Breast CancerPhase 2/3HERMIONENCT02213744
MM-302 Plus Trastuzumab vs. Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice Plus Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
A Phase 2/3 study testing MM-302, Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in people with Breast Cancer and HER2 Positive Breast Cancer, run by Merrimack Pharmaceuticals at 109 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
This study is an open label, randomized, multicenter trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab. The trial is designed to demonstrate whether MM-302 plus trastuzumab is more effective than the chemotherapy of physician's choice (CPC) plus trastuzumab in locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- MM-302, Gemcitabine and Capecitabine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 113 participants
- Where
- 109 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to Jun 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive cancer of the breast
- Patients must have documented locally advanced/metastatic disease, defined by the investigator, which is not amenable to resection with curative intent.
- Patients must have HER2-positive breast cancer as defined by ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines that is confirmed by a Sponsor-designated central laboratory
- Patients must have progressed on, or be intolerant to pertuzumab in the LABC/MBC setting or had disease recurrence within 12 months of pertuzumab treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.
- Patients must have progressed on, or be intolerant to ado-trastuzumab emtansine in the LABC/MBC setting
- Patients must have been previously treated with trastuzumab in any setting (which may have been previously administered with or without pertuzumab)
- ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Patients who have previously been treated with doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin, mitoxantrone, or any other anthracycline derivative
- Subjects with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, unless they have been treated and are stable without symptoms for 4 weeks after completion of treatment and must be off steroids for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment
- Patients with any class of New York Heart Association (NYHA) CHF or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF)
- Patients with a history of known coronary artery disease or a myocardial infarction within the last 12 months
- Patients with a known history of serious cardiac arrhythmias requiring treatment (exception: controlled atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia)
- Patients who previously discontinued trastuzumab due to unacceptable cardiac toxicity
- Patients with a history of LVEF decline to below 50% during or after prior trastuzumab/lapatinib or other HER2 directed therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
109 sites in 9 countries.
109 sites in 9 countries
United States70 sites
New York Oncology Hematology, P.C.
Albany, New York
New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance
Albuquerque, New Mexico
McFarland Clinic PC
Ames, Iowa
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado
Texas Oncology- Central Austin Cancer Center
Austin, Texas
Johns Hopkins Medicine- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland
St. Charles Health System
Bend, Oregon
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts
Office of Carey K. Anders
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Tennessee Oncology
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Northwestern University- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
Oncology Hematology Care
Cincinnati, Ohio
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio
Ohio State University Hospital
Columbus, Ohio
Minnesota Oncology Hematology
Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas
Texas Oncology- Medical City
Dallas, Texas
Duke Cancer Institute
Durham, North Carolina
North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates
East Setauket, New York
Texas Oncology
El Paso, Texas
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute
Fort Meyers, Florida
The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Fort Worth, Texas
St. Jude Heritage Healthcare
Fullerton, California
Palo Verde Cancer Center
Glendale, Arizona
Bon Secours Saint Francis Hospital Cancer Center
Greenville, South Carolina
Greenville Health System Cancer Institute
Greenville, South Carolina
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey
Memorial Regional Hospital
Hollywood, Florida
Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City
Houston, Texas
The University of Texas- MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana
Swedish Medical Center
Issaquah, Washington
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Jacksonville, Florida
Joliet Oncology-Hematology Associates
Joliet, Illinois
Saint Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
Littleton, Colorado
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California
University of Minnesota- Masonic Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
The Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee
Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
New Port Richey, Florida
Morton Coleman MD
New York, New York
NYU Langone Medical Center
New York, New York
Southeastern Regional Medical Center
Newnan, Georgia
Virginia Oncology Associate
Norfolk, Virginia
UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health
Orlando, Florida
Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Florida Cancer Research Institute
Plantation, Florida
University of Miami Comprehensive Cancer Center
Plantation, Florida
Cancer Care Associates Medical Group
Redondo Beach, California
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, California
Sansum Clinic
Santa Barbara, California
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Scottsdale, Arizona
Barnes-Jewish West County Hospital
St Louis, Missouri
Northwest Medical Specialties
Tacoma, Washington
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York
