HemorrhoidsNCT02216305
HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial
A study testing Hemorrhoidectomy and HAL-RAR in people with Hemorrhoids and Pain, Postoperative, run by Hospital Plató at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
HYPOTHESIS 1. HAL- RAR causes a lower immediate postoperative pain compared with excision hemorrhoidectomy. 2. HAL - RAR achieves similar immediate and long term results compared to the excision hemorrhoidectomy in the control of hemorrhoidal symptoms. 3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemorrhoids, Pain, Postoperative
- What is being tested?
- Hemorrhoidectomy and HAL-RAR
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids (bleeding, pain, itching, soiling or prolapse) that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods.
Who cannot join
- Associated recto-anal pathology such as acute thrombosed hemorrhoid, anal fissure, perianal fistula, perianal abscess, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence or anal stenosis.
- Prior anorectal surgery .
- Systemic pathology that could alter the outcome of the surgery as coagulopathies, chronic pain with continued consumption of analgesics.
- Age younger than 18 or older than 80 years, socio-pathology or inability to understand the study objectives
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective and Randomized Trial Comparing Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation With Recto-anal Repair (HAL-RAR) Versus Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids
HYPOTHESIS
- HAL- RAR causes a lower immediate postoperative pain compared with excision hemorrhoidectomy.
- HAL - RAR achieves similar immediate and long term results compared to the excision hemorrhoidectomy in the control of hemorrhoidal symptoms.
- The complication rate of HAL- RAR is low and similar to excision hemorrhoidectomy.
OBJECTIVES
- Compare postoperative pain of both techniques.
- Assess the short and long-term control of hemorrhoidal symptoms by HAL- RAR technique, and compare the results with those of the excision hemorrhoidectomy.
- Evaluate and compare the rate of complications of both techniques.
- Assess the quality of life of patients before and after treatment.
Read the detailed description
The classic surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease is the excisional hemorrhoidectomy, that consist in the surgical removal of one or more hemorrhoidal cushion, it is considered a safe, radical and definitive treatment; however, it is not exempt of complications and the postoperative pain is considerable. During the last two decades the concept of treatment has evolved to control hemorrhoidal symptoms with less invasive techniques, such as hemorrhoidal bands, arterial ligation Doppler guided hemorrhoidal and more recently, the association of anorectal repair or mucopexia for treating hemorrhoidal mucosal prolapse .
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The trial was subjected to evaluation and accepted by the Ethics Committee of the Fundació Unió Catalana d'Hospitals (Catalonian Union of Hospitals Foundation).
All patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods who agree to participate in the study, will be included in the prospective randomized trial. All patients will be required to sign the specific informed consent.
Patients who are suitable for treatment with both techniques will be randomly assigned to the surgical technique.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids (bleeding, pain, itching, soiling or prolapse) that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods.
Exclusion criteria:
- Associated recto-anal pathology such as acute thrombosed hemorrhoid, anal fissure, perianal fistula, perianal abscess, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence or anal stenosis.
- Prior anorectal surgery .
- Systemic pathology that could alter the outcome of the surgery as coagulopathies, chronic pain with continued consumption of analgesics.
- Age younger than 18 or older than 80 years, socio-pathology or inability to understand the study objectives.
All surgeries are performed on an outpatient basis under regional anesthesia and sedation for the same team of three surgeons. Preoperative preparation consists of a cleansing enema and no prophylactic antibiotics will be administered.
Both techniques will be performed in "Jack -Knife" position. The open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture. Once completed hemorrhoidectomy a perianal block is performed with bupivacaine/epinephrine.
Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorroid. Other procedures will not be associated, if necessary, the patient will be excluded from the study .
The patient will be discharged if adequate pain control, oral tolerance and spontaneous diuresis is achieved, and after examination by the surgeon in order to discard immediate complications. The ambulatory treatment consists of an osmotic laxative (magnesium hydroxide ), oral analgesia with paracetamol/tramadol ( 325mg/37.5mg ) every 6 hours and Dexketoprofen (25 mg) every 8 hours, metamizol (575 mg) may be associated every 8 hours if pain. In case of persistent pain, the patient will be examined in emergency room.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS A power analysis was performed to assess the study sample size. Choosing a power of 0.8 and a confidence interval of 95% α-error of 0.05, we calculated that 20 patients were needed in each arm.
