AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes, Type 2InovaDM2NCT02222623

The Inova Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Study

A study testing Glargine and NPH in people with Diabetes, Type 2, run by Inova Health Care Services at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the two different basal insulins commonly used for basal blood sugar control in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients who are hospitalized and require low doses of insulin: neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and glargine… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes, Type 2
What is being tested?
Glargine and NPH
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2015to May 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients ages18-75 admitted to a general medicine or surgical Department of Medicine hospitalist services.
  • A known history of T2DM, receiving either diet alone, low dose insulin (≤0.4 units/kg/day), OADs, GLP1 analogs, or in any combination of OADs, GLP1 analogs and low dose insulin (≤0.4 units/kg/day).
  • Subjects must have a BG >140 mg/dL and ≤240 mg/dL before randomization without laboratory evidence of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome (bicarbonate <18 mEq/L, pH <7.30, or positive serum or urinary ketones, BG >240 mg/dL).

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
  • Patients using nutritional bolus insulin at home.
  • Patients with increased blood glucose concentration, but without a known history of diabetes.
  • Patients with a history of diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, or ketonuria.
  • Patients admitted to or expected to require admission to any intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate care unit (IMC).
  • Patients who are receiving or are anticipated to receive enteral or parenteral nutrition.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patients admitted for cardiac surgery.
  • Patients receiving continuous insulin infusion.
  • Patients with clinically relevant hepatic disease (diagnosed liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension), corticosteroid therapy, or impaired renal function (creatinine ≥ 3.5 mg/dL).
  • Persons with decisional incapacity (mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study).
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or immediately (same hospitalization) post partum at time of enrollment into the study.
  • Patients with recognized or suspected endocrine disorders associated with increased insulin resistance, acromegaly, or hyperthyroidism.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Inova Fairfax Hospital

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22042

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Insulin Glargine vs NPH as Basal Insulin on Glycemic Values in Hospitalized Patients: The Inova Diabetes Study

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the two different basal insulins commonly used for basal blood sugar control in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients who are hospitalized and require low doses of insulin: neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and glargine (Lantus®) insulin. Previous research has shown that both NPH insulin and glargine (Lantus®) insulin is safe and effective for the control of blood sugar in a type 2 diabetic patient. This research is being done because the costs of medications for diabetic patients are very expensive. Our goal with this research is to show that a less expensive insulin (NPH) is as safe and effective as a more expensive insulin [glargine (Lantus®)] in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are in the hospital.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, open label trial comparing effectiveness of insulin glargine and insulin NPH in a basal plus correctional regimen. Patients will be randomized to either an intervention (NPH) or a control group (glargine) upon admission. The following data will be collected: age, sex, weight, preadmission diabetes medications, admission diagnosis, HbA1C, blood glucose (BG), chemistry, hematology, urine analysis, pregnancy test, duration of hospitalization, insulin dose, and discharge status. Data will be recorded and maintained confidentially.

Being tested
Glargine, NPH
Keywords
insulin, basal, diabetes, hospital, glucose, hypoglycemia, glargine, NPH, neutral protamine hagedorn
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Insulin Resistance, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypoglycemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GlargineDrug

    Also called Lantus

    Glargine given as 100% total daily dose with breakfast. The initial dose will be calculated using the patient's weight or using their basal insulin doses prior to hospitalization.

  • NPHDrug

    Also called Novolin N, Humulin N

    NPH 2/3 of the total daily dose given with breakfast, 1/3 of the total daily dose given at bedtime. The initial dose is calculated using the patient's weight or using the basal insulin dose prior to hospitalization.

Study groups in NCT02222623
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
glargine insulinActive comparatorBasal glargine given once daily in the morning before breakfast plus standard hospital corrective doses of insulin aspart before meals and at bedtime.
Receives: Drug: Glargine
NPH insulinActive comparatorBasal NPH given twice daily before breakfast and at bedtime plus standard hospital corrective doses of insulin aspart before meals and at bedtime.
Receives: Drug: NPH

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean daily blood glucose

    Measured: 5 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Percent of total BG readings within target BG 70-180 mg/dL before meals.

    Measured: 5 days

  2. Number (Percent) of episodes and total BG readings of hypoglycemic events (BG < 70 mg/dL)

    Measured: 5 days

  3. Number (Percent) of total BG readings of severe hyperglycemia (BG > 300 mg/dL) after the first day of treatment.

    Measured: 5 days

  4. Hospital mortality

    Measured: 5 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Why it stopped: No participants enrolled

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02222623
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-1623
Acronym
InovaDM2
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
19 Aug 2014
Last updated
5 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Glargine and NPH in people with Diabetes, Type 2, run by Inova Health Care Services at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean daily blood glucose (time frame: 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in