AzTrials
AzTrials

Pre-eclampsiaESTEEMNCT02218931

ESTEEM - Effect of Simple, Targeted Diet in Pregnant Women With Metabolic Risk Factors on Pregnancy Outcomes

A study testing Targeted ESTEEM diet and Non-randomised cohort in people with Pre-eclampsia and Obesity, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Obesity is a growing problem in East London and every other woman who enters pregnancy is obese or overweight. In addition to obesity, other metabolic risk factors such as raised lipids, high blood pressure and diabetes increase pregnancy related complications such as preeclampsia and long term problems such as heart… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pre-eclampsia, Obesity, Raised Lipids
What is being tested?
Targeted ESTEEM diet and Non-randomised cohort
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,442 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
12 Sep 2014to 30 Apr 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • BMI <18.5 Kg/m2or ≥40 Kg/m2 ii. Women on lipid altering drugs iii. History of diabetes iv. Chronic renal disease v. Auto immune disease vi. Multiple pregnancy vii. Poor understanding of written and spoken English viii. Not able to follow Mediterranean diet for religious or other reasons ix. <16 years of age x. Not able to consume nuts or extra virgin olive oil

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Barts Health NHS Trust

    London, E1 1BB

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Effect of Simple, Targeted Diet in Pregnant Women With Metabolic Risk Factors on Pregnancy Outcomes (ESTEEM): A Randomised Trial

Obesity is a growing problem in East London and every other woman who enters pregnancy is obese or overweight. In addition to obesity, other metabolic risk factors such as raised lipids, high blood pressure and diabetes increase pregnancy related complications such as preeclampsia and long term problems such as heart diseases, stroke and death. Preeclampsia, presenting as hypertension and proteinuria is a leading cause of maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. Interventions that reduce cardiovascular events by modifying risk factors also have the potential to reduce the risk of preeclampsia. The investigators work funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) in the UK showed that dietary interventions in obese pregnant women may reduce the risk of preeclampsia. The investigators propose to show that pregnant women with metabolic risk factors derive the most benefit from a simple, targeted intervention based on Mediterranean dietary pattern to reduce the risk of maternal and fetal complications . Women with the risk factors (1230 women) will be randomly allocated to dietary intervention or usual antenatal dietary advice and the risk of maternal and fetal complications will be evaluated. The remaining eligible women who are consented for lipid tests, but do not have metabolic risk factors, will be followed up for outcome data only. Diet based interventions, especially those based on a Mediterranean dietary pattern has a potential to reduce the risk of preeclampsia. In the investigators study, pregnant mothers with risk factors will be randomly allocated to either a dietary invention or usual antenatal care and they will assess their composite maternal (pre-eclampsia or gestational diabetes) and fetal (stillbirth, small for gestational age or admission to neonatal intensive care unit) outcomes. The investigators will tailor the intervention to suit the individual needs of the mother and provide nuts and olive oil to improve compliance. The study will be undertaken across the three maternity units at Barts Health NHS Trust, which delivers 17,000 women/year and two other maternity units in England. The study is supported by the office of the Mayor of Tower Hamlets which will facilitate the involvement of grassroots workers to promote recruitment and uptake of the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Obesity is a growing problem in east London with a fifth of women entering pregnancy as obese. In addition to obesity, other metabolic risk factors such as raised lipids, high blood pressure and insulin resistance are increasingly prevalent. With a large proportion of ethnic minority mothers in east London, dietary habits and underlying genetic predisposition are major contributors to this phenomenon. Obesity and raised serum lipids, especially triglycerides increase the risk of complications such as preeclampsia in pregnancy and cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, stroke and death in the long term. Preeclampsia, a condition in pregnancy, with raised blood pressure and increased protein in the urine is a leading cause of maternal and fetal deaths. Its treatment gives rise to large health care costs. Preeclampsia contributes to preterm birth, one of the leading causes of perinatal deaths in east London. It accounts for 65% of neonatal deaths and 50% of neurological disability in childhood. Around £900 million in extra costs for care of preterm babies per year in the NHS are linked to neonatal care. Preeclampsia, characterised by insulin resistance, widespread endothelial damage and dysfunction, coagulation defects and increased systemic inflammatory response, shares metabolic risk factors with cardiovascular disease. Obesity, dyslipidaemia and hypertension are independent risk factors for pre-eclampsia. Interventions that reduce cardiovascular events by modifying metabolic risk factors also have the potential to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia.

Early identification of mothers at risk of preeclampsia will allow clinicians to deliver these targeted interventions in pregnancy, with the potential to prevent preeclampsia and modify cardiovascular risk in the long-term. Currently, low dose aspirin, recommended as a prophylactic measure reduces preeclampsia risk by only 10%. Simple, low-cost and effective acceptable interventions are required to reduce this risk further. Dietary interventions in pregnant women with metabolic risk factors such as obesity and insulin resistance are shown to reduce the risk of preeclampsia. But the existing studies are of poor quality and do not evaluate preeclampsia as the primary outcome. Furthermore, they focus on specific components of the diet, rather than modifying the overall dietary pattern. Mediterranean diet with high consumption of vegetables and fruits, olive oil and nuts and low consumption of red meat and processed food significantly reduces lipid levels and cardiovascular adverse events in non-pregnant high risk population. In pregnancy, the beneficial effect of the Mediterranean dietary pattern was observed in a large prospective study of nulliparous pregnant women with a 28% reduction in the risk of preeclampsia (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.62, 0.85). These results need confirmation in a sound experimental study.