All patients will be evaluated with a validated questionnaire of 36 questions on quality of life ( SF-36 ) and specific questions about specific symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease (pain, itching , bleeding, soiling and hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction ). The questionnaire will be answered before the intervention, after six and twelve months of follow up.
All patients will complete a diary testing global postoperative pain every day, measured on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 during the first 15 days.
The patients will be assessed on the day of discharge and at 7, 14, and 30 postoperative days. The patients will be evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 postoperative months in the outpatient clinic.
- Conditions
- Hemorrhoids, Pain, Postoperative
- Being tested
- Hemorrhoidectomy, HAL-RAR
- Keywords
- HAL-RAR, Hemorrhoids, Hemorrhoid artery ligation, Anal repair, Quality of Life, Postoperative Complications
- Medical subject headings
- Hemorrhoids, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HemorrhoidectomyProcedure or surgery
Open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture
HAL-RARProcedure or surgery
Also called Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair
Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorrhoid. Other procedures will not be associated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hemorrhoidectomy | Active comparator | Open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture Receives: Procedure: Hemorrhoidectomy |
| HAL-RAR | Active comparator | Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorrhoid. Other procedures will not be associated. Receives: Procedure: HAL-RAR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Immediate postoperative pain
All patients will complete a diary testing global postoperative pain every day, measured on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 during the first 15 days.
Measured: up to first 15 postoperative days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Long-term control of hemorrhoidal symptoms
Specific symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease (pain, itching , bleeding, soiling and hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction) will be evaluated. Te patient will mark in a questionaire the options "yes" or "no" for each item.
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completionNov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HemorrhoidsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Plató
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fernando Carvajal, Dr, Principal investigator, Hospital Plató Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02216305
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HAL-RAR Plató 2.0
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):380-6. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90828-o.
PubMed 2295392Elmer SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE. A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):484-90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827a8567.
PubMed 23478616
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective and Randomized Trial Comparing Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation With Recto-anal Repair (HAL-RAR) Versus Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02216305
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HAL-RAR Plató 2.0
- Conditions
- Hemorrhoids, Pain, Postoperative
- Keywords
- HAL-RAR, Hemorrhoids, Hemorrhoid artery ligation, Anal repair, Quality of Life, Postoperative Complications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital PlatóUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
HYPOTHESIS
- HAL- RAR causes a lower immediate postoperative pain compared with excision hemorrhoidectomy.
- HAL - RAR achieves similar immediate and long term results compared to the excision hemorrhoidectomy in the control of hemorrhoidal symptoms.
- The complication rate of HAL- RAR is low and similar to excision hemorrhoidectomy.
OBJECTIVES
- Compare postoperative pain of both techniques.
- Assess the short and long-term control of hemorrhoidal symptoms by HAL- RAR technique, and compare the results with those of the excision hemorrhoidectomy.
- Evaluate and compare the rate of complications of both techniques.
- Assess the quality of life of patients before and after treatment.
Detailed description
The classic surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease is the excisional hemorrhoidectomy, that consist in the surgical removal of one or more hemorrhoidal cushion, it is considered a safe, radical and definitive treatment; however, it is not exempt of complications and the postoperative pain is considerable. During the last two decades the concept of treatment has evolved to control hemorrhoidal symptoms with less invasive techniques, such as hemorrhoidal bands, arterial ligation Doppler guided hemorrhoidal and more recently, the association of anorectal repair or mucopexia for treating hemorrhoidal mucosal prolapse .
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The trial was subjected to evaluation and accepted by the Ethics Committee of the Fundació Unió Catalana d'Hospitals (Catalonian Union of Hospitals Foundation).
All patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods who agree to participate in the study, will be included in the prospective randomized trial. All patients will be required to sign the specific informed consent.
Patients who are suitable for treatment with both techniques will be randomly assigned to the surgical technique.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids (bleeding, pain, itching, soiling or prolapse) that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods.
Exclusion criteria:
- Associated recto-anal pathology such as acute thrombosed hemorrhoid, anal fissure, perianal fistula, perianal abscess, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence or anal stenosis.
- Prior anorectal surgery .
- Systemic pathology that could alter the outcome of the surgery as coagulopathies, chronic pain with continued consumption of analgesics.
- Age younger than 18 or older than 80 years, socio-pathology or inability to understand the study objectives.
All surgeries are performed on an outpatient basis under regional anesthesia and sedation for the same team of three surgeons. Preoperative preparation consists of a cleansing enema and no prophylactic antibiotics will be administered.
