AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT02225925

Intraoperative Dosimetry for Prostate Brachytherapy Using Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound

A study testing Brachytherapy in people with Prostate Cancer and Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of a system of intraoperative dynamic dosimetry during prostate seed implantation (brachytherapy) including its new elements, to evaluate and refine technical methods of using the system, as well as confirm its performance and accuracy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
What is being tested?
Brachytherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2014to 28 Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed, localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • Clinical stages T1b - T3a
  • The patient has decided to undergo brachytherapy (or brachytherapy plus external beam radiation) as a treatment modality for his prostate cancer
  • Karnofsky Performance Status > 60
  • Prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) < 55 cc
  • International Prostate symptom score (IPSS) 20 or less
  • Ability to have Magnetic resonance imaging as part of post-implant assessment
  • Signed study-specific consent form prior to registration

Who cannot join

  • Stage T3b or greater disease.
  • Prior history of pelvic radiation therapy
  • Significant obstructive symptoms (IPSS greater than 20)
  • Major medical or psychiatric illness which, in the investigator's opinion, would prevent completion of treatment and would interfere with follow up.
  • Implanted device or apparatus which obstruct visibility of the implanted sources on fluoroscopy
  • Metallic implants, claustrophobia not amenable to medication, or known contraindications to undergoing MR scanning

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The SKCCC at Johns Hopkins

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Phase II Study of Dynamic Intraoperative Dosimetry for Prostate Brachytherapy Using Registered Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound

The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of a system of intraoperative dynamic dosimetry during prostate seed implantation (brachytherapy) including its new elements, to evaluate and refine technical methods of using the system, as well as confirm its performance and accuracy.

Read the detailed description

The use of brachytherapy or implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate for adenocarcinoma has advantages over external beam radiation in that a very high dose can be delivered to the tumor while limiting the doses to the surrounding normal tissue (i.e., bowel and bladder). It is established that outcomes after treatment with brachytherapy are related to the technical quality of source placement within the gland. Accurate placement of the radioactive sources with achievement of optimum dose distributions within the prostate is key to the success of brachytherapy with regard to both killing tumor as well as minimizing toxicity.

Due to factors such as deformations of the prostate during needle insertion, needle deviation from intended path during insertion, prostatic edema from needle trauma, and relaxation of tissues as well as source migration after needle removal, the actual source positions upon completion of the procedure may fail to accurately match their intended placement, resulting in variations from the idealized dosimetric plan.

One way to overcome this complex problem is to have the capability of visualizing the sources once they are in the prostate and then continuously updating the dosimetric plan in real time. To this end, we have developed a mechanism whereby ultrasound and fluoroscopy are quantitatively integrated to allow for real-time visualization of source positions intraoperatively. A prior Phase I study performed by this group evaluated a prototype version of this mechanism, resulting in the successful treatment of 6 patients with true intraoperative dynamic dosimetry. Dosimetric outcomes within this cohort of patients was excellent, and the intraoperative doses predicted by the system more accurate than that predicted by the current standard method (ultrasound-based dosimetry).

Being tested
Brachytherapy
Keywords
brachytherapy
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BrachytherapyRadiation

Study groups in NCT02225925
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dynamic dosimetry brachytherapyExperimentalCohort treated with dynamic dosimetry brachytherapy
Receives: Radiation: Brachytherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedure Time

    Additional procedure time with the registered ultrasound and fluoroscopy system (RUF) in the intra-operative setting for implantation procedure

    Measured: at time of implantation procedure

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Seed Reconstruction From Intra-operative Fluoroscopy

    Number of patients with all seeds reconstructed from fluoroscopy

    Measured: up to 30 days post-treatment

  2. Number of Participants With Seed Reconstruction Utilizing RUF Versus CT / Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Reconstruction

    Number of participants with seed reconstruction with RUF versus CT fused with MRI doses for Prostate D90 (dose received by 90% of prostate)

    Measured: 30 days post-treatment

  3. Impact of RUF System on Dosimetric Outcomes of Seed Placement as Assessed by Number of Patients With Prostate V100 of 95% or Greater

    Number of patients with prostate V100 (the percent of the postimplant MR/CT-based prostate volume that received at least 100% of dose) of 95% or greater

    Measured: 30 days post-treatment

  4. Mean Difference in D90 Between Intra-operative RUF and Standard CT/MRI Based Dosimetry

    Mean difference of D90 (% of prescribed dose) between intra-operative RUF and standard CT/MRI based dosimetry

    Measured: Treatment - 30 days

  5. Dosimetric Accuracy Comparison Between Pre and Post Ultrasound (US) Implantation Prostate Edema

    Measured: Treatment - 30 days

  6. Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments

    Change in Quality of Life measures based on International Prostate Symptom Score (range 0-35, higher score reflects lower quality of life), Sexual Health Inventory Score (1-25, lower score reflects lower quality of life), Epic-26 Bowel score (0-100, lower score reflects lower quality of life)

    Measured: baseline, 30 days post-implant, semiannually post treatment until year 2 and then annually until year 5

  7. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Outcomes

    PSA biochemical failure-free survival at last follow-up visit

    Measured: up to 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Oct 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02225925
Sponsor's protocol ID
J13164
Other IDs
NA_00091766
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
8 Apr 2014
Last updated
13 Mar 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Brachytherapy in people with Prostate Cancer and Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedure Time (time frame: at time of implantation procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in