Diseases/DiagnosesNSIGHTNCT02225522
Genomic Sequencing in Acutely Ill Neonates
A study testing Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq) in people with Diseases/Diagnoses and Genetic Disease, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rapid next generation sequencing (NGS, such as whole genome sequencing1) with current practice to provide diagnostic or prognostic information or treatment guidance in acutely ill neonates and infants, particularly with respect to clinical care, cost and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 4 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Diseases/Diagnoses, Genetic Disease
- What is being tested?
- Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 4 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Clinical genetic testing or a genetic consult is ordered
- Subject has one major structural anomaly or three or more minor anomalies
- Abnormal laboratory testing suggestive of a genetic disease
- Abnormal response to standard therapy for a major underlying condition
Who cannot join
- Previously confirmed genetic diagnosis that explains the clinical condition
- Has features pathognomonic for a large chromosomal aberration (Trisomy 13, 18, 21 or other)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Trial of the Clinical Utility of Rapid Next Generation Sequencing in Acutely Ill Neonates
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rapid next generation sequencing (NGS, such as whole genome sequencing1) with current practice to provide diagnostic or prognostic information or treatment guidance in acutely ill neonates and infants, particularly with respect to clinical care, cost and outcomes.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized, blinded, prospective study examining the comparative effectiveness - both clinical and cost effectiveness - of rapid NGS (StatSeq), compared to standard of care, including an expanded newborn screen, in acutely ill neonates and infants with potential genetic diseases. Acutely ill neonates and infants who have an undiagnosed illness, and their families, will be eligible to participate in the study. The investigators will enroll approximately 1,000 neonates and infants at a single study site. The study population will be recruited from Children's Mercy Hospital inpatient population, primarily the intensive care nursery (ICN, also known as the NICU), with a smaller subpopulation presenting to other hospital services, such as the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). All affected study participants will receive an expanded newborn screen (NBS). Newborn screening is biochemical testing of a heel-prick blood spot that is federally mandated to be performed on all US live births. 67 diseases are tested for by NBS in MO, most of which are genetic diseases. The expanded NBS proposed herein is the clinically available StepOne Newborn Screen® from Perkin Elmer, and will be performed in addition to standard State of MO screening on all enrolled infants in both arms. Half of the affected study participants will be randomized to receive StatSeq in addition to standard testing for their acute illness and expanded NBS. Additionally, all willing clinical providers will be enrolled and their perceptions on clinical outcomes will be measured.
All subjects will have blood drawn for nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) isolation and the expanded NBS at the time of enrollment in the study. All blood sample volumes will adhere to the CMH policy on maximum blood in pediatric patients. If the volume allowed for in this policy exceeds 5ml, 5 ml will be the maximum collected at enrollment. Buccal smears, heel-prick blood spots, additional blood, urine and tissue samples may be collected, if available as sample retains from other studies, and stored in the Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine (CPGM) per their approved IRB protocol (IRB Study #11120514). The latter samples will not involve invasive sampling. Nucleic acids will be isolated and prepared for NGS with standard protocols at the CPGM (Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine). Familial samples (for example, mother, father, affected or unaffected siblings) will also be obtained, and nucleic acids will also be sequenced per the Genome Center Biorepository protocol, as indicated, to assist in diagnosis of the acute medical condition in the newborn. All sequencing data will be stored in the Genome Center Biorepository (IRB Study #11120514).
