AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationiReadNCT02214069

Using Smart Phone Technology in Detecting the Presence of Atrial Fibrillation

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine whether patients can use the AliveCor case to record their heart rhythm and to assess the accuracy of the software in detecting AF vs sinus rhythm Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter
What is being tested?
Record and transmit heart rhythm
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2014to Jul 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the hospital for your atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female between > 18 and < 80 years of age
  • Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Admitted for antiarrhythmic drug loading (Dofetilide or Sotalol)
  • Already has iPhone 4, 4S or 5 with data plan that accommodates the AliveCor case
  • Willing to use the Alive Cor case
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Unable or unwilling to use the Alive Cor case for their smart phone
  • Presence of a permanent pacemaker

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Assessing the Accuracy of an Atrial Fibrillation Detection Algorithm Using Novel Smart Phone Technology in Detecting the Presence of Atrial Fibrillation. iRead Study

The purpose of this study is to examine whether patients can use the AliveCor case to record their heart rhythm and to assess the accuracy of the software in detecting AF vs sinus rhythm

Read the detailed description

AliveCor is a new monitoring technology used with a smart phone which allows patients to record their rhythm. The study will compare AliveCor recordings and automated interpretation of the rhythm with the interpretation by an Electrophysiologist.

Being tested
Record and transmit heart rhythm
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Record and transmit heart rhythmDevice

    The patient uses the AliveCor device to record and transmit heart rhythm two times a day. The patient, device software, and Electrophysiologist interpret the rhythm

Study groups in NCT02214069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with Atrial FibrillationPatients with Atrial Fibrillation admitted to the hospital for drug loading with Dofetilide or Sotalol willing to record and transmit heart rhythm using AliveCor.
Receives: Device: Record and transmit heart rhythm

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Examine the accuracy of the AliveCor software in detecting AF or sinus rhythm compared to the physician interpretation

    Both the software nd overreading electrophysiologist come to the same conclusion regarding the rhythm of the ECG and Alivecor reading. Both determining that the tracing is either normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation.

    Measured: 6 month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Assess the correlation between QT interval derived from the AliveCor device compared to standard 12 lead ECG, as assessed by the overreading electrophysiologists.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionOct 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02214069
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-612
Acronym
iRead
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
6 Aug 2014
Last updated
13 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • William AD, Kanbour M, Callahan T, Bhargava M, Varma N, Rickard J, Saliba W, Wolski K, Hussein A, Lindsay BD, Wazni OM, Tarakji KG. Assessing the accuracy of an automated atrial fibrillation detection algorithm using smartphone technology: The iREAD Study. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Oct;15(10):1561-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

    PubMed 30143448

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Examine the accuracy of the AliveCor software in detecting AF or sinus rhythm compared to the physician interpretation (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02214069, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in