Both techniques will be performed in "Jack -Knife" position. The open hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture. Once completed hemorrhoidectomy a perianal block is performed with bupivacaine/epinephrine.
Hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorroid. Other procedures will not be associated, if necessary, the patient will be excluded from the study .
The patient will be discharged if adequate pain control, oral tolerance and spontaneous diuresis is achieved, and after examination by the surgeon in order to discard immediate complications. The ambulatory treatment consists of an osmotic laxative (magnesium hydroxide ), oral analgesia with paracetamol/tramadol ( 325mg/37.5mg ) every 6 hours and Dexketoprofen (25 mg) every 8 hours, metamizol (575 mg) may be associated every 8 hours if pain. In case of persistent pain, the patient will be examined in emergency room.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS A power analysis was performed to assess the study sample size. Choosing a power of 0.8 and a confidence interval of 95% α-error of 0.05, we calculated that 20 patients were needed in each arm.
All patients will be evaluated with a validated questionnaire of 36 questions on quality of life ( SF-36 ) and specific questions about specific symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease (pain, itching , bleeding, soiling and hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction ). The questionnaire will be answered before the intervention, after six and twelve months of follow up.
All patients will complete a diary testing global postoperative pain every day, measured on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 during the first 15 days.
The patients will be assessed on the day of discharge and at 7, 14, and 30 postoperative days. The patients will be evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 postoperative months in the outpatient clinic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hemorrhoidectomy | Active comparator | Procedure: HemorrhoidectomyOpen hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture |
| HAL-RAR | Active comparator | Procedure: HAL-RARHemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorrhoid. Other procedures will not be associated. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids (bleeding, pain, itching, soiling or prolapse) that are eligible for surgical treatment with both methods.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Associated recto-anal pathology such as acute thrombosed hemorrhoid, anal fissure, perianal fistula, perianal abscess, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence or anal stenosis.
- Prior anorectal surgery .
- Systemic pathology that could alter the outcome of the surgery as coagulopathies, chronic pain with continued consumption of analgesics.
- Age younger than 18 or older than 80 years, socio-pathology or inability to understand the study objectives
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HemorrhoidectomyOpen hemorrhoidectomy may include one to three anal cushions and made according to the Milligan-Morgan technique, with resection of the anal cushion and the external hemorrhoidal epidermal component using electrocautery and ligation of the hemorrhoidal base with absorbable suture | Procedure or surgery | Hemorrhoidectomy |
| HAL-RARAlso: Hemorrhoid Artery Ligation and Rectoanal RepairHemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair will be performed with the AMI minimally invasive surgery device HAL/RAR, and consist in the ligation of the terminal branches of the superior rectal artery with 2-0 absorbable polyglycolic acid suture after identifying the blood flow approximately 3 cm above the dentate line by using Doppler guidance. Subsequently, a running suture was added from the suture point to 5 mm above the dentate line to lift the prolapsing hemorrhoid. Other procedures will not be associated. | Procedure or surgery | HAL-RAR |
Primary outcome
Immediate postoperative pain
Time frame: up to first 15 postoperative days
All patients will complete a diary testing global postoperative pain every day, measured on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 during the first 15 days.
1 secondary outcome
Long-term control of hemorrhoidal symptoms
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 2295392Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):380-6. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90828-o.
- Background: PubMed 23478616Elmer SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE. A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):484-90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827a8567.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hemorrhoids
Not yet recruiting
Auricular Indwelling Needles Added to Diosmin/Hesperidin for Grade I-II Internal Hemorrhoids With Heat-Toxin Syndrome
Internal Haemorrhoids
Enrolling by invitation
Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Guided Pudendal Block for Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain
Hemorrhoids, Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Bleeding Reduction in Grade II-III Haemorrhoids Through Embolization Treatment
Hemorrhoid, Hemorrhoid Bleeding
Recruiting
Ligasure Versus Conventional Diathermy in Hemorrhoidectomy
Hemorrhoids
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Case-Specific Health Care Professional Clinical Survey for Concerto Versa™ Detachable Coils
Arteriovenous Malformation, Gastrointestinal Bleed
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fernando Carvajal, Dr principal investigator
Hospital Plató Barcelona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hemorrhoidectomy and HAL-RAR in people with Hemorrhoids and Pain, Postoperative, run by Hospital Plató at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Immediate postoperative pain (time frame: up to first 15 postoperative days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02216305, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2023.