Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia MyelofibrosisPhase 2NCT02226172
Single-Agent Glasdegib In Patients With Myelofibrosis Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib
A Phase 2 study testing Glasdegib (PF-04449913) in people with Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, run by Pfizer at 19 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
A lead-in cohort of ~20 patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors enrolled to single-agent glasdegib to evaluate safety and tolerability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
- What is being tested?
- Glasdegib (PF-04449913)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2014to 31 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of primary MF (PMF) or secondary MF (PET-MF and PPV-MF) as per WHO 2008 criteria.
- Lead-in cohort: resistant or intolerant to 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors (licensed or experimental).
- Randomized cohort: resistant or intolerant to prior ruxolitinib therapy. Documentation by the Investigator that the patient has exhausted available treatment options (eg, resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea, etc).
- Spleen 5 cm below the inferior left costal margin as measured by manual palpation.
- Active symptomatic MF as defined by the screening MPN-SAD patient-reported instrument requiring a severity score of at least 5 on one symptom, or a severity score of ≥ 3 on at least two of the symptoms (on a 0 to 10 scale).
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, 2, or 3.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Adequate organ function, demonstrated by the following laboratory values:
- Absolute Neutrophil Count 75 x 10(9)/L;
- Platelet count >50 x 10(9)/L with no evidence of bleeding and not requiring platelet transfusions;
- Serum creatinine <1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or estimated creatinine clearance 60 mL/min (as calculated using the standard method of the institution);
- Serum amylase or lipase <1.5 x ULN;
- Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase values 3.0 x ULN (or 5x ULN in the case of patients with MF accompanied by hepatic extramedullary hematopoiesis, as manifested by any degree of hepatomegaly).
- Total bilirubin values <1.5 x ULN unless the bilirubin is principally unconjugated (in the context of hemolysis) or there is documented Gilbert's disease.
- Serum electrolyte values < Grade 2 (sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorous and magnesium), per CTCAE v.4.03.
- Recovery to Grade 1 from all clinically significant adverse events related to prior MF therapy, including transplant-related toxicities.
- More than 2 months out from allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant prior to randomization.
- Must be able to undergo MRI of abdomen (spleen and liver). Patients who are contra indicated for MRI may be enrolled and evaluated by CT scan at the discretion of the Sponsor.
- 18 years of age.
- Male subjects able to father children and female patients of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy must agree to use two highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study and for 90 days after the last dose of assigned treatment.
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with a licensed or experimental smoothened inhibitor.
- Randomized cohort only: Prior treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor other than ruxolitinib.
- Other anti-cancer therapy up to 14 days prior to enrollment, with the exception of hydroxyurea, which can be given up to 4 days prior to enrollment.
- Splenic irradiation 3 months prior to enrollment.
- History of congenital long QT syndrome, or a baseline >470 msec QTcF abnormality (average of the triplicate reading).
- Evidence of significant cardiac disease, for example: symptomatic cardiac heart failure (CHF, NYHA class 3), complete bundle branch block, significant atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmias and any unstable cardiac arrhythmias requiring medication.
Show all 17Show fewer
- History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to enrollment.
- Uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, peptic ulcer disease or history of significant gastro intestinal bleeding within 6 months of enrollment.
- Any condition requiring chronic use of moderate/high dose steroids (equivalent to 10 mg QD prednisone).
- Hematopoietic growth factor receptor agonists (eg, erythropoietin (Epo), granulocyte colony stimulating factor, romiplostim, eltrombopag within 28 days of enrollment.
- Currently active malignancy (other than MF). Prior malignancies are allowed so long as there is no evidence of disease recurrence within the last 2 years (with the exception of fully excised, non-complicated basal cell carcinoma which can have been active within the prior 2 years, and certain localized, non-invasive fully excised skin, cervical, breast, prostate or bladder tumors).
- Prior history of chronic liver disease (eg, chronic alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, hemachromatosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH]).
- Active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal or viral infection, including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, known human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome related illness.
- Active graft versus host disease (GVHD) with other than grade 1 skin involvement or GVHD requiring immunosuppressive treatment.
- Uncontrolled disseminated intravascular coagulation.
- Current (including their administration within 3 days prior to study entry) use or anticipated need for food or drugs that are strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.
- Current use or anticipated requirement for drugs that are known strong CYP3A4/5 inducers.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 2 countries.
