AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy Term InfantsGOLFIIINCT02221687

The Combiotic-Study

A study testing Synbiotic formula in people with Healthy Term Infants, run by HiPP GmbH & Co. Vertrieb KG at 25 sites in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that a synbiotic formula, fed for the duration of the first year of life (infant and follow-on formula) reduces the incidence rate of episodes of infectious diarrhea in infants during the first year of life compared to a standard infant formula. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 5 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Term Infants
What is being tested?
Synbiotic formula
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
540 participants
Where
25 sitesFrance
Study dates
Aug 2014to Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 5 weeks
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy term infants
  • Female or male gender
  • Gestational age between 37 and 41 weeks completed (= 41 weeks + 6 days)
  • Age at time of V1 visit : 4 +/- 7 days
  • Birth weight between 2500 ans 4200g, with regular weight gain (≥ 150g / week)
  • Two legal representatives (parent(s) / guardian(s)) who are capable of and willing to comply with the protocol and have signed the informed consent in accordance with legal requirements.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • at least one of the legal representatives is affiliated to with a social security scheme.
  • Additionnaly , criteria of inclusion in one of the formula-fed groups or in the breast-fed group, respectively, are the following:
  • To be included in one of the formula arm, infants will have to be exclusively formula-fed (no breast milk meal) at the time of V1 visit (randomization).
  • or
  • To be included in the breastfeeding arm, infants will have to be exclusively breast-fed (no more than one formula meal per day) at V1 visit (randomization) and its mother will have to be willing to pursue exclusive breastfeeding at least until the infant will be 4-month old.

Who cannot join

  • Intensive care during at least the first 14 days of life
  • Neonatal health problems, such as: respiratory distress, asphyxia, hypoglycemia, sepsis, NEC (necrotizing enterocolitis),...
  • Clinical evidence of chronic illness or gastrointestinal disorders such as : GER (Gastrooesophageal Reflux), gastroenteritis,...
  • Known metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, lactose intolerance,....
  • Known immune deficiency
  • Subjects recommended to receive formula with hydrolized protein (e.g. children with allergy risk)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subject under oral antibiotic treatment at V1 visit
  • Participation in another biomedical study
  • Whose legal representatives have psychological or linguistic incapability to sign the informed consent form
  • Reasons to presume that parents are unable to meet the study plan requirements (e.g. impossibility to contact study representatives in case of emergency, drug addiction etc)

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 1 country.

25 sites in 1 country

France25 sites
  • Alain PALOMBA

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Christophe RONDEAU

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Damien GODIN

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Daniel GOMBAUD

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Jean-François FOUCAULT

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Michel LAMBERT

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Nolwenn RONCERAY

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Philippe REMAUD

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Pierre-André FERRAND

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Vanessa BERNAND

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49000

  • Francisco MARTINEZ-CORTES

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49100

  • Damien GUILLON

    Angers, Maine-et-Loire, 49120

  • Christine REGIMBART

    Bécon-les-Granits, Maine-et-Loire, 49370

  • Elie JABBOUR

    Gémozac, Charente-Maritime, 17260

  • C.I.C Pédiatrique - C.H.U. de Grenoble - Hôpital Couple-Enfant

    Grenoble, Isère, 38043

  • Christophe VIEL

    La Rochelle, Charente-Maritime, 17000

  • Alain BATY

    Laval, Mayenne, 53000

  • Christian DUROY

    Laval, Mayenne, 53000

  • François RICHARD

    Laval, Mayenne, 53000

  • Patrick ROBERT

    Laval, Mayenne, 53000

  • Antoine LEPELLETIER

    Montreuil, Maine-et-Loire, 49460

  • C.I.C pédiatrique - C.H.U. de Nantes - Hôpital Mère-Enfant

    Nantes, Loire-Atlantique, 44093

  • Benoit DAGUZAN

    Segré, Maine-et-Loire, 49500

  • Didier NOURRY

    Tiercé, Maine-et-Loire, 49125

  • Philippe IGIGABEL

    Tiercé, Maine-et-Loire, 49125

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of an Infant Formula Containing Synbiotics and Its Effects on the Incidence of Infectious Diseases in the Infant Gut : a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Interventional Study

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that a synbiotic formula, fed for the duration of the first year of life (infant and follow-on formula) reduces the incidence rate of episodes of infectious diarrhea in infants during the first year of life compared to a standard infant formula.