University of Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona
Texas Oncology
Tyler, Texas
Kaiser Permanent Medical Center
Vallejo, California
Washington Cancer Institute
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Midwestern Regional Medical Center
Zion, Illinois
Spain10 sites
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
Cáceres
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
Córdoba
Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Madrid
H.U.Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca
Hospital de Navarra
Pamplona
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena
Seville
Italy9 sites
Centro Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori
Aviano
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona
Cremina
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
Milan
Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale
Naples
Instituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS
Padova
Oncology Unit Macerata Hospital
Province of Macerata
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Milan
Azienda Ospedaliero S. Maria di Terni
Terni
France5 sites
Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest site Paul Papin
Angers
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon
Hopital de l'Institut Curie
Paris
Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest
Saint-Herblain
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse
Belgium4 sites
GZA Ziekenhuizen - Campus Sint-Augustinus
Antwerp
University Hospital Antwerp
Antwerp
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels
Clinique Saint-Joseph
Liège
Canada4 sites
University of Alberta- Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton
London Regional Cancer Center
London, Ontario
McGill University Health Center
Québec
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario
Austria3 sites
Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck
Innsbruck
AKh Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Linz
Linz
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna
Germany3 sites
Universitatsklinikum des Saarlandes
Homburg
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck
Interdisziplinares Onkologisches Zentrum
Munich
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open Label Study of MM-302 Plus Trastuzumab vs. Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice Plus Trastuzumab in Anthracycline Naive Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
This study is an open label, randomized, multicenter trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab. The trial is designed to demonstrate whether MM-302 plus trastuzumab is more effective than the chemotherapy of physician's choice (CPC) plus trastuzumab in locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Patients may not have been previously treated with an anthracycline in any setting. Patients must have received prior treatment with trastuzumab in any setting, have either progressed or are intolerant to ado-trastuzumab emtansine in the metastatic or locally advanced setting, have either progressed or are intolerant to pertuzumab in the metastatic or locally advanced setting or had disease recurrence within 12 months of pertuzumab treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- MM-302, Gemcitabine, Capecitabine, Vinorelbine, Trastuzumab
- Keywords
- HER2-positive, HER2+, HER2, Locally Advanced Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer, trastuzumab, Herceptin, pertuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, TDM-1, Perjeta, Kadcyla
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MM-302Drug
GemcitabineDrug
Also called Gemzar
CapecitabineDrug
Also called Xeloda
VinorelbineDrug
TrastuzumabDrug
Also called Herceptin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MM-302 + trastuzumab | Experimental | MM-302 + trastuzumab Receives: Drug: MM-302; Drug: Trastuzumab |
| Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice plus trastuzumab | Active comparator | Chemotherapy limited to one of the following: Gemcitabine, Capecitabine or Vinorelbine Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine; Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Vinorelbine; Drug: Trastuzumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Independently assessed progression-free survival according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Secondary outcomes (7)
Locally assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Overall Survival
Measured: Approximately 3 years
Time to Treatment Failure
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Objective Response Rate based on independent and investigator review of tumor assessments
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Duration of Response (DoR) based on independent and investigator review of tumor assessments
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Safety
We will look specifically at the Number of Participants with Adverse Events related to MM-302 as compared to the control arm
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Pharmacokinetic exposure of MM-302
Area Under Curve (AUC) Time Frame: Cycles 1 and 2 - pre-infusion, post-infusion, and 168 hours post-dose. An optional timepoint at 8-96 hours post infusion is included during both cycles as well.
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionJun 2017 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Felt not to show benefit over control per DMC and confirmed via futility analysis
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Merrimack Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02213744
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MM-302-02-02-03
- Acronym
- HERMIONE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Miller K, Cortes J, Hurvitz SA, Krop IE, Tripathy D, Verma S, Riahi K, Reynolds JG, Wickham TJ, Molnar I, Yardley DA. HERMIONE: a randomized Phase 2 trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy of physician's choice plus trastuzumab in patients with previously treated, anthracycline-naive, HER2-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jun 3;16:352. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2385-z.
