AzTrials
AzTrials

Central Serous ChorioretinopathyPhase 2/3NCT02215330

A Study of the Beneficial Effects of Eplerenone on Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

A Phase 2/3 study testing Eplerenone and Maltodextrin in people with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, run by Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA at 1 site in Austria.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is supposedly the fourth most common non-surgical retinopathy after age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and branch retinal vein occlusion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
What is being tested?
Eplerenone and Maltodextrin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Oct 2014to Sep 2017
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients suffering from untreated CSC for less than two months
  • Age 21 and older
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have recently been treated with eplerenone
  • Pregnancy or patients who are currently breast-feeding
  • Patients who should not use eplerenone for any reason - an extensive internal medicine assessment will be performed in all patients prior to treatment start)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Oliver Findl

    Vienna, 1140

    Oliver Findl, MD, Prof, MBA, 0043191021 ext. 57568, ofindl@googlemail.com

    Oliver Findl, MD, Prof, MBA

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-masked, Placebo Controlled Study of the Beneficial Effects of Eplerenone on Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is supposedly the fourth most common non-surgical retinopathy after age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and branch retinal vein occlusion. The disease was first described by Albrecht von Graefe in 1866 as a 'recurrent central retinitis' and is nowadays commonly known as 'central serous chorioretinopathy', a term mainly coined by Donald Gass in the late 1960s.

Although the disease has been known for decades, the underlying mechanism is not yet fully understood. Numerous studies have shown an involvement of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and the choroid which lead to accumulation of subretinal fluid with subsequent detachment of the neurosensory retina.

Read more

Among several assumed risk factors, high serum glucocorticoid levels seem to be related to the occurrence of CSC.

CSC typically affects young, male patients unilaterally and causes decreased and distorted vision, often associated with metamorphopsia, micropsia, dyschromatopsia and reduced contrast sensitivity. CSC can occur in an acute or chronic form. However, there is no agreement in the literature concerning the duration of the two forms. Some authors define CSC as chronic if there is persistent subretinal fluid for at least 6 months 11, others speak of chronic CSC when symptoms last longer than 3 months. In contrast there are studies where CSC is defined acute within the first 4 months. Spontaneously absorption is possible in up to 50% and normally leads to the recurrence of a normal visual acuity. Chronic CSC can result in a wide spread RPE damage and in a constantly reduction of visual acuity.

Structural changes in the retina and RPE have been found about 2 months after onset of the disease. Those changes can cause accumulation of photoreceptor outer segments, lead to consecutive atrophy of the photoreceptor cells and are associated with a loss of visual acuity.

Different concepts of treatment exist, but none of these may be deemed to be the golden standard. In the past few years several studies where CSC was treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT) or half-fluence PDT showed good visual outcomes and morphologic reconstitution. However, PDT is a destructive method which causes structural damage and can trigger other severe complications like choroidal ischemia and iatrogenic CNV. Furthermore, CSC is a self-limiting disease in many cases and physicians often hesitate to perform a relatively destructive therapeutical approach to treat a potentially self-limiting disease.

A newer, non-destructive therpeutical concept is the oral use of eplerenone a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. It is currently used in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. In the recent literature it was shown that eplerenone improved CSC and no serious adverse effects were observed in any case. However, no randomised controlled studies were performed comparing eplerenone with placebo to evaluate the clinical effect.

Read the detailed description

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is supposedly the fourth most common non-surgical retinopathy after age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and branch retinal vein occlusion. The disease was first described by Albrecht von Graefe in 1866 as a 'recurrent central retinitis' and is nowadays commonly known as 'central serous chorioretinopathy', a term mainly coined by Donald Gass in the late 1960s.

Although the disease has been known for decades, the underlying mechanism is not yet fully understood. Numerous studies have shown an involvement of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and the choroid which lead to accumulation of subretinal fluid with subsequent detachment of the neurosensory retina.

Among several assumed risk factors, high serum glucocorticoid levels seem to be related to the occurrence of CSC.

CSC typically affects young, male patients unilaterally and causes decreased and distorted vision, often associated with metamorphopsia, micropsia, dyschromatopsia and reduced contrast sensitivity. CSC can occur in an acute or chronic form. However, there is no agreement in the literature concerning the duration of the two forms. Some authors define CSC as chronic if there is persistent subretinal fluid for at least 6 months 11, others speak of chronic CSC when symptoms last longer than 3 months. In contrast there are studies where CSC is defined acute within the first 4 months. Spontaneously absorption is possible in up to 50% and normally leads to the recurrence of a normal visual acuity. Chronic CSC can result in a wide spread RPE damage and in a constantly reduction of visual acuity.

Structural changes in the retina and RPE have been found about 2 months after onset of the disease. Those changes can cause accumulation of photoreceptor outer segments, lead to consecutive atrophy of the photoreceptor cells and are associated with a loss of visual acuity.