Being tested
Synbiotic formula, Control formula
Keywords
synbiotic formula, infant formula, diarrhea
Medical subject headings
Diarrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Synbiotic formulaDietary supplement

    Standard milk formula enriched with a prebiotic fiber and a probiotic strain

  • Control formulaDietary supplement

    Standard milk formula without pre and probiotic

Study groups in NCT02221687
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Synbiotic formulaExperimentalSynbiotic formula : standard formula enriched with a prebiotic fiber and a probiotic strain Dose : variable number of powder scoops, adapted to the infant's age and weight, and addition of the defined amount of water, according to the Dose and Drinking Amount table. Route : oral, ad libitum Duration of product intake: * Synbiotic IF : 5 months of consumption (from the inclusion until 6 months completed of age) * Synbiotic FoF: 6 months of consumption (from 6 to 12 months of age)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Synbiotic formula
Control formulaPlacebo comparatorControl formula : standard formula without pre and probiotic Dose : variable number of powder scoops, adapted to the infant's age and weight, and addition of the defined amount of water according to the Dose and Drinking Amount table. Route: oral, ad libitum Duration of product intake: * Control IF : 5 months of consumption (from the inclusion until 6 months completed of age) * Control FoF : 6 months of consumption (from 6 to 12 months of age)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Control formula
Breast-fed groupNo intervention- Breast milk as exclusive feeding (no more than one formula meal per day), from birth until at least 4 months of age. Then, when the mother decides to stop breastfeeding, the infants can consume any formula on parent's choice respecting forbidden products list. Dose: * Breast milk : on demand Route : oral, ad libitum Duration of product intake: * Breast milk : at least 4 month (from birth until at least 4 months of age)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. (Cumulative) number of infectious diarrhea episodes per subject during the first year of life.

    Difference between formula groups are evaluated via incidence rate based on number of subjects.

    In formula-fed infants, diarrhea is defined as three or more loose or watery stools in 24 hours with or without fever or vomiting (according to WHO and ESPGHAN definition). For breast-fed infants, a change in stool consistency versus previous stool consistency is more indicative of diarrhea than stool number.

    Diarrhea episode is considered as ended as soon as 2 consecutive non-watery stools are observed or no stools are observed in 24 hours.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (57)
  1. Analysis of fecal microbiota by molecular analysis from frozen stools in planned stool samples

    Levels of total lactobacilli, Lactobacillus fermentum species (and if possible the strain CECT 5716 will be quantified too), total bifidobacteria, enterobacteriaceae, clostridium difficile

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Analysis of fecal microbiota by molecular analysis from frozen stools in planned stool samples

    Levels of total lactobacilli, Lactobacillus fermentum species (and if possible the strain CECT 5716 will be quantified too), total bifidobacteria, enterobacteriaceae, clostridium difficile

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Analysis of fecal microbiota by molecular analysis from frozen stools in planned stool samples

    Levels of total lactobacilli, Lactobacillus fermentum species (and if possible the strain CECT 5716 will be quantified too), total bifidobacteria, enterobacteriaceae, clostridium difficile

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Analysis of fecal microbiota by molecular analysis from frozen stools in planned stool samples

    Levels of total lactobacilli, Lactobacillus fermentum species (and if possible the strain CECT 5716 will be quantified too), total bifidobacteria, enterobacteriaceae, clostridium difficile

    Measured: 3 years

  5. Analysis of fecal microbiota by molecular analysis from frozen stools in diarrhea samples

    levels of potential pathogens causing diarrhea including rotavirus, norovirus, Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli (potential pathogenic bacteria will be screened only in case of negative testing for viruses on sample collected within 72 hours after beginning of the diarrhea episode);

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Fecal pH and levels of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in planned stool samples

    short chain fatty acids (SCFA): acetate, propionate, butyrate;

    Measured: 4 months

  7. Fecal pH and levels of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in planned stool samples

    short chain fatty acids (SCFA): acetate, propionate, butyrate;

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Fecal pH and levels of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in planned stool samples

    short chain fatty acids (SCFA): acetate, propionate, butyrate;

    Measured: 2 years

  9. Fecal pH and levels of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in planned stool samples

    short chain fatty acids (SCFA): acetate, propionate, butyrate;

