- Where
- 416 sitesin 30 countries
- Study dates
- 10 Sep 2014to 11 Nov 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Randomized into Study 20110118 (FOURIER; NCT01764633)
Who cannot join
- Current or known past diagnosis of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Trial locations and contacts
416 sites in 30 countries.
416 sites in 30 countries
United States134 sites
Research Site
Addison, Illinois, 60101
Research Site
Alhambra, California, 91801
Research Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Research Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
Research Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78758
Research Site
Banning, California, 92220
Research Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Research Site
Belleville, Illinois, 62220
Research Site
Bend, Oregon, 97701
Research Site
Biddeford, Maine, 04005
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Research Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Research Site
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06610
Research Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11206
Research Site
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Research Site
Burke, Virginia, 22015
Research Site
Calabash, North Carolina, 28467
Research Site
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011
Research Site
Canton, Ohio, 44708
Research Site
Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, 17201
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60616
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Research Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814
Research Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43201
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Research Site
Cortlandt Manor, New York, 10567
Research Site
Crystal River, Florida, 34429
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75216
Research Site
Dayton, Ohio, 45414
Research Site
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Research Site
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33442
Research Site
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Research Site
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Research Site
Feasterville, Pennsylvania, 19053
Research Site
Fleming Island, Florida, 32003
Research Site
Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707
Research Site
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Research Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Research Site
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201
Research Site
Grandville, Michigan, 49418
Research Site
Great Falls, Montana, 59405
Research Site
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301
Research Site
Hammond, Indiana, 46320
Research Site
Hammond, Louisiana, 70403
Research Site
Harbor City, California, 90710
Research Site
Haverhill, Massachusetts, 01830
Research Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Research Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Research Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Research Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33024
Research Site
Hopewell, Virginia, 23860
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77025
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Research Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Research Site
Hutchinson, Kansas, 67502
Research Site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Research Site
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109
Research Site
Jerseyville, Illinois, 62052
Research Site
Kalispell, Montana, 59901
Research Site
Lafayette, Louisiana, 70508
Research Site
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
Research Site
Lansing, Michigan, 48912
Research Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Research Site
Long Beach, California, 90807
Research Site
Long Beach, California, 90822
Research Site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33144
Research Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Research Site
Moncks Corner, South Carolina, 29461
Research Site
Monroe, Louisiana, 71201
Research Site
Mooresville, North Carolina, 28117
Research Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Research Site
Muskegon, Michigan, 49444
Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Research Site
New Hyde Park, New York, 11042
Research Site
New Windsor, New York, 12553
Research Site
Newton, Massachusetts, 02459
Research Site
North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29582
Research Site
Oceanside, California, 92056