A minimum of two expert Center data analysts will be responsible for analyzing the DNA variants following NGS. One of the analysts will then compile a report to be presented to the Molecular Pathology Laboratory Director or Assistant Director. In the case of positive study findings that may be diagnostic, the Molecular Pathology Laboratory Director or Assistant Director will perform confirmatory clinical diagnostic testing and, if confirmed, a standard clinical diagnostic report will be placed in the patient's medical record. In the case of acutely material (actionable) positive study findings, the results will be verbally conveyed to the primary clinical team directly prior to confirmatory testing. A generic research note will be placed in the patient's medical record that indicates that a verbal, provisional report was issued (Appendix A). Verbal, provisional reporting of results before confirmatory testing will only be performed in cases where the delay in reporting necessary for confirmation was likely to result in significant harm to the patient. Confirmatory testing will be performed promptly in all cases, including those in which in which a verbal report has been given. A case conference format may be utilized for return of results if the complexity of the diagnosis or potential treatment for that diagnosis warrants detailed discussion. If no potentially pathogenic variants are identified, a verbal report will be provided to the clinical care physician of record to communicate that there were no causative findings, and a generic research note will be placed in the medical record that states that nondiagnostic research grade NGS was performed (Appendix B). No negative diagnostic written report of results will be placed in the patient's chart in this instance, as there is no available clinical grade testing to confirm negative results for all genes tested. Follow up with the patient's family will be guided by the clinical care team. All study participants and their clinicians will be notified of randomization assignment at/by day 10 after randomization. This information will help alleviate anxiety on the part of the family, and also provides a mechanism for patient crossover into the rapid NGS arm if the patient is clinically deteriorating, and at the clinical care team's request. Rarely, those participants and clinicians will be notified sooner if they were randomized to the rapid NGS group and a diagnosis is made in less than 10 days. Both molecular diagnoses made and time to diagnosis will be recorded as primary outcomes.
All positive results from the Perkin Elmer StepOne expanded NBS (received by all enrolled infants and NOT a study variable) will be returned to the Genome Center personnel. Based on these results, confirmatory testing through Perkin Elmer will be performed if this condition was not identified on the standard State NBS screen for each infant. These provisional results will be verbally communicated with the primary clinician team and additional samples requested, if necessary, for confirmation. Upon confirmation, the results will be entered in the patient's medical record.
Each time a study participant is enrolled, the primary clinical providers will be asked to fill out a survey prior to StatSeq testing and after return of results. We will also review the patient's medical record and collect clinical variables including laboratory testing, radiology results, medications and other treatments received to further analyze the effect rapid NGS has on clinical care. We plan to follow up with families annually up to 5 years post enrollment and record clinical outcomes related to this study.
This study will be integrated with two other study protocols, one being the CMH Genomic Medicine Repository (IRB 11120514) and the other Genomes in newborns (#13120442) that studies the ethical and legal implications of rapid NGS in this population. Data records will be requested from both studies. The participants must agree to enroll in the Genome Center Biorepository. The Genomes in newborns study will be optional.
- Conditions
- Diseases/Diagnoses, Genetic Disease
- Being tested
- Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq)
- Keywords
- Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Infant, Newborn, Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Medical subject headings
- Disease, Genetic Diseases, Inborn
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq)Other
Patients in this arm will received standard genetic testing, the Perkins Elmer StepOne expanded newborn screen and the rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq). the receipt of the StatSeq testing is the different factor between arms. the standard genetic testing includes any testing that is clinically available to the attending physician that would normally be ordered for the patient if not enrolled in this study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | No intervention | Patients in this arm receive standard genetic evaluation without the addition of next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of their presumed genetic condition |
| Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq) | Experimental | Patients in this arm will receive standard of care genetic evaluation and next generation sequencing of their genome to achieve rapid diagnosis of genetic conditions. Receives: Other: Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Molecular Diagnosis Made
If randomized to the Rapid Genome Sequencing group, did the testing result in a molecular diagnosis for the patient with three weeks of receipt of the DNA in the lab.
Measured: 28 days
Time to Molecular Diagnosis
How many days from enrollment were required in our to achieve a molecular diagnosis in the infant
Measured: 28 days
Change in Clinical Management
If randomized to the Rapid Genome Sequencing group and a molecular diagnosis achieved, did it provide a change in clinical management as determined by a survey of primary care team attending via a survey
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Consults
Total number of consultations including follow up required during hospitalization
Measured: 28 days
Cost Effectiveness
Determination of utilization of healthcare resources in hospital charges in both arms
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diseases/DiagnosesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephen Kingsmore, MB BAO ChB, Principal investigator, Rady Children's Hospital, San DiegoSteve Leeder, PhD, Principal investigator, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsLaurel K Willig, MD, Study director, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJoshua E Petrikin, MD, Principal investigator, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02225522
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HD13-010
- Acronym
- NSIGHT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Trial of the Clinical Utility of Rapid Next Generation Sequencing in Acutely Ill Neonates
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02225522
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NSIGHT / HD13-010
- Conditions
- Diseases/Diagnoses, Genetic Disease
- Keywords
- Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Infant, Newborn, Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rapid next generation sequencing (NGS, such as whole genome sequencing1) with current practice to provide diagnostic or prognostic information or treatment guidance in acutely ill neonates and infants, particularly with respect to clinical care, cost and outcomes.
