Effect of Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy Verses Oral Hygiene Instructions on Patients With Chronic Periodontitis

Subjects with moderate to advanced chronic periodontitis were selected for this longitudinal randomized clinical trial. Ethical clearance for the study was granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya [Medical Ethics Committee Number: DF PE1002/0045(P)]. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. The CONSORT guidelines for clinical trials were followed.

Out of 112 screened patients 56 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were minimum of 12 teeth present with pocket of 5mm or more and probing attachment loss of 4mm or more in at least 2 different quadrants which bled on probing. Exclusion criteria included history of cardiovascular problems, pregnancy, smokers, and subjects receiving antibiotics in past 4 months or NSPT in past 6 months. Recruited patients were treated at the Periodontology clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya. Using Cohen's d formula it was calculated that at least 26 patients would be needed per treatment group to detect this difference with 80% power.

Prior to baseline examination, patients were assigned in the NSPT and OHI group using block randomization. Patients in NSPT group received OHI, scaling and root planing followed by 0.12% Chlorhexidine mouth rinses while patients in OHI group received OHI only. At each month recall visit, participants in both groups were reviewed and motivated. Professional prophylaxis was only received by NSPT group. Two calibrated examiners (RPCR and WNAWA) performed all treatment on the patients. Probing pocket depth ( PPD), probing attachment loss (PAL), gingival bleeding index (BI) and visible plaque index (PI) were determined on all present teeth except third molars at baseline and 3 months after therapy. For PI and BI, 4 sites were measured (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) and for PPD and PAL 6 sites were recorded (disto-buccal, mid-buccal, mesio-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual and disto-lingual). Utilizing Kappa statistics, good agreements (>0.8) were obtained for intra and inter operator reproducibility of all recorded clinical parameters.

Identification of subgingival microbiota using quantitative polymerase chain reaction technique.

Sub-gingival plaque scraping samples were obtained at baseline and 3-months post therapy with sterile curettes from the deepest sites at each quadrant and were pooled together for each subject. Prior to sampling, isolation was maintained with cotton rolls and supra-gingival plaque was removed using cotton pellets. Plaque scrapings were re-suspended in 1.5 ml of Phosphate Buffered Saline and stored at -80⁰C freezer prior to DNA extraction. 100µl of plaque sample was used for automated DNA extraction in the lab using the Qiacube machine (Qiagen®, Biotechnology, Netherlands). The tubes containing the plaque samples were centrifuged at a speed of 5,000 × g for 10 minutes on a tabletop centrifuge machine to obtain the pellet. The pellet was then used for automated DNA extraction with the Qiacube machine. 100µl of eluted DNA was stored in -20⁰C for bacterial detection using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Applied Biosystem, USA).

Reference bacterial strains used in this study were P.gingivalis (W83), A.actinomycetemcomitans (NCTC9710), P.intermedia (ATCC25611) and T.forsythia (CCUG 21028AT). All the bacterial strains were grown as recommended by American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). After the growth of bacteria till late exponential phase they were washed with sterile distilled water and DNA extraction was carried out using the same protocol as for plaque samples.

The concentration and purity of extracted DNA was determined using spectrophotometer machine (Nanodrop 2000, Thermo scientific, USA). DNA concentration from both plaque samples and reference strain were calculated and recorded accordingly. The extracted DNAs were stored in -20⁰C until the initiation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction procedure.

The protocol given by Boutaga et al., (2005) was followed for quantitative polymerase chain reaction . Primers and probes selected for this study are shown in Table 1. A total reaction mixture of 20ul was used for amplification, which contains 2ul of template DNA from plaque sample/reference strain,10 ul of 2 x TaqMan fast advanced master mix (Applied biosystems, USA), 1ul of 20x gene expression assay and 7ul nuclease free water. All the components of reaction mixture except for DNA sample were added in 1.5ml micro centrifuge tube. The tube was vortexed and than centrifuged to eliminate air bubbles. Mixture was transferred to 96-well plate with addition of 2ul DNA sample. The Plate was then covered with optical adhesive and centrifuged again to make sure air bubbles are eliminated. The cycling conditions used were as follows: 50oc for 2min and 95oc for 10min followed by 45 cycles at 95oc for 15s and 60oc for 1min.

Dilutions of known amounts of reference strains of DNA were used to generate standard curves with correlation coefficient (R2: 0.99). For quantification/copy number determination, the results from unknown samples were projected on the standard curves obtained from the pure cultures using the formula: Quantity DNA=10(ct-b)/m.

Determination of Interleukin-1, Interleukin-6, Adiponectin and Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha level in Serum.

All reagents were allowed to reach room temperature before use and were gently mixed prior to the experiments. Number of 8-well strips needed for the assay was determined. 100 ul of the Standard Diluent Buffer were added to zero wells and 1 well was reserved for chromogen blank. 100 ul of standards, samples and controls were added to the appropriate microtiter wells. 50 ul of biotinylated anti-Interleukin-6 (Biotin Conjugate) solution were pipetted into each well except the chromagen blank and then gently tapped on the side of the plate to mix. Next, plates were covered with plate covers and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Solutions were thoroughly aspirated from wells and the liquid discarded. The wells were washed 4 times. 100 ul streptavidin-histidine-rich protein working solution were added to each well except the chromogen blank. Again, the plates were covered with the plate covers and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. Solution from wells was thoroughly aspirated and the liquid discarded. The wells were washed 4 times. 100ul of Stabilized Chromogen was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark. 100 ul of stop solution was added to each well and then gently tapped on the side of the plate to mix. The absorbance of each well was read at 450 nm having blanked the plate reader against a chromogen blank composed of 100 ul each of Stabilized Chromogen and Stop Solution. The absorbance of the standards against the standard concentration was then plotted on graph paper.