There is a need for an adequately powered randomised trial to evaluate the beneficial effect of lipid modifying diet in pregnancy that is simple, accessible and acceptable. The investigators hypothesis is that pregnant women with metabolic risk factors will derive benefit from dietary intervention in preventing maternal and fetal complications.

Being tested
Targeted ESTEEM diet, Non-randomised cohort
Keywords
Pre-eclampsia, Gestational diabetes, Stillbirth, Small for gestational age, Admission to neonatal intensive care unit, Obesity, Raised Lipids, High Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular risk, Insulin resistance, Mediterranean dietary pattern, Dietary interventions
Medical subject headings
Pre-Eclampsia, Obesity, Hypertension, Insulin Resistance, Diabetes, Gestational, Stillbirth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Targeted ESTEEM dietBehavioural

    The key components of the diet are:

    High intake of vegetables, nuts, non-refined grains, legumes and fruits;Moderate to high consumption of fish;Small to moderate intake of poultry and dairy products such as yoghurt and cheese;Low consumption of red meat and processed meat and avoidance of sugary drinks, fast food and high fat food;High fibre;Intake of nuts including walnuts and almonds that are rich sources of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids (30 g/day);Olive oil to cook and dress salads as the main source of fat (0.5 l/week)

    The intervention will include structured meal plans and grocery lists, recipes for healthy diet and appropriate choices at restaurants

  • Non-randomised cohortOther

    Non-randomised cohort of women with no metabolic risk factors will be followed up to delivery to collect outcome data

Study groups in NCT02218931
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Targeted ESTEEM dietExperimentalThe ESTEEM dietary pattern is similar to that in a Mediterranean diet associated with reduced risk of pre-eclampsia. The intervention will include structured meal plans and grocery lists, recipes for healthy diet and appropriate choices at restaurants
Receives: Behavioral: Targeted ESTEEM diet
Current clinical practiceNo interventionThe control group will be provided the usual antenatal dietary advice. This includes advice on healthy and physical activity in women with normal weight and obesity and overweight. Folic acid and vit D supplementation are provided as per national recommendations. Participants will provide outcome data at point of delivery and food frequency questionnaire at baseline and 36 weeks or delivery depending on which is sooner.
Non-randomised cohortOtherNon-randomised cohort of women with no metabolic risk factors will be followed up to delivery to collect outcome data
Receives: Other: Non-randomised cohort

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite maternal outcomes: pre-eclampsia or gestational diabetes

    Diagnosis of pre-eclampsia defined as:

    • new onset hypertension after 20 weeks gestation defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, in at least two readings AND New onset proteinuria defined as spot urine Protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) test greater than 30mg/mmol or >24 hour urine 300mg/24 hours or 2+ or more on standard urinary dipstick tests after 20 weeks gestation
    • superimposed pre-eclampsia in women with chronic hypertension or chronic proteinuria
    • women with eclamptic seizures with no hypertension or proteinuria

    Diagnosis of gestational diabetes defined as:

    • fasting venous glucose of 5·1 mmol/L or higher or
    • 2 h venous glucose of 8·5 mmol/L or higher or
    • combination of these

    Measured: At delivery

  2. Composite fetal outcomes: stillbirth, small for gestational age or admission to neonatal intensive care unit

    Measured: At delivery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. To assess the effect of targeted dietary intervention vs. usual antenatal dietary advice on other maternal and fetal outcomes

    Measured: At delivery

  2. The number of participants with a change in lipid profiles from early pregnancy to delivery in women a) with and without dietary interventions b) with and without pre-eclampsia on the composite maternal and fetal outcomes.

    Measured: At delivery

  3. The rates of composite maternal and fetal outcomes in the following subgroups of women in the intervention and control group: obese; raised triglycerides and with raised blood pressure.

    Measured: Baseline and 36 weeks or delivery depending on which is sooner

  4. Development of a cohort for medium and long term follow up of mothers and babies after birth through applications to other grant giving bodies.

    Measured: End of follow up, an average of 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start12 Sep 2014
  3. Primary completionNov 2016
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3,442 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02218931
Sponsor's protocol ID
009337QM
Other IDs
732/2029
Acronym
ESTEEM
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
11 Jul 2014
Last updated
17 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • H Al Wattar B, Dodds J, Placzek A, Beresford L, Spyreli E, Moore A, Gonzalez Carreras FJ, Austin F, Murugesu N, Roseboom TJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Hitman GA, Hooper R, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S; ESTEEM study group. Mediterranean-style diet in pregnant women with metabolic risk factors (ESTEEM): A pragmatic multicentre randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23;16(7):e1002857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002857. eCollection 2019 Jul.

    PubMed 31335871
  • Al Wattar BH, Dodds J, Placzek A, Spyreli E, Higgins S, Moore A, Hooper R, Beresford L, Roseboom TJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Hitman G, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S; ESTEEM study group. Mediterranean diet based intervention in pregnancy to improve maternal and fetal outcomes: Methodological challenges and lessons learned from the multicentre ESTEEM study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Mar 29;6:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.02.012. eCollection 2017 Jun.

    PubMed 29740638
  • Al Wattar BH, Dodds J, Placzek A, Spyreli E, Moore A, Hooper R, Beresford L, Roseboom TJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Hitman G, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S; ESTEEM study group. Effect of simple, targeted diet in pregnant women with metabolic risk factors on maternal and fetal outcomes (ESTEEM): study protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 21;6(10):e013495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013495.

    PubMed 27798035

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Targeted ESTEEM diet and Non-randomised cohort in people with Pre-eclampsia and Obesity, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite maternal outcomes: pre-eclampsia or gestational diabetes (time frame: At delivery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02218931, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in