19 sites in 2 countries
United States15 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Cleveland Clinic - Taussig Cancer Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center - Investigational Drug Services
La Jolla, California, 92037-0845
UCSD Medical Center Clinical Laboratory - La Jolla
La Jolla, California, 92037
University of California San Diego (UCSD) Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0698
Froedtert Hospital and Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226-3522
Weill Cornell Medical College - New York-Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10021
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center-Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10065
Mayo Clinic Building - Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
UC San Diego Medical Center- Hillcrest
San Diego, California, 92103
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Japan4 sites
Juntendo University Hospital
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431
Kobe University Hospital
Kobe, Hyōgo, 6500017
Osaka University Hopsital
Suita-Shi, Osaka, 565-0871
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
Tokyo, 160-0023
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized Safety And Efficacy Study Of Glasdegib (Pf-04449913) Versus Placebo In Patients With Myelofibrosis Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib
A lead-in cohort of ~20 patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors enrolled to single-agent glasdegib to evaluate safety and tolerability. Following the lead-in, a phase 2, double blind, 2-arm study, randomized 2:1 to oral single-agent glasdegib versus placebo in 201 patients resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib.
- Being tested
- Glasdegib (PF-04449913), Placebo
- Keywords
- Primary myelofibrosis, Secondary myelofibrosis, PMF, PET-MF, PPV-MF, Ruxolitinib resistant or intolerant, previously treated myelofibrosis, smoothened inhibitor, oral, single agent.
- Medical subject headings
- Primary Myelofibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Glasdegib (PF-04449913)Drug
Oral daily dose of glasdegib (PF-04449913) 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.
PlaceboDrug
Oral daily dose of placebo 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Oral daily dose of glasdegib (PF-04449913) 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles. Receives: Drug: Glasdegib (PF-04449913) |
| Arm B | Placebo comparator | Oral daily dose of placebo 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT) Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse event.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in Cohort
AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability; congenital anomaly.Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death. Only categories with at least 1 participant with event were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (<)0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets <0.5*LLN greater than (>)1.75*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) <0.6* LLN >1.5* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils<0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN, blast cells >1.0*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio >1.1* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin >1.5*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN, protein,albumin <0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine >1.3*ULN,uric acid >1.2*ULN.Electrolytes: sodium <0.95*LLN >1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium <0.9* LLN >1.1*ULN,phosphate <0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN.Chemistry: glucose <0.6*LLN >1.5*ULN,creatine kinase >2.0*ULN, amylase,lipase >1.5*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood >1.0*ULN,red blood cells,WBC >=20,epithelial cells >=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline >1,cellular casts,crystals>=1,bacteria >20.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
Anemia (grade [g]1:< LLN to 10 gram per deciliter [g/dL],g2:<10 to 8g/dL,g3:<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:<LLN to 75*10^3/millimeter[mm]^3, g2:<75*10^3/mm^3 to 50*10^3/mm^3, g3:<50*10^3/mm^3 to 25*10^3/mm^3, g4:<25*10^3/mm^3); lymphopenia (g1:<LLN to 8*10^2/mm^3, g2:<8*10^2 to 5*10^2/mm^3, g3:<5*10^2 to 2*10^2/mm^3, g4:<2*10^2/mm^3);neutrophil (Absolute) (g1:<LLN to 15*10^2/mm^3, g2:<15*10^2 to 10*10^2/mm^3, g3:<10*10^2 to 5*10^2/mm^3, g4:<5*10^2/mm^3); white blood cell count(g1:<LLN to 3*10^3/mm^3, g2:<3*10^3 to 2*10^3/mm^3, g3:<2*10^3 to 1*10^3/mm^3, g4:<1*10^3/mm^3); hemoglobin (g1:increase in hemoglobin level >0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2:increase in hemoglobin level>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g3: increase in hemoglobin level>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