Detailed description
This is a randomized, blinded, prospective study examining the comparative effectiveness - both clinical and cost effectiveness - of rapid NGS (StatSeq), compared to standard of care, including an expanded newborn screen, in acutely ill neonates and infants with potential genetic diseases. Acutely ill neonates and infants who have an undiagnosed illness, and their families, will be eligible to participate in the study. The investigators will enroll approximately 1,000 neonates and infants at a single study site. The study population will be recruited from Children's Mercy Hospital inpatient population, primarily the intensive care nursery (ICN, also known as the NICU), with a smaller subpopulation presenting to other hospital services, such as the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). All affected study participants will receive an expanded newborn screen (NBS). Newborn screening is biochemical testing of a heel-prick blood spot that is federally mandated to be performed on all US live births. 67 diseases are tested for by NBS in MO, most of which are genetic diseases. The expanded NBS proposed herein is the clinically available StepOne Newborn Screen® from Perkin Elmer, and will be performed in addition to standard State of MO screening on all enrolled infants in both arms. Half of the affected study participants will be randomized to receive StatSeq in addition to standard testing for their acute illness and expanded NBS. Additionally, all willing clinical providers will be enrolled and their perceptions on clinical outcomes will be measured.
All subjects will have blood drawn for nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) isolation and the expanded NBS at the time of enrollment in the study. All blood sample volumes will adhere to the CMH policy on maximum blood in pediatric patients. If the volume allowed for in this policy exceeds 5ml, 5 ml will be the maximum collected at enrollment. Buccal smears, heel-prick blood spots, additional blood, urine and tissue samples may be collected, if available as sample retains from other studies, and stored in the Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine (CPGM) per their approved IRB protocol (IRB Study #11120514). The latter samples will not involve invasive sampling. Nucleic acids will be isolated and prepared for NGS with standard protocols at the CPGM (Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine). Familial samples (for example, mother, father, affected or unaffected siblings) will also be obtained, and nucleic acids will also be sequenced per the Genome Center Biorepository protocol, as indicated, to assist in diagnosis of the acute medical condition in the newborn. All sequencing data will be stored in the Genome Center Biorepository (IRB Study #11120514).
A minimum of two expert Center data analysts will be responsible for analyzing the DNA variants following NGS. One of the analysts will then compile a report to be presented to the Molecular Pathology Laboratory Director or Assistant Director. In the case of positive study findings that may be diagnostic, the Molecular Pathology Laboratory Director or Assistant Director will perform confirmatory clinical diagnostic testing and, if confirmed, a standard clinical diagnostic report will be placed in the patient's medical record. In the case of acutely material (actionable) positive study findings, the results will be verbally conveyed to the primary clinical team directly prior to confirmatory testing. A generic research note will be placed in the patient's medical record that indicates that a verbal, provisional report was issued (Appendix A). Verbal, provisional reporting of results before confirmatory testing will only be performed in cases where the delay in reporting necessary for confirmation was likely to result in significant harm to the patient. Confirmatory testing will be performed promptly in all cases, including those in which in which a verbal report has been given. A case conference format may be utilized for return of results if the complexity of the diagnosis or potential treatment for that diagnosis warrants detailed discussion. If no potentially pathogenic variants are identified, a verbal report will be provided to the clinical care physician of record to communicate that there were no causative findings, and a generic research note will be placed in the medical record that states that nondiagnostic research grade NGS was performed (Appendix B). No negative diagnostic written report of results will be placed in the patient's chart in this instance, as there is no available clinical grade testing to confirm negative results for all genes tested. Follow up with the patient's family will be guided by the clinical care team. All study participants and their clinicians will be notified of randomization assignment at/by day 10 after randomization. This information will help alleviate anxiety on the part of the family, and also provides a mechanism for patient crossover into the rapid NGS arm if the patient is clinically deteriorating, and at the clinical care team's request. Rarely, those participants and clinicians will be notified sooner if they were randomized to the rapid NGS group and a diagnosis is made in less than 10 days. Both molecular diagnoses made and time to diagnosis will be recorded as primary outcomes.
