AzTrials
AzTrials

Advance Care PlanningPhase 3NCT02208947

Consumer Engagement to Increase Advance Care Planning

A Phase 3 study testing Consumer financial incentive and PREPARE in people with Advance Care Planning, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The specific aims of the project are: 1) to test the effectiveness of consumer-directed financial incentives paired with provider-directed financial incentives, compared to provider-directed financial incentives alone, for increasing advance care planning (ACP) among Medicaid beneficiaries; and 2) to assess… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Advance Care Planning
What is being tested?
Consumer financial incentive and PREPARE
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2014to Feb 2015
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

PCP Subject Inclusion Criteria:

  • Partnership HealthPlan of California Medicaid and/or Medicare provider

PCP Subject Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prohibition by clinic director

Patient Subject Inclusion Criteria:

  • Partnership HealthPlan of California Medicaid and/or Medicare enrollee;
  • Age 65+ or < 65 with a life-limiting illness (including advanced cardiac disease [end-stage congestive heart failure, severe coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy (LVEF <25%)], advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, amputation due to vascular disease, cancer [metastatic/recurrent], dementia, diabetes mellitus with creatinine clearance under 50, or an amputation, end stage renal disease, generalized debility and decreased functioning, long term resident of skilled nursing facility, stroke [w/at least 50% decreased function]);
  • Internet access (computer, tablet, phone)

Patient Subject Exclusion Criteria:

  • Completion of a Partnership HelathPlan of California advance care planning attestation form within the last 12 months;
  • Inability to read English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Partnership HealthPlan-contracting provider groups in Northern California

    Fairfield, California, 94534

Other trials in United States

About this study

The specific aims of the project are: 1) to test the effectiveness of consumer-directed financial incentives paired with provider-directed financial incentives, compared to provider-directed financial incentives alone, for increasing advance care planning (ACP) among Medicaid beneficiaries; and 2) to assess perceptions regarding the appropriateness of consumer-directed financial incentives for ACP among study participants. The investigators hypothesize that consumer-directed financial incentives will result in a 15-percentage point absolute increase in the proportion of subjects completing ACP. The investigators do not advance hypotheses about the qualitative component.

Read the detailed description

This is a parallel cluster randomized controlled single-blind trial of consumer-directed financial incentives paired with provider-directed financial incentives (intervention), compared to provider-directed financial incentives alone (control) on the completion of ACP among Partnership HealthPlan of California (PHC) Medi-Cal patients. PHC is a county-organized health system contracted by the State of California to provide a health care delivery system for 360,000 Medi-Cal beneficiaries in Northern California. PHC has 400 contracted Primary Care Provider (PCP) entities, representing over 2000 individual physicians, working in solo practice, small groups, community health centers, large groups, and integrated health systems. The rationale for using PHC is their commitment to experimenting with strategies to improve ACP, including their current quality improvement program incentive payment to PCPs to discuss and document ACP with patients 65+ and <65 with a serious chronic illness.

The investigators will randomize 40 PCPs to one of two different patient education packets for their patients. Each PCP is eligible for financial incentives for documenting ACP (usual care), regardless of the randomization group.

Each PCP will be responsible for identifying and enrolling 10 eligible subjects during routine clinic visits, for a target enrollment of 400 patient subjects.

The investigators will stratify randomization based on salience of the financial incentive (e.g., accrues directly to non-salaried provider, such as in a private practice, or accrues to the organization of a salaried provider, such as in a Federally Qualified Health Center or multispecialty group).

All enrolled patients will receive access to the patient education tool, Prepare for Your Care (www.prepareforyourcare.org), developed by Dr. Sudore for low-literacy Medi-Cal populations, in their education packets. The intervention group patients will additionally be offered a consumer (patient) financial incentive. the primary outcome of the study is having a conversation with the PCP about ACP. Secondary outcomes include: 1) website use metrics and 2) attitudes about providing financial incentives for ACP (among a purposively sampled subset of participants).

Being tested
Consumer financial incentive, PREPARE
Keywords
advance care planning, decision making, patient engagement, patient education, financial incentives, behavioral economics
Medical subject headings
Patient Participation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Consumer financial incentiveBehavioural

    Immediate financial reward upon completing self-directed ACP (e.g., completing the web-based educational modules on PREPARE steps 1-4) and a small probability of a large reward for discussing the plans with their physician (e.g., PREPARE step 5, documented by the PHC ACP attestation form).

  • PREPAREBehavioural

    PREPARE for your care is 5-step on-line ACP process developed specifically for low-literacy Medi-Cal populations. PREPARE can be navigated as interactive, self-directed modules or "played" like a movie, at a time or a place of the subject's own choosing (e.g., home, work, public library).

Study groups in NCT02208947
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PREPAREActive comparatorPartnership HealthPlan of California (PHC) pays primary care physicians (PCPs) to discuss and document ACP with Medi-Cal beneficiaries aged 65 and older and those younger than 65 with a life-limiting illness (usual care). The control condition, or "enhanced usual care," adds a packet of educational information about ACP and access to the PREPARE website and verbal encouragement by their PCP delivered during a routine clinic visit to usual care.
Receives: Behavioral: PREPARE
PREPARE + consumer financial incentiveExperimentalThe experimental condition adds a consumer-directed financial incentive to enhanced usual care (provider-directed financial incentive and educational packet with information about the PREPARE website). Specifically, subjects will receive an immediate financial reward upon completing self-directed ACP (e.g., PREPARE steps 1-4) and a small probability of a large reward for discussing the plans with their physician (e.g., PREPARE step 5, documented by the PHC ACP attestation form).
Receives: Behavioral: Consumer financial incentive; Behavioral: PREPARE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Advance care planning conversation with provider

    The primary outcome is the patient discussing their ACP with their provider within 2 months of having received the study advance care planning information packet, measured by the provider submitting an attestation form to Partnership HealthPlan of California to receive their ACP quality incentive payment.

    Measured: 2 months (+/- 1 month)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Use of the PREPARE website

    The process measure is developing a plan using the PREPARE website, measured by tracking website user metrics and receipt of the subject's "action plan and summary" by e-mail.

    Measured: 2 months (+/- 1 month)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completionNov 2014
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Why it stopped: failure to accure

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02208947
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRO13120230
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
19 Jun 2014
Last updated
15 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Consumer financial incentive and PREPARE in people with Advance Care Planning, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: failure to accure). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Advance care planning conversation with provider (time frame: 2 months (+/- 1 month)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in