Hepatitis C Virus InfectionPhase 2NCT02219685
Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Fixed-Dose Combination on Cerebral Metabolism and Neurocognition in Treatment-Naive and Treatment-Experienced Participants With Chronic Genotype 1 HCV Infection
A Phase 2 study testing LDV/SOF in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by Gilead Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of sustained virologic response (SVR) on cerebral metabolism as determined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and on neurocognition as measured by neurocognitive tests. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection
- What is being tested?
- LDV/SOF
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic HCV infection (≥ 6 months) documented by prior medical history or liver biopsy
- Chronic genotype 1 HCV infection
- Screening laboratory values within defined thresholds
- Use of protocol-specified method(s) of contraception if female of childbearing potential or sexually active male
Who cannot join
- Clinically-significant illness (other than HCV) or any other major medical disorder that may interfere with treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol. Current or prior history of any of the following:
- Hepatic decompensation
- Solid organ transplantation
- Significant pulmonary or cardiac disease
- Chronic liver disease of a non-HCV etiology
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Show all 14Show fewer
- Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV)
- Infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- History of recent epilepsy (within 2 years of screening) or cerebral vascular accident (CVA)
- Structural brain damage
- Presence of cirrhosis
- Contraindication to MRI
- Pregnant or nursing female
- Prior treatment NS5A directly-acting antiviral agent. Any interferon (IFN)-containing regimen within 8 weeks of Screening
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study to Investigate the Effect of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Fixed-Dose Combination on Cerebral Metabolism and Neurocognition in Treatment-Naive and Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Chronic Genotype 1 HCV Infection
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of sustained virologic response (SVR) on cerebral metabolism as determined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and on neurocognition as measured by neurocognitive tests. This study will also evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) for 12 weeks in treatment-naive or treatment-experienced adults.
During the blinded treatment phase, participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive LDV/SOF FDC or placebo for 12 weeks. After the unblinding at the Posttreatment Week 4 visit, participants in the placebo group will be offered open-label treatment of LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection
- Being tested
- LDV/SOF, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LDV/SOFDrug
Also called Harvoni®, GS-5885/GS-7977
90/400 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
PlaceboDrug
Tablet administered orally once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LDV/SOF | Experimental | Participants will receive LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: LDV/SOF |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive LDV/SOF placebo for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Open-Label Treatment Phase | Experimental | Following Posttreatment Week 4, participants in the placebo group will be offered open-label treatment with LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: LDV/SOF |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: NAA + NAAG
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal N-acetylaspartate (NAA) + N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in MRS Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Choline
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal choline was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in MRS Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Myoinositol
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal myoinositol was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Memory T Score
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Memory T Score: visuospatial memory immediate total T score (BVMTTTs), visuospatial memory delayed T score (BVMTTDTS), verbal memory total T score (HVLTTTS), and verbal memory delayed T score (HVLTDTS).
For this analysis, Memory T Score (total) ranged from 80 to 320, with higher scores indicating better memory.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Attention Scaled Score
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Attention Scaled Score: forward digit span scaled score (FSCORESS), backward digit span scaled score (BSCORESS), and symbol span total scaled score (SYMSPSS).
For this analysis, Attention Scaled Score (total) ranged from 3 to 57, with higher scores indicating better working memory capacity and control.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 1 Processing Speed
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 1 Processing Speed score: symbol search total scaled score (SSSS) and trails A total raw score (TrailARS).
For this analysis, Executive 1 Processing Speed score (total) ranged from 1 to 108, with lower scores indicating better executive control.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score: trails B raw score (TrailBRS), age \& education adjusted raw score (FASadj), color word interference score (time) (CWTrial3), and color word interference/shifting score (time) (CWTrial4).
For this analysis, Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score (total) ranged from 1 to 570, with lower scores indicating better executive control.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Motor
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Motor score: dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (DomHtot) and non-dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (nonDOMHtot).
For this analysis, Motor score (total) ranged from 20 to 600, with lower scores indicating better fine motor speed.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Secondary outcomes (14)
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) at 4, 12, and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR4, SVR12, and SVR24)
SVR4, SVR12, and SVR24 were defined as HCV RNA < the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; ie, 15 IU/mL) at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after stopping study treatment with LDV/SOF, respectively.
Measured: Posttreatment Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Memory T Score
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Memory T Score: visuospatial memory immediate total T score (BVMTTTs), visuospatial memory delayed T score (BVMTTDTS), verbal memory total T score (HVLTTTS), and verbal memory delayed T score (HVLTDTS).