All positive results from the Perkin Elmer StepOne expanded NBS (received by all enrolled infants and NOT a study variable) will be returned to the Genome Center personnel. Based on these results, confirmatory testing through Perkin Elmer will be performed if this condition was not identified on the standard State NBS screen for each infant. These provisional results will be verbally communicated with the primary clinician team and additional samples requested, if necessary, for confirmation. Upon confirmation, the results will be entered in the patient's medical record.
Each time a study participant is enrolled, the primary clinical providers will be asked to fill out a survey prior to StatSeq testing and after return of results. We will also review the patient's medical record and collect clinical variables including laboratory testing, radiology results, medications and other treatments received to further analyze the effect rapid NGS has on clinical care. We plan to follow up with families annually up to 5 years post enrollment and record clinical outcomes related to this study.
This study will be integrated with two other study protocols, one being the CMH Genomic Medicine Repository (IRB 11120514) and the other Genomes in newborns (#13120442) that studies the ethical and legal implications of rapid NGS in this population. Data records will be requested from both studies. The participants must agree to enroll in the Genome Center Biorepository. The Genomes in newborns study will be optional.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | No intervention | –Patients in this arm receive standard genetic evaluation without the addition of next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of their presumed genetic condition |
| Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq) | Experimental | Other: Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq)Patients in this arm will receive standard of care genetic evaluation and next generation sequencing of their genome to achieve rapid diagnosis of genetic conditions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 4 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Clinical genetic testing or a genetic consult is ordered
- Subject has one major structural anomaly or three or more minor anomalies
- Abnormal laboratory testing suggestive of a genetic disease
- Abnormal response to standard therapy for a major underlying condition
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Previously confirmed genetic diagnosis that explains the clinical condition
- Has features pathognomonic for a large chromosomal aberration (Trisomy 13, 18, 21 or other)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq)Patients in this arm will received standard genetic testing, the Perkins Elmer StepOne expanded newborn screen and the rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq). the receipt of the StatSeq testing is the different factor between arms. the standard genetic testing includes any testing that is clinically available to the attending physician that would normally be ordered for the patient if not enrolled in this study. | Other | Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq) |
Primary outcome
Molecular Diagnosis Made
Time frame: 28 days
If randomized to the Rapid Genome Sequencing group, did the testing result in a molecular diagnosis for the patient with three weeks of receipt of the DNA in the lab.
Time to Molecular Diagnosis
Time frame: 28 days
How many days from enrollment were required in our to achieve a molecular diagnosis in the infant
Change in Clinical Management
Time frame: 28 days
If randomized to the Rapid Genome Sequencing group and a molecular diagnosis achieved, did it provide a change in clinical management as determined by a survey of primary care team attending via a survey
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Consults
Time frame: 28 days
Cost Effectiveness
Time frame: 28 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2017.
Related trials for Diseases/Diagnoses
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Individualized Nursing Interventions on Glycemic Variability and Self-Management in Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Venetoclax and HMA Treatment of Older and Unfit Adults With FLT3 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Interval Exercise in Patients Diagnosed With Venous Insufficiency: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Chronic Venous Insufficiency C2 and Below
RecruitingPhase 2
Comparing Different Treatment Lengths for Venetoclax in Older People With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Non-Invasive MASLD Diagnosis & T2D Remission Biomarkers
MASLD, T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen Kingsmore, MB BAO ChB principal investigator
Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego
Steve Leeder, PhD principal investigator
Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Laurel K Willig, MD study director
Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rapid whole genome sequencing (StatSeq) in people with Diseases/Diagnoses and Genetic Disease, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Molecular Diagnosis Made (time frame: 28 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2017.