AzTrials
AzTrials

Dentin SensitivityPhase 2NCT02226562

Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Mouthwash in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

A Phase 2 study testing Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride and Standard fluoride dentifrice in people with Dentin Sensitivity, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the longitudinal efficacy of a potassium nitrate mouthwash formulation when used as an adjunct to brushing with a standard fluoride dentifrice for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) compared to brushing with a standard fluoride dentifrice alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dentin Sensitivity
What is being tested?
Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride and Standard fluoride dentifrice
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
191 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Sep 2014to 5 Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants in good general health, with self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months but not more than 10 years.
  • Participants with minimum of 20 natural teeth.
  • At screening, a minimum of four, non-adjacent teeth.
  • Teeth showing signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion.
  • Teeth with Gingival Index score ≤1 and a clinical mobility of ≤1.
  • Teeth that are determined to be sensitive by the participant following a 1 second air blast to the cervical margin.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes.
  • Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes dry mouth.
  • Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay in 12 months of screening.
  • In the 8 weeks prior to screening use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of DH.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Mouthwash in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity

The aim of this study is to investigate the longitudinal efficacy of a potassium nitrate mouthwash formulation when used as an adjunct to brushing with a standard fluoride dentifrice for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) compared to brushing with a standard fluoride dentifrice alone. This will be a single centre, eight week, randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, parallel design, stratified (by maximum baseline Schiff Sensitivity Score of the two selected test teeth) study in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the Screening and Baseline visit. Participants will be assessed at Baseline, and at four and eight weeks to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.

Being tested
Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride, Standard fluoride dentifrice
Medical subject headings
Dentin Sensitivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Potassium nitrate and sodium fluorideDrug

    3.0% w/w potassium nitrate mouthwash with 0.02% sodium fluoride

  • Standard fluoride dentifriceDrug

    Standard fluoride dentifrice containing 1000 ppm fluoride as SMFP

Study groups in NCT02226562
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Potassium nitrate and sodium fluorideExperimental3.0% weight by weight (w/w) potassium nitrate mouthwash with 0.02% sodium fluoride
Receives: Drug: Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride
Standard fluoride dentifriceOtherStandard fluoride dentifrice containing 1000 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP)
Receives: Drug: Standard fluoride dentifrice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8

    The examiner indicated the participant's response to an evaporaitve air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score is indicative of an imrpovement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 week

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4

    The examiner indicated the participant's response to an evaporaitve air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score is indicative of an imrpovement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline to 4 week

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 8

    The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 week

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 4

    The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

    Measured: Baseline to 4 week

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale (VRS) at Week 8

    Participants rated the intensity of their response to an evaporative air stimulus using a 10 point VRS scale with 1 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'Intense pain'. A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 week

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in VRS at Week 4

    Participants rated the intensity of their response to an evaporative air stimulus using a 10 point VRS scale with 1 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'Intense pain'. A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline to 4 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Sep 2014
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2014
  4. Study completion5 Dec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
191 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02226562
Sponsor's protocol ID
202196
Other IDs
RH02492
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
25 Aug 2014
Last updated
27 Aug 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Hall C, Sufi F, Milleman JL, Milleman KR. Efficacy of a 3% potassium nitrate mouthrinse for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity: An 8-week randomized controlled study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Mar;150(3):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.10.023.

    PubMed 30803493

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride and Standard fluoride dentifrice in people with Dentin Sensitivity, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline to 8 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02226562, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in