Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 2/3NCT02220088
The Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment With TAI for Patients Who Showed TACE-resistant: a Randomized Controlled Trial
A Phase 2/3 study testing TAI of FOLFOX and Sorafenib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the gold standard for treating intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, any treatment guidelines do not specify the criteria for repeating TACE. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- TAI of FOLFOX and Sorafenib
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 79 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients, > 18 years and <=70 years old diagnosed with HCC according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) diagnostic criteria
- The patient has received 2 session of TACE
- TACE failure/refractoriness by Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) criteria
- Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A
- The following laboratory parameters:
- Platelet count ≥ 60,000/µL
Show all 13Show fewer
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL Serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L
- ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal
- INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3
- Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document
Who cannot join
- Patients with complete response (CR) after the first TACE did not receive a further TACE session
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) >1
- Known history of HIV
- History of organ allograft
- Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
- Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
- Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis.
- Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
- Severe Arterioportal Shunts or Arteriavein Shunts
- Known metastatic disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment With Transcatheter Arterial Infusion (TAI) for Patients Who Showed TACE-resistant: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the gold standard for treating intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, any treatment guidelines do not specify the criteria for repeating TACE. The study,conducted in Europe ,recently published in the journal of Hepatology shows the ART score of >=2.5 prior the second TACE identifies patients with a dismal prognosis who may not profit from further TACE sessions. However,in clinical practice,we also found some patients who showed TACE-resistant at the beginning of treatment may access to get objective response of retreatment with transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI). So the investigators conduct this prospective,randomized controlled study to find out whether the patient who showed TACE-resistant can obtain survival benefit from retreatment with TAI.
Read the detailed description
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the gold standard for treating intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, intermediate-stage HCC includes a heterogeneous population of patients with varying tumour burdens, liver function (Child-Pugh A or B) and disease aetiology.This suggests that not all patients with intermediate-stage HCC will derive similar benefit from transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI), and that some patients may benefit from other treatment options.
Repetition of TACE is based on evidence suggesting that one cycle of TACE may not be sufficient for effective treatment of intermediate-stage HCC and repeating TACE prolongs survival. However, intermediate-stage HCC patients often have unsatisfactory clinical outcomes with repeated TACE and there is not sufficiently addressed by existing guidelines include the criteria for repeating TACE and recommendations about the number of TACE cycles to be repeated before switching to another or no treatment.The study,recently published in the journal of Hepatology shows the ART score of >=2.5 prior the second TACE identifies patients with a dismal prognosis who may not profit from further TACE sessions.In clinical practice,however, we also found some patients who showed TACE-resistant at the beginning of treatment may access to get objective response of retreatment with TAI. So we conduct this prospective,randomized controlled study to find out whether the patient who showed TACE-resistant can obtain survival benefit from retreatment with TAI.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- TAI of FOLFOX, Sorafenib
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, TACE, TACE failure, TACE refractoriness, TAI, Sorafenib
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TAI of FOLFOXProcedure or surgery
Also called Transcatheter arterial infusion of oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin
Retreatment with TAI: administration of Oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin via the tumor feeding arteries
SorafenibDrug
Accept sorafenib.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TAI of FOLFOX | Experimental | Retreatment With Transcatheter arterial infusion of oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin Receives: Procedure: TAI of FOLFOX |
| Sorafenib | Active comparator | treatment with sorafenib Receives: Drug: Sorafenib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression free survival
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Adverse Events
All severe adverse events for the entire course of treatment
Measured: 30 days
overall survival
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completionJul 2018
- Study completionJul 2018
Why it stopped: protocol violation
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kaiping Central Hospital, Guangzhou No.12 People's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shi Ming, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Ming Shi, Principal investigator, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-set University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02220088
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCC201408
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Raoul JL, Sangro B, Forner A, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Bolondi L, Lencioni R. Evolving strategies for the management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: available evidence and expert opinion on the use of transarterial chemoembolization. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011 May;37(3):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
PubMed 20724077Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, Sangro B. Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis. 2012 Nov;32(4):348-59. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329906. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
PubMed 23397536Park JW, Amarapurkar D, Chao Y, Chen PJ, Geschwind JF, Goh KL, Han KH, Kudo M, Lee HC, Lee RC, Lesmana LA, Lim HY, Paik SW, Poon RT, Tan CK, Tanwandee T, Teng G, Cheng AL. Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC). Liver Int. 2013 Mar;33(3):327-37. doi: 10.1111/liv.12083. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
PubMed 23331661Sieghart W, Hucke F, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Muller C, Heinzl H, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M. The ART of decision making: retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013 Jun;57(6):2261-73. doi: 10.1002/hep.26256. Epub 2013 May 3.