ALT/AST g1:>ULN 3*ULN, g2:>3-5*ULN, g3:>5 20*ULN, g4:>20*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:>ULN 2.5*ULN,g2:>2.5-5*ULN, g3:>5 20*ULN, g4:>20*ULN); Creatinine (g1:>ULN-1.5*ULN,g2:>1.5-3*ULN, g3:>3 6*ULN, g4:>6*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:>ULN-160,g2:>160 250, g3:>250 500, g4:>500mg/dL);bilirubin(total) (g1:>ULN-1.5*ULN, g2:>1.5-3*ULN, g3:>3 10*ULN,g4:>10*ULN);hypoglycaemia (g1:<LLN-55,g2:<55-40, g3:<40 30,g4:<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:>ULN-5.5,g2:>5.5-6, g3:>6 7,g4:>7mmol/L);hypokalemia (g1:<LLN-3,g2:<LLN-3, g3:<3 2.5, g4:<2.5mmol/L);hypermagnesemia (g1:>ULN-3,g3:>3 8, g4:>8mg/dL);hypocalcemia (g1:<LLN-8,g2:<8-7, g3:<7-6, g4:<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:>ULN-11.5,g2:>11.5-12.5, g3:>12.5-13.5, g4:>13.5mg/dL); hypomagnesemia (g1:<LLN-1.2,g2:<1.2-0.9,g3:<0.9-0.7, g4:<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:<LLN-130,g3:<130-120, g4:<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:<LLN-3,g2:<3 2,g3:<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:<LLN-2.5,g2:<2.5-2, g3:<2-1, g4:<1mg/dL).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Secondary outcomes (21)
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort
MRI (CT scan may have been permitted if MRI was contraindicated) of the spleen and the liver was performed at baseline, then every 12 weeks while the participant was on treatment. The same method of assessment used at baseline was used for the duration of the trial to ensure consistency. Spleen volume was assessed by a central, independent blinded reader.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort
The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Measured: Week 24
Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in Cohort
The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in Cohort
Anemia response was defined as transfusion-independent participants with a ≥20 gram per liter (g/L) increase in hemoglobin (Hb) level where baseline Hb level was <100 g/L, or baseline transfusion-dependent patients becoming transfusion-independent post-baseline. Transfusion dependency before the start of study treatment was defined as transfusions of ≥6 units of packed red blood cells in the 12 weeks prior to start of study treatment, for a final pre-treatment Hb of <85 g/L. In addition, the most recent transfusion episode must have occurred in the 28 days prior to study enrollment. Response in transfusion-dependent patients required absence of any packed red blood cell transfusions during any consecutive rolling 12-week interval during the treatment phase, capped by a Hb level of ≥85 g/L.
Measured: Baseline to end of treatment
Maximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in Cohort
Cmax was the highest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cmin was the lowest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cavg was the average concentration at steady state estimated using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis.
Measured: Cycle 1, Day 15
Area Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort
AUCtau was the area under the glasdegib plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) estimated by non-compartmental PK analysis using the linear/log trapezoidal method.
Measured: Cycle 1, Day 15
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort
Tmax was the time of the first occurrence of Cmax observed directly from the plasma concentration data.
Measured: Cycle 1, Day 15
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥50% as Measured by MRI/CT Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Week 24
Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall TSS in the Randomized Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Randomized Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline to end of treatment
Participant Reported Outcomes of Health Related Quality of Life and Health Status in the Randomised Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline to end of treatment
Median Duration of SVR in the Randomized Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline to end of treatment
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Randomized Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline to end of treatment
Glasdegib PK Parameters in the Randomized Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Cycle 1, Day 15
Psychometric Validation of the MPN-SAD in the Randomised Cohort
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline to end of treatment
Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to Maximum Severity: Randomized Cohort
AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort
Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (<)0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets <0.5*LLN >1.75*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) <0.6* LLN greater than (>)1.5* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils<0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN, blast cells >1.0*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio >1.1* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin >1.5*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN, protein,albumin <0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine >1.3* ULN,uric acid >1.2* ULN.Electrolytes: sodium <0.95*LLN >1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium <0.9* LLN >1.1*ULN,phosphate <0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN.Chemistry: glucose <0.6*LLN >1.5*ULN,creatine kinase >2.0*ULN, amylase,lipase >1.5*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood >1.0*ULN,red blood cells,WBC >=20,epithelial cells >=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline >1,cellular casts,crystals>=1,bacteria >20.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort
Anemia g1:< LLN to 10 g/dL, g2:<10 to 8g/dL, g3:<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:<LLN to 75*10^3/mm^3, g2:<75*10^3/mm^3 to 50*10^3/mm^3, g3:<50*10^3/mm^3 to 25*10^3/mm^3, g4:<25*10^3/mm^3); lymphopenia (g1:<LLN to 8*10^2/mm^3, g2:<8*10^2 to 5*10^2/mm^3, g3:<5*10^2 to 2*10^2/mm^3, g4:<2*10^2/mm^3);neutrophil (absolute) (g1:<LLN to 15*10^2/mm^3, g2:<15*10^2 to 10*10^2/mm^3, g3:<10*10^2 to 5*10^2/mm^3, g4:<5*10^2/mm^3); white blood cell count (g1:<LLN to 3*10^3/mm^3, g2:<3*10^3 to 2*10^3/mm^3, g3: <2*10^3 to 1*10^3/mm^3, g4:<1*10^3/mm^3); hemoglobin(g1:increase in hemoglobin level>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2: increase in hemoglobin level>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g3:increase in hemoglobin level>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort
ALT/AST g1:>ULN 3*ULN, g2:>3-5*ULN, g3:>5 20*ULN, g4:>20*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:>ULN 2.5*ULN, g2:>2.5-5*ULN, g3:>5 20*ULN, g4:>20*ULN);Creatinine (g1:>ULN-1.5*ULN, g2:>1.5-3*ULN, g3:>3 6*ULN, g4:>6*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:>ULN-160,g2:>160 250, g3:>250 500,g4:>500mg/dL); bilirubin(total) (g1:>ULN-1.5*ULN, g2:>1.5-3*ULN, g3:>3 10*ULN,g4:>10*ULN); hypoglycaemia (g1:<LLN-55, g2:<55-40, g3:<40 30, g4:<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:>ULN-5.5,g2:>5.5-6, g3:>6 7,g4:>7mmol/L); hypokalemia (g1:<LLN-3,g2:<LLN-3,g3:<3 2.5, g4:<2.5mmol/L); hypermagnesemia (g1:>ULN-3,g3:>3 8,g4:>8mg/dL); hypocalcemia (g1:<LLN-8,g2:<8-7, g3:<7-6, g4:<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:>ULN-11.5,g2:>11.5-12.5, g3:>12.5-13.5, g4:>13.5mg/dL);hypomagnesemia (g1:<LLN-1.2,g2:<1.2-0.9, g3:<0.9-0.7,g4:<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:<LLN-130,g3:<130-120, g4:<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:<LLN-3,g2:<3-2, g3:<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:<LLN-2.5,g2:<2.5-2,g3:<2-1,g4:<1mg/dL).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 131
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study start6 Oct 2014
- Primary completion14 Dec 2016
- Study completion31 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia MyelofibrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02226172
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B1371013
- Other IDs
- SMOI, 2014-000933-21, 2014-001048-40, 2014
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized Safety And Efficacy Study Of Glasdegib (Pf-04449913) Versus Placebo In Patients With Myelofibrosis Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02226172
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B1371013
- Keywords
- Primary myelofibrosis, Secondary myelofibrosis, PMF, PET-MF, PPV-MF, Ruxolitinib resistant or intolerant, previously treated myelofibrosis, smoothened inhibitor
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Apr 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A lead-in cohort of ~20 patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors enrolled to single-agent glasdegib to evaluate safety and tolerability. Following the lead-in, a phase 2, double blind, 2-arm study, randomized 2:1 to oral single-agent glasdegib versus placebo in 201 patients resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Drug: Glasdegib (PF-04449913)Oral daily dose of glasdegib (PF-04449913) 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles. |
| Arm B | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboOral daily dose of placebo 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Diagnosis of primary MF (PMF) or secondary MF (PET-MF and PPV-MF) as per WHO 2008 criteria.
- Lead-in cohort: resistant or intolerant to 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors (licensed or experimental).
- Randomized cohort: resistant or intolerant to prior ruxolitinib therapy. Documentation by the Investigator that the patient has exhausted available treatment options (eg, resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea, etc).
- Spleen 5 cm below the inferior left costal margin as measured by manual palpation.
- Active symptomatic MF as defined by the screening MPN-SAD patient-reported instrument requiring a severity score of at least 5 on one symptom, or a severity score of ≥ 3 on at least two of the symptoms (on a 0 to 10 scale).
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Prior treatment with a licensed or experimental smoothened inhibitor.
- Randomized cohort only: Prior treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor other than ruxolitinib.
- Other anti-cancer therapy up to 14 days prior to enrollment, with the exception of hydroxyurea, which can be given up to 4 days prior to enrollment.
- Splenic irradiation 3 months prior to enrollment.