Research Site
Owensboro, Kentucky, 42303
Research Site
Oxnard, California, 93030
Research Site
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Research Site
Palm Springs, California, 92262
Research Site
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, 02860
Research Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33025
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19152
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206
Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75024
Research Site
Ponte Vedra, Florida, 32081
Research Site
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Research Site
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Research Site
Pryor, Oklahoma, 74362
Research Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Research Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Research Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23219
Research Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23294
Research Site
Rochester, New York, 14609
Research Site
Roseville, California, 95661
Research Site
Sacramento, California, 95816
Research Site
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
Research Site
Salisbury, Maryland, 21804
Research Site
San Pedro, California, 90732
Research Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34232
Research Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Research Site
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Research Site
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458
Research Site
Springfield, Ohio, 45505
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
Research Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713
Research Site
Suffolk, Virginia, 23435
Research Site
Suwanee, Georgia, 30024
Research Site
Tabor City, North Carolina, 28463
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Research Site
Tarzana, California, 91356
Research Site
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Research Site
Toledo, Ohio, 43615
Research Site
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Research Site
Troy, New York, 12180
Research Site
Tullahoma, Tennessee, 37388
Research Site
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Research Site
Waterloo, Iowa, 50702
Research Site
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Research Site
West Seneca, New York, 14224
Research Site
Westwood, New Jersey, 07675
Research Site
Wichita Falls, Texas, 76301
Research Site
Williamsville, New York, 14221
Research Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Poland28 sites
Research Site
Gdansk, 80-952
Research Site
Gdynia, 81-384
Research Site
Gdynia, 81-402
Research Site
Katowice, 40-018
Research Site
Katowice, 40-040
Research Site
Katowice, 40-084
Research Site
Kielce, 25-020
Research Site
Krakow, 31-216
Research Site
Krakow, 32-082
Research Site
Lodz, 90-368
Research Site
Lodz, 91-347
Research Site
Lublin, 20-857
Research Site
Olsztyn, 10-010
Research Site
Poznan, 60-702
Research Site
Puławy, 24-100
Research Site
Ruda Śląska, 41-709
Research Site
Staszów, 28-200
Research Site
Świdnik, 21-040
Research Site
Tarnów, 33-100
Research Site
Torun, 87-100
Research Site
Warsaw, 01-192
Research Site
Warsaw, 02-507
Research Site
Warsaw, 04-730
Research Site
Włocławek, 87-800
Research Site
Wroclaw, 50-088
Research Site
Wroclaw, 50-349
Research Site
Wroclaw, 51-685
Research Site
Zamość, 22-400
Japan27 sites
Research Site
Chikushi-gun, Fukuoka, 811-1244
Research Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0027
Research Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180
Research Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-8522
Research Site
Himeji-shi, Hyōgo, 672-8043
Research Site
Ichinomiya-shi, Aichi-ken, 491-8551
Research Site
Itoshima-shi, Fukuoka, 819-1104
Research Site
Kasugai-shi, Aichi-ken, 487-0031
Research Site
Kawaguchi-shi, Saitama, 332-8558
Research Site
Komatsushima-shi, Tokushima, 773-8502
Research Site
Kyoto, Kyoto, 615-0035
Research Site
Matsudo-shi, Chiba, 271-0077
Research Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 451-8511
Research Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 457-8511
Research Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 460-0001
Research Site
Okinawa-shi, Okinawa, 904-8585
Research Site
Osaka, Osaka, 530-0001
Research Site
Osaka, Osaka, 543-0035
Research Site
Saga, Saga-ken, 840-8571
Research Site
Saga, Saga-ken, 849-0917
Research Site
Saijo-shi, Ehime, 793-0030
Research Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0031
Research Site
Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa, 901-0493
