Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT02210780
Study of Dupilumab and Immune Responses in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
A Phase 2 study testing Dupilumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 42 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This was a 32-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessing immunization responses to vaccination in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who are treated with subcutaneous dupilumab. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Dupilumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 194 participants
- Where
- 42 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Aug 2014to 15 Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female adults ages 18 to 64 years with Chronic AD (according to the American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria, [Eichenfeld 2004])that has been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit
- Participants with documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to a sufficient course of outpatient treatment with topical AD medication(s), or for whom topical AD therapies are otherwise inadvisable (e.g., because of side effects or safety risks).
- Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the screening visit and the baseline visit
- Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥3 (on the 0-4 IGA scale) at the screening and baseline visits
- ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with dupilumab (REGN668/ SAR231893)
- Patients needing >10 mg of daily prednisone (including equivalent doses of other steroids) or high dose systemic corticosteroids (≥2 mg/kg) for 14 days or longer during the 16 week treatment period of the study
- History of Guillain-Barre syndrome
- History of severe allergic reaction to either vaccine or to vaccine components including alum, thimerosal, phenol
- Patients with a severe reaction to natural rubber latex products (some packaging components of the vaccines contain rubber latex and may cause a reaction in susceptible individuals)
- Treatment with biologics within 4 months of baseline visit
- Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antifungals within 4 weeks before screening visit or superficial skin infections within 1 week of screening visit
- The information listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial and not all inclusion/ exclusion criteria are listed.
Trial locations and contacts
42 sites in 1 country.
42 sites in 1 country
United States42 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Arlington, Texas
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Buffalo, New York
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio
Study site
Denver, Colorado
Study site
Forest Hills, New York
Study site
Fort Smith, Arkansas
Study site
Greer, South Carolina
Study site
Hackensack, New Jersey
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Macon, Georgia
Study site
Maywood, Illinois
Study site
Medford, Oregon
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Mission Viejo, California
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Norman, Oklahoma
Study site
Overland Park, Kansas
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Study site
Plainfield, Indiana
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Rolling Hills Estates, California
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Santa Monica, California
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Troy, Michigan
Study site
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Study site
Webster, Texas
Study site
West Dundee, Illinois
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study Investigating Vaccine Responses in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Dupilumab
This was a 32-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessing immunization responses to vaccination in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who are treated with subcutaneous dupilumab.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Dupilumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DupilumabDrug
Also called REGN668, SAR231893, Dupixent
Administered via subcutaneous injection.
PlaceboDrug
An inactive substance containing no medicine administered via subcutaneous injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo qw | Experimental | Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection qw from Week 1 to Week 15. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Dupilumab 300 mg qw | Experimental | Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 300 mg injection qw from Week 1 to Week 15. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥4-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16
A positive response was defined as a ≥ 4-fold increase from pre-vaccination at baseline in anti-tetanus immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer for participants with a pre-vaccination tetanus antibody titers ≥ 0.1 IU/ml or a titer of ≥ 0.2 IU/ml for participants with pre-vaccination titers of <0.1 IU/ml. There was no planned statistical hypothesis testing regarding the difference in immune response between the 2 treatment groups for this study, therefore no formal statistical hypothesis between groups was performed.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥2-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16
Participants with positive response defined as a ≥2-fold increase from pre-vaccination baseline in anti-tetanus IgG titer for participants with pre-vaccination tetanus antibody titers ≥0.1 IU/ml or a titer of ≥0.2 IU/ml for participants with pre-vaccination titers of <0.1 IU/ml.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (SBA Antibody Titer of ≥8 for Serogroup C) to Menomune Vaccine at Week 16
A positive response to the Menomune vaccine was a serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titer of ≥8 for serogroup C.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16
IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (≥50% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50 responders were the participants who achieved ≥50% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 16. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved ≥75% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 16. Values after first rescue treatment use were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were considered as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritis Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Weekly average obtained in the 7-day period prior to the baseline visit. Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by Last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by AD at Week 16
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) Components (Erythema, Infiltration/Papulation, Excoriations and Lichenification) at Week 16
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing. Analysis was completed using MMRM model which includes treatment, randomization strata, visit, baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline-by-visit interaction as covariates. These results are observed results without imputation.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Changes From Baseline in GISS Cumulative Score to Week 16
Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score From Baseline to Week 16
The POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study start5 Aug 2014
- Primary completion15 Sep 2015
- Study completion15 Sep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 194 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02210780
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R668-AD-1314
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 7 May 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Mickevicius T, Pink AE, Bhogal M, O'Brart D, Robbie SJ. Dupilumab-Induced, Tralokinumab-Induced, and Belantamab Mafodotin-Induced Adverse Ocular Events-Incidence, Etiology, and Management. Cornea. 2023 Apr 1;42(4):507-519. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003162. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
PubMed 36525340
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study Investigating Vaccine Responses in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Dupilumab
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02210780
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R668-AD-1314
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 194 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- 5 Aug 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 May 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a 32-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessing immunization responses to vaccination in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who are treated with subcutaneous dupilumab.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo qw | Experimental | Drug: PlaceboTwo subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection qw from Week 1 to Week 15. |
| Dupilumab 300 mg qw | Experimental | Drug: DupilumabTwo subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 300 mg injection qw from Week 1 to Week 15. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female adults ages 18 to 64 years with Chronic AD (according to the American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria, [Eichenfeld 2004])that has been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit
- Participants with documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to a sufficient course of outpatient treatment with topical AD medication(s), or for whom topical AD therapies are otherwise inadvisable (e.g., because of side effects or safety risks).
- Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the screening visit and the baseline visit
- Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥3 (on the 0-4 IGA scale) at the screening and baseline visits
- ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Prior treatment with dupilumab (REGN668/ SAR231893)
- Patients needing >10 mg of daily prednisone (including equivalent doses of other steroids) or high dose systemic corticosteroids (≥2 mg/kg) for 14 days or longer during the 16 week treatment period of the study
- History of Guillain-Barre syndrome
- History of severe allergic reaction to either vaccine or to vaccine components including alum, thimerosal, phenol
- Patients with a severe reaction to natural rubber latex products (some packaging components of the vaccines contain rubber latex and may cause a reaction in susceptible individuals)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DupilumabAlso: REGN668, SAR231893, DupixentAdministered via subcutaneous injection. | Drug | Dupilumab 300 mg qw |
| PlaceboAn inactive substance containing no medicine administered via subcutaneous injection. | Drug | Placebo qw |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥4-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
A positive response was defined as a ≥ 4-fold increase from pre-vaccination at baseline in anti-tetanus immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer for participants with a pre-vaccination tetanus antibody titers ≥ 0.1 IU/ml or a titer of ≥ 0.2 IU/ml for participants with pre-vaccination titers of <0.1 IU/ml. There was no planned statistical hypothesis testing regarding the difference in immune response between the 2 treatment groups for this study, therefore no formal statistical hypothesis between groups was performed.
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥2-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (SBA Antibody Titer of ≥8 for Serogroup C) to Menomune Vaccine at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (≥50% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritis Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by AD at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) Components (Erythema, Infiltration/Papulation, Excoriations and Lichenification) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Changes From Baseline in GISS Cumulative Score to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36525340Mickevicius T, Pink AE, Bhogal M, O'Brart D, Robbie SJ. Dupilumab-Induced, Tralokinumab-Induced, and Belantamab Mafodotin-Induced Adverse Ocular Events-Incidence, Etiology, and Management. Cornea. 2023 Apr 1;42(4):507-519. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003162. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
42 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Dupilumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 42 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 42 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 May 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥4-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02210780, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2020.