- History of congenital long QT syndrome, or a baseline >470 msec QTcF abnormality (average of the triplicate reading).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Glasdegib (PF-04449913)Oral daily dose of glasdegib (PF-04449913) 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles. | Drug | Arm A |
| PlaceboOral daily dose of placebo 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles. | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT) Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Week 24
The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse event.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability; congenital anomaly.Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death. Only categories with at least 1 participant with event were reported.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (<)0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets <0.5*LLN greater than (>)1.75*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) <0.6* LLN >1.5* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils<0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN, blast cells >1.0*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio >1.1* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin >1.5*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN, protein,albumin <0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine >1.3*ULN,uric acid >1.2*ULN.Electrolytes: sodium <0.95*LLN >1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium <0.9* LLN >1.1*ULN,phosphate <0.8* LLN >1.2* ULN.Chemistry: glucose <0.6*LLN >1.5*ULN,creatine kinase >2.0*ULN, amylase,lipase >1.5*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood >1.0*ULN,red blood cells,WBC >=20,epithelial cells >=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline >1,cellular casts,crystals>=1,bacteria >20.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Anemia (grade [g]1:< LLN to 10 gram per deciliter [g/dL],g2:<10 to 8g/dL,g3:<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:<LLN to 75*10^3/millimeter[mm]^3, g2:<75*10^3/mm^3 to 50*10^3/mm^3, g3:<50*10^3/mm^3 to 25*10^3/mm^3, g4:<25*10^3/mm^3); lymphopenia (g1:<LLN to 8*10^2/mm^3, g2:<8*10^2 to 5*10^2/mm^3, g3:<5*10^2 to 2*10^2/mm^3, g4:<2*10^2/mm^3);neutrophil (Absolute) (g1:<LLN to 15*10^2/mm^3, g2:<15*10^2 to 10*10^2/mm^3, g3:<10*10^2 to 5*10^2/mm^3, g4:<5*10^2/mm^3); white blood cell count(g1:<LLN to 3*10^3/mm^3, g2:<3*10^3 to 2*10^3/mm^3, g3:<2*10^3 to 1*10^3/mm^3, g4:<1*10^3/mm^3); hemoglobin (g1:increase in hemoglobin level >0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2:increase in hemoglobin level>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g3: increase in hemoglobin level>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
ALT/AST g1:>ULN 3*ULN, g2:>3-5*ULN, g3:>5 20*ULN, g4:>20*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:>ULN 2.5*ULN,g2:>2.5-5*ULN, g3:>5 20*ULN, g4:>20*ULN); Creatinine (g1:>ULN-1.5*ULN,g2:>1.5-3*ULN, g3:>3 6*ULN, g4:>6*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:>ULN-160,g2:>160 250, g3:>250 500, g4:>500mg/dL);bilirubin(total) (g1:>ULN-1.5*ULN, g2:>1.5-3*ULN, g3:>3 10*ULN,g4:>10*ULN);hypoglycaemia (g1:<LLN-55,g2:<55-40, g3:<40 30,g4:<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:>ULN-5.5,g2:>5.5-6, g3:>6 7,g4:>7mmol/L);hypokalemia (g1:<LLN-3,g2:<LLN-3, g3:<3 2.5, g4:<2.5mmol/L);hypermagnesemia (g1:>ULN-3,g3:>3 8, g4:>8mg/dL);hypocalcemia (g1:<LLN-8,g2:<8-7, g3:<7-6, g4:<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:>ULN-11.5,g2:>11.5-12.5, g3:>12.5-13.5, g4:>13.5mg/dL); hypomagnesemia (g1:<LLN-1.2,g2:<1.2-0.9,g3:<0.9-0.7, g4:<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:<LLN-130,g3:<130-120, g4:<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:<LLN-3,g2:<3 2,g3:<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:<LLN-2.5,g2:<2.5-2, g3:<2-1, g4:<1mg/dL).
21 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Week 24
Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment
Maximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15
Area Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥50% as Measured by MRI/CT Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Week 24
Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall TSS in the Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment
Participant Reported Outcomes of Health Related Quality of Life and Health Status in the Randomised Cohort
Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment
Median Duration of SVR in the Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment
Glasdegib PK Parameters in the Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15
Psychometric Validation of the MPN-SAD in the Randomised Cohort
Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment
Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to Maximum Severity: Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of Pelabresib (DAK539) and Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis (MF)
Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Momelotinib in Combination With Luspatercept in Participants With Transfusion Dependent Myelofibrosis
Primary Myelofibrosis, Myelofibrosis; Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of PRT12396 in Participants With Select Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Polycythemia Vera (PV), Myelofibrosis (MF)
RecruitingObservational study
Tissue, Blood, and Body Fluid Sample Collection From Patients With Hematologic Cancer
Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Extended Access of Momelotinib in Adults With Myelofibrosis
Primary Myelofibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
19 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Glasdegib (PF-04449913) in people with Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, run by Pfizer at 19 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United States, Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Apr 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT) Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort (time frame: Week 24). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2019.