Research Site
Toride-shi, Ibaraki, 302-0022
Research Site
Toyohashi, Aichi-ken, 440-8510
Research Site
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558
Research Site
Urasoe-shi, Okinawa, 901-2132
United Kingdom27 sites
Research Site
Belfast, BT7 2EB
Research Site
Birmingham, B15 2SQ
Research Site
Birmingham, B18 7QH
Research Site
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW
Research Site
Cardiff, CF14 5GJ
Research Site
Chesterfield, S40 4AA
Research Site
Chippenham, SN15 2SB
Research Site
Chorley, PR7 7NA
Research Site
Doncaster, DN9 1EP
Research Site
Glasgow, G20 0SP
Research Site
Glasgow, G45 9AW
Research Site
Hexham, NE46 1QJ
Research Site
Leicester, LE3 9QP
Research Site
Liverpool, L22 0LG
Research Site
Liverpool, L9 7AL
Research Site
London, EC1M 6BQ
Research Site
London, W2 1LA
Research Site
Manchester, M15 6SX
Research Site
Manchester, M23 9LT
Research Site
Newport, PO30 5TG
Research Site
Nuneaton, CV10 7DJ
Research Site
Reading, RG2 0TG
Research Site
Sandbach, CW11 1EQ
Research Site
Sheffield, S5 7AU
Research Site
West Bromwich, B71 4HJ
Research Site
Whitby, YO21 1SD
Research Site
Worcester, WR5 1DD
Czechia23 sites
Research Site
Beroun, 266 01
Research Site
Bílovec, 743 01
Research Site
Brandýs nad Labem, 250 01
Research Site
Brno, 602 00
Research Site
Brno, 636 00
Research Site
Brno, 638 00
Research Site
Chomutov, 430 02
Research Site
Havlíčkův Brod, 580 22
Research Site
Hodonín, 695 01
Research Site
Klatovy IV, 339 01
Research Site
Liberec, 460 63
Research Site
Litomyšl, 570 14
Research Site
Mohelnice, 789 85
Research Site
Olomouc, 779 00
Research Site
Ostrava - Vitkovice, 703 00
Research Site
Pardubice, 530 02
Research Site
Prague, 101 00
Research Site
Prague, 128 08
Research Site
Prague, 130 00
Research Site
Prague, 140 21
Research Site
Praha 5 - Smichov, 150 00
Research Site
Přerov, 750 02
Research Site
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
Russia18 sites
Research Site
Ivanovo, 153012
Research Site
Izhevsk, 426063
Research Site
Kemerovo, 650002
Research Site
Kemerovo, 650099
Research Site
Kirov, 610014
Research Site
Moscow, 117292
Research Site
Moscow, 121552
Research Site
Nizhny Novgorod, 603076
Research Site
Novosibirsk, 630089
Research Site
Omsk, 644018
Research Site
Pushkin, 196601
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 191015
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 192242
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Research Site
Saint Petersburg, 199106
Research Site
Saratov, 410054
Research Site
Tomsk, 634012
Research Site
Yekaterinburg, 620144
Germany14 sites
Research Site
Bad Krozingen, 79189
Research Site
Berlin, 10787
Research Site
Berlin, 12559
Research Site
Berlin, 13353
Research Site
Bochum, 44787
Research Site
Cologne, 50937
Research Site
Dresden, 01307
Research Site
Frankfurt am Main, 60596
Research Site
Hamburg, 20246
Research Site
Hanover, 30159
Research Site
Leipzig, 04103
Research Site
Stuttgart, 70376
Research Site
Witten, 58455
Research Site
Wuppertal, 42117
Canada12 sites
Research Site
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 7K9
Research Site
Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 6S8
Research Site
London, Ontario, N6C 0A7
Research Site
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8
Research Site
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 8C3
Research Site
Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 0B2
Research Site
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 3J1
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4M6
Research Site
Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, J3A 1C3
Research Site
Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, J7Z 5T3
Research Site
Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3
Research Site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
Slovakia12 sites
Research Site
Bardejov, 085 01
Research Site
Brezno, 977 42
Research Site
Košice, 040 22
Research Site
Lučenec, 984 01
Research Site
Moldava nad Bodvou, 045 01
Research Site
Nové Zámky, 940 01
Research Site
Rimavská Sobota, 979 01
Research Site
Rožňava, 048 01
Research Site
Snina, 069 01
Research Site
Svidník, 08901
Research Site
Trenčín, 911 01
Research Site
Trnava, 917 01
South Africa11 sites
Research Site
Cape Town, 7530
Research Site
Centurion, Gauteng, 0158
Research Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1724
Research Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2196
Research Site
Kempton Park, 1619
Research Site
Paarl, Western Cape, 7646
Research Site
Parow, Western Cape, 7505