For this analysis, Memory T Score (total) ranged from 80 to 320, with higher scores indicating better memory.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Attention Scaled Score
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Attention Scaled Score: forward digit span scaled score (FSCORESS), backward digit span scaled score (BSCORESS), and symbol span total scaled score (SYMSPSS).
For this analysis, Attention Scaled Score (total) ranged from 3 to 57, with higher scores indicating better working memory capacity and control.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 1 Processing Speed
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 1 Processing Speed score: symbol search total scaled score (SSSS) and trails A total raw score (TrailARS).
For this analysis, Executive 1 Processing Speed score (total) ranged from 1 to 108, with lower scores indicating better executive control.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score: trails B raw score (TrailBRS), age \& education adjusted raw score (FASadj), color word interference score (time) (CWTrial3), and color word interference/shifting score (time) (CWTrial4).
For this analysis, Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score (total) ranged from 1 to 570, with lower scores indicating better executive control.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Motor
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Motor score: dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (DomHtot) and non-dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (nonDOMHtot).
For this analysis, Motor score (total) ranged from 20 to 600, with lower scores indicating better fine motor speed.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Scale - Physical Component Score
The SF-36 Health Survey is a self-reporting, multi-item scale measuring 8 health concepts: 1) physical functioning, 2) role limitations due to physical health problems, 3) bodily pain, 4) general health, 5) vitality (energy/fatigue), 6) social functioning, 7) role limitations due to emotional problems and 8) mental health (psychological distress and psychological well-being). The first 6 concepts constitute the physical component summary. The total score is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 with lower scores representing more disability and higher scores representing less disability.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by SF-36 Health Survey Scale - Mental Component Score
The SF-36 Health Survey is a self-reporting, multi-item scale measuring 8 health concepts: 1) physical functioning, 2) role limitations due to physical health problems, 3) bodily pain, 4) general health, 5) vitality (energy/fatigue), 6) social functioning, 7) role limitations due to emotional problems and 8) mental health (psychological distress and psychological well-being). The last 5 concepts constitute the mental component summary. The total score is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 with lower score representing more disability and higher scores representing less disability.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment (PT) Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire - HCV (CLDQ-HCV)
The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life. CLDQ-HCV scores are calculated using participant responses to 29 questions divided into 4 domains: Activity/Energy, Emotion, Worry, and Systemic. An overall CLDQ-HCV score is calculated by taking the mean of all domain scores. Overall CLDQ-HCV scores range between 1 and 7, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)
The FACIT-Fatigue score was measured using a 40-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The FACIT-F total score was calculated by taking the sum of all 40 individual scores and ranged from 0-160, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, Hepatitis C (WPAI: Hepatitis C) - Overall Work Impairment
Impairment in overall work productivity was measured using the WPAI: Hepatitis C questionnaire completed by participants during study visits throughout the study. This questionnaire measured the effect of hepatitis C on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Overall work impairment is expressed as a percentage and ranges from 0% (no effect) to 100% (completely prevented from working).
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by WPAI: Hepatitis C - Activity Impairment
Activity impairment was measured using the WPAI: Hepatitis C questionnaire completed by participants during study visits throughout the study. This questionnaire measured the effect of hepatitis C on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Overall activity impairment is expressed as a percentage and ranges from 0% (no effect) to 100% (completely prevented from performing regular activities).
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Pre-treatment Assessment in Mood Related Assessment at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report instrument for measuring the severity of depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The item scores are summed to yield a derived total score that can range from 0 to 63 with lower values indicating less depression.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Pre-treatment Assessment in Mood Related Assessment at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)
The BHS is a 20-item scale for measuring the extent of negative attitudes about the future (pessimism) as perceived by adolescents and adults. The BHS consists of 20 true-false statements. Each of the 20 statements is scored 1 or 0. Of the 20 true-false statements, 9 are keyed FALSE, and 11 are keyed TRUE to indicate endorsement of pessimism about the future. The item scores are summed to yield a total score that can range from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater hopelessness.
Measured: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hepatitis C Virus InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Gilead SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gilead Sciences
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Benedetta Massetto, MD, Study director, Gilead Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02219685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GS-US-337-1445
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 16 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion. For more information, please visit our website at http://www.gilead.com/research/disclosure-and-transparency.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study to Investigate the Effect of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Fixed-Dose Combination on Cerebral Metabolism and Neurocognition in Treatment-Naive and Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Chronic Genotype 1 HCV Infection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02219685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GS-US-337-1445
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gilead SciencesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Nov 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of sustained virologic response (SVR) on cerebral metabolism as determined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and on neurocognition as measured by neurocognitive tests. This study will also evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) for 12 weeks in treatment-naive or treatment-experienced adults.