PubMed 27259714
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multicenter, Open Label Study of MM-302 Plus Trastuzumab vs. Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice Plus Trastuzumab in Anthracycline Naive Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02213744
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HERMIONE / MM-302-02-02-03
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- HER2-positive, HER2+, HER2, Locally Advanced Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer, trastuzumab, Herceptin, pertuzumab
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Felt not to show benefit over control per DMC and confirmed via futility analysis
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Merrimack PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is an open label, randomized, multicenter trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab. The trial is designed to demonstrate whether MM-302 plus trastuzumab is more effective than the chemotherapy of physician's choice (CPC) plus trastuzumab in locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Patients may not have been previously treated with an anthracycline in any setting. Patients must have received prior treatment with trastuzumab in any setting, have either progressed or are intolerant to ado-trastuzumab emtansine in the metastatic or locally advanced setting, have either progressed or are intolerant to pertuzumab in the metastatic or locally advanced setting or had disease recurrence within 12 months of pertuzumab treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MM-302 + trastuzumab | Experimental | Drug: MM-302, Drug: TrastuzumabMM-302 + trastuzumab |
| Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice plus trastuzumab | Active comparator | Drug: Gemcitabine, Drug: Capecitabine, Drug: Vinorelbine, Drug: TrastuzumabChemotherapy limited to one of the following: Gemcitabine, Capecitabine or Vinorelbine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive cancer of the breast
- Patients must have documented locally advanced/metastatic disease, defined by the investigator, which is not amenable to resection with curative intent.
- Patients must have HER2-positive breast cancer as defined by ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines that is confirmed by a Sponsor-designated central laboratory
- Patients must have progressed on, or be intolerant to pertuzumab in the LABC/MBC setting or had disease recurrence within 12 months of pertuzumab treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.
- Patients must have progressed on, or be intolerant to ado-trastuzumab emtansine in the LABC/MBC setting
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients who have previously been treated with doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin, mitoxantrone, or any other anthracycline derivative
- Subjects with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, unless they have been treated and are stable without symptoms for 4 weeks after completion of treatment and must be off steroids for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment
- Patients with any class of New York Heart Association (NYHA) CHF or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF)
- Patients with a history of known coronary artery disease or a myocardial infarction within the last 12 months
- Patients with a known history of serious cardiac arrhythmias requiring treatment (exception: controlled atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MM-302 | Drug | MM-302 + trastuzumab |
| GemcitabineAlso: Gemzar | Drug | Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice plus trastuzumab |
| CapecitabineAlso: Xeloda | Drug | Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice plus trastuzumab |
| Vinorelbine | Drug | Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice plus trastuzumab |
| TrastuzumabAlso: Herceptin | Drug | Chemotherapy of Physician's Choice plus trastuzumab, MM-302 + trastuzumab |
Primary outcome
Independently assessed progression-free survival according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
7 secondary outcomes
Locally assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Overall Survival
Time frame: Approximately 3 years
Time to Treatment Failure
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Objective Response Rate based on independent and investigator review of tumor assessments
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Duration of Response (DoR) based on independent and investigator review of tumor assessments
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Safety
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Pharmacokinetic exposure of MM-302
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Felt not to show benefit over control per DMC and confirmed via futility analysis). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27259714Miller K, Cortes J, Hurvitz SA, Krop IE, Tripathy D, Verma S, Riahi K, Reynolds JG, Wickham TJ, Molnar I, Yardley DA. HERMIONE: a randomized Phase 2 trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy of physician's choice plus trastuzumab in patients with previously treated, anthracycline-naive, HER2-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jun 3;16:352. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2385-z.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
109 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing MM-302, Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in people with Breast Cancer and HER2 Positive Breast Cancer, run by Merrimack Pharmaceuticals at 109 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 109 sites in United States, Spain, Italy, France, Belgium and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Felt not to show benefit over control per DMC and confirmed via futility analysis). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Independently assessed progression-free survival according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 (time frame: Approximately 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02213744, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2017.