Research Site
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0184
Research Site
Pretoria West, Gauteng, 0183
Research Site
Somerset West, Western Cape, 7130
Research Site
Worcester, Western Cape, 6850
Australia9 sites
Research Site
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Research Site
Ashford, South Australia, 5035
Research Site
Auchenflower, Queensland, 4066
Research Site
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Research Site
Epping, Victoria, 3076
Research Site
Fullarton, South Australia, 5063
Research Site
Geelong, Victoria, 3220
Research Site
Hobart, Tasmania, 7000
Research Site
Woden, Australian Capital Territory, 2605
Hungary9 sites
Research Site
Békéscsaba, 5600
Research Site
Berettyóújfalu, 4100
Research Site
Budapest, 1036
Research Site
Nyíregyháza, 4400
Research Site
Pécs, 7624
Research Site
Szeged, 6725
Research Site
Szekszárd, 7100
Research Site
Szikszó, 3800
Research Site
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Belgium8 sites
Research Site
Aalst, 9300
Research Site
Bonheiden, 2820
Research Site
Brussels, 1020
Research Site
Brussels, 1070
Research Site
Gozée, 6534
Research Site
Ieper, 8900
Research Site
La Louvière, 7100
Research Site
Liège, 4000
Finland8 sites
Research Site
Helsinki, 00180
Research Site
Helsinki, 00290
Research Site
Jyväskylä, 40100
Research Site
Kuopio, 70100
Research Site
Oulu, 90100
Research Site
OYS, 90029
Research Site
Tampere, 33100
Research Site
Turku, 20100
Denmark7 sites
Research Site
Aalborg, 9000
Research Site
Ballerup Municipality, 2750
Research Site
Esbjerg, 6700
Research Site
Hvidovre, 2650
Research Site
København S, 2300
Research Site
Køge, 4600
Research Site
Vejle, 7100
France7 sites
Research Site
Besançon, 25030
Research Site
Le Coudray, 28630
Research Site
Montepellier Cedex, 34295
Research Site
Nantes, 44093
Research Site
Paris, 75013
Research Site
Pessac, 33604
Research Site
Toulouse, 31059
Greece7 sites
Research Site
Alexandroupoli, 68100
Research Site
Athens, 11521
Research Site
Athens, 14233
Research Site
Athens, 14561
Research Site
Ioannina, 45500
Research Site
Larissa, 41110
Research Site
Piraeus, 18536
Latvia7 sites
Research Site
Daugavpils, 5417
Research Site
Kuldīga, LV-3301
Research Site
Liepāja, 3402
Research Site
Ogre, 5001
Research Site
Ogre, LV-5003
Research Site
Riga, 1012
Research Site
Riga, LV-1001
Norway7 sites
Research Site
Ålesund, 6003
Research Site
Hamar, 2317
Research Site
Lierskogen, 3420
Research Site
Oslo, 0450
Research Site
Skedsmokorset, 2020
Research Site
Skien, 3710
Research Site
Stavanger, 4005
Spain7 sites
Research Site
Galdakao, Basque Country, 48960
Research Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Research Site
Madrid, 28034
Research Site
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706
Research Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46010
Research Site
Vigo, Galicia, 36200
Research Site
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009
Sweden7 sites
Research Site
Helsingborg, 251 87
Research Site
Linköping, 581 85
Research Site
Lund, 222 21
Research Site
Stockholm, 111 35
Research Site
Stockholm, 171 76
Research Site
Uddevalla, 451 50
Research Site
Västerås, 721 89
Turkey (Türkiye)7 sites
Research Site
Adana, 01330
Research Site
Ankara, 06100
Research Site
Gaziantep, 27310
Research Site
Istanbul, 34096
Research Site
Istanbul, 34865
Research Site
Izmir, 35100
Research Site
Kocaeli, 41380
Netherlands5 sites
Research Site
Arnhem, 6815 AD
Research Site
Ede, 6716 RP
Research Site
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ
Research Site
Hoorn, 1625 HV
Research Site
Uden, 5406 PT
Estonia4 sites
Research Site
Paide, 72713
Research Site
Tallinn, 10128
Research Site
Tallinn, 10138
Research Site
Tallinn, 13419
Portugal4 sites
Research Site
Almada, 2801-951
Research Site
Carnaxide, 2790-134
Research Site
Coimbra, 3000-075
Research Site
Covilha, 6200-251
Malaysia2 sites
Research Site
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000
Research Site
Kuala Lumpur, 59100
New Zealand2 sites
Research Site
Christchurch, 8011
Research Site
Tauranga, 3143
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Effect of Evolocumab on Cognitive Function in Patients With Clinically Evident Cardiovascular Disease and Receiving Statin Background Lipid Lowering Therapy: A Study for Subjects Enrolled in the FOURIER (Study 20110118) Trial
This study evaluated change over time in neurocognitive testing in patients receiving statin therapy in combination with evolocumab (AMG 145), compared with patients receiving statin therapy in combination with placebo.