    Measured: 3 years

  10. Characteristics of bowel movements and stools

    • assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents
    • average daily number of bowel movements;
    • (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) (using the validated scale for preterm and term infants proposed by Bekkali N, et al., 2009), and especially
    • average daily incidence of loose or watery stools (category A, subscale 'consistency' on Bekkali scale);
    • dominant stool color per visit

    Measured: 4 months

  11. Characteristics of bowel movements and stools

    • assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents
    • average daily number of bowel movements;
    • (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) (using the validated scale for preterm and term infants proposed by Bekkali N, et al., 2009), and especially
    • average daily incidence of loose or watery stools (category A, subscale 'consistency' on Bekkali scale);
    • dominant stool color per visit

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Characteristics of bowel movements and stools

    • assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents
    • average daily number of bowel movements;
    • (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) (using the validated scale for preterm and term infants proposed by Bekkali N, et al., 2009), and especially
    • average daily incidence of loose or watery stools (category A, subscale 'consistency' on Bekkali scale);
    • dominant stool color per visit

    Measured: 9 months

  13. Characteristics of bowel movements and stools

    • assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents
    • average daily number of bowel movements;
    • (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) (using the validated scale for preterm and term infants proposed by Bekkali N, et al., 2009), and especially
    • average daily incidence of loose or watery stools (category A, subscale 'consistency' on Bekkali scale);
    • dominant stool color per visit

    Measured: 1 year

  14. Characteristics of bowel movements and stools

    • assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents
    • average daily number of bowel movements;
    • (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) (using the validated scale for preterm and term infants proposed by Bekkali N, et al., 2009), and especially
    • average daily incidence of loose or watery stools (category A, subscale 'consistency' on Bekkali scale);
    • dominant stool color per visit

    Measured: 2 years

  15. Characteristics of bowel movements and stools

    • assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents
    • average daily number of bowel movements;
    • (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) (using the validated scale for preterm and term infants proposed by Bekkali N, et al., 2009), and especially
    • average daily incidence of loose or watery stools (category A, subscale 'consistency' on Bekkali scale);
    • dominant stool color per visit

    Measured: 3 years

  16. Characteristics of bowel movements during diarrhea episodes

    • assessed through a diary filled in by parents during diarrhea episodes
    • average daily number of bowel movements per diarrhea episode;
    • average duration (number of days) of diarrhea episodes;
    • total number of days with diarrhea, within the first year of age (between V1 and V5);
    • (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) per diarrhea episode.

    Measured: 1 year

  17. Levels of fecal IgA and fecal calprotectin in planned stool samples

    Measured: 4 months

  18. Levels of fecal IgA and fecal calprotectin in planned stool samples

    Measured: 1 year

  19. Levels of fecal IgA and fecal calprotectin in planned stool samples

    Measured: 2 years

  20. Levels of fecal IgA and fecal calprotectin in planned stool samples

    Measured: 3 years

  21. Number and duration of infectious diseases

    Especially: otitis media, infections of upper and lower respiratory tract and of urinary tract;

    Measured: 3 years

  22. Number and duration of fever episodes;

    Measured: 3 years

  23. Number and duration of antibiotic treatment.

    Measured: 3 years

  24. Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements

    weight, size, head circumference;

    Measured: 4 weeks

  25. Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements

    weight, size, head circumference;

    Measured: 4 months

  26. Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements

    weight, size, head circumference;

    Measured: 6 months

  27. Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements

    weight, size, head circumference;

    Measured: 9 months

  28. Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements

    weight, size, head circumference;

    Measured: 1 year

  29. Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements

    weight, size, head circumference;

    Measured: 2 years

  30. Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements

    weight, size, head circumference;

    Measured: 3 years

  31. Child's behavior

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Average sleep duration and crying duration per 24 hours;

    Measured: 4 months

  32. Child's behavior

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Average sleep duration and crying duration per 24 hours;

    Measured: 6 months

  33. Child's behavior

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Average sleep duration and crying duration per 24 hours;

    Measured: 9 months

  34. Child's behavior

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Average sleep duration and crying duration per 24 hours;

    Measured: 1 year

  35. Child's behavior

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Average sleep duration and crying duration per 24 hours;

    Measured: 2 years

  36. Child's behavior

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Average sleep duration and crying duration per 24 hours;