Different concepts of treatment exist, but none of these may be deemed to be the golden standard. In the past few years several studies where CSC was treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT) or half-fluence PDT showed good visual outcomes and morphologic reconstitution. However, PDT is a destructive method which causes structural damage and can trigger other severe complications like choroidal ischemia and iatrogenic CNV. Furthermore, CSC is a self-limiting disease in many cases and physicians often hesitate to perform a relatively destructive therapeutical approach to treat a potentially self-limiting disease.

A newer, non-destructive therpeutical concept is the oral use of eplerenone a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. It is currently used in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. In the recent literature it was shown that eplerenone improved CSC and no serious adverse effects were observed in any case. However, no randomised controlled studies were performed comparing eplerenone with placebo to evaluate the clinical effect.

Aim of this randomised controlled double-masked study is to compare the treatment effects of eplerenone versus placebo in patients with acute or chronic CSC with an untreated observational period of at least 2 months. If there is no sign of clinical improvement within the first 16 weeks after the onset of symptoms, patients will be offered half-fluence PDT.

In smaller case series, eplerenone was shown to be a valuable therapeutical option for patients suffering from CSC, but no randomised studies are available. The oral application was well tolerated by the patients and no severe side effects occurred.

The most common side effect of eplerenone is hyperkalemia making close monitoring in individuals with diabetes mellitus or renal disease necessary. In our study, blood tests according to the standard for eplerenone will be performed for all patients. Additionally, all patients in the study will be seen and examined by an internal medicine specialist sub-specialized in endocrinology prior to treatment and during the entire duration of the study.

Patients suffering from CSC included in this study will either receive eplerenone or placebo tablets. The treatment will start 2 months after recognition of first symptoms at the earliest. Therefore, patients with acute CSC are not missing out on treatment, as the usual "treatment" in this phase is observation only. Patients in the eplerenone group may benefit from taking part in this study, whereas patients in the control group will undergo the standard treatment (=observation only). Our current treatment protocol is to perform a half-fluence PDT approximately 4 months after onset of symptoms. All patients that do not improve within this time period will be offered to receive a half-fluence PDT. In the case of chronic CSC, with onset of symptoms or diagnosis more than 2 months of duration, eplerenone or placebo will nevertheless be offered with the above mentioned treatment period of 2 months and the rescue therapy option of half-fluence PDT in case of no signs of a positive treatment effect within 4 months of eplerenone therapy.

Being tested
Eplerenone, Maltodextrin
Keywords
Central serous chorioretinopathy, Eplerenone, Photodynamic Therapy, Macula, Retina
Medical subject headings
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02215330
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sugar pillPlacebo comparatorMaltodextrin filled into capsules. 1 Pill starting dosage Follow-up visits (every two weeks, beginning at week 4): * If subretinal fluid is present and the patient takes two pills a day dosage stays the same. * If no subretinal fluid is present, the patient will continue the present dosage for another 2 weeks and will then stop the medication. * If no subretinal fluid is present and the patient takes no medication everything stays the same. * If subretinal fluid is present again (recurrence) and the patient takes no medication, the medication will be re-started again, the patient has to take one tablet beginning at the following day
Receives: Drug: Maltodextrin
EplerenoneExperimentalEplerenone 25mg pills triturated and filled into capsules. 1 Pill starting dosage Follow-up visits (every two weeks, beginning at week 4): * If subretinal fluid is present and the patient takes two pills a day dosage stays the same. * If no subretinal fluid is present, the patient will continue the present dosage for another 2 weeks and will then stop the medication. * If no subretinal fluid is present and the patient takes no medication everything stays the same. * If subretinal fluid is present again (recurrence) and the patient takes no medication, the medication will be re-started again, the patient has to take one tablet beginning at the following day
Receives: Drug: Eplerenone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in the number of successful treatments after 16 weeks, defined as complete absence of subretinal fluid on SD-OCT

    Difference in the number of successful treatments after 16 weeks, defined as complete absence of subretinal fluid on SD-OCT, between the study and the control groups. The final evaluation will be performed by an external retina specialist. Significance testing will be performed using Fischer's exact test.

    Measured: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Changes in visual acuity between eplerenone and placebo.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  2. Changes in retinal thickness between eplerenone and placebo.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  3. Changes in retinal volume between eplerenone and placebo.

    Measured: 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionMar 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02215330
Sponsor's protocol ID
EPL
Other IDs
EK_14_170_0814
Status last verified
Aug 2014
First submitted
11 Aug 2014
Last updated
13 Aug 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lange CA, Qureshi R, Pauleikhoff L. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.

    PubMed 40522203

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Eplerenone and Maltodextrin in people with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, run by Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in the number of successful treatments after 16 weeks, defined as complete absence of subretinal fluid on SD-OCT (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02215330, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in