Read the detailed description
Participants who were enrolled in study 20110118 (FOURIER; NCT01764633) at select sites in select countries (selected based on study start-up timelines) were invited to participate in this cognitive function study, 20130385. There was no separate randomization for Study 20130385; data were analyzed according to Study 20110118 randomized treatment arm.
- Conditions
- Dyslipidemia
- Being tested
- Evolocumab, Placebo, Background Statin Therapy
- Keywords
- High cholesterol, Treatment for high cholesterol, Lowering cholesterol, Lowering high cholesterol, Hypercholesterolemia
- Medical subject headings
- Dyslipidemias, Hypercholesterolemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EvolocumabBiological
Also called AMG 145, Repatha
Administered subcutaneously using a spring-based prefilled 1.0 mL autoinjector/pen.
PlaceboDrug
Administered subcutaneously using a spring-based prefilled 1.0 mL autoinjector/pen.
Background Statin TherapyDrug
Participants were required to be on a stable, high- to moderate-intensity statin background therapy consisting of an effective statin dose, ie, at least atorvastatin 20 mg daily or equivalent, and where locally approved, highly effective statin therapy (defined as at least atorvastatin 40 mg daily or equivalent) was recommended.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections either once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or once a month (QM) according to their own preference. Participants continued with their background statin therapy during the course of the study. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Background Statin Therapy |
| Evolocumab | Experimental | Participants received evolocumab 140 mg Q2W or 420 mg QM subcutaneous injections according to their own preference. Participants continued with their background statin therapy during the course of the study. Receives: Biological: Evolocumab; Drug: Background Statin Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline in Spatial Working Memory Strategy Index of Executive Function (6-8 Boxes) Z Score
Assessments were performed with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), a language-independent battery of computerized tests that is used to assess cognitive function.
The Spatial Working Memory (SWM) test assesses the cognitive domain of executive function (high-level thinking and decision making). Patients search for colored tokens hidden inside boxes on the screen by touching them. The critical instruction is that once a token has been found inside a box, there will never be a token hidden inside that box again, so patients must not return to a box where a token has been found.
The SWM strategy index of executive function represented the number of times a subject began a search with a different box. The Z score represents the standardized measure of how far an individual subject deviates from the study cohort average at baseline. A higher Z score reflects better performance. The mean change from baseline averaged across all the visits is reported.
Measured: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mean Change From Baseline in Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Between-errors Z Score
Assessments were performed with the CANTAB, a language-independent battery of computerized tests that is used to assess cognitive function. The Spatial Working Memory (SWM) between-errors test assesses the cognitive domain of working memory (holding material in mind while that material is being actively processed). Patients search for colored tokens hidden inside boxes on the screen by touching them. The critical instruction is that once a token has been found inside a box, there will never be a token hidden inside that box again, so patients must not return to a box where a token has been found.
The SWM between-errors score is the number of times that a patient revisited a box in which a token had previously been found. The Z score represents the standardized measure of how far an individual participant deviates from the study cohort average at baseline. A higher Z score reflects better performance. The mean change from baseline averaged across all the visits is reported.
Measured: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Mean Change From Baseline in Paired Associated Learning (PAL) Total Errors Adjusted Z Score
The CANTAB PAL test assesses visuospatial episodic memory (storing/retrieving information by associating an event with a time and place). Boxes on the screen opened up one at a time to reveal a number of patterns. Participants were asked to remember the location of each pattern. After all the boxes had been opened, each pattern was then shown in the center of the screen in a randomized order, and the patient should touch the box where they think each pattern was hidden. The PAL total errors adjusted comprised the number of errors committed by a patient plus an adjustment for the estimated number of errors the patient would have made on any stages that were not reached.