    Measured: 3 years

  37. Minor gastrointestinal disorders (digestive tolerance)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily vomiting, regurgitation/reflux, flatulence, constipation (according to WHO definition);

    Measured: 4 months

  38. Minor gastrointestinal disorders (digestive tolerance)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily vomiting, regurgitation/reflux, flatulence, constipation (according to WHO definition);

    Measured: 6 months

  39. Minor gastrointestinal disorders (digestive tolerance)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily vomiting, regurgitation/reflux, flatulence, constipation (according to WHO definition);

    Measured: 9 months

  40. Minor gastrointestinal disorders (digestive tolerance)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily vomiting, regurgitation/reflux, flatulence, constipation (according to WHO definition);

    Measured: 1 year

  41. Minor gastrointestinal disorders (digestive tolerance)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily vomiting, regurgitation/reflux, flatulence, constipation (according to WHO definition);

    Measured: 2 years

  42. Minor gastrointestinal disorders (digestive tolerance)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily vomiting, regurgitation/reflux, flatulence, constipation (according to WHO definition);

    Measured: 3 years

  43. Suitability for daily use

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily consumption: drinking amounts and formula acceptance;

    Measured: 4 months

  44. Suitability for daily use

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily consumption: drinking amounts and formula acceptance;

    Measured: 6 months

  45. Suitability for daily use

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily consumption: drinking amounts and formula acceptance;

    Measured: 9 months

  46. Suitability for daily use

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily consumption: drinking amounts and formula acceptance;

    Measured: 1 year

  47. Suitability for daily use

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily consumption: drinking amounts and formula acceptance;

    Measured: 2 years

  48. Suitability for daily use

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • average daily consumption: drinking amounts and formula acceptance;

    Measured: 3 years

  49. Adverse events (AE)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Number of events, number of subjects showing adverse events, intensity and relationship of AE.

    Measured: 4 months

  50. Adverse events (AE)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Number of events, number of subjects showing adverse events, intensity and relationship of AE.

    Measured: 6 months

  51. Adverse events (AE)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Number of events, number of subjects showing adverse events, intensity and relationship of AE.

    Measured: 9 months

  52. Adverse events (AE)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Number of events, number of subjects showing adverse events, intensity and relationship of AE.

    Measured: 1 year

  53. Adverse events (AE)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Number of events, number of subjects showing adverse events, intensity and relationship of AE.

    Measured: 2 years

  54. Adverse events (AE)

    Assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents

    • Number of events, number of subjects showing adverse events, intensity and relationship of AE.

    Measured: 3 years

  55. Number and duration of fever episodes;

    Measured: 1 year

  56. Number and duration of antibiotic treatment.

    Measured: 1 year

  57. Number and duration of infectious diseases

    Especially: otitis media, infections of upper and lower respiratory tract and of urinary tract;

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2019
  4. Study completionApr 2021

Why it stopped: Recruitment of breastfed infants was very slow. Decision with PI (05/2018): Termination (80/100); no implication on primary outcome. Predetermined number of breastfed infants (n=100) was arbitray choice. Formula groups completed (460/460) 12/2017.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
540 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02221687
Sponsor's protocol ID
505564 - PEC10561
Acronym
GOLFIII
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
19 Aug 2014
Last updated
20 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Piloquet H, Vrignaud B, Gillaizeau F, Capronnier O, Berding K, Gunther J, Hecht C, Regimbart C; GOLF III Study Group. Efficacy and safety of a synbiotic infant formula for the prevention of respiratory and gastrointestinal infections: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 May;119(5):1259-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Mar 10.

    PubMed 38462218
  • Lagkouvardos I, Intze E, Schaubeck M, Rooney JP, Hecht C, Piloquet H, Clavel T. Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Feb;117(2):326-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

    PubMed 36811568

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Synbiotic formula in people with Healthy Term Infants, run by HiPP GmbH & Co. Vertrieb KG at 25 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment of breastfed infants was very slow. Decision with PI (05/2018): Termination (80/100); no implication on primary outcome. Predetermined number of breastfed infants (n=100) was arbitray choice. Formula groups completed (460/460) 12/2017.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

(Cumulative) number of infectious diarrhea episodes per subject during the first year of life. (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02221687, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in