PubMed 23316013Cheng AL, Amarapurkar D, Chao Y, Chen PJ, Geschwind JF, Goh KL, Han KH, Kudo M, Lee HC, Lee RC, Lesmana LA, Lim HY, Paik SW, Poon RT, Tan CK, Tanwandee T, Teng G, Park JW. Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel. Liver Int. 2014 Feb;34(2):174-83. doi: 10.1111/liv.12314. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
PubMed 24251922Hucke F, Sieghart W, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Muller C, Heinzl H, Waneck F, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M. The ART-strategy: sequential assessment of the ART score predicts outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma re-treated with TACE. J Hepatol. 2014 Jan;60(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
PubMed 24012941Yousuf F, Cross TJ, Palmer D. The ART strategy: sequential assessment of the ART score predicts outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma re-treated with TACE. J Hepatol. 2014 Jul;61(1):175. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 24657396
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment With Transcatheter Arterial Infusion (TAI) for Patients Who Showed TACE-resistant: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02220088
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCC201408
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma, TACE, TACE failure, TACE refractoriness, TAI, Sorafenib
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: protocol violation
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kaiping Central Hospital, Guangzhou No.12 People's Hospital
- Study start
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the gold standard for treating intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, any treatment guidelines do not specify the criteria for repeating TACE. The study,conducted in Europe ,recently published in the journal of Hepatology shows the ART score of >=2.5 prior the second TACE identifies patients with a dismal prognosis who may not profit from further TACE sessions. However,in clinical practice,we also found some patients who showed TACE-resistant at the beginning of treatment may access to get objective response of retreatment with transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI). So the investigators conduct this prospective,randomized controlled study to find out whether the patient who showed TACE-resistant can obtain survival benefit from retreatment with TAI.
Detailed description
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the gold standard for treating intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, intermediate-stage HCC includes a heterogeneous population of patients with varying tumour burdens, liver function (Child-Pugh A or B) and disease aetiology.This suggests that not all patients with intermediate-stage HCC will derive similar benefit from transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI), and that some patients may benefit from other treatment options.
Repetition of TACE is based on evidence suggesting that one cycle of TACE may not be sufficient for effective treatment of intermediate-stage HCC and repeating TACE prolongs survival. However, intermediate-stage HCC patients often have unsatisfactory clinical outcomes with repeated TACE and there is not sufficiently addressed by existing guidelines include the criteria for repeating TACE and recommendations about the number of TACE cycles to be repeated before switching to another or no treatment.The study,recently published in the journal of Hepatology shows the ART score of >=2.5 prior the second TACE identifies patients with a dismal prognosis who may not profit from further TACE sessions.In clinical practice,however, we also found some patients who showed TACE-resistant at the beginning of treatment may access to get objective response of retreatment with TAI. So we conduct this prospective,randomized controlled study to find out whether the patient who showed TACE-resistant can obtain survival benefit from retreatment with TAI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TAI of FOLFOX | Experimental | Procedure: TAI of FOLFOXRetreatment With Transcatheter arterial infusion of oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin |
| Sorafenib | Active comparator | Drug: Sorafenibtreatment with sorafenib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Male or female patients, > 18 years and <=70 years old diagnosed with HCC according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) diagnostic criteria
- The patient has received 2 session of TACE
- TACE failure/refractoriness by Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) criteria
- Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A
- The following laboratory parameters:
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients with complete response (CR) after the first TACE did not receive a further TACE session
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) >1
- Known history of HIV
- History of organ allograft
- Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TAI of FOLFOXAlso: Transcatheter arterial infusion of oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorinRetreatment with TAI: administration of Oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin via the tumor feeding arteries | Procedure or surgery | TAI of FOLFOX |
| SorafenibAccept sorafenib. | Drug | Sorafenib |
Primary outcome
Progression free survival
Time frame: 1 year
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 days
overall survival
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: protocol violation). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jan 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 20724077Raoul JL, Sangro B, Forner A, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Bolondi L, Lencioni R. Evolving strategies for the management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: available evidence and expert opinion on the use of transarterial chemoembolization. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011 May;37(3):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 23397536Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, Sangro B. Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis. 2012 Nov;32(4):348-59. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329906. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 23331661Park JW, Amarapurkar D, Chao Y, Chen PJ, Geschwind JF, Goh KL, Han KH, Kudo M, Lee HC, Lee RC, Lesmana LA, Lim HY, Paik SW, Poon RT, Tan CK, Tanwandee T, Teng G, Cheng AL. Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC). Liver Int. 2013 Mar;33(3):327-37. doi: 10.1111/liv.12083. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 23316013Sieghart W, Hucke F, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Muller C, Heinzl H, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M. The ART of decision making: retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013 Jun;57(6):2261-73. doi: 10.1002/hep.26256. Epub 2013 May 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 24251922Cheng AL, Amarapurkar D, Chao Y, Chen PJ, Geschwind JF, Goh KL, Han KH, Kudo M, Lee HC, Lee RC, Lesmana LA, Lim HY, Paik SW, Poon RT, Tan CK, Tanwandee T, Teng G, Park JW. Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel. Liver Int. 2014 Feb;34(2):174-83. doi: 10.1111/liv.12314. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 24012941Hucke F, Sieghart W, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Muller C, Heinzl H, Waneck F, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M. The ART-strategy: sequential assessment of the ART score predicts outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma re-treated with TACE. J Hepatol. 2014 Jan;60(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 24657396Yousuf F, Cross TJ, Palmer D. The ART strategy: sequential assessment of the ART score predicts outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma re-treated with TACE. J Hepatol. 2014 Jul;61(1):175. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 18. No abstract available.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ming Shi principal investigator
Cancer Center, Sun Yat-set University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing TAI of FOLFOX and Sorafenib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: protocol violation). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression free survival (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02220088, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2019.