Z score represents the standardized measure of how far an individual patient deviates from the study cohort average at baseline. A higher Z score indicated better performance. The mean change from baseline averaged across all the visits is reported.
Measured: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Mean Change From Baseline in Reaction Time (RTI) Median 5-choice Reaction Time Z Score
Assessments were performed with the CANTAB, a language-independent battery of computerized tests that is used to assess cognitive function. The Reaction Time (RTI) test assessed the cognitive domain of psychomotor speed (detecting and responding to a stimulus). Participants held down a button until a spot appeared in 1 of 5 circles on the screen. As soon as possible after the spot flashed up, the patient lifted their finger from the button and touched the circle in which the spot appeared. The RTI median 5-choice reaction time was the median duration between the onset of the stimulus and the release of the button. Z score represents the standardized measure of how far an individual participant deviates from the study cohort average at baseline. A higher Z score reflects better performance. The mean change from baseline averaged across all the visits is reported.
Measured: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study start10 Sep 2014
- Primary completion11 Nov 2016
- Study completion11 Nov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DyslipidemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,974 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02207634
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20130385
- Other IDs
- 2014-001976-75, 2014
- Acronym
- EBBINGHAUS
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Giugliano RP, Mach F, Zavitz K, Kurtz C, Schneider J, Wang H, Keech A, Pedersen TR, Sabatine MS, Sever PS, Honarpour N, Wasserman SM, Ott BR; EBBINGHAUS Investigators. Design and rationale of the EBBINGHAUS trial: A phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the effect of evolocumab on cognitive function in patients with clinically evident cardiovascular disease and receiving statin background lipid-lowering therapy-A cognitive study of patients enrolled in the FOURIER trial. Clin Cardiol. 2017 Feb;40(2):59-65. doi: 10.1002/clc.22678. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
PubMed 28207168Giugliano RP, Mach F, Zavitz K, Kurtz C, Im K, Kanevsky E, Schneider J, Wang H, Keech A, Pedersen TR, Sabatine MS, Sever PS, Robinson JG, Honarpour N, Wasserman SM, Ott BR; EBBINGHAUS Investigators. Cognitive Function in a Randomized Trial of Evolocumab. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):633-643. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701131.
PubMed 28813214Schmidt AF, Carter JL, Pearce LS, Wilkins JT, Overington JP, Hingorani AD, Casas JP. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub3.
PubMed 33078867
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Effect of Evolocumab on Cognitive Function in Patients With Clinically Evident Cardiovascular Disease and Receiving Statin Background Lipid Lowering Therapy: A Study for Subjects Enrolled in the FOURIER (Study 20110118) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02207634
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EBBINGHAUS / 20130385
- Conditions
- Dyslipidemia
- Keywords
- High cholesterol, Treatment for high cholesterol, Lowering cholesterol, Lowering high cholesterol, Hypercholesterolemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,974 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Sep 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jan 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluated change over time in neurocognitive testing in patients receiving statin therapy in combination with evolocumab (AMG 145), compared with patients receiving statin therapy in combination with placebo.