During the blinded treatment phase, participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive LDV/SOF FDC or placebo for 12 weeks. After the unblinding at the Posttreatment Week 4 visit, participants in the placebo group will be offered open-label treatment of LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LDV/SOF | Experimental | Drug: LDV/SOFParticipants will receive LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive LDV/SOF placebo for 12 weeks. |
| Open-Label Treatment Phase | Experimental | Drug: LDV/SOFFollowing Posttreatment Week 4, participants in the placebo group will be offered open-label treatment with LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Chronic HCV infection (≥ 6 months) documented by prior medical history or liver biopsy
- Chronic genotype 1 HCV infection
- Screening laboratory values within defined thresholds
- Use of protocol-specified method(s) of contraception if female of childbearing potential or sexually active male
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Clinically-significant illness (other than HCV) or any other major medical disorder that may interfere with treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol. Current or prior history of any of the following:
- Presence of cirrhosis
- Contraindication to MRI
- Pregnant or nursing female
- Prior treatment NS5A directly-acting antiviral agent. Any interferon (IFN)-containing regimen within 8 weeks of Screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LDV/SOFAlso: Harvoni®, GS-5885/GS-797790/400 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily | Drug | LDV/SOF, Open-Label Treatment Phase |
| PlaceboTablet administered orally once daily | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: NAA + NAAG
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal N-acetylaspartate (NAA) + N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Change From Baseline in MRS Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Choline
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal choline was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Change From Baseline in MRS Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Myoinositol
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
MRS was analyzed in the LCmodel program and measured in 3 specific areas of brain (basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). The cerebral metabolic signal myoinositol was analyzed. Spectroscopy results are expressed as metabolic ratio with creatine used as the control metabolite, so there are no units of measure.
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Memory T Score
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Memory T Score: visuospatial memory immediate total T score (BVMTTTs), visuospatial memory delayed T score (BVMTTDTS), verbal memory total T score (HVLTTTS), and verbal memory delayed T score (HVLTDTS). For this analysis, Memory T Score (total) ranged from 80 to 320, with higher scores indicating better memory.
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Attention Scaled Score
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Attention Scaled Score: forward digit span scaled score (FSCORESS), backward digit span scaled score (BSCORESS), and symbol span total scaled score (SYMSPSS). For this analysis, Attention Scaled Score (total) ranged from 3 to 57, with higher scores indicating better working memory capacity and control.
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 1 Processing Speed
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 1 Processing Speed score: symbol search total scaled score (SSSS) and trails A total raw score (TrailARS). For this analysis, Executive 1 Processing Speed score (total) ranged from 1 to 108, with lower scores indicating better executive control.
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score: trails B raw score (TrailBRS), age \& education adjusted raw score (FASadj), color word interference score (time) (CWTrial3), and color word interference/shifting score (time) (CWTrial4). For this analysis, Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation score (total) ranged from 1 to 570, with lower scores indicating better executive control.
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Motor
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4
Neurocognitive function tests were administered by a licensed clinician. The sum of following neurocognitive test scores was used to determine the Motor score: dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (DomHtot) and non-dominant hand fine motor speed (time) (nonDOMHtot). For this analysis, Motor score (total) ranged from 20 to 600, with lower scores indicating better fine motor speed.
14 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) at 4, 12, and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR4, SVR12, and SVR24)
Time frame: Posttreatment Weeks 4, 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Memory T Score
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Attention Scaled Score
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 1 Processing Speed
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Executive 2 Conceptual Shift and Initiation
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: Motor
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Scale - Physical Component Score
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by SF-36 Health Survey Scale - Mental Component Score
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment (PT) Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire - HCV (CLDQ-HCV)
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, Hepatitis C (WPAI: Hepatitis C) - Overall Work Impairment
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by WPAI: Hepatitis C - Activity Impairment
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Pre-treatment Assessment in Mood Related Assessment at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Change From Pre-treatment Assessment in Mood Related Assessment at 4 and 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy as Assessed by Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)
Time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Weeks 4 and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Nov 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion. For more information, please visit our website at http://www.gilead.com/research/disclosure-and-transparency.
Related trials for Hepatitis C Virus Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elimination of Hepatitis C Virus Among Users of Substances
Hepatitis C in Substance Users
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for CLIA-Waived Use
HCV Infection
Not yet recruiting
Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for Point-of-Care Use in Individuals at Risk for HCV Infection or Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of HCV Infection
HCV Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Benedetta Massetto, MD study director
Gilead Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing LDV/SOF in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by Gilead Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Nov 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Metabolic Ratio at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy: NAA + NAAG (time frame: Baseline; Posttreatment Week 4). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Nov 2018.