Detailed description
Participants who were enrolled in study 20110118 (FOURIER; NCT01764633) at select sites in select countries (selected based on study start-up timelines) were invited to participate in this cognitive function study, 20130385. There was no separate randomization for Study 20130385; data were analyzed according to Study 20110118 randomized treatment arm.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: Background Statin TherapyParticipants received placebo subcutaneous injections either once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or once a month (QM) according to their own preference. Participants continued with their background statin therapy during the course of the study. |
| Evolocumab | Experimental | Biological: Evolocumab, Drug: Background Statin TherapyParticipants received evolocumab 140 mg Q2W or 420 mg QM subcutaneous injections according to their own preference. Participants continued with their background statin therapy during the course of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Randomized into Study 20110118 (FOURIER; NCT01764633)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Current or known past diagnosis of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EvolocumabAlso: AMG 145, RepathaAdministered subcutaneously using a spring-based prefilled 1.0 mL autoinjector/pen. | Biological | Evolocumab |
| PlaceboAdministered subcutaneously using a spring-based prefilled 1.0 mL autoinjector/pen. | Drug | Placebo |
| Background Statin TherapyParticipants were required to be on a stable, high- to moderate-intensity statin background therapy consisting of an effective statin dose, ie, at least atorvastatin 20 mg daily or equivalent, and where locally approved, highly effective statin therapy (defined as at least atorvastatin 40 mg daily or equivalent) was recommended. | Drug | Evolocumab, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline in Spatial Working Memory Strategy Index of Executive Function (6-8 Boxes) Z Score
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Assessments were performed with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), a language-independent battery of computerized tests that is used to assess cognitive function. The Spatial Working Memory (SWM) test assesses the cognitive domain of executive function (high-level thinking and decision making). Patients search for colored tokens hidden inside boxes on the screen by touching them. The critical instruction is that once a token has been found inside a box, there will never be a token hidden inside that box again, so patients must not return to a box where a token has been found. The SWM strategy index of executive function represented the number of times a subject began a search with a different box. The Z score represents the standardized measure of how far an individual subject deviates from the study cohort average at baseline. A higher Z score reflects better performance. The mean change from baseline averaged across all the visits is reported.
3 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in Spatial Working Memory (SWM) Between-errors Z Score
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Mean Change From Baseline in Paired Associated Learning (PAL) Total Errors Adjusted Z Score
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Mean Change From Baseline in Reaction Time (RTI) Median 5-choice Reaction Time Z Score
Time frame: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28207168Giugliano RP, Mach F, Zavitz K, Kurtz C, Schneider J, Wang H, Keech A, Pedersen TR, Sabatine MS, Sever PS, Honarpour N, Wasserman SM, Ott BR; EBBINGHAUS Investigators. Design and rationale of the EBBINGHAUS trial: A phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the effect of evolocumab on cognitive function in patients with clinically evident cardiovascular disease and receiving statin background lipid-lowering therapy-A cognitive study of patients enrolled in the FOURIER trial. Clin Cardiol. 2017 Feb;40(2):59-65. doi: 10.1002/clc.22678. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
- Background: PubMed 28813214Giugliano RP, Mach F, Zavitz K, Kurtz C, Im K, Kanevsky E, Schneider J, Wang H, Keech A, Pedersen TR, Sabatine MS, Sever PS, Robinson JG, Honarpour N, Wasserman SM, Ott BR; EBBINGHAUS Investigators. Cognitive Function in a Randomized Trial of Evolocumab. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):633-643. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701131.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33078867Schmidt AF, Carter JL, Pearce LS, Wilkins JT, Overington JP, Hingorani AD, Casas JP. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub3.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Dyslipidemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Study Evaluating LDL-C Change and Adherence to Inclisiran Lipid-lowering Therapy in ASCVD
Primary Hypercholesterolemia, Mixed Dyslipidemia
Not yet recruiting
Plasma Lipids-Dependent Vitamin E Metabolism During Dynamic Hyperlipidemia
Lipid Metabolism Disorders
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Developing a Learning COmmunity to Increase eNgagemeNt and Enrollment in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials (CONNECT)
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
416 sites in 30 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Evolocumab and Background Statin Therapy in people with Dyslipidemia, run by Amgen at 416 sites in 30 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 416 sites in United States, Poland, Japan, United Kingdom, Czechia and 25 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline in Spatial Working Memory Strategy Index of Executive Function (6-8 Boxes) Z Score (time frame: Assessments were conducted at Baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, 144 and end of study visit (median time on study was 19.4 months